1. Pendelluft in hypoxemic patients resuming spontaneous breathing: proportional modes versus pressure support ventilation
- Author
-
Daniel H. Arellano, Roberto Brito, Caio C. A. Morais, Pablo Ruiz-Rudolph, Abraham I. J. Gajardo, Dannette V. Guiñez, Marioli T. Lazo, Ivan Ramirez, Verónica A. Rojas, María A. Cerda, Juan N. Medel, Victor Illanes, Nivia R. Estuardo, Alejandro R. Bruhn, Laurent J. Brochard, Marcelo B. P. Amato, and Rodrigo A. Cornejo
- Subjects
Acute respiratory distress syndrome ,Neurally-adjusted ventilatory assist ,Proportional assist ventilation ,Pressure support ventilation ,Pendelluft ,Medical emergencies. Critical care. Intensive care. First aid ,RC86-88.9 - Abstract
Abstract Background Internal redistribution of gas, referred to as pendelluft, is a new potential mechanism of effort-dependent lung injury. Neurally-adjusted ventilatory assist (NAVA) and proportional assist ventilation (PAV +) follow the patient’s respiratory effort and improve synchrony compared with pressure support ventilation (PSV). Whether these modes could prevent the development of pendelluft compared with PSV is unknown. We aimed to compare pendelluft magnitude during PAV + and NAVA versus PSV in patients with resolving acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Methods Patients received either NAVA, PAV + , or PSV in a crossover trial for 20-min using comparable assistance levels after controlled ventilation (> 72 h). We assessed pendelluft (the percentage of lost volume from the non-dependent lung region displaced to the dependent region during inspiration), drive (as the delta esophageal swing of the first 100 ms [ΔPes 100 ms]) and inspiratory effort (as the esophageal pressure–time product per minute [PTPmin]). We performed repeated measures analysis with post-hoc tests and mixed-effects models. Results Twenty patients mechanically ventilated for 9 [5–14] days were monitored. Despite matching for a similar tidal volume, respiratory drive and inspiratory effort were slightly higher with NAVA and PAV + compared with PSV (ΔPes 100 ms of –2.8 [−3.8–−1.9] cm H2O, −3.6 [−3.9–−2.4] cm H2O and −2.1 [−2.5–−1.1] cm H2O, respectively, p
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF