Search

Selection for feed efficiency is the goal for many genetic breeding programs in beef cattle. Residual feed intake has been included in genetic evaluations to reduce feed intake without compromising performance traits as liveweight, body gain or carcass traits. However, measuring feed intake is expensive, and only a small percentage of selection candidates are phenotyped. Genomic selection has become a very important tool to achieve effective genetic progress in these traits. Another effective strategy has been the implementation of multi-trait prediction using easily recordable predictor traits on both reference animals and candidates without phenotypes, and this could be another inexpensive way to increase accuracy. The objective of this work was to analyse and compare the prediction ability of two alternative different approaches to predict GEBVs for RFI. The population of inference was Hereford bulls in Uruguay that were genotyped candidates for to selection. The first model was the conventional univariate model for RFI and the second model was a multi-trait model which included a predictor trait (weaning weight, WW), in addition to the traits used in the first one (dry matter intake, metabolic mid test weight, average daily gain and ultrasound back fat) (DMI, MWT, ADG, UBF, respectively). GEBVs from the multi-trait model were combined using selection index theory to derive RFI values. All analyses were performed using ssGBLUP procedure. The prediction ability of both models was tested using two validation strategies (30 different replicates of random groups of animals and validation across 9 different feed intake tests). The prediction quality was assessed by the following parameters: bias, dispersion, ratio of accuracies and the relative increase in accuracy by adding phenotypic information. All parameters showed that the univariate model outperforms the multi-trait model, regardless of the validation strategy considered. These results indicate that including WW as a proxy trait in a multi-trait analysis does not improve the prediction ability when all animals to be predicted are genotyped., (© 2023 John Wiley & Sons Ltd. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

The objective of this study was to quantify the emissions of enteric CH 4 from growing Hereford steers raised under feedlot conditions based on contrasting levels of residual feed intake (RFI). A repeated measurements experiment was conducted over 20 d to determine CH 4 production from two groups of nine Hereford steers, with contrasting RFI values (mean ± SD): low RFI (LRFI group; -0.78 ± 0.22 kg DMI/d) vs. high RFI (HRFI group; 0.83 ± 0.34 kg DMI/d). Steers were selected from a larger contemporary population in which the RFI was evaluated. Steers were maintained under confined conditions with ad libitum access to water and feed, comprising a total mixed ration of 55% sorghum silage, 21% barley silage, 21% corn grain, and 3% protein-mineral-vitamin-premix, provided twice a day. Before the beginning of CH 4 measurements, the live weight of both groups of animals was determined, which on average (±SEM) was 357.0 ± 5.11 and 334.0 ± 10.17 kg in the LRFI and HRFI groups, respectively. Methane emission (g/d) was measured on each animal with the sulfur hexafluoride (SF 6 ) tracer technique, during two consecutive periods of 5 d. Individual daily intake and feeding behavior characteristics were measured using a GrowSafe automated feeding system (Model 6000, GrowSafe Systems Ltd, Airdrie, Alberta, Canada). Methanogens in the ruminal content were quantified using quantitative polymerase chain reaction with primers targeting the mcrA gene. Methane emission was near 27% lower in animals with LRFI when expressed in absolute terms (g/d; 26.8%; P = 0.009), by unit of dry matter intake (g CH 4 /kg; 27.9%, P = 0.021), or as % of gross energy intake (26.7%; P = 0.027). These differences could not be explained by differences in amount of total of methanogens (average = 9.82 log 10 units; P = 0.857). However, there were some differences in animal feeding behavior that could explain these differences (e.g., LRFI animals tended to spend less time in feeders). Our results suggest that, in Hereford steers, the selection by RFI values is a promising mitigation strategy for the reduction of the emission of enteric CH 4 ., (© The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science.)