Search

Introduction: Partial nephrectomy is the treatment of choice for small localized renal tumors. In case of doubt, a biopsy can confirm the diagnosis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of a delayed time to partial nephrectomy on cancer development., Materials and Methods: Our single center study enrolled localized renal tumor patients who underwent a partial nephrectomy between 2015 and 2020; the collected data were included in the uroCCR prospective database. The histopathological stage of the tumors and the recurrence rate in patients treated with surgery >90 days after diagnosis were investigated. The impact a preoperative biopsy on was also explored. Statistical significance was tested using Student's t-test and Chi-squared test (SPSS software)., Results: The cohort consisted of 179 patients, among which 41 (23 %) received a preoperative biopsy. 89 patients (50 %) were treated surgically >3 months after diagnosis. The median time to nephrectomy was 86 days (13-1 037). A delayed time to surgery did not lead to significantly higher recurrence rates (P=0.66). Preoperative biopsy led to a doubling time to surgery (P<0.001) but was neither correlated to a more severe tumor stage (P=0.944) nor to a higher recurrence rate (P=0.08). Tumor growth was not significantly different with or without the presence of a biopsy (P=0.122)., Conclusion: Our data evidence that a substantial delayed time to partial nephrectomy does not result in a negative impact on cancer prognosis in localized renal tumor patients., (Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.)

Introduction: An elevated PSA and a negative prostate biopsy (PB) can be a false negative PB that ignores a prostate cancer (PCa) or a false positive PSA not related to PCa. The objective of this study was to analyze a group of patients who had a negative first BP for a PSA superior to 4 ng/mL and at least one additional PB and to compare these cases with controls who had the diagnosis PCa from the first PB., Methods: Retrospective single-center study comparing patients with an elevated PSA and repeat biopsy following a first negative PB and patients with PCa diagnosed from the first PB., Results: The 63 cases were younger than the 75 controls and had more often a normal digital rectal examination. Their prostate volume was larger and their number of PSA before the first PB lower: this corresponded to a lower PSA in the second (7/64), third (6/31), fourth (3/9) and sixth (1/1) PB. Among these cases with PCa, the length of core invaded by cancer and the total length of cancer of the entire PB were smaller than controls. In 76% of cases, the Gleason score among cases was 6 or less., Conclusion: PCa discovered on repeat biopsy had features of better prognosis than those of controls. We propose an algorithm for management of patients with elevated PSA and negative first PB., (Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)