Search

The progress observed over the last 30 years in the field of axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) has not made it possible to answer all the current questions. This manuscript represents the proceedings of the meeting of the French spondyloArthitiS Task force (FAST) in Besançon on September 28 and 29, 2023. Different points of discussion were thus individualized as unmet needs: biomarkers for early diagnosis and disease activity, a common electronic file dedicated to SpA nationwide, a better comprehension of dysbiosis in the disease, a check-list for addressing to the rheumatologist, adapt patient reported outcomes thresholds for female gender, implementation of comorbidities screening programs, new imaging tools, in research cellular and multi omics approaches, grouping, at a nationwide level, different cohorts and registries, therapeutic strategy studies, consensual definition of difficult to treat disease and management, preclinical stage of the disease, mastering AI as a tool in the various aspects of research. These elements may represent a framework for the research agenda in axSpA for the years to come., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: The therapeutic armamentarium for spondyloarthritis has expanded considerably in recent years, and there is growing evidence to support the increasing use of IL-17 inhibitors (IL-17i) in axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA)., Areas Covered: This literature review provides an update on the role of IL-17 in the pathogenesis of axSpA, efficacy and safety from clinical trials and real-life studies on the use of IL17i in axSpA. We also review the impact of extra-musculoskeletal manifestations on the decision to treat with IL17i and the efficacy of IL17i on structural progression., Expert Opinion: There are still some unanswered questions concerning the use of IL-17i in axSpA in clinical practice such as their respective place in the management of axSpA compared to TNFα inhibitors (TNFi). Their main differences rely on their specific efficacy in extra-articular manifestations such as psoriasis, uveitis, and inflammatory bowel diseases leading to the choice of the best treatment in a given patient. Regarding their real impact on structural progression, the rate of progression under IL-17i appears to be low and presumably similar to TNFi. One final question is the advantage of blocking the two IL-17 isoforms A and F compared to the single inhibition of IL-17A.

Introduction: The therapeutic interest of targeting B-cell activating factor (BAFF) in Sjögren's disease (SjD) can be suspected from the results of two phase II clinical trials but has not been evaluated in an animal model of the disease. We aimed to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of this strategy on dryness and salivary gland (SG) infiltrates in the NOD mouse model of SjD., Material and Methods: Female NOD mice between ages 10 and 18 weeks were treated with a BAFF-blocking monoclonal antibody, Sandy-2 or an isotype control. Dryness was measured by the stimulated salivary flow. Salivary lymphocytic infiltrates were assessed by immunohistochemistry. Blood, SGs, spleen and lymph-node lymphocyte subpopulations were analysed by flow cytometry. SG mRNA expression was analysed by transcriptomic analysis., Results: BAFF inhibition significantly decreased SG lymphocytic infiltrates, which was inversely correlated with salivary flow. The treatment markedly decreased B-cell number in SGs, blood, lymph nodes and spleen and increased Foxp3 + regulatory and CD3 + CD4 - CD8 - double negative T-cell numbers in SGs., Conclusion: A monoclonal antibody blocking BAFF and depleting B cells had therapeutic effectiveness in the NOD mouse model of SjD. The increase in regulatory T-lymphocyte populations might underlie the efficacy of this treatment., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Objective: The objective of this study was to assess the prevalence and characteristics of, and knowledge about, photosensitivity and the use of photoprotective measures in an international cohort of cutaneous lupus erythematosus and SLE patients., Methods: We conducted an international, cross-sectional study based on a 46-question web-based survey, including patients with medically confirmed lupus erythematosus, conducted between November 2021 and April 2022., Results: A total of 600 patients with lupus erythematosus [94% female, median age: 41 years, interquartile range (IQR): 33-51] from 50 countries were included. A history of photosensitivity was reported by 389/600 (64.8%) patients. Photosensitivity was associated with the presence of other cutaneous involvement [odds ratio (OR) = 3.8; 95% CI 2.5-5.7; P < 0.001] and differed according to the area of residence and level of education (P < 0.001, for all). Photosensitivity was characterized by a wide range of clinical manifestations (both cutaneous and systemic symptoms in 56.1% and systemic symptoms only in 29.8% of patients). Fatigue was the most frequently reported systemic manifestation (82.3%). Overall, 559/600 (93%) patients were aware of the detrimental role of ultraviolet radiation exposure in lupus erythematosus, but 160/480 (33.3%) were unaware of the importance of photoprotective measures, including 90/310 (29%) among those with photosensitivity., Conclusion: A high rate of self-reported photosensitivity characterizes lupus erythematosus patients. Photosensitivity frequently includes subjective features, which makes it difficult to evaluate in clinical practice. As fatigue is frequent in lupus erythematosus, further study is needed to clarify the causal link with ultraviolet radiation exposure. About one-third of lupus erythematosus patients are unaware of the importance of photoprotective measures. This should be improved through more frequent and targeted awareness interventions., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Objective: To develop recommendations for the routine management of patients with polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR)., Methods: Following standard procedures, a systematic review of the literature by five supervised junior rheumatologists, based on the questions selected by the steering committee (5 senior rheumatologists), was used as the basis for working meetings, followed by a one-day plenary meeting with the working group (15 members), leading to the development of the wording and determination of the strength of the recommendations and the level of agreement of the experts., Results: Five general principles and 19 recommendations were drawn up. Three recommendations relate to diagnosis and the use of imaging, and five to the assessment of the disease, its activity and comorbidities. Non-pharmacological therapies are the subject of one recommendation. Three recommendations concern initial treatment based on general corticosteroid therapy, five concern the reduction of corticosteroid therapy and follow-up, and two concern corticosteroid dependence and steroid-sparing treatments (anti-IL-6)., Conclusion: These recommendations take account of current data on PMR, with the aim of reducing exposure to corticosteroid therapy and its side effects in a fragile population. They are intended to be practical, to help practitioners in the day-to-day management of patients with PMR., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: The objective of this systematic review was to provide an overview of current developments and potentially available therapeutic options for polymyalgia rheumatic (PMR) and giant cell arteritis (GCA), in the coming years., Methods: We conducted a systematic review of 17 national and international clinical trial databases for all disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) for PMR and GCA that are already marketed, in clinical development or withdrawn. The search was performed on January 2024, with the keywords "polymyalgia rheumatica" and "giant cell arteritis". For each molecule, we only considered the study at the most advanced stage of clinical development., Results: For PMR, a total of 15 DMARDs were identified: 2 conventional synthetic DMARDs (csDMARDs), 11 biologic DMARDs (bDMARDs) and 2 targeted synthetic DMARDs (tsDMARDs). For GCA, 18 DMARDs were identified: 2 csDMARDs, 14 bDMARDs and 2 tsDMARDs. Currently, there are only 2 approved corticosteroid-sparing therapies in these diseases, which both target the IL-6 signaling pathway, namely tocilizumab in GCA and sarilumab in PMR. Most of the molecules in current development are repurposed from from other conditions and clinical research in PMR/GCA seems to be mostly driven by the potential to repurpose existing treatments rather than by translational research., Conclusion: This systematic review identified 23 DMARDs evaluated for PMR and GCA: 3 csDMARDs, 17 bDMARDs and 3 tsDMARDs. Several promising treatments are likely to be marketed in the coming years., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Renaud FELTEN reports a relationship with AbbVie France that includes: board membership, consulting or advisory, and non-financial support. Renaud FELTEN reports a relationship with Amgen SAS that includes: speaking and lecture fees. Renaud FELTEN reports a relationship with Bristol Myers Squibb Co that includes: consulting or advisory and speaking and lecture fees. Renaud FELTEN reports a relationship with Celltrion, Inc. that includes: consulting or advisory. Renaud FELTEN reports a relationship with Fresenius Kabi France LLC that includes: consulting or advisory. Renaud FELTEN reports a relationship with Galapagos that includes: consulting or advisory. Renaud FELTEN reports a relationship with GSK that includes: consulting or advisory. Renaud FELTEN reports a relationship with Janssen-Cilag SAS that includes: consulting or advisory, non-financial support, speaking and lecture fees, and travel reimbursement. Renaud FELTEN reports a relationship with Eli Lilly and Company that includes: speaking and lecture fees and travel reimbursement. Renaud FELTEN reports a relationship with MEDAC that includes: speaking and lecture fees and travel reimbursement. Renaud FELTEN reports a relationship with MSD France SAS that includes: travel reimbursement. Renaud FELTEN reports a relationship with Nordic Group that includes: travel reimbursement. Renaud FELTEN reports a relationship with Novartis Pharma SAS that includes: board membership, consulting or advisory, employment, speaking and lecture fees, and travel reimbursement. Renaud FELTEN reports a relationship with Pfizer France that includes: speaking and lecture fees. Renaud FELTEN reports a relationship with Sanofi-Aventis France SA that includes: non-financial support and travel reimbursement. Renaud FELTEN reports a relationship with UCB Inc. that includes: consulting or advisory, speaking and lecture fees, and travel reimbursement. Laurent ARNAUD reports a relationship with AstraZeneca that includes: consulting or advisory. Laurent ARNAUD reports a relationship with AbbVie Inc. that includes: consulting or advisory. Laurent ARNAUD reports a relationship with Alpine Institute for Drug Discovery SA that includes: consulting or advisory. Laurent ARNAUD reports a relationship with Biogen that includes: consulting or advisory. Laurent ARNAUD reports a relationship with Bristol Myers Squibb Co that includes: consulting or advisory. Laurent ARNAUD reports a relationship with Boehringer Ingelheim Ltd. that includes: consulting or advisory. Laurent ARNAUD reports a relationship with Chugai Pharmaceutical Co Ltd. that includes: consulting or advisory. Laurent ARNAUD reports a relationship with GSK that includes: consulting or advisory. Laurent ARNAUD reports a relationship with Grifols Inc. that includes: consulting or advisory. Laurent ARNAUD reports a relationship with Janssen Pharmaceuticals Inc. that includes: consulting or advisory. Laurent ARNAUD reports a relationship with Kezar Life Sciences Inc. that includes: consulting or advisory. Laurent ARNAUD reports a relationship with LFB Biopharmaceuticals Ltd. that includes: consulting or advisory. Laurent ARNAUD reports a relationship with Eli Lilly and Company that includes: consulting or advisory. Laurent ARNAUD reports a relationship with MEDAC that includes: consulting or advisory. Laurent ARNAUD reports a relationship with Merck & Co Inc. that includes: consulting or advisory. Laurent ARNAUD reports a relationship with Novartis that includes: consulting or advisory. Laurent ARNAUD reports a relationship with Pfizer that includes: consulting or advisory. Laurent ARNAUD reports a relationship with Roche that includes: consulting or advisory. Laurent ARNAUD reports a relationship with UCB that includes: consulting or advisory. Guillermo CARVAJAL ALEGRIA reports a relationship with AbbVie France that includes: speaking and lecture fees. Guillermo CARVAJAL ALEGRIA reports a relationship with Biogen that includes: speaking and lecture fees. Guillermo CARVAJAL ALEGRIA reports a relationship with BMS that includes: speaking and lecture fees. Guillermo CARVAJAL ALEGRIA reports a relationship with Chugai that includes: speaking and lecture fees. Guillermo CARVAJAL ALEGRIA reports a relationship with Fresenius-Kabi that includes: speaking and lecture fees. Guillermo CARVAJAL ALEGRIA reports a relationship with Galapagos that includes: speaking and lecture fees. Guillermo CARVAJAL ALEGRIA reports a relationship with Lilly that includes: speaking and lecture fees. Guillermo CARVAJAL ALEGRIA reports a relationship with MSD that includes: speaking and lecture fees. Guillermo CARVAJAL ALEGRIA reports a relationship with Novartis that includes: speaking and lecture fees. Guillermo CARVAJAL ALEGRIA reports a relationship with Pfizer that includes: speaking and lecture fees. If there are other authors, they declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: We aimed to evaluate the value of the Fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) score as a prognostic factor in RA in the prospective ESPOIR cohort. Methods: We included patients from the ESPOIR cohort with a diagnosis of RA according to ACR/EULAR criteria. The formula for the FIB-4 score is as follows: [age (years) × aspartate transaminase level (U/L)]/[platelet count (10 9 /L) × alanine aminotransferase level (U/L) 1/2 ]. We used a linear mixed-effects model with a random effect of patient to account for repeated measures over time. Results: Overall, 647 of the 813 patients included met the ACR/EULAR criteria for RA, with no differential diagnosis during the first 10 years of follow-up. Of these patients, at baseline, 633 had a calculable FIB-4 score. Median FIB-4 score was 0.75 (interquartile range 0.53-0.99). On multivariate analysis, FIB-4 score was not independently associated with progression of Disease Activity Score in 28 joints over 10 years of follow-up, unlike baseline C-reactive protein level and SJC. Baseline FIB-4 score was not associated with the modified Sharp score at 5-year follow-up, unlike age and ACPAs. FIB-4 score was not associated with mortality (hazard ratio 1.1 [95% CI 0.46; 2.8], p = 0.77) or major adverse cardiovascular events (0.46 [0.13; 1.6], p = 0.22) over the 10-year follow-up. No significant change in FIB-4 score over time was related to treatments. Conclusions: The present prospective cohort study did not find a prognostic role of FIB-4 score in RA. Reassuringly, FIB-4 score was not increased with DMARD treatment after 10 years of follow-up.

Objective: The C reactive protein polymyalgia rheumatica activity score (CRP-PMR-AS) is a composite index that includes CRP levels and was developed specifically for PMR. As treatments such as interleukin-6 antagonists can normalise CRP levels, the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) of PMR-AS, the clinical (clin)-PMR-AS and the imputed-CRP (imp-CRP)-PMR-AS have been developed to avoid such bias. Our primary objective was to measure the correlation of these activity scores. Our secondary objective was to evaluate the concordance between different cutoffs of the PMR-ASs., Method: Data from the Safety and Efficacy of tocilizumab versus Placebo in Polymyalgia rHeumatica With glucocORticoid dEpendence (SEMAPHORE) trial, a superiority randomised double-blind placebo-controlled trial, were subjected to post hoc analysis to compare the efficacy of tocilizumab versus placebo in patients with active PMR. The CRP-PMR-AS, ESR-PMR-AS, clin-PMR-AS and imp-CRP-PMR-AS were measured at every visit. The concordance and correlation between these scores were evaluated using kappa correlation coefficients, Bland-Altman correlations, intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and scatter plots., Results: A total of 101 patients were included in the SEMAPHORE trial, and 100 were analysed in this study. The correlation between the PMR-ASs was excellent, as the ICC and kappa were >0.85 from week 4 until week 24 (CRP-PMR-AS ≤10 or >10). Bland-Altman plots revealed that the differences between the CRP-PMR-AS and the other threescores were low. The cut-off values for the clin-PMR-AS were similar to those for the CRP-PMR-AS 86% of the time., Conclusion: The correlation between all the PMR-ASs was excellent, reflecting the low weight of CRP. In clinical trials using drugs that have an impact on CRP, the derived activity scores can be used., Trial Registration Number: NTC02908217., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

The improved understanding of the molecular basis of innate immunity have led to the identification of type I interferons (IFNs), particularly IFN-α, as central mediators in the pathogenesis of several Immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs) such as systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), systemic sclerosis, inflammatory myositis and Sjögren's syndrome. Here, we review the main data regarding the opportunity to target type I IFNs for the treatment of IMIDs. Type I IFNs and their downstream pathways can be targeted pharmacologically in several manners. One approach is to use monoclonal antibodies against IFNs or the IFN-receptors (IFNARs, such as with anifrolumab). The downstream signaling pathways of type I IFNs also contain several targets of interest in IMIDs, such as JAK1 and Tyk2. Of these, anifrolumab is licensed and JAK1/Tyk2 inhibitors are in phase III trials in SLE. Targeting IFN-Is for the treatment of SLE is already a reality and in the near future may prove useful in other IMIDs. IFN assays will find a role in routine clinical practice for the care of IMIDs as further validation work is completed and a greater range of targeted therapies becomes available., (Copyright © 2023 Société française de rhumatologie. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Background and Aims: The Pharmacovigilance Risk Assessment Committee (PRAC) proposed measures to address severe side effects linked to Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi) in immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMID). Use of these medications in individuals aged 65 and older, those at high cardiovascular risk, active or former long-term smokers, and those with increased cancer risk should be considered only if no alternatives exist. Caution is advised when administering JAKi to patients at risk of venous thromboembolism. We aim to implement recommendations from regulatory guidelines based on areas of uncertainty identified., Methods: A two-round modified Research and Development/University of California Los Angeles appropriateness methodology study was conducted. A panel of 21 gastroenterologists, dermatologists and rheumatologists used a 9-point Likert scale to rate the appropriateness of administering a JAKi for each proposed clinical scenario. Scores for appropriateness were categorized as appropriate, uncertain, or inappropriate. Two rounds were performed, each with online surveys and a virtual meeting to enable discussion and rating of each best practice., Results: Round 1 involved participants rating JAKi appropriateness and suggesting descriptors to reduce uncertainty. Survey results were discussed in a virtual meeting, identifying areas of disagreement. In round 2, participants rated their agreement with descriptors from round 1, and the level of uncertainty and disagreement reduced. Age flexibility is recommended in the absence of other risk factors. Active counseling on modifiable risks (e.g., overweight, mild hyperlipidemia and hypertension) and smoking cessation is advised. Uncertainty persists regarding cancer risk due to various factors., Conclusions: We outlined regulatory guidance without a personalized evaluation of the patient's risk profile might lead to uncertainty and become an arid technicality. Therefore, we identified gaps and implemented PRAC recommendations to help health professionals in clinical practice., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest Virginia Solitano and Magnus Petersen declare no conflict of interest. Paola Facheris has served as consultant for Eli Lilly. Ferdinando D'Amico has served as a speaker for Sandoz, Janssen, Galapagos, and Omega Pharma. He has also served as advisory board member for Abbvie, Ferring, Galapagos, and Nestlè. Michela Ortoncelli has declared no conflicts of interest. Daniel Aletaha received grants from AbbVie, Amgen, Galapagos, Eli Lilly and Sanofi, and honoraria (speaker's bureau, consultancy) from AbbVie, Amgen, Galapagos, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer and Sandoz and is a member of the ARD Editorial Board. Pablo A. Olivera received consulting fees from Abbvie, Takeda, and Janssen and lecture fees from Takeda and Janssen. Thomas Bieber was speaker or consultant or Investigator for AbbVie, Affibody, Allmiral, AnaptysBio, Arena, Asana Biosciences, ASLAN pharma, Bayer Health, BioVerSys, Böhringer-Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Connect Pharma, Dermavant, Domain Therapeutics, EQRx, Eli Lilly and Company, Galderma, Glenmark, GSK, Incyte, Innovaderm, IQVIA, Janssen, Kirin, Kymab, LEO, LG Chem, L'Oréal, MSD, Novartis, Numab, OM-Pharma, Pfizer, Pierre Fabre, Q32bio, RAPT, Sanofi/Regeneron, UCB. He is founder and chairman of the board of the non-profit biotech “Davos Biosciences”. Sofia Ramiro research grants and/or consultancy fees: AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Janseen, Galapagos, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB, Sanofi. Subrata Ghosh declares receiving consulting fees from Pfizer, Janssen, AbbVie, Takeda, Bristol Myers Squibb, Receptos, Celgene, Gilead, Eli Lilly, and Boehringer Ingelheim, and speaker fees from AbbVie, Janssen, Takeda, Ferring, Pfizer, Shield, and Falk Pharma outside of the submitted work. Maria Antonietta D'Agostino reports speaker or consultant fees from Novartis, BMS, Janssen,Pfizer, Amgen, Galapagos, AbbVie, UCB, and Eli Lilly. PC reports research grants from UCB, MSD and Pfizer; speaker fees or consultant fees from Pfizer, MSD, Novartis, Bristol Myers Squibb, AbbVie, UCB, Eli Lilly, Gilead and Celgene Corporation. Britta Siegmund has served as consultant for Abbvie, Abivax, Arena, BMS, Boehringer, CED Service GmbH, Celgene, CT Scout, Endpoint Health, Falk, Forga Software, Galapagos, Janssen, Lilly, Materia Prima, Pfizer, Takeda, Pharma Insight, Predictimmune, PsiCro; Speaker fees: AbbVie, BMS, CED Service GmbH, Chiesi, Falk, Ferring, Gilead, Janssen, Lilly, Materia Prima, Takeda, Pfizer and grant support by Arena/Pfizer (served as representative of the Charité). Isabelle Chary-Valckenaere received consulting fees from Abbvie, BMS, Galapagos, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB. Ailsa Hart has served as consultant, advisory board member or speaker for AbbVie, Arena, Atlantic, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Celltrion, Falk, Galapogos, Lilly, Janssen, MSD, Napp Pharmaceuticals, Pfizer, Pharmacosmos, Shire and Takeda. She also serves on the Global Steering Committee for Genentech. Lorenzo Dagna Lorenzo Dagna received consultation honoraria from Abbvie, Amgen, Biogen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celltrion, Galapagos, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi-Genzyme, SOBI, and Vifor outside of the current work. Fernando Magro has served as a speaker and received honoraria from Merck Sharp & Dohme, Abbvie, Vifor, Falk, Laboratorios Vitoria, Ferring, Hospira, and Biogen. Renaud Felten has been a consultant for Amgen, BMS, Galapagos, GSK, Janssen-Cilag, Lilly, Medac, MSD, Nordic, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi, UCB. Paulo Kotze has received honoraria from AbbVie, Ferring, Janssen, Pfizer, and Takeda as a speaker and member of advisory boards. He also received scientific research grants from Pfizer and Takeda. Vipul Jairath has received consultancy/advisory board fees from AbbVie, Alimentiv Inc., Arena pharmaceuticals, Asahi Kasei Pharma, Asieris, Astra Zeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celltrion, Eli Lilly, Ferring, Flagship Pioneering, Fresenius Kabi, Galapagos, GlaxoSmithKline, Genentech, Gilead, Janssen, Merck, Mylan, Pandion, Pendopharm, Pfizer, Protagonist, Reistone Biopharma, Roche, Sandoz, Second Genome, Takeda, Teva, Topivert, Ventyx, and Vividion; and speaker's fees from, Abbvie, Ferring, Galapagos, Janssen Pfizer Shire, Takeda, and Fresenius Kabi. Antonio Costanzo has served as an advisory board member, consultant and has received fees and speaker's honoraria or has participated in clinical trials for Abbvie, Almirall, Biogen, LEO Pharma, Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi Genzyme and UCB-Pharma. Lars Erik Kristensen has received fees for participation in speakers bureaus, research grants and consultancy fees from Pfizer, AbbVie, Amgen, Galapagos, UCB, Celgene, BMS, MSD, Novartis, Eli Lilly and Janssen Pharmaceuticals. Laurent Peyrin Biroulet has served as a speaker, consultant, and advisory board member for Merck, Abbvie, Janssen, Genentech, Mitsubishi, Ferring, Norgine, Tillots, Vifor, Hospira/Pfizer, Celltrion, Takeda, Biogaran, Boerhinger Ingelheim, Lilly, HAC Pharma, Index Pharmaceuticals, Amgen, Sandoz, Forward Pharma GmbH, Celgene, Biogen, Lycera, Samsung Bioepis, and Theravance. Silvio Danese has served as a speaker, consultant, and advisory board member for Schering-Plough, AbbVie, Actelion, Alphawasserman, AstraZeneca, Cellerix, Cosmo Pharmaceuticals, Ferring, Genentech, Grunenthal, Johnson and Johnson, Millenium Takeda, MSD, Nikkiso Europe GmbH, Novo Nordisk, Nycomed, Pfizer, Pharmacosmos, UCB Pharma, and Vifor., (Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Introduction: Colchicine, commonly used in gout flare, is contraindicated in severe chronic kidney disease (CKD) (estimated glomerular filtration rate <30 mL/min). However, in this context, there are few alternatives, and colchicine use persists. We evaluated the tolerance of colchicine and its efficacy in patients with severe CKD., Patients and Methods: All prescriptions of colchicine for managing crystal-induced arthritis flare (gout or calcium pyrophosphate deposition (CPPD) disease) in a hospitalised patient with severe CKD were screened from September 2020 to September 2021. After patient consent and treatment information, clinical and biological safety and efficacy data were prospectively collected from day 1 (D1) to D11., Results: We included 54 patients (median age 75 years (IQR 67-83)) with 62 colchicine prescriptions (cases). Twelve (22%) patients were on dialysis. The main reason for hospitalisation was heart failure (31.5%), acute renal failure (22.2%), infection (18.5%) or an acute joint episode (9.3%). In total, 59.3% of patients had diabetes. The prescriptions concerned 58 cases of gout flares, 1 case of CPPD and 3 cases of both. Initial colchicine dosages were ≤0.5 mg/day in 47/62 (75.8%) cases; no dosage exceeded 1 mg/day (median duration of 6 days (IQR 3-11)). Colchicine was well tolerated in 47/61 (77%) cases. No serious adverse event was reported. Colchicine was considered completely effective by the medical team in 48/58 (83%) of cases., Conclusion: The use of colchicine, at reduced doses, was mostly effective to treat crystal-induced arthritis flare in 54 patients with severe CKD and was well tolerated, without any serious adverse events., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Objectives: Stratification approaches are vital to address clinical heterogeneity in Sjogren's syndrome (SS). We previously described that the Newcastle Sjogren's Stratification Tool (NSST) identified four distinct clinical subtypes of SS. We performed proteomic and network analysis to analyse the underlying pathobiology and highlight potential therapeutic targets for different SS subtypes., Method: We profiled serum proteins using O-link technology of 180 SS subjects. We used 5 O-link proteomics panels which included a total of 454 unique proteins. Network reconstruction was performed using the ARACNE algorithm, with differential expression estimates overlaid on these networks to reveal the key subnetworks of differential expression. Furthermore, data from a phase III trial of tocilizumab in SS were reanalysed by stratifying patients at baseline using NSST., Results: Our analysis highlights differential expression of chemokines, cytokines and the major autoantigen TRIM21 between the SS subtypes. Furthermore, we observe differential expression of several transcription factors associated with energy metabolism and redox balance namely APE1/Ref-1, FOXO1, TIGAR and BACH1. The differentially expressed proteins were inter-related in our network analysis, supporting the concept that distinct molecular networks underlie the clinical subtypes of SS. Stratification of patients at baseline using NSST revealed improvement of fatigue score only in the subtype expressing the highest levels of serum IL-6., Conclusions: Our data provide clues to the pathways contributing to the glandular and non-glandular manifestations of SS and to potential therapeutic targets for different SS subtypes. In addition, our analysis highlights the need for further exploration of altered metabolism and mitochondrial dysfunction in the context of SS subtypes., Competing Interests: Competing interests: VD-P has undertaken clinical trials and provided consultancy or expert advice in the area of Sjogren’s disease to the following companies: MedImmune, UCB, Abbvie, Sanofi, Novartis and BMS. BF has undertaken consultancy for Novartis, BMS, Servier, Galapagos, Roche, Sanofi and Janssen and received research funding from Janssen, Galapagos, Servier and Celgene. SJB has undertaken consultancy for Novartis, BMS, Iqvia and Janssen and accepted hospitality from Novartis to attend a working dinner at the BSR conference regarding secukinumab in inflammatory arthritis in the last year. MB has received consultancy and/or advisory board fees and/or grant support from GSK, Janssen, Ono Pharmaceutical, Horizon Therapeutics in the last two years. W-FN has undertaken clinical trials and provided consultancy or expert advice in the area of Sjogren’s syndrome to the following companies: GlaxoSmithKline, MedImmune, UCB, Abbvie, Roche, Eli Lilly, Takeda, Resolves Therapeutics, Sanofi, Novartis and BMS. No other potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background: Medium-dose glucocorticoids can improve symptoms in nearly all patients with polymyalgia rheumatica. According to its good safety profile, abatacept could be used instead of glucocorticoids in early polymyalgia rheumatica. We aimed to determine whether the efficacy of abatacept is sufficient to justify larger studies in early polymyalgia rheumatica., Methods: To evaluate whether abatacept allows low disease activity without glucocorticoids in early polymyalgia rheumatica, we conducted a proof-of-concept, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial. Participants were recruited from five centres in France (in Brest, Le Mans, Morlaix, Dinan and Saint Malo, and Strasbourg) and were included if they had recent-onset (<6 months) polymyalgia rheumatica with a C-reactive protein (CRP) polymyalgia rheumatica activity score (PMR-AS) of more than 17 without any signs or symptoms of giant cell arteritis (clinical and [ 18 F]fluorodeoxyglucose PET-CT evaluation). Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive weekly subcutaneous abatacept (125 mg) or matching placebo, with glucocorticoid rescue therapy allowed in cases of high disease activity, for 12 weeks, and then glucocorticoid treatment based on disease activity, until week 36. Investigators, patients, outcome assessors, and sponsor personnel were masked to group assignments. The primary endpoint was low disease activity (CRP PMR-AS ≤10) at week 12 without glucocorticoids and without rescue treatment. The study was powered to demonstrate a 60% difference in response rates between groups. Open-ended adverse events were collected at each visit by clinicians and were categorised following system organ class classification after study completion. The ALORS trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03632187., Findings: 34 patients (22 women and 12 men) were randomly assigned between Dec 13, 2018, and Oct 21, 2021. All patients who had been randomly assigned were included in the analysis. The primary endpoint was reached by eight (50%) of 16 patients in the abatacept group and four (22%) of 18 patients in the placebo group (relative risk 2·2 [0·9-5·5]); crude p=0·15; adjusted p=0·070). Eight (50%) patients in the abatacept and 15 (83%) in the placebo group had adverse events. Four patients (one [6%] in the abatacept group and three [17%] in the placebo group) had serious adverse events. There were no deaths or new safety concerns., Interpretation: This study suggests that the effect of abatacept alone is not strong enough to justify larger studies in early polymyalgia rheumatica. This is only a first step in deciding whether a larger study should be conducted in early polymyalgia rheumatica and does not exclude a potential effect of abatacept in glucocorticoid-dependent polymyalgia rheumatica., Funding: BMS Pharma France., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests ASa reports work from speakers bureaus for speakers bureau for AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb (BMS), Galapagos, Lilly, Novartis, Nordic, Pfizer, Roche-Chugai, Sanofi, and Union Chimique Belge (UCB); and grants or research support from AbbVie, BMS, Lilly, and Novartis. GC-A reports work from speakers bureaus for AbbVie, BMS, Chugai, Lilly, and Novartis. AT reports work from speakers bureaus for Galapagos and BMS. RF reports work from speakers bureaus for Amgen, BMS, Galapagos, GSK, Janssen-Cilag, Medac, MSD, Nordic, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi, and UCB. SJ-J reports work from speakers bureaus for AbbVie, Amgen, AstraZeneca, BMS, Galapagos, Janssen, Pfizer, UCB, Novartis, MSD, GSK, and Sanofi. TM reports funding from AbbVie, Amgen, Chugaï, Lilly, Mylan, Novartis, and Pfizer. VD-P reports grants and research support from BMS. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Spondylarthritis (SpA) is generally observed in young male patients but can be diagnosed in older patients. These cases correspond to late-onset SpA (LoSpA) with two main clinical presentations, axial and peripheral SpA. Another increasingly common situation is that of older patients who have had SpA for many years. The therapeutic management of LoSpA is quite smilar to the management of patients with an early-onset disease, combining both non-pharmacological and pharmacological treatments. The treatments that can be used in LoSpA include non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and biological agents targeting TNFα or IL-17A. Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi) were recently introduced on the market for SpA. TNF inhibitors and IL-17inhibitors are very effective drugs in early-onset SpA. The effectiveness and safety of targeted therapies have not been specifically evaluated in LoSpA or older patients, and thus caution is required for these patients with comorbidities and/or polymedication. According to indirect data, biological agents seem to be less effective in LoSpA compared with early-onset disease. In parallel, a careful evaluation for the risk of infection, malignancy and cardiovascular events is recommended before initiating these drugs in this age category. JAKi may be used in LoSpA, but only in selected patients according to recent recommendations from the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the European Medicines Agency (EMA). When considering that the prevalence of such situations is expected to increase as ageing progresses, it is certainly time to consider this patient category as a distinct subgroup within the spectrum of SpA. Specific studies evaluating targeted agents in this age category are thus desirable., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.)

Following better understanding of molecular pathways involved in the pathogenesis of Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), pharmaceutical companies have been investigating new targeted drugs for SLE. The purpose of this scoping review is to provide an updated view of the most promising targeted therapies currently in clinical development or recently approved for SLE treatment as well as of the most promising potential future therapeutic strategies in SLE. In the past several years, two new drugs have been developed for lupus treatment along with an extended indication for belimumab. Anifrolumab, the anti-interferon medication, to treat non-renal lupus; voclosporin, a calcineurin inhibitor, for the treatment of lupus nephritis; and belimumab for lupus nephritis. More than 90 investigational drugs are currently in clinical development for SLE treatment, with various targets including inflammatory cytokines and their receptors, intracellular signaling, B cells or plasma cells, co-stimulation molecules, complement fractions, T cells, plasmacytoid dendritic cells as well as various other immunological targets of interest. Researchers are also actively engaged in the development of new therapeutic strategies, including the use of monoclonal antibodies in combination with bispecific monoclonal antibodies, nanobodies and nanoparticles, therapeutic vaccines, utilizing siRNA interference techniques, autologous hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation and Chimeric Antigens Receptor (CAR)-T cells. The therapeutic management and prognosis of SLE have profoundly evolved with changes in the therapeutic armamentarium. With the broad pipeline of targeted treatments in clinical development and new treatment strategies in the future, current challenges are transitioning from the availability of new drugs to the selection of the most appropriate strategy at the patient level., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest, (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: To date, no immunomodulatory drug has demonstrated its efficacy in primary SS (pSS). We sought to analyse potential commonalities between pSS transcriptomic signatures and signatures of various drugs or specific knock-in or knock-down genes., Methods: Gene expression from peripheral blood samples of patients with pSS was compared with that of healthy controls in two cohorts and three public databases. In each of the five datasets, we analysed the 150 most up- and downregulated genes between pSS patients and controls with regard to the differentially expressed genes resulting from the biological action on nine cell lines of 2837 drugs, 2160 knock-in and 3799 knock-down genes in the Connectivity Map database., Results: We analysed 1008 peripheral blood transcriptomes from five independent studies (868 patients with pSS and 140 healthy controls). Eleven drugs could represent potential candidate drugs, with histone deacetylases and PI3K inhibitors among the most significantly associated. Twelve knock-in genes were associated with a pSS-like profile and 23 knock-down genes were associated with a pSS-revert profile. Most of those genes (28/35, 80%) were interferon-regulated., Conclusion: This first drug repositioning transcriptomic approach in SS confirms the interest of targeting interferons and identifies histone deacetylases and PI3K inhibitors as potential therapeutic targets., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Objectives: Patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) are at a significantly increased risk of hyperuricaemia and development of gout, and those with hyperuricaemia have been found to respond poorly to PsA treatment and have more peripheral and destructive joint damage. We present a comprehensive post hoc analysis using pooled data from the FUTURE 2-5 studies and the MAXIMISE study to further evaluate the impact of hyperuricaemia on clinical presentation/disease severity and response to secukinumab in patients with PsA., Methods: Patients were stratified into two groups based on baseline serum uric acid (SUA) level (threshold of 360 µmol/L). A sensitivity analysis was also performed based on SUA thresholds of 300 µmol/L and 420 µmol/L. Demographics, clinical, radiological characteristics and comorbidities data were collected., Results: At baseline, patients with hyperuricaemia were mostly male, reported a higher prevalence of hypertension, with more clinical dactylitis, more psoriasis and more severe skin disease compared with patients with normouricaemia. A similar proportion of patients in the normouricaemic and hyperuricaemic cohorts achieved American College of Rheumatology responses, resolution of enthesitis and dactylitis, inhibition of structural damage progression and improvement in health-related quality of life across all secukinumab doses at week 52., Conclusion: Patients with PsA and hyperuricaemia have different clinical characteristics from patients with PsA and normouricaemia. Identification of these patients at an early stage may facilitate a personalised treatment approach and improved management of comorbidities. Furthermore, secukinumab provided a rapid and sustained response across all manifestations of PsA up to week 52, irrespective of baseline uricaemia status., Competing Interests: Competing interests: RF: Consulting fees and advisory boards (Novartis); J-EG: Consulting fees and advisory boards (Novartis); CG and WB are employees and shareholders of Novartis., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Objectives: The objective of this systematic review was to provide an overview of current developments and potentially available therapeutic options for spondyloarthritis (SpA) in the coming years., Methods: We conducted a systematic review of 17 national and international clinical trial databases for all disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) for SpA that are already marketed, in clinical development or withdrawn. The search was performed on February 2023 with the keywords "spondyloarthritis", "ankylosing spondylitis" and "psoriatic arthritis". For each molecule, we only considered the study at the most advanced stage of clinical development., Results: Concerning axial SpA (axSpA), a total of 44 DMARDs were identified: 6 conventional synthetic DMARDs (csDMARDs), 27 biological DMARDs (bDMARDs) and 11 targeted synthetic DMARDs (tsDMARDs). Among the 18 targeted treatments (b+tsDMARDs) in current development, corresponding trials reached phase I (n=1), II (n=10) and III (n=7). Ten molecules are IL-17 inhibitors, two Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors and two granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor inhibitors; four have another mode of action. Concerning psoriatic arthritis (PsA), 44 DMARDs were identified: 5 csDMARDs, 27 bDMARDs and 12 tsDMARDs. Among the 15 molecules in current development, corresponding trials reached phase II (n=8) and III (n=7). Six molecules are JAK inhibitors, six IL-17 inhibitors and one an IL-23 inhibitor; two have another mode of action., Conclusion: This systematic review identified 18 and 15 molecules in clinical development for axSpA and PsA, respectively, which suggests a strengthening of the therapeutic arsenal in the coming years. However, with so many DMARDs but low target diversity, we will need to develop strategies or biomarkers to help clinicians make informed treatment decisions., Competing Interests: Competing interests: AD declares that she has no competing interest. CS declares that he has no competing interest. GB declares that he has no competing interest. RF has been a consultant for Amgen, BMS, Galapagos, GSK, Janssen-Cilag, Lilly, Medac, MSD, Nordic, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi, UCB. LA has been a consultant for Astra-Zeneca, BMS, GSK, Janssen, Lilly, Medac, Novartis, Nordic Pharma, Pfizer, Roche-Chugaï, Sanofi, UCB., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Drugs of unknown mechanisms of action are no longer being developed because we have largely capitalized on our improved understanding of the immunopathogenesis of immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs) to develop therapeutic monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) and targeted treatments. These therapies have profoundly revolutionized the care of IMIDs. However, because of the heterogeneity of IMIDs and the redundancy of the targeted molecular pathways, some patients with IMIDs might not respond to a specific targeted drug or their disease might relapse secondarily. Therefore, there is much at stake in the development of new therapeutic strategies, which include combinations of mAbs or bispecific mAbs (BsMAbs), nanobodies and nanoparticles (NPs), therapeutic vaccines, small interfering RNA (siRNA) interference, autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (aHSCT), or chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cells. With the broad pipeline of targeted treatments in clinical development, the therapeutic paradigm is rapidly evolving from whether new drugs will be available to the complex selection of the most adequate targeted treatment (or treatment combination) at the patient level. This paradigm change highlights the need to better characterize the heterogeneous immunological spectrum of these diseases. Only then will these novel therapeutic strategies be able to fully demonstrate their potential to treat IMIDs., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Innate lymphoid cells (ILCs) are a cell population implicated in the pathogenesis of various chronic inflammatory diseases, but little is known about their role in primary Sjögren's syndrome (pSS). The aim of this study was to assess the frequency of ILC subsets in peripheral blood (PB) and their quantity and location in minor salivary glands (MSGs) in pSS., Methods: The frequency of ILC subsets was analysed in the PB of patients with pSS and healthy controls (HCs) by flow cytometry. The amount and location of ILC subsets in MSGs were studied in patients with pSS and sicca controls by immunofluorescence assay., Results: In PB, the frequency of ILC subsets did not differ between patients with pSS and HCs. The circulating frequency of the ILC1 subset was increased in patients with pSS with positive anti-SSA antibodies and that of the ILC3 subset was reduced in patients with pSS with glandular swelling. In MSGs, the ILC3 number was higher in lymphocytic-infiltrated than non-infiltrated tissue in patients with pSS and normal glandular tissues in sicca controls. The ILC3 subset was preferentially located at the periphery of infiltrates and was more abundant in small infiltrates of recently diagnosed pSS., Conclusion: Altered ILC homeostasis mainly concerns salivary glands in pSS. Most ILCs in MSGs consist of the ILC3 subset, located at the periphery of lymphocytic infiltrates. The ILC3 subset is more abundant in smaller infiltrates and in recently diagnosed pSS. It might play a pathogenic role in the development of T and B lymphocyte infiltrates in the early stages of pSS., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

The use of online surveys as a recruitment tool for clinical research has recently expanded; nevertheless, optimal recruitment strategies remain poorly identified. Objectives. The study aimed to identify the most effective recruitment strategies for online research studies and to determine the optimal survey channels for obtaining patients' responses. This is a post-hoc analysis of the ARCOVAX (ArLAR COVID Vaccination) study. Multiple recruitment strategies were disseminated in Arabic, English, and French. The proportion of enrolled patients was correlated with each strategy. Channels used by patients to complete the survey were divided into three categories (social media (SoMe), doctor, and patients' associations). These channels were correlated with the patients' characteristics and the country's Gross Domestic Product (GDP). A total of 1595 patients from 19 Arab countries completed the survey. Patients' mean age was 39 years, 73.2% (1159) were females, 17.8% (284) had a university education level and 93.1% (1468) answered the survey in Arabic. The most effective recruitment strategies were personalized WhatsApp reminders to recruiters (30% of enrolled patients), technical support in response to access issues (27%) and sharing recruitment status by country on a WhatsApp group (24%). The channels used to complete the survey were: SoMe in 45% (711), doctor in 40% (647), and patients' associations in 8.5% (233), and correlated with age and GDP. To optimize recruitment, it is recommended to combine multiple strategies and channels, use the native language and be active (mobilize teams), reactive (provide prompt technical support), and proactive (share regular updates and reminders)., (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared.

Introduction: Despite available therapies, persistently active and corticosteroid-dependent Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) represent a significant therapeutic challenge. The purpose of this systematic review was to provide an updated view of targeted therapies currently in clinical development in SLE, with a special focus on the most promising ones., Methods: We performed a systematic review of targeted therapies in clinical development in SLE in clinicaltrials.gov (search date: 28th of August 2022). Targeted therapies (defined as drugs specifically designed to block certain molecules, receptors, or pathways involved in the development of SLE) were extracted. For each investigational drug, we considered only the study at the most advanced stage of clinical development., Results: The systematic review yielded a total of 92 targeted therapies (58 biological DMARDs [bDMARDs] and 34 targeted synthetic [ts]DMARDs) assessed in a total of 203 clinical trials. The candidate drugs reached phase I (n=20), Ia/IIb (n=6), phase II (n=51), phase II/III (n=1), phase III (n=13) and phase IV (n=1). These trials were reported as recruiting (n=31), active but not recruiting (n=8), not yet recruiting (n=4), enrolling by invitation (n=2), completed (n=31), prematurely terminated (n=12) and withdrawn in 1 (status unknown in 3). The main investigational drugs for SLE target inflammatory cytokines, chemokines or their receptors (n=19), intracellular signaling pathways (n=18), B cells (n=14) or plasma cells (n=7),T/B cells co-stimulation molecules (n=10), complement molecules (n=5),T lymphocytes (n=2), plasmacytoid dendritic cells (n=2), as well as various other immune targets (n=15)., Conclusion: The pipeline of investigational drugs in SLE is highly diversified and will hopefully enable more optimal Treat-To-Target with the goal of disease modification. Companion biomarkers will be needed to better characterized SLE heterogeneity and optimize treatment selection at the individual-patient level., (Copyright © 2023 Société française de rhumatologie. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Objective: COVID-19 outcome may be less favourable in patients with inflammatory rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases (RMD) receiving immunosuppressive therapy. We aimed to investigate whether RMD patients on anti-IL6 therapy prior to SARS-CoV-2 infection have less severe disease and better outcomes of COVID-19., Methods: We conducted a retrospective national, multicentre cohort study using data from the French RMD COVID-19 cohort. We compared the severity and outcome of highly suspected or confirmed COVID-19 infection in RMD patients previously treated with tocilizumab or sarilumab (anti-IL6 group) with patients who did not receive anti-IL6 therapy (no anti-IL6 group)., Results: Data were collected for 1883 patients with mean age of 55.2 years [SD 16.7] and 1256 (66.7%) female. Two hundred ten (11.1%) developed severe COVID-19 and 115 (6.4%) died. After adjusting for potential confounding factors, severe COVID-19 was less frequent in the anti-IL6 group compared with the no anti-IL6 group (aOR for moderate vs. mild severity, 0.23 [95% CI, 0.10 to 0.54], p ≤ 0.01 and aOR for severe vs. mild, 0.29 [95% CI, 0.10 to 0.81], p ≤ 0.01). No significant differences were found for the evolution of COVID-19 between the anti-IL6 group and the no anti-IL6 group (aOR for recovery with sequelae vs recovery without sequelae, 0.78 [95% CI, 0.41 to 1.48] and aOR for death vs recovery without sequelae, 0.29 [95% CI, 0.07 to 1.30])., Conclusion: RMD patients receiving anti-IL6 therapy prior to SARS-CoV-2 infection have less severe forms of COVID-19. No difference was observed in COVID-19 evolution, i.e., sequelae or death, between the groups., Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (© 2023 The Authors.)

Objective: Primary Sjögren's syndrome (SS) is the second most frequent systemic autoimmune disease, affecting 0.1% of the general population. To characterize the molecular and clinical variabilities among patients with primary SS, we integrated transcriptomic, proteomic, cellular, and genetic data with clinical phenotypes in a cohort of 351 patients with primary SS., Methods: We analyzed blood transcriptomes and genotypes of 351 patients with primary SS who were participants in a multicenter prospective clinical cohort. We replicated the transcriptome analysis in 3 independent cohorts (n = 462 patients). We determined circulating interferon-α (IFNα) and IFNγ protein concentrations using digital single molecular arrays (Simoa)., Results: Transcriptome analysis of the prospective cohort showed a strong IFN gene signature in more than half of the patients; this finding was replicated in the 3 independent cohorts. Because gene expression analysis did not discriminate between type I IFN and type II IFN, we used Simoa to demonstrate that the IFN transcriptomic signature was driven by circulating IFNα and not by IFNγ protein levels. IFNα protein levels, detectable in 75% of patients, were significantly associated with clinical and immunologic features of primary SS disease activity at enrollment and with increased frequency of systemic complications over the 5-year follow-up. Genetic analysis revealed a significant association between IFNα protein levels, a major histocompatibility (MHC) class II haplotype, and anti-SSA antibody. Additional cellular analysis revealed that an MHC class II HLA-DQ locus acts through up-regulation of HLA class II molecules on conventional dendritic cells., Conclusion: We identified the predominance of IFNα as a driver of primary SS variability, with IFNα demonstrating an association with HLA gene polymorphisms., (© 2022 The Authors. Arthritis & Rheumatology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American College of Rheumatology.)

Introduction: To compare the time distribution of initial COVID-19 among patients with self-reported post-acute sequelae of COVID-19 (PASC)., Methods: We compared the distribution of the date of the reported initial COVID-19 among patients with self-reported PASC and the COVID-19 cases in France between the first wave (January 1-May 11, 2020) and the later period (May 12, 2020-June 30, 2021) using the chi-squared test. COVID-19 cases in France were assessed using previous modeling of COVID-19 burden in France for the first time period, and positive RT-PCR testing for the second time period., Results: The study included 567 individuals with PASC (median age 44, [IQR 37-50]; 83.4% women). A total of 293 (51.7%) patients reported an initial COVID-19 infection during the first period while 272 (48%) reported it during the later period (missing data, n = 2; 0.3%). Patients with PASC were 82% more likely to report initial COVID-19 during the first pandemic wave than afterward (OR 1.82, 95% CI [1.55-2.15]; p < 0.0001)., Conclusions: The incidence of self-reported PASC wave was significantly higher when initial COVID-19 happened during the first pandemic wave than afterward, suggesting the importance of non-viral factors in PASC development., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

The word lupus (Latin term for the wolf) was used indistinctively since the Middle Ages for several types of diseases characterized by ulcerous lesions, mainly in the lower limbs. In the middle of the 18th century, the French dermatologist Cazenave mentioned for the first time the term "lupus érythémateux," while Kaposi reported discoid lupus as a separate entity. The true turning point in the history of lupus occurred at the beginning of the 19th century, when the distinction between lupus vulgaris and cutaneous lupus in its modern sense emerged slowly. Major subsequent contributions from Kaposi, Sequiera and Balean, and Osler enabled the recognition of the systemic nature of the disease, with its modern history being marked by the recognition of DNA as the main target of antinuclear antibodies and the central role of interferons. Although many nonpharmacologic treatments have been used throughout the ages, glucocorticoids, hydroxychloroquine, and immunosuppressive agents mainly appeared in the second half of the 20th century. The beginning of the 21st century is now characterized by an in-depth understanding of the pathogenesis of the disease and the appearance of biologic and targeted treatments, paving the way for a better care of lupus patients., (Copyright © 2020 American Academy of Dermatology, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: To assess the tolerance and efficacy of targeted therapies prescribed off-label in refractory low-prevalence autoimmune and inflammatory systemic diseases., Methods: The TATA registry (TArgeted Therapy in Autoimmune Diseases) is a prospective, observational, national and independent cohort follow-up. The inclusion criteria in the registry are as follows: age >18 years; low-prevalence autoimmune and inflammatory systemic disease treated with off-label drugs started after 1 January 2019., Results: Hundred (100) patients (79 women) were enrolled. The median age was 52.5 years (95% CI 49 to 56) and the median disease duration before enrolment was 5 years (3 to 7). The targeted therapies at enrolment were as follows: Janus kinase/signal transducers and activators of transcription inhibitors (44%), anti-interleukin (IL)-6R (22%), anti-IL-12/23, anti-IL-23 and anti-IL-17 (9%), anti-B cell activating factor of the tumour necrosis factor family (5%), abatacept (5%), other targeted treatments (9%) and combination of targeted treatments (6%). 73% of patients were receiving corticosteroid therapy at enrolment (median dose 10 mg/day). The current median follow-up time is 9 months (8 to 10). Safety: 11 serious infections (incidence rate of 14.8/100 patient-years) and 1 cancer (1.3 cancers/100 patient-years) were observed. Two patients died from severe COVID-19 (2.7 deaths/100 patient-years). Efficacy: the targeted treatment was considered effective by the clinician in 56% of patients and allowed, in responders, a median reduction of oral corticosteroids of 15 (9 to 21) mg/day, below 7.5 mg/day in 76% of patients, while 28% discontinued., Conclusion: These initial results of the TATA registry confirm the diversity of targeted treatments prescribed off-label in refractory autoimmune diseases and their corticosteroid-sparing effect when effective. Tolerance was acceptable in these refractory patients with a long history of treatment with immunosuppressive drugs., Competing Interests: Competing interests: XM received consulting fees from BMS, Novartis, Sanofi, Pfizer, UCB, Janssen, GSK, Galapagos and BMS and is RMD Open associate editor. JE-G received grants from BMS, Lilly, Pfizer (payments made to University of Strasbourg Foundation; no access to TATA data) and consulting fees from BMS, Galapagos, Abbvie, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi, Gilead, Roche, Chugai and Lilly., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Importance: Few treatments are available for patients with glucocorticoid-dependent polymyalgia rheumatica. IL-6 antagonists may reduce disease activity in patients with active glucocorticoid-dependent polymyalgia rheumatica., Objective: To compare the efficacy of tocilizumab vs placebo in patients with glucocorticoid-dependent polymyalgia rheumatica., Design, Setting, and Participants: This double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial enrolled 101 patients with polymyalgia rheumatica at 17 hospitals in France from February 2017 to October 2019. Final follow-up occurred in November 2020. Inclusion criteria were persistent disease activity (polymyalgia rheumatica activity score computed using the C-reactive protein level [CRP PMR-AS] >10) and prednisone dose greater than or equal to 10 mg per day., Interventions: Patients were randomly assigned to receive intravenous tocilizumab (8 mg/kg; n = 51) or placebo (n = 50) every 4 weeks for 24 weeks, combined with predefined standardized tapering of oral prednisone., Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary efficacy end point was CRP PMR-AS less than 10 (range, 0-100; higher values indicate greater activity; no minimal clinically important difference defined) combined with either prednisone dose less than or equal to 5 mg per day or a decrease in prednisone dose greater than or equal to 10 mg from baseline at week 24. There were 11 secondary outcomes assessed at week 24 included in this report, including disease activity (measured by CRP PMR-AS) and the proportion of patients no longer taking prednisone., Results: Of the 101 randomized patients (mean age, 67.2 years; 68 [67.3%] women), 100 (99%) received at least 1 infusion and 100 completed the trial. The primary end point was achieved in 67.3% of patients in the tocilizumab group and 31.4% of patients in the placebo group (adjusted difference, 36.0% [95% CI, 19.4%-52.6%]; adjusted relative risk, 2.3 [95% CI, 1.5-3.6]; P < .001). Of 11 reported secondary end points at 24 weeks, 7 showed significant differences favoring tocilizumab, including mean CRP PMR-AS score (7.5 [95% CI, 5.4-9.6] vs 14.9 [95% CI, 11.4-18.4]; adjusted difference, -7.5 [95% CI, -11.2 to -3.8]; P < .001) and the percentage of patients no longer receiving prednisone (49.0% vs 19.6%; adjusted difference, 29.3% [95% CI, 18.9%-39.7%]; adjusted relative risk, 2.5 [95% CI, 1.8-3.5]; P < .001). The most frequent adverse events were infections, experienced by 23 patients (46.9%) in the tocilizumab group and 20 (39.2%) in the placebo group., Conclusions and Relevance: Among patients with active polymyalgia rheumatica despite prednisone therapy, tocilizumab, compared with placebo, resulted in a significantly greater percentage of patients with a CRP PMR-AS less than 10 with reduced prednisone requirements at week 24. Further research is needed to confirm efficacy and to determine the balance of potential benefits and harms., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02908217.

Objectives: To describe new-onset IBD (new IBD) in patients treated with IL-17 inhibitors (IL-17i), to assess their incidence and to identify their risk factors in real life., Methods: A French national registry (MISSIL) aimed to report all cases of new IBD in patients treated with IL-17i from January 2016 to December 2019. Using the estimated number of patients treated by IL-17 in France during the study period, the annual incidence rates of new IBD was reported in IL-17i-treated patients. A case-control study was performed with two controls per new IBD case matched by gender, age and underlying inflammatory disease., Results: Thirty-one cases of new IBD under IL-17i were collected: 27 patients treated for spondyloarthritis and four patients for psoriasis. All were observed with secukinumab (SEK). The median time to onset of new IBD symptoms was 4.0 (1.5-7.5) months. SEK was discontinued in all patients. The evolution was favourable with complete resolution (17/31), improvement (7/31) or stabilization (5/31). Two patients died: one due to a massive myocardial infarction and one due to post-colectomy complications. The incidence of new IBD decreased from 0.69/100 patient-years [PY] (7/1010) in 2016 to 0.08/100 PY (6/7951) in 2019. No previous treatment with etanercept (odds ratio [OR] = 0.33, 95% CI: 0.14-0.80, P = 0.014) and low number of previous biologic therapies (OR = 0.67, 95% CI: 0.47, 0.94, P = 0.021) were significantly associated with new IBD., Conclusion: The incidence of new IBD was low and decreased from 2016 to 2019. The outcome was favourable in 24 out of 31 patients, but two patients died., (© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Objective: To study the impact of hyperuricemia on clinical presentation, severity, and associated comorbidities of psoriatic arthritis (PsA)., Methods: Retrospective bicentric case-control study performed in Strasbourg and Colmar, France, from 2009 to 2019. Patients with PsA (according to ICD-10 coding) and at least one available serum urate (SU) measurement were included. Demographic, comorbidities, clinical, and radiographic data were collected. Hyperuricemia was defined as SU level ≥ 360 µmol/L., Results: We included 242 patients: 73 (30.2%) had hyperuricemia and 15 (6.2%) met 2015 ACR/EULAR criteria for gout. On univariate analysis, as compared with normo-uricemic patients, hyperuricemic patients were more frequently male (72.6% vs 39.1%, p = 1.6 × 10 -6 ) with higher body mass index (30.9 vs 28.7 kg/m 2 , p = 0.015) and more comorbidities (Charlson comorbidity index: 2.6 vs 1.8, p = 0.005). PsA started at an older age (47.5 vs 43 years, p = 0.016) was more polyarticular (56.2% vs 41.9%, p = 0.049) than axial (9.6% vs 22.8%, p = 0.019) and more destructive (52.8% vs 37.4%, p = 0.032). PsA patients with joint destruction more frequently had hyperuricemia than did others (37.6% vs 25.8%, p = 0.047). Multivariable analysis confirmed the association of hyperuricemic PsA with peripheral joint involvement (odds ratio 2.98; 95% confidence interval 1.15-7.75; p = 0.025) and less good response to treatment (0.35; 0.15-0.87; p = 0.024)., Conclusion: Patients with hyperuricemic PsA show poorer response to PsA treatment and have more peripheral and destructive joint damage than normo-uricemic patients. Key Points • Gout and psoriatic arthritis (PsA) can co-exist in the same patient. • Monosodium urate crystals might have a deleterious impact on PsA. • Hyperuricemic PsA is more polyarticular, less frequently axial, and more destructive than normo-uricemic PsA. • PsA with hyperuricemia should lead to more personalized medicine., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

The management of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) has long been equated with that of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), particularly because methotrexate (MTX) was found efficient in RA in the 1990s. However, results of collective evidence-based medicine, included and argued in this narrative review, do not currently support the use of MTX as first-line therapy in severe PsA. A recent Cochrane systematic review examining the efficacy of MTX in PsA concluded that low-dose MTX was only slightly more effective than placebo. Questions about a structural effect of MTX in PsA remains non-elucidated. Even if tolerance data on MTX are more consensual and adverse events generally non-severe, subjective side effects such as fatigue might lead to MTX withdrawal based on the patient's decision. PsA patients with axial disease, radiographic lesions, and extensive and disabling skin or joint involvement should receive early treatment with targeted therapy and no longer with MTX. Finally, the usefulness of MTX combined with targeted therapies is limited. MTX does not affect efficacy but only seems to increase the therapeutic maintenance of monoclonal TNF inhibitors. This narrative review may help clarify the place of MTX in PsA management. It allows for reflection on the evolution of current concepts and practices., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest statement: The authors declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: R.F. has received speaker and consultant fees from Abbvie, BMS, Janssen, Lilly, Nordic, Novartis, Medac, MSD, Pfizer, Sanofi, and UCB. G.L.C. declare no conflict of interest. E.L. has received speaker and consultant fees from Celgene, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, and Pfizer., (© The Author(s), 2022.)

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has accelerated changes to rheumatology daily clinical practice. The main goal of the 12th International Immunology Summit, held 25-26 June, 2021 (virtual meeting), was to provide direction for these active changes rather than undergoing change reactively in order to improve patient outcomes. This review describes and explores the concept of change in rheumatology clinical practice based on presentations from the Immunology Summit. Many of the changes to rheumatology practice brought about by the COVID-19 pandemic may be considered as having a positive impact on disease management and may help with the long-term development of more patient-focused treatment. Rheumatologists can contribute key knowledge regarding the use of immunosuppressive agents in the context of the pandemic, and according to the European League Against Rheumatism, they should be involved in any multidisciplinary COVID-19 guideline committees. New technologies, including telemedicine and artificial intelligence, represent an opportunity for physicians to individualise patient treatment and improve disease management. Despite major advances in the treatment of rheumatic diseases, the efficacy of available disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) remains suboptimal and data regarding serological biomarkers are limited. Synovial tissue biomarkers, such as CD68 + macrophages, have shown promise in elucidating pathogenesis and targeting treatment to the individual patient. In spondyloarthritis (SpA) or psoriatic arthritis (PsA), information regarding the effectiveness of the available agents with different mechanisms of action may be integrated to manage patients using a treat-to-target approach. Early diagnosis of SpA and PsA is important for optimisation of treatment response and long-term outcomes. Improving our understanding of disease pathogenesis and practice methods may help reduce diagnostic delays, thereby optimising disease outcomes in patients with rheumatic diseases., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Competing Interests: LA reports consulting fees and honoraria from Pfizer and AstraZeneca, outside this work. All other authors declare no competing interests. NZ, LEK, IH, and MM designed the study and were part of the steering committee that wrote the study protocol, included participants from their respective countries, and supervised the recruitment of participants in all the countries. LA and RF provided the original questionnaire from the VAXICOV study and participated in the questionnaire adaptation and in the finalisation of the protocol. NZ, LEK, MM, and IH drafted the manuscript and handled the comments of the authors. NA, HH, ME, MER, BM, FA, WH, AA, and AAN participated in the study design and protocol, included participants from their respective countries, and helped in addressing logistical issues during recruitment. NZ and IH analysed the results of the survey and designed the tables and figures. All authors made substantial contributions to work and participated in the discussion of the study results, the draft of the manuscript, and revised the final submitted document for intellectual content. All the authors approved the version to be published and agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work. RF and LA contributed equally.

The antimalarial hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) has demonstrated several crucial properties for the treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Herein, we reviewed the main HCQ pharmacologic features, detailed its mechanism of action, and summarized the existing guidelines and recommendations for HCQ use in rheumatology with a systematic literature search for the randomized controlled trials focused on lupus. HCQ has been shown to decrease SLE activity, especially in mild and moderate disease, to prevent disease flare and to lower the long-term glucocorticoid need. The numerous benefits of HCQ are extended to pregnancy and breastfeeding period. Based on cohort studies, antithrombotic and metabolic HCQ's effects were shown, including lipid-lowering properties, which might contribute to an improved cardiovascular risk. Moreover, early HCQ use in antinuclear antibodies positive individuals might delay the progression to SLE. Finally, HCQ has a significant favorable impact on long-term outcomes such as damage accrual and mortality in SLE. Based on these multiple benefits, HCQ is now the mainstay long-term treatment in SLE, recommended by current guidelines in all patients unless contraindications or side effects. The daily dose associated with the best compromise between efficacy and safety is matter of debate. The concern regarding retinal toxicity rather than proper efficacy data is the one that dictated the daily dosage of ⩽5 mg/kg/day actual body weight currently agreed upon., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest statement: The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article., (© The Author(s), 2022.)

Objective: We recently recorded a high prevalence of inclusion body myositis (IBM) in patients with Sjögren's syndrome (SS). Whether myositis patients with SS differ from myositis patients without SS in terms of the characteristics of the myositis is currently unknown. Anti-cytosolic 5'-nucleotidase 1 A (cN1A) has recently been proposed as a biomarker for IBM but is also frequent in SS. Whether anti-cN1A is independently associated with IBM is still an open question. We aimed to assess the significance of SS and anti-cN1A in myositis patients., Methods: Cumulative data on all myositis patients (EULAR/ACR 2017 criteria) screened for SS (ACR/EULAR 2016 criteria) in a single centre were analysed. Ninety-nine patients were included, covering the whole spectrum of EULAR/ACR 2017 myositis subgroups and with a median follow-up of 6 years (range 1.0-37.5). The 34 myositis patients with SS (myositis/SS+) were compared with the 65 myositis patients without SS (myositis/SS-)., Results: . IBM was present in 24% of the myositis/SS+ patients vs 6% of the myositis/SS- group (P = 0.020). None of the IBM patients responded to treatment, whether they had SS or not. Anti-cN1A was more frequent in myositis/SS+ patients (38% vs 6%, P = 0.0005), independently of the higher prevalence of IBM in this group (multivariate P value: 0.02). Anti-cN1A antibody specificity for IBM was 0.96 (95% CI: 0.87, 0.99) in the myositis/SS- group but dropped to 0.70 (95% CI: 0.48, 0.85) in the myositis/SS+ group., Interpretation: In myositis patients, SS is associated with IBM and with anti-cN1A antibodies, independently of the IBM diagnosis. As a consequence, anti-cN1A has limited specificity for IBM in myositis patients with SS., (© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Competing Interests: There was no funding for this study. LA declares consulting fees from AstraZeneca, Janssen, and BMS, unrelated to the current work. All other authors declare no competing interests. RF and FG contributed equally and have directly accessed and verified the underlying data. All authors contributed to the concept, design and drafting of the study and have approved the final version.

Competing Interests: RS has received consulting fees from GSK, BMS, Fresenius Kabi, Boerhinger, Jansen, Amgen, Pfizer, and Roche. AB has received honoraria from AbbVie, BMS, Celgene, Janssen, Eli Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Biogen, and UCB. M-ET has received honoraria or participated on advisory boards for Galapagos, Eli Lilly, SOBI, Boehringer Ingelheim, Fresenius Kabi, MSD, and AbbVie and had received research support from Gilead. AR has received honoraria from AbbVie and Pfizer. J-EG has received honoraria or participated on advisory boards for AbbVie, BMS, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Gilead, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, Novartis, MSD, CSL-Behrin,g and Genzyme and received research support from BMS. RF has received honoraria or participated on advisory boards for AbbVie, Eli Lilly, and Pfizer. AC has received honoraria from Chugai and Pfizer. JA has received consultancy fees from AbbVie, Sanofi, and Nordic Pharma; honoraria from Galapagos, AbbVie, BMS, Sanofi, Roche-Chugai, Nordic Pharma, Biogen, Fresenius Kabi, and MSD; and research support from Pfizer, BMS, and Novartis. XM has received consulting fees from BMS, Galapagos, Gilead, Janssen, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi, and UCB and research support from Ose Pharmaceutical and Pfizer. CP has received honoraria from UCB, Eli Lilly, AbbVie, Sandoz, Pfizer, and Novartis; support for attending meetings from Chugai, AbbVie, Sandoz, and Amgen; and a research grant from Pfizer. J-HS has received consulting fees or honoraria from Eli Lilly, Pfizer, AbbVie, and Galapagos. ED has received honoraria from AbbVie, Amgen, Celgene, BMS, UCB, Eli Lilly, Janssen, MSD, and Novartis. All other authors declare no competing interests. We thank the French Society of Rheumatology, the sponsor of this study. We also thank the MAJIK scientific committee and the group of MAJIK Registry investigators and Pascale Thevenot for her great help. Funding of the MAJIK Registry is supported by the French Rheumatology Society. The French Rheumatology Society received unrestricted institutional grants for conducting the MAJIK Registry from AbbVie, Galapagos, Eli Lilly, and Pfizer. The French Rheumatology Society, AbbVie, Galapagos, Eli Lilly, and Pfizer were not involved in the study design, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation, or writing of the manuscript. RS and MC contributed to study conception, study design, data collection, statistical analysis, interpretation of data and writing - original draft. RS and MC had full access to all data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. J-HS, CR, ED, AB, VG, CL, SB, M-ET, AR, J-EG, RF, FC, AC, CP, XM, and JA contributed to interpretation of data and writing - critical review for intellectual concept and editing.

Introduction: Few data are available concerning the effect of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination on the persistent symptoms associated with COVID-19, also called long-COVID or post-acute sequelae of COVID-19 (PASC)., Patients and Methods: We conducted a nationwide online study among adult patients with PASC as defined by symptoms persisting over 4 weeks following a confirmed or probable COVID-19, without any identified alternative diagnosis. Information concerning PASC symptoms, vaccine type and scheme and its effect on PASC symptoms were studied., Results: 620 questionnaires were completed and 567 satisfied the inclusion criteria and were analyzed. The respondents' median age was 44 (IQR 25-75: 37-50) and 83.4% were women. The initial infection was proven in 365 patients (64%) and 5.1% had been hospitalized to receive oxygen. A total of 396 patients had received at least one injection of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine at the time of the survey, after a median of 357 (198-431) days following the initially-reported SARS-CoV-2 infection. Among the 380 patients who reported persistent symptoms at the time of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, 201 (52.8%) reported a global effect on symptoms following the injection, corresponding to an improvement in 21.8% and a worsening in 31%. There were no differences based on the type of vaccine used. After a complete vaccination scheme, 93.3% (28/30) of initially seronegative patients reported a positive anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG. A total of 170 PASC patients had not been vaccinated. The most common reasons for postponing the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine were fear of worsening PASC symptoms (55.9%) and the belief that vaccination was contraindicated because of PASC (15.6%)., Conclusion: Our study suggests that SARS-CoV-2 vaccination is well tolerated in the majority of PASC patients and has good immunogenicity. Disseminating these reassuring data might prove crucial to increasing vaccine coverage in patients with PASC.

B and T lymphocyte attenuator (BTLA) is a co-inhibitory receptor that is expressed by lymphoid cells and regulates the immune response. Consistent with an inhibitory role for BTLA, the disease is exacerbated in BTLA-deficient lupus mice. We recently demonstrated that the BTLA pathway is altered in CD4 + T cells from lupus patients. In the present work, we aimed at delineating the expression pattern of BTLA on CD4 + T cell subsets suspected to play a key role in lupus pathogenesis, such as circulating follicular helper T cells (cT FH ) and regulatory T cells (Tregs). We did not detect significant ex vivo variations of BTLA expression on total CD4 + T cells (naive and memory), cT FH or T FH subsets between lupus patients and healthy controls. However, we interestingly observed that BTLA expression is significantly increased on activated Tregs, but not resting Tregs, from lupus patients, especially those displaying an active disease. Moreover, it correlates with the diminution of the Tregs frequency observed in these patients. We also showed that both BTLA mRNA and protein expression remain low after TCR stimulation of activated Tregs sorted from healthy donors and evidenced a similar dynamic of BTLA and HVEM expression profile by human Tregs and effector CD4 + T cells upon T cell activation than the one previously described in mice. Finally, we observed that the HVEM/BTLA ratio is significantly lower in Tregs from lupus patients compared to healthy controls, whereas ex vivo effector CD4 + T cells express higher BTLA levels. Our data suggest that an altered expression of BTLA and HVEM could be involved in an impaired regulation of autoreactive T cells in lupus. These results provide a better understanding of the BTLA involvement in lupus pathogenesis and confirm that BTLA should be considered as an interesting target for the development of new therapeutic strategies., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2021 Aubergeon, Sawaf, Felten, Gottenberg, Dumortier and Monneaux.)

Introduction: Given the COVID-19 pandemic, it is crucial to understand the underlying behavioural determinants of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine hesitancy in patients with autoimmune or inflammatory rheumatic diseases (AIIRDs). We aimed to analyse patterns of beliefs and intention regarding SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in AIIRD patients, as a mean of identifying pragmatic actions that could be taken to increase vaccine coverage in this population., Methods: Data relating to 1258 AIIRD patients were analysed using univariate and multivariate logistic regression models, to identify variables associated independently with willingness to get vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2. Subsets of patients showing similar beliefs and intention about SARS-CoV-2 vaccination were characterized using cluster analysis., Results: Hierarchical cluster analysis identified three distinct clusters of AIIRD patients. Three predominant patient attitudes to SARS-COV-2 vaccination were identified: voluntary, hesitant and suspicious. While vaccine willingness differed significantly across the three clusters (P < 0.0001), there was no significant difference regarding fear of getting COVID-19 (P = 0.11), the presence of comorbidities (P = 0.23), the use of glucocorticoids (P = 0.21), or immunocompromised status (P = 0.63). However, patients from cluster #2 (hesitant) and #3 (suspicious) were significantly more concerned about vaccination, the use of a new vaccine technology, lack of long-term data in relation to COVID-19 vaccination, and potential financial links with pharmaceutical companies (P < 0.0001 in all) than patients from cluster #1 (voluntary)., Discussion: Importantly, the differences between clusters in terms of patient beliefs and intention was not related to the fear of getting COVID-19 or to any state of frailty, but was related to specific concerns about vaccination. This study may serve as a basis for improved communication and thus help increase COVID-19 vaccine coverage among AIIRD patients., (© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Clinical practice needs the identification of the patient disease. The physician has to rationalize symptoms allowing the recognition of a realistic entity and its classification in a reference nosology. Unlike other practices, the biomedical model uses scientific census methodology, from a tabular perspective to the definition of diseases. Due to its simplification process, it therefore neglects transitional or complex cases. In Rheumatology, this reasoning is challenged by the lack of objectivity and specificity of the items supporting the clinician when he builds the diagnosis, but also by the physiopathological complexity. Sometimes, diseases may be confused or superposed, possibly leading to the description of novel entities. The authors describe herein the difficulties encountered in practical clinical medicine. They show, from a concrete and real personal situation, how it can possibly lead to the justification of a new entity., (© 2021 médecine/sciences – Inserm.)