Search

OBJECTIVES Aortic valved allografts (homografts) have been used alternatively to mechanical or biological valve prostheses in expectation of better durability; however, homograft valves do degenerate, and redo procedures have proven challenging due to heavy wall calcification. The aim of the study was to compare the outcome of open surgical (SAVR) and transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in degenerated homografts. METHODS Between 1993 and 2022, 81 patients underwent repeat aortic valve procedures having previously received an aortic homograft. The redo had become necessary due to regurgitation in 85% and stenosis in 15%. Sixty-five percent underwent open surgery, 35% TAVR. RESULTS Isolated SAVR was possible in 79%, and root procedures were necessary in 21%. TAVR was performed in 79% via transfemoral and 21% via transapical access. Median prosthetic valve size was 23 (22.3–23.2) mm in the SAVR and 26 (25.2–26.9) in the TAVR group. Thirty-day mortality was 0% in the TAVR and 7% in the SAVR group (P  = n.s.). TAVR showed a significantly better outcome concerning prolonged ventilation (0 vs 21%, P  = 0.013) as well as ICU (1 vs 2 days; P  < 0.001) and in-hospital stay (10.5 vs 13 days; P  = 0.028). Five-year survival was statistically comparable between groups, and no severe leakage was observed. CONCLUSIONS SAVR following structural homograft degeneration shows acceptable results, but the perioperative risk remains substantial and poorly predictable. TAVR presents a reasonable and more easily accessible alternative and is associated with good short- and mid-term results. In the absence of relevant contraindications, TAVR is presently the preferred treatment option for these patients at our center. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Endovascular repair of the thoracic aorta (TEVAR) is the preferred option for the treatment of the distal arch and descending thoracic aorta. Fenestrated and branched TEVAR have become an option to treat pathologies of the aortic arch, avoiding sternotomy and cardiopulmonary arrest as well as total surgical debranching. We describe here the case of a symptomatic patient with an arteria lusoria aneurysm associated with Kommerel diverticulum who underwent total endovascular repair with a triple-branched TEVAR. Case Report: A 66-year-old male patient was treated for a symptomatic arteria lusoria artery associated with a Kommerel diverticulum, resulting in difficulty swallowing and choking. We used a custom-made triple inner-branch endograft (Cook Medical, Bloomington, Indiana) following implantation of a right-sided carotid-subclavian (C-S) bypass. The C-S bypass occluded in the interval time between the 2 procedures and required recanalization and stent-graft placement during the aortic arch procedure. The arteria lusoria was embolized with a vascular plug. No complications occurred and postoperative tomography showed exclusion and thrombosis of the Kommerel diverticulum and perfusion of the supra-aortic vessels. Conclusions: Treatment of arteria lusoria aneurysms can be performed with total endovascular arch inner-branch repair, avoiding increased risk of morbidity and mortality caused by open or hybrid procedures. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Open in new tab Download slide OBJECTIVES The aim of the study was to investigate the outcomes of branched endovascular arch repair (b-TEVAR) with a custom-made double- or triple-branched arch endograft in patients with distal anastomotic aneurysms after open repair of the ascending aorta or proximal arch replacement. METHODS Retrospective analysis was conducted of all consecutive patients with anastomotic aneurysms after open surgical repair involving the ascending aorta and/or aortic arch treated with b-TEVAR. All patients were treated with a custom-made double or triple inner-branched arch endograft. Study end points were technical success, 30-day and follow-up mortality/morbidity and re-interventions. RESULTS Between 2018 and 2022, 10 patients were treated with custom-made double- or triple-branched thoracic endovascular aortic repair due to anastomotic aneurysms after open ascending aorta and/or proximal aortic arch replacement. Eight patients received a triple and 2 a double arch-branched endograft. Eight cases were performed electively and 2 urgently for contained rupture. Technical success was achieved in 9 cases (90%). All elective patients survived. Two patients treated due to contained ruptures expired. Within 30 postoperative days, 1 transient ischaemic attack occurred. No early endograft-related re-interventions were necessary. The median follow-up was 20 months. One patient died 2 months after discharge due to sepsis caused by pneumonia. No further deaths or endograft-related re-interventions were observed. CONCLUSIONS Endovascular aortic arch repair with double or triple inner-branched arch endograft for anastomotic aneurysms after open ascending and/or proximal arch replacement is technically feasible and a promising alternative in a patient cohort unfit for surgery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Type Ia endoleaks due to failed sealing or loss of landing zone and the adequate management thereof remain crucial for long-term therapeutic success following TEVAR. This expert opinion summarizes our institutional experience with endovascular, open surgical, and hybrid techniques in the context of recent scientific publications. The rapid turnover of technical innovations, but most importantly outcome data demonstrate the requirement for increasingly patient-tailored treatment strategies and the need for specialized aortic centers. The latter should offer a complete range of treatment options, an adequate perioperative management, and the highest level of multidisciplinary expertise. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of total percutaneous implantation of the Zenith Alpha Thoracic (ZTA) endograft in the treatment of diseases of the descending thoracic aorta. Materials and Methods: A retrospective cohort study of 56 consecutive patients undergoing total percutaneous ZTA implantation between 2018 and 2020 was performed in a single center. Patients' demographics, clinical characteristics, anatomical parameters, operative details, device features, and postoperative outcomes were assessed. The primary endpoint was ongoing clinical success. A Cox regression model was used to determine the predictive factors of worse postoperative outcomes. Results: Eighty-three ZTA endografts were implanted in 35 men and 21 women with a mean age of 69±11 years for the treatment of 26 degenerative aneurysms, 15 type B dissections, and 8 penetrating ulcers, among others. Primary technical success was 100%, with a 30-day ongoing clinical success rate of 94.6%. The 1-year ongoing clinical success rate was 91.1% (51 patients), and freedoms from all-cause mortality, type 1 and 3 endoleaks, and any unplanned reintervention were, respectively, 95.3%, 91.4%, and 88.2% at 1 year. During follow-up, there was one case of surgical conversion for an aorto-esophageal fistula. On the contrary, neither aneurysmal rupture nor significant aneurysmal expansion was recorded. Repair of ruptured thoracic aorta and a high ratio of sheath outer diameter to external iliac artery diameter were found to be independently associated with worse outcomes, with adjusted odds ratios of 4.4 [1.5-15.3] and 4.9 [1.1-23.9], respectively. Conclusion: The outcomes of total percutaneous implantation of ZTA endograft show excellent primary technical success and favorable midterm ongoing clinical success. Factors associated with worse outcomes include the repair of ruptured aorta and a high sheath to access vessel ratio. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Endovascular repair of the ascending aorta and aortic arch has evolved at an astonishing pace in the past several decades. Results of endovascular arch repair in experienced centers have been improving and the technology evolving, and it has begun to challenge the current gold standard status of open surgery in some groups of patients. Hybrid strategies with adjunctive cervical debranching for distal arch lesions are being replaced by fenestrated arch repairs. Total endovascular repair for proximal aortic arch pathologies with the use of inner branches has achieved the best results; however, the main current limitations of endovascular arch repair are diameter-, length-, and angulation-related issues with the ascending aorta (proximal landing zone). Ascending aorta endovascular repair has allowed extending treatment further proximally in patients with post-surgical pseudoaneurysms of the ascending aorta or post–type A chronic aortic dissections. However, sufficient proximal landing zone is still needed in the proximal aorta for these repairs; in a significant number of patients, this is not feasible with simple proximal tubular grafts. Therefore, new technologies and techniques are being developed to deal with this limitation, including the endovascular Bentall concept, with incorporation of the aortic valve and coronary ostia. In this review, the current state and future directions of endovascular ascending and arch repairs and the motion towards an endovascular Bentall procedure are discussed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Open in new tab Download slide OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to determine the proportion of patients undergoing open arch repair who would be anatomically suitable for multi-branched endovascular arch repair. METHODS This study was a single-centre review of patients undergoing open arch repair between 2000 and 2020. Anatomical feasibility was determined by comparing arch measurements to the anatomical criteria of the Zenith® double and triple inner branched-arch endografts (Cook Medical) and the Relay® double arch branched device (Terumo-Aortic). RESULTS Ninety (90) patients were included in this study, with 43/90 presenting degenerative aneurysm. The distance between the sinotubular junction and the brachiocephalic trunk measured 114 ± 30 mm on the outer curvature, and the maximum diameter of the proximal landing zone (PLZ) was 41 ± 11mm. A total of 42/90 patients (47%) were anatomically suitable for at least 1 stent graft and 29/90 patients (32%) were eligible for a triple-branched endograft. The most important determinant factors of anatomical suitability were the PLZ diameter (Cramer's V  = 0.743, P  < 0.001) and length (Cramer's V  = 0.777, P  < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS This study shows that the proportion of patients who may be anatomically suitable for branched-arch repair remains limited. The PLZ dimensions tend to be the most important anatomical limitations and should receive more emphasis in the development of branched-arch devices. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The outcome of FBEVAR in post-dissection thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms has not been well established in the literature. The aim of this study was to compare midterm outcomes following FBEVAR in post-dissection aneurysms to degenerative aneurysms. (2) Methods: This was a retrospective review of all patients undergoing FBEVAR in a single center between 2017 and 2020. The baseline characteristics, intraoperative details, and postoperative outcomes of patients with post-dissection aneurysms were compared to those with degenerative outcomes. The primary end point was unplanned reinterventions. Cox regression analysis was performed to identify the determinants of worse outcomes. Results: A total of 137 subjects with a mean age of 70 ± 10 years were included in the study, out of which 30 presented post-dissection aneurysms (22%). Custom-made devices were employed in 119 patients, off-the-shelf devices in 13 and physician-modified endografts in 5, with incorporation in 505 target vessels. The technical success rate was comparable in both groups (97% vs. 98%, p = 0.21). However, the one-year freedom from unplanned reintervention was lower in the post-dissection group (67% vs. 89%, p = 0.011). Conclusion: FBEVAR in post-dissection aneurysms is associated with a favorable technical success rate, but reintervention rates remain high. Long procedural duration and the use of adjunctive techniques are associated with increased risk of reinterventions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background We analyzed the short-term and mid-term outcomes as well as the health-related quality of life (HRQOL) of octogenarians undergoing elective and urgent cardiac surgery. Patients and Methods We retrospectively identified 688 consecutive octogenarians who underwent cardiac surgery at our center between January 2012 and December 2019. A propensity score matching was performed which resulted in the formation of 80 matched pairs. The patients were interviewed and the Short Form-36 survey was used to assess the HRQOL of survivors. Multivariable analysis incorporated binary logistic regression using a forward stepwise (conditional) model. Results The median age of the matched cohort was 82 years (p = 0.937), among whom, 38.8% of patients were female (p = 0.196). The median EuroSCORE II of the matched cohort was 19.4% (10.1–39.1%). The duration of postoperative mechanical ventilation was found to be independently associated with in-hospital mortality (odds ratio: 1.01 [95% confidence interval: 1.0–1.02], p = 0.038). The survival rates at 1, 2, and 5 years was 75.0, 72.0, and 46.0%, respectively. There was no difference in the total survival between the groups (p = 0.080). The physical health summary score was 41 (30–51) for the elective patients and 42 (35–49) for the nonelective octogenarians (p = 0.581). The median mental health summary scores were 56 (48–60) and 58 (52–60), respectively (p = 0.351). Conclusion Cardiac surgery can be performed in octogenarians with good results and survivors enjoy a good quality of life; however, the indication for surgery or especially for escalation of therapy should always be made prudently, reserved, and in consideration of patient expectations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The Munich Valsalva Implantation Technique (MuVIT) is a non-invasive alternative which uses a modified Valsalva manoeuvre to reduce cardiac output (CO). The aim of this study was to evaluate the technical success and safety of MuVIT in standard and complex endovascular thoracic aneurysm repair (TEVAR). This was a retrospective single centre cohort study. Patients were included who underwent CO reduction with MuVIT between March 2020 and February 2021 for standard and fenestrated/branched TEVAR (fbTEVAR). The target systolic blood pressure (SBP) reduction was used as an indicator of CO reduction. The aim of the SBP reduction was 50% in patients undergoing proximal sealing in Ishimaru zones 0–1 (Group 1), and 30% in patients with sealing in Ishimaru zones 2–3 (Group 2). Efficacy outcomes included MuVIT technical success and procedural technical success. Safety outcomes included MuVIT and procedural related complications in the first 30 days. During the study period 52 cases were screened for MuVIT. Of these, 40 patients (77%) underwent procedures that were performed under MuVIT. Exclusion reasons were local anaesthesia (n = 9); pulmonary contraindications (n = 2), and poor heart pump function (n = 1). Fifteen patients (37.5%) underwent bTEVAR, three patients (7.5%) fTEVAR, and 22 patients (55%) standard TEVAR. Twenty nine (72.5%) procedures were elective, seven (17.5%) were urgent, and four (10%) were as an emergency. Successful proximal endograft deployment under MuVIT was 100%. The target SBP reduction was achieved in 95% (Group 1: 89.5%, Group 2: 100%), with an overall mean reduction of 46% (Group 1: 55%, Group 2: 40%). The 30 day mortality was 7.5%, and was not MuVIT related. Two patients with COPD Gold III/IV developed respiratory complications. MuVIT is a safe and effective manoeuvre for CO reduction during aortic arch TEVAR. However, careful patient selection is required and potential adverse effects on patients with severe COPD needs further evaluation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To synthesise and present all available evidence regarding the surgical treatment of patients with aberrant subclavian artery (aSA) pathologies during the last 30 years. The study also aimed to create a checklist of suggested reporting items to help increase reporting homogeneity. A systematic search of medical databases was performed to identify all studies published between 1990 and 2020 reporting on the outcomes of patients undergoing surgery for an aSA pathology. Patients were divided into two groups; Group A included patients undergoing open or hybrid surgery through sternotomy/thoracotomy and Group B included patients undergoing endovascular or hybrid treatment without chest access. The % crude rates (CR) of all variables of interest were calculated. A proportion meta-analysis was performed reporting pooled rates with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Three hundred and fourteen studies were identified reporting on the surgical outcomes of 732 patients (60.1% males; 440/732). The quality of evidence was generally low, with 286 studies including fewer than four patients and 28 studies with five or more cases. Aberrant right subclavian artery (aRSA) in a left sided aortic arch was present in 71.4% of the patients and a Kommerell's diverticulum was present in 50.1% of the cases. A total of 68% of the patients were symptomatic on presentation, with the majority complaining of dysphagia (49.6%). Group A included 453 and Group B 279 patients. Studies reporting on five or more patients were included in the main meta-analysis. The pooled early mortality rate was 1.62% (95% CI 0.05% – 4.53%) in Group A and 1.96% (95% CI 0 – 6.34%) in Group B. Pooled rates of symptom relief were 99.52% (95% CI 92.05% – 100.00%) in Group A and 95.79% (95% CI 83.96% – 100.00%) in Group B. The surgical techniques used to treat aSA and aortic pathologies involving an aSA had remarkably low mortality rates and high clinical success, regardless of the technique used. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The supraaortic vessel anastomosis stent bridging (SAVSTEB) technique simplifies the reattachment of the supraaortic vessels in aortic arch surgery; however, follow-up data are limited. The study aimed to investigate the stent-related performance and complications. Between February 2009 and September 2020, 112 patients underwent total arch replacement with a tetrabranched graft and using the SAVSTEB technique. Mean age was 59.3±12.7 years, and male gender prevailed. Nineteen percent of these patients had acute aortic dissection extending into the supraaortic vessels, 12% had chronically dissected vessels, and 70% had unaffected vessels. The left subclavian artery, left common carotid artery, and innominate artery were bridged in 88%, 75%, and 2%, respectively, and an aberrant right subclavian artery was bridged in 2%. Total stent experience was 341 stent-years, and stent patency was found in 98%. Technical success was achieved in all but 1 case. One percent of patients had major stent thrombosis requiring reintervention. Minor stent thrombosis was found in 2%. No endoleak was found, and the number of new-onset dissections distal to the stent was 4%. Freedom from stent-related events was estimated at 89.1% ± 0.5% at 3 years. The stroke rate was 10%, with the highest incidence among nondissected vessels. The vertebral artery was overstented in 15%, and 2% of these cases were associated radiographically with stroke. SAVSTEB is a comparatively simple, safe, and efficacious technique to create the anastomosis between tetrabranched arch grafts and the supraaortic arteries in the short and intermediate term. Bleeding from the anastomoses, kinking, and scar-associated stenosis are negligible; however, vertebral overstenting remains a critical technical issue. [Display omitted] [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The objective was to provide initial data from our prospective valve-sparing aortic root replacement (V-SARR) registry and reasons for conversion to prosthetic aortic valve replacement. Six centers established an intention-to-treat-design V-SARR-registry (the German Aortic Root Repair Registry; first patient in October 2016); the main inclusion criterion was being scheduled for V-SARR as plan A. Clinical information, operative details, intraoperative valve/root measurements, and clinical and transthoracic echocardiography follow-up-data are documented. Of a total of 449 patients, we report data for 401 (81% male; mean age 51 ± 14 years). Overall, 350 patients underwent V-SARR as scheduled, group A (David variants I 55%, III 2%, IV 13%, V 24%, V-Stanford 2%, and Yacoub remodeling 2%); and 51 were converted to aortic valve replacement (group B). Median follow-up was 11 months (range, 0 to 2.6 years), cumulative follow-up was 279 patient-years. In group B, there were fewer connective tissue disorders (6% vs 16%), fewer patients had left ventricular ejection fraction greater than 50% (60% vs 90%), more had bicuspid aortic valves (45% vs 28%), and fewer patients had preoperative none/trace aortic regurgitation (2% vs 20%). Fewer patients in group B had rare types of bicuspid aortic valve (fused N/L, R/N, 10% vs 30%) and more had unbalanced roots (56% vs 40%). Immediate postoperative aortic regurgitation was none/trace in 79% and mild in 20%. At 30 days, the mean transvalvular pressure gradient was 7 ± 5 mm Hg. None of the patients died in hospital; two strokes occurred. One patient needed early aortic valve replacement as redo surgery. The main factors causing surgeons to convert a planned V-SARR to aortic valve replacement include asymmetry of aortic valve/root, severity of aortic regurgitation, safety reasons (left ventricular ejection fraction), and bicuspid aortic valves (but not rare types). The German Aortic Root Repair Registry will help us identify the impact on long-term outcomes of preoperative and postoperative valvular anatomy and various V-SARR types. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To present a novel technique to successfully cross a mechanical aortic valve prosthesis.Technique: A 55-year-old female patient with genetically verified Marfan syndrome presented with a 5-cm anastomotic aneurysm of the proximal aortic arch after previous ascending aortic replacement due to a type A aortic dissection in 2007. The patient also underwent mechanical aortic valve replacement in 1991. A 3-stage hybrid repair was planned. The first 2 steps included debranching of the supra-aortic vessels. In the third procedure, a custom-made double branched endovascular stent-graft with a short 35-mm introducer tip was implanted. The mechanical valve was passed with the tip of the dilator on the lateral site of the leaflet, without destructing the valve and with only mild symptoms of aortic insufficiency, as one leaflet continued to work. This allowed the implantation of the stent-graft directly distally of the coronary arteries. Postoperative computed tomography angiography showed no endoleaks and patent coronary and supra-aortic vessels.Conclusion: Passing a mechanical aortic valve prosthesis at the proper position is feasible and allows adequate endovascular treatment in complex arch anatomy. However, caution should be taken during positioning of the endovascular graft as the tip may potentially damage the valve prosthesis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To demonstrate the feasibility of urgent endovascular treatment of a chronic type A dissection and contained rupture of the false lumen using a noncustomized triple-branched arch endograft, which necessitated reassignment of the branches to the supra-aortic vessels. Case Report:: A 57-year-old patient with a contained rupture of the descending thoracic aorta, in the setting of a chronic type A dissection and a maximum aortic diameter of 85 mm, was converted to endovascular repair after failure of an open surgical approach. A custom-made triple-branched arch endograft designed for another patient was employed, with concomitant occlusion of the false lumen using a Candy Plug occluder. To adjust the graft's configuration to the patient's anatomy, the supra-aortic vessels were not assigned to the originally planned branches. The 12-month follow-up angiography demonstrated a satisfactory result. Conclusion: A noncustomized triple-branched arch endograft can be used in an emergency setting to treat chronic type A dissection, reassigning the branches to the supra-aortic vessels as needed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The first-in-man implant of a custom-made branched frozen elephant trunk graft designed for an anastomosis in aortic arch zone 0 is reported. Combining endovascular technology with open surgical techniques has allowed for simplification of the open procedure with substantial reduction in circulatory arrest time and in the extent of the surgical preparations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]