Search

BACKGROUND: Different antihypertensive drug classes may alter risk for atrial fibrillation. Some studies suggest that drugs that interfere with the renin-angiotensin system may be favorable because of their effect on atrial remodeling. OBJECTIVE: To assess and compare the relative risk for incident atrial fibrillation among hypertensive patients who receive antihypertensive drugs from different classes. DESIGN: Nested case-control analysis. SETTING: The United Kingdom-based General Practice Research Database, a well-validated primary care database comprising approximately 5 million patient records. PATIENTS: 4661 patients with atrial fibrillation and 18,642 matched control participants from a population of 682,993 patients treated for hypertension. MEASUREMENTS: A comparison of the risk for atrial fibrillation among hypertensive users of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, angiotensin II-receptor blockers (ARBs), or beta-blockers with the reference group of users of calcium-channel blockers. Patients with clinical risk factors for atrial fibrillation were excluded. RESULTS: Current exclusive long-term therapy with ACE inhibitors (odds ratio [OR], 0.75 [95% CI, 0.65 to 0.87]), ARBs (OR, 0.71 [CI, 0.57 to 0.89]), or beta-blockers (OR, 0.78 [CI, 0.67 to 0.92]) was associated with a lower risk for atrial fibrillation than current exclusive therapy with calcium-channel blockers. LIMITATION: Blood pressure changes during treatment courses could not be evaluated, and risk for bias by indication cannot be fully excluded in an observational study. CONCLUSION: In hypertensive patients, long-term receipt of ACE inhibitors, ARBs, or beta-blockers reduces the risk for atrial fibrillation compared with receipt of calcium-channel blockers. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: None. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To test the short- and long-term performance of a simple algorithm to detect or rule out acute coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients referred with acute chest pain (CP). DESIGN: Prospective, multicenter study with 30-day and 1-year follow-ups. SETTING: Emergency and coronary care units of two university hospitals and four affiliated teaching hospitals in a suburban region of northern Switzerland. PATIENTS: One hundred sixty-one consecutive patients referred with acute CP with a high CAD risk profile underwent exercise testing (ET) within 24 h if results of two troponin tests and ECG remained normal within 6 h. The patients were discharged if ET results were negative or underwent angiography if the results were positive. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: The primary end point was survival free of death, myocardial infarction (MI), and acute coronary syndrome, as well as the correct diagnosis of CAD in need of revascularization. Failure of the algorithm included events not predicted and false-positive ET results. Symptom-limited ET was performed in 142 patients, and stress imaging was performed in 17 patients. Discharge within 24 h was possible in 76%. Angiography in 21 patients showed no CAD in 4 patients, whereas revascularization was necessary in 17 patients. During follow-up, three patients had an MI (one fatal) and two patients had unstable angina, for an event rate of 3.1%/yr. Overall sensitivity of the algorithm to detect CAD was 71%, whereby six of seven false-positive ET results were due to exercise-induced CP without ECG changes. More importantly, the negative predictive value was 96.4%, indicating that this simple algorithm failed to identify only 3.6% of patients at risk for future events. CONCLUSIONS: Discharge within 24 h after onset of acute CP in high-risk CAD patients is safe, irrespective of CAD history, if ECG findings remain unchanged and troponin test results are normal within 6 h, and if results of adequate ET are negative. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims: Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is frequently used to treat sustained arrhythmias. One major complication is pericardial effusion-tamponade. Therefore, many centres perform echocardiography after interventions, but data on necessity of such routine procedures are scarce. Methods and Results: We included 510 patients with RFA and compared echocardiographic results acquired before and <24 h after intervention. We defined pericardial effusion as 'small', if <10 mm in diastole, 'moderate' if >10 mm, 'large' if >20 mm, or tamponade (>20 mm with haemodynamic compromise). Age was 55 +/- 16 years, 40% were females. Thirty-five percentage underwent RFA for atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia (AVNRT), 28% for atrial flutter, 15% for atrial fibrillation (AF), 12% for Wolff-Parkinson-White (WPW) syndrome, and 10% for different other arrhythmias. In 16 patients (3.2%), small asymptomatic effusions were detected. The only moderate effusion was suspected due to procedure circumstances. Radiofrequency ablation for AF had a higher incidence compared to AVNRT and flutter (P = 0.001 and <0.0001, respectively) or to WPW syndrome (P = 0.06). Conclusion: Numbers of significant pericardial effusion as detected by routine echocardiography were low (3.6%) and clinically relevant effusions absent. We thus recommend performing echocardiography after RFA only, if effusion is suspected clinically or if RFA was performed for AF, due to the high incidence of effusions with this type of ablation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Cardiac resynchronization defibrillator (CRT-D) as primary prevention is known to reduce mortality. At the time of replacement, higher age and comorbidities may attenuate the benefit of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the progression of comorbidities after implantation and their association with mortality following CRT-D generator replacement. In addition, a risk score was developed to identify patients at high risk for mortality after replacement., Methods and Results: We identified patients implanted with a primary prevention CRT-D (n = 648) who subsequently underwent elective generator replacement (n = 218) from two prospective ICD registries. The cohort consisted of 218 patients (median age: 70 years, male gender: 73%, mean left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF]: 36 ± 11% at replacement). Median follow-up after the replacement was 4.2 years during which 64 patients (29%) died and 11 patients (5%) received appropriate ICD shocks. An increase in comorbidities was observed in 77 patients (35%). The 5-year mortality rate was 41% in patients with ≥2 comorbidities at the time of replacement. A risk score incorporating age, gender, LVEF, atrial fibrillation, anemia, chronic kidney disease, and history of appropriate ICD shocks at time of replacement accurately predicted 5-year mortality (C-statistic 0.829). Patients with a risk score of greater than 2.5 had excess mortality at 5-year postreplacement compared with patients with a risk score less than 1.5 (57% vs. 6%; p < .001)., Conclusion: A simple risk score accurately predicts 5-year mortality after replacement in CRT-D patients, as patients with a risk score of greater than 2.5 are at high risk of dying despite ICD protection., (© 2021 The Authors. Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Background: The Heart Failure (HF) Meta-score may be useful in predicting prognosis in patients with primary prevention cardiac resynchronization defibrillators (CRT-D) considering the competing risk of appropriate defibrillator shock versus mortality., Methods: Data from 648 consecutive patients from two centers were used for the evaluation of the performance of the HF Meta-score. The primary endpoint was mortality and the secondary endpoint was time to first appropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) shock or death without prior appropriate ICD shock. Fine-Gray model was used for competing risk regression analysis., Results: In the entire cohort, 237 patients died over a median follow-up of 5.2 years. Five-year cumulative incidence of mortality ranged from 12% to 53%, for quintiles 1 through 5 of the HF Meta-score, respectively (log-rank P < 0.001). Compared with the lowest quintile, mortality risk was higher in the highest quintile (HR 6.9; 95%CI 3.7-12.8). The HF Meta-score had excellent calibration, accuracy, and good discrimination in predicting mortality (C-statistic 0.76 at 1-year and 0.71 at 5-year). The risk of death without appropriate ICD shock was higher in risk quintile 5 compared to quintile 1 (sub HR 5.8; 95%CI 3.1-11.0, P < 0.001)., Conclusions: Our study demonstrated a good ability of the HF Meta-score to predict survival in HF patients treated with CRT-D as primary prevention. The HF Meta-score proved to be useful in identifying a subgroup with a significantly poor prognosis despite a CRT-D., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest Dr. Theuns has received research grants from Biotronik and Boston Scientific and consulting fees from Boston Scientific. Dr. Schaer is listed on the speaker's bureau for Medtronic. Dr. Sticherling has received speaker fees from Boston Scientific, Biotronik and Microport CRM and consulting fees from Biotronik, Boston Scientific, and Medtronic. Dr. Yap is listed as an ad hoc consultant for Medtronic and Boston Scientific and has been a speaker for Medtronic. The other authors have nothing to disclose., (Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Myocardial scarring from infarction or nonischemic fibrosis forms an arrhythmogenic substrate. The Selvester QRS score has been developed to estimate myocardial scar from the 12-lead electrocardiogram., Objective: We aimed to assess the value of an automated version of the Selvester QRS score for the prediction of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy and death in patients undergoing primary prevention ICD implantation., Methods: Unselected patients undergoing primary prevention ICD implantation were included in this retrospective, observational, multicenter study. The QRS score was calculated automatically from a digital standard preimplantation 12-lead electrocardiogram and was correlated to the occurrence of death and appropriate and inappropriate shocks during follow-up. Analyses were performed in groups defined by QRS duration < 130 ms vs ≥ 130 ms., Results: Overall, 1047 patients (872 [83%] men; median age 64 years IQR [55-71]) with ischemic (648, 62%) or nonischemic (399, 38%) cardiomyopathy were included. The median QRS duration was 123 ms (interquartile range [IQR] 111-157 ms), and the median QRS score was 5 (IQR 2-8). The QRS duration was <130 ms in 59% and ≥130 ms in 41%. During a median follow-up of 45 months (IQR 24-72 months), a QRS score of ≥5 was independently associated with a significantly higher risk of mortality (hazard ratio [HR] 1.67; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.05-2.66; P = .031) and appropriate (HR 1.83; 95% CI 1.07-3.14; P = .028) and inappropriate (HR 2.32; 95% CI 1.04-5.17; P = .039) shocks in patients with QRS duration ≥ 130 ms. No association of the QRS score and outcome was observed in patients with QRS duration < 130 ms (P > .05)., Conclusion: The automatically calculated Selvester QRS score, an indicator of myocardial scar burden, predicts mortality and appropriate and inappropriate shocks in patients undergoing primary prevention ICD implantation with a prolonged QRS duration., (Copyright © 2020 Heart Rhythm Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The beneficial effects of a cardiac resynchronization defibrillator (CRT-D) in patients with heart failure, low left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and wide QRS have clearly been established. Nevertheless, mortality remains high in some patients. The aim of this study was to develop and validate a risk score to identify patients at high risk for early mortality who are implanted with a CRT-D., Methods and Results: For predictive modelling, 1282 consecutive patients from 5 centers (74% male; median age 66 years; median LVEF 25%; New York Heart Association class III-IV 60%; median QRS-width 160 ms) were randomly divided into a derivation and validation cohort. The primary endpoint is mortality at 3 years. Model development was performed using multivariate logistic regression by checking log likelihood, Akaike information criterion, and Bayesian information criterion. Model performance was validated using C statistics and calibration plots. The risk score included 7 independent mortality predictors, including myocardial infarction, LVEF, QRS duration, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic kidney disease, hyponatremia, and anemia. Calibration-in-the-large was suboptimal, reflected by a lower observed mortality (44%) than predicted (50%). The validated C statistic was 0.71 indicating modest performance., Conclusion: A risk score based on routine, readily available clinical variables can assist in identifying patients at high risk for early mortality within 3 years after CRT-D implantation., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Many patients receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) suffer from permanent atrial fibrillation (AF). Knowledge of the atrial rhythm is important to direct pharmacological or interventional treatment as well as maintaining AV-synchronous biventricular pacing if sinus rhythm can be restored. A single pass single-coil defibrillator lead with a floating atrial bipole has been shown to obtain reliable information about the atrial rhythm but has never been employed in a CRT-system. The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility of implanting a single coil right ventricular ICD lead with a floating atrial bipole and the signal quality of atrial electrograms (AEGM) in CRT-defibrillator recipients with permanent AF., Methods and Results: Seventeen patients (16 males, mean age 73 ± 6 years, mean EF 25 ± 5%) with permanent AF and an indication for CRT-defibrillator placement were implanted with a designated CRT-D system comprising a single pass defibrillator lead with a atrial floating bipole. They were followed-up for 103 ± 22 days using remote monitoring for AEGM transmission. All patients had at last one AEGM suitable for atrial rhythm diagnosis and of 100 AEGM 99% were suitable for visual atrial rhythm assessment. Four patients were discharged in sinus rhythm and one reverted to AF during follow-up., Conclusion: Atrial electrograms retrieved from a single-pass defibrillator lead with a floating atrial bipole can be reliably used for atrial rhythm diagnosis in CRT recipients with permanent AF. Hence, a single pass ventricular defibrillator lead with a floating bipole can be considered in this population., (Copyright © 2018 Indian Heart Rhythm Society. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Aims: Therapy with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) is established for the prevention of sudden cardiac death (SCD) in high risk patients. We aimed to determine the effectiveness of primary prevention ICD therapy by analysing registry data from 14 centres in 11 European countries compiled between 2002 and 2014, with emphasis on outcomes in women who have been underrepresented in all trials., Methods and Results: Retrospective data of 14 local registries of primary prevention ICD implantations between 2002 and 2014 were compiled in a central database. Predefined primary outcome measures were overall mortality and first appropriate and first inappropriate shocks. A multivariable model enforcing a common hazard ratio for sex category across the centres, but allowing for centre-specific baseline hazards and centre specific effects of other covariates, was adjusted for age, the presence of ischaemic cardiomyopathy or a CRT-D, and left ventricular ejection fraction ≤25%. Of the 5033 patients, 957 (19%) were women. During a median follow-up of 33 months (IQR 16-55 months) 129 women (13%) and 807 men (20%) died (HR 0.65; 95% CI: [0.53, 0.79], P-value < 0.0001). An appropriate ICD shock occurred in 66 women (8%) and 514 men (14%; HR 0.61; 95% CI: 0.47-0.79; P = 0.0002)., Conclusion: Our retrospective analysis of 14 local registries in 11 European countries demonstrates that fewer women than men undergo ICD implantation for primary prevention. After multivariate adjustment, women have a significantly lower mortality and receive fewer appropriate ICD shocks.

Several multivariate risk score models were developed to predict prognosis of patients with heart failure (HF). We compared 3 models with regard to prediction of mortality in patients with HF who received an implantable defibrillator (ICD) or a cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator (CRT-D), as primary prevention of sudden death. The study cohort consisted of 823 patients (ICD = 410; CRT-D = 413). The evaluated models were the Seattle Heart Failure Model (SHFM), the Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial II (MADIT II) score, and an adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index (aCCI). End point was the performance of the models to predict all-cause mortality at 5 years. This was determined by c-statistics, for both subgroups. Multivariate analysis was used to analyze the relations between the risk score models, their individual components and mortality, and its applicability to the entire population. Cumulative mortality was 4.9% at 1 year and 21.1% at 5 years. Discriminatory power for 5-year mortality was highest for the SHFM (0.73; p <0.001) compared with the MADIT II score and the aCCI for the entire population. SHFM performed better than the MADIT II score for CRT-D group. In the entire population, the SHFM and the aCCI were significant predictors of mortality in multivariate analysis (hazard ratio 1.90, 95% confidence interval 1.49 to 2.43 vs hazard ratio 1.11, 95% confidence interval 1.01 to 1.22). The strongest individual components were age, HF, impaired renal function, and cancer, whereas CRT-D use was no predictor. In conclusion, the SHFM has the best discriminatory power for 5-year mortality in patients with HF with an ICD or CRT-D. The aCCI and MADIT II scores are less powerful but viable alternatives., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Aims: Longevity of implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) is crucial for patients and healthcare systems as replacements impact on infection rates and cost-effectiveness. Aim was to determine longevity using very large databases of two teaching hospitals with a high number of replacements and a rather homogeneous distribution among manufacturers., Methods and Results: The study population consists of all patients in whom an ICD was inserted in. All ICD manufacturers operating in Switzerland and the Netherlands and all implanted ICDs were included. Implantable cardioverter defibrillator replacements due to normal battery depletion were considered events, and other replacements were censored. Longevity was assessed depending on manufacturers, pacing mode, implant before/after 2006, and all parameters combined. We analysed data from 3436 patients in whom 4881 ICDs [44.2% VVI-ICDs, 27.4% DDD-ICDs, 26.3% cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT)-ICDs, 2.0% subcutaneous ICDs] were implanted. The four major manufacturers had implant shares between 18.4 and 31.5%. Replacement due to battery depletion (27.4%) was performed for 1339 ICDs. Patient survival at 5 years was 80.1%. Longevity at 5 years improved in contemporary compared with elderly ICDs [63.9-80.6% across all ICDs, of 73.7-92.1% in VVIs, 58.2-76.1% in DDDs, and of 47.1-66.3% in CRT defibrillators, all P value < 0.05]. Remarkable differences were seen among manufacturers, and those with better performance in elderly ICDs were not those with better performance in contemporary ones., Conclusion: Implantable cardioverter defibrillator longevity increased in contemporary models independent of manufacturer and pacing mode. Still, significant differences exist among manufacturers. These results might impact on device selection., (© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.)

Background: Many patients receiving an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) also have atrial fibrillation (AF). Shock testing during ICD implantation carries a potential risk of cardioversion to sinus rhythm (SR) and thrombembolic events. We aimed to analyze the recurrence of AF after cardioversion to SR during ICD shock testing., Methods: A total of 555 consecutive patients referred to a tertiary hospital in Switzerland for ICD implantation or generator exchange between 02/2002 and 03/2010 were screened for AF. Fifty-seven patients who were in AF at the time of ICD shock testing were included., Results: Forty-four patients (77%) were successfully cardioverted from AF to SR. Type of AF (persistent, not permanent 64 vs 31% of cardioverted patients) was the only predictor. Thirty-nine patients (89%) experienced a recurrence of AF/atrial flutter after a median of 54 days (interquartile range 35-251 days). The only predictor for recurrence of AF was previous AF declared as permanent. No ischemic stroke occurred during hospitalization for the procedure., Conclusions: For patients in AF undergoing shock testing at the time of ICD implant, there is a high chance of cardioversion from AF to SR, but there is also a high risk of early recurrence. Decisions regarding long-term anticoagulation should not be based on the heart rhythm immediately following shock testing., (© 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Objective: It is not clear whether patients who received an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) for primary prevention should undergo device replacement if they never experienced an appropriate ICD therapy during the first generator longevity. This study evaluated the incidence and predictors of appropriate ICD therapy after device replacement in this specific population., Methods: From two large prospective ICD registries, we identified all primary prevention patients who had a first ICD replacement without previous appropriate ICD therapy. Cox regression analysis was used to identify predictors of appropriate ICD therapy., Results: Of 403 primary prevention patients needing first ICD replacement, 275 patients (68%) had not received previous appropriate ICD therapy. Patients without previous appropriate ICD therapy before first ICD replacement (mean age at replacement 62 ± 12 years, 75% male) had a mean follow-up of 86 ± 24 months after the initial implantation and 30 ± 24 months after device replacement. Following replacement, 3-year cumulative incidence of appropriate ICD therapy was 13.7% (95% CI 8.6 to 18.8%). No predictive factors associated with appropriate ICD therapy after replacement could be identified in spite of including seven clinically relevant factors., Conclusions: A considerable number of primary prevention patients without previous appropriate ICD therapy before first ICD replacement received appropriate ICD therapy after replacement. As there were no predictors of appropriate ICD therapy after replacement, replacing an ICD is still recommended in all primary prevention patients despite the lack of appropriate ICD therapy during first battery service life., (Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.)

Objective: The implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) is very effective in the prevention of sudden cardiac death, but its benefit is impaired by competing risks. A simple risk model to predict mortality was designed for patients with primary prevention and ischaemic cardiomyopathy. We aimed to apply this score to a general ICD population., Methods: This retrospective registry study included all patients in whom an ICD was implanted at a tertiary referral hospital. Risk factors were age >70 years, QRS width >120 ms, atrial fibrillation, New York Heart Association Functional Classification class >2 and glomerular filtration rate <60 mL/min/1.73 m(2). Kaplan-Meier curves were constructed according to the presence of 0, 1, 2 and >2 risk factors., Results: The cohort consists of 1032 patients, 881 (86%) were men, mean age was 61±14 years and mean follow-up 66±46 months. 256 patients (25%) died 58±41 months after implant. The setting was secondary prevention in 498 patients (48%). No risk factors was present in 32% of patients, 1 in 27%, 2 in 20% and >2 in 21%, respectively. There was a significant and comprehensible relation between risk score and mortality. Cumulative survival was 82% in patients with 0 risk factors, 63% in those with 1, 41% in those with 2 and 23% in those with >2 risk factors (p < 0.0001). ICD therapies were documented in 421 patients (41%) without correlation to risk factors., Conclusions: In a mixed population of primary and secondary preventive ICD carriers, application of a simple risk score predicts long-term mortality but not appropriate use of the ICD.

Question Under Study: Cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) with defibrillator back-up (CRT-D) is widely used in selected patients with moderate/severe heart failure. Renal failure is common in these patients. Data on the impact of CRT on renal function are controversial and limited by short follow-up. The aim of this study was to describe changes in glomerular filtration rate (GFR) from baseline compared with 1 and 2 years after CRT implantation., Methods: A total of 284 CRT-D patients with creatinine levels at baseline and after 1 year were identified in two prospective registries. In 149 patients, levels after 2 years were available. GFR in ml/min/1.73 m2 was estimated with the Modification Diet in Renal Disease equation and patients stratified into GFR stages 1 to 4., Results: The population was predominantly male (75%), mean (± standard deviation) age was 61 ± 7 years and ejection fraction 24% ± 8 %. GFR was 63 ± 24 ml/min/1.73 m2 at implantation and 60 ± 24 ml/min/1.73 m2 after 1 year (p = 0.26). At the 2-year follow-up, GFR had decreased from 60 ± 21 to 56 ± 21 ml/min/1.73 m2 (p = 0.04). Mean GFR decreased in stages 1 and 2, remained stable in stage 3 and improved in stage 4 patients. After 2 years, GFR had decreased ≥10 ml/min/1.73 m2 in 42%, but improved in only 15% (p = 0.04)., Conclusions: Overall, mean GFR in CRT-D patients decreases at 1 and 2 years after implantation, depending in part on the initial degree of renal function. However, the chance of further substantial deterioration (≥10 ml/min/1.73 m2) is considerable.

Introduction: Defibrillation threshold (DFT) testing has been performed to prove functionality of the implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD). Over the past years it has become increasingly controversial because of possible morbidity and mortality. The goal of this study was to determine unsuccessful shock testing and report strategies used to overcome these problems., Methods and Results: A total of 314 patients with a de novo implantation of an ICD and 127 patients receiving a generator exchange were identified retrospectively. All patients underwent defibrillation threshold testing after induction of VF using a low-energy T-wave shock during the intervention, 2 shock tests after de novo implantations, 1 after generator change. A safety margin of 10 J or more was requested. Seven (2.3%) patients in the de novo group and 2 patients (1.4%) in the generator exchange group could not be defibrillated using the standard approach. All of those patients had either chronic amiodarone therapy, secondary prevention or a cardiac resynchronization therapy device (CRT). In univariate analysis, amiodarone therapy, dilated cardiomyopathy, and lower ejection fraction were predictors of failure., Conclusion: Our study's results as well as a review of the current literature favor shock testing, especially in patients with specific risk factors as mentioned above., (© 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Aim: "Optimal" medical therapy is mandatory before implantation of a cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) device, but "optimal" is not further specified. We determined the number of patients on a specific drug, the percentages of recommended target doses of the drugs the patients were on and their evolution over time., Methods: Drug therapy (ACE-inhibitors (ACE-I), AT-receptor antagonists (ARBs), betablockers) of 140 patients with a follow-up of at least one year was studied. Response to CRT was defined as reduction in NYHA class ≥1., Results: Age was 66±9 years, follow-up 43±25 months during which 28 patients (20%) had died. At baseline, 81 % of patients were on a betablocker compared to 95% after 3 years (P-value 0.02). Percentages of target doses were 55±34% and increased to 68±41% after 3 years (P-value <0.02). Percentages were increased in responders (58±40% to 72±32%, P-value 0.01 after 3 years), but not in non-responders (57±31% to 56±38%). At baseline, 97% of patients were on ACE-Is/ARBs and 100% after 3 years. Mean percentages of target doses were 78±43% at implant and between 73±40% and 79±49% during follow-up. Percentages were stable both in responders (83% at implant, 78% after 3 years) and in non-responders (80%/87%, both P-value n.s.)., Conclusion: Even though quantity and quality of drug therapy at baseline was on an acceptable (betablockers) or high (ACE-Is/ARBs) level, physicians must be very observant on therapy during long-term follow-up, especially on target doses of betablockers in non-responders.

Objective: The aim of this study was to quantify daytime symptoms in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients with and without sleep related breathing disorders (SRBD)., Background: SRBD are common in patients with AF but little is known about daytime symptoms among those with SRBD., Methods: Patients with AF admitted to clinics of two tertiary referral hospitals for a variety of different cardiovascular diseases were screened with a trans-nasal airflow measurement device allowing measurement of the apnea-hypopnea-index. Data on cardiac risk factors, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and cardiac medication were collected. Presence of SRBD was defined as an AHI ≥ 15/h. The Epworth sleepiness scale (ESS) was used to quantify daytime symptoms., Results: Of 102 screened patients 8 were excluded due to device malfunction (n=1), dislocation of nasal cannula (n=6), or hyperthyroidism (n=1). Among the remaining 94 patients, 40 (43%) were diagnosed with SRBD. Patients with and without SRBD had similar age, body mass index, LVEF and cardiac medication. The prevalence of coronary artery disease was higher in patients with SRBD than in those without (50 vs. 17%; p=0.0007). ESS score was low and similar in both groups (no SRBD: median 4, interquartile range (IQR) 2-4 vs. SRBD: 5, IQR 3-8; p=0.14). Only 6/40 (5%) of the patients underwent overnight polysomnography and 2 (5%) started CPAP ventilation during follow-up., Conclusions: Even though SRBD are common in patients with AF, the prevalence of daytime symptoms is rare. Consequently, most patients will not initiate CPAP ventilation after positive SRBD screening., (Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Besides optimal drug therapy, cardiac resynchronisation therapy offers a further therapy option for selected patients. Additional ICD implantation should be evaluated as well to prevent sudden cardiac death.

Aims: Comorbidity, such as myocardial infarction, diabetes, and renal failure, plays a pivotal role in the prognosis of a patient with arrhythmias. However, data on the prognostic impact of comorbiditiy in heart failure patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy and defibrillation (CRT-D) are scarce. The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of comorbidity on survival in CRT-D patients., Methods and Results: The study population consisted of 463 heart failure patients who received a CRT-D between 1999 and 2008 in Rotterdam and Basel. The Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) is often used as an adjusting variable in prognostic models. The Cox proportional hazards analysis was performed to determine the independent effect of comorbidity on survival. During a median follow-up of 30.5 months, 85 patients died. Mortality rates at 1 and 7 years were 6.3 and 32.3%. Cumulative incidence of implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) therapy at 7 years was 50%, and death without ICD therapy was observed in 9% of patients. At least three comorbid conditions were observed in 81% of patients. Patients who died had a higher CCI score compared with those who survived (3.9 ± 1.5 vs. 2.9 ± 1.5; P < 0.001). An age-adjusted CCI score ≥ 5 was a predictor of mortality (hazard ratio 3.69, 95% CI 2.06-6.60; P < 0.001) independent from indication for ICD therapy, and from ICD interventions during the clinical course., Conclusion: Comorbidity is often present in heart failure patients, and a high comorbidity burden was a significant predictor of mortality in CRT-D recipients. Comorbidity cannot predict appropriate ICD therapy. Death without prior ICD therapy occurs in a minor proportion of patients.

Aims: The aim of this study was to determine the relationship between improved ejection fraction (EF) and occurrence of arrhythmias in patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy devices with defibrillator function (CRT-D). The hypothesis was that patients who experienced a marked improvement in EF also had fewer appropriate defibrillator interventions., Methods and Results: We analysed data of 270 patients from 2 prospective registries with follow-up of ≥12 months and echocardiography performed ≥8 months after CRT-D implantation. The discriminator was whether left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) improved to >35% [cut-off for primary prevention implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implantation]. Mean age was 61±11 years, LVEF 22±5%, and follow-up 40±22 months. Ischaemic cardiomyopathy was present in 48%, and secondary prevention indication was present in 25%. Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator interventions were delivered to 35% of patients. Echocardiography (20±15 months after implantation) showed an improvement in LVEF from 22% (SD 5.4%) to 30% (SD 9.8%). Improvement to >35% was seen in 21% of patients. Those who improved to >35% had fewer ICD interventions than those who did not (23 vs.38%; P-value 0.03). Analysing only patients with a primary prevention indication and stratifying again in patients with and without improvement of LVEF to >35%, the latter had highly significant more ICD-therapies (6 vs. 31%; P-value 0.0008)., Conclusion: Patients with CRT-D for primary prevention, whose LVEF improved to >35% during mid-term follow-up, are at low risk of first ICD therapies beyond year 1. If similar findings are reported in other patient cohorts, this might impact on decision-making at the time of battery depletion.

Background: Antithrombotic treatment (AT) is recommended for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), except for those with lone AF or contraindications., Aim: The aim of our study was to determine contemporary AT in AF patients and to ascertain reasons for withholding oral anticoagulant treatment (OAC) in eligible patients., Design: Prospective observational study., Methods: Consecutive patients were screened for non-valvular paroxysmal or permanent AF. Subjects with newly diagnosed AF or with an indication for AT other than AF were excluded. According to the CHADS2 risk score patients were divided into a low- (CHADS2 = 0), an intermediate (CHADS2 = 1) and a high risk group (CHADS2 > or =2). AT on hospital admission was correlated to current guidelines., Results: 389 patients were screened and 84 (22%) excluded (71 new onset AF, 13 other indications for OAC). Of the remaining 305 patients (80 +/- 10 yrs) 43% had paroxysmal and 57% permanent AF. Eleven patients (4%) were classified as low risk, 61 (20%) as intermediate risk, and 233 (76%) as high risk. In patients at low risk OAC was prescribed in 63%, whereas one third of those at high risk were not on anticoagulant therapy. The main reasons why OAC was withheld in high risk patients were presumed risk of fall in 21 patients (27%), while the grounds were a history of major bleeding and presumed drug non-compliance in 13 (17%), respectively., Conclusion: In this survey of AF-patients, AT was not tailored to the thromboembolic risk.

Background: Because the best possible device longevity is crucial (i.e., risk of infection with premature device exchange, current cost-effectiveness calculations depending on reasonable longevity, patient comfort), industry-independent real-life data are fundamental. However, only limited independent data on the longevity of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) are available., Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine ICD device longevity and influencing factors., Methods: From a prospective database, we studied overall device longevity and identified those devices with replacement for battery depletion or prolonged charge time. For every device, we determined factors that included averaged shocks, pacing percentage, pacing mode, device size, and time of implant. Survival probabilities at different time intervals were calculated, and Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses were used. Observed longevity was compared to industry-projected longevity obtained from product performance reports., Results: A total of 644 ICDs (Medtronic 317, Guidant 189, St. Jude 118, Intermedics 20) were implanted in 499 patients. During follow-up, 163 (25.3%) ICDs were replaced. Manufacturer, time of implant, pacing mode, pacing percentage, and capacitor reformation interval influenced longevity, whereas device size and number of shocks did not. Median longevity was 7.6 years for Medtronic devices, 5.0 years for Guidant devices, and 3.8 years for St. Jude devices. After 5 years, only 70% of ICDs were still in service compared to the 80% projected by industry., Conclusion: Marked differences in device longevity among manufacturers cannot be explained by pacing mode, number of shocks, or pacing percentage only. Overall, device performance requires further improvement for the sake of patient health and cost.

Background: Even though current guidelines suggest the use of VDD pacemakers in patients with AV block and normal sinus node function, a DDD system is often preferred for fear of either long-term atrial undersensing or late sinus node dysfunction and the resultant need for system upgrades., Methods: We evaluated the long-term follow-up of all VDD pacemakers implanted in our center between 1992 and 2001 regarding atrial sensing, maintenance of AV synchrony, incidence of atrial fibrillation (AF), or the need for system upgrade, respectively., Results: 320 consecutive patients (56% men, age 75+/-13 years) received a VDD pacemaker for the following indications: third-degree AV block 54%, second-degree AV block 34%, fascicular block with first-degree AV block and syncope 6%, others 6%. 138 patients (43%) died during follow-up, 3.8+/-2.3 years after implantation. Follow-up duration was 6.1+/-2.5 years in the remaining patients. At the last follow-up, 268 pacemakers (84%) were programmed to the VDD mode, 47 pacemakers (15%) were permanently programmed to the VVI mode (AF 36, undersensing 7, others 4, respectively). In five patients a DDD upgrade was necessary for sinus node dysfunction (3) or lead defect (2). Lead revision was performed in 19 patients (6%) (ventricular lead dislocation 7, atrial undersensing 6, lead fracture 3, others 2, respectively)., Conclusion: VDD pacemakers have an excellent long-term performance in patients with AV block. They have a very low incidence of lead revisions for atrial undersensing (2%) and DDD upgrades for secondary sinus node dysfunction (1%).

Questions Under Study: Compared to thrombolysis, acute percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) allows both immediate revascularisation and identification of additional relevant stenosis, so that subsequently no further risk stratification should be necessary and hospital stay shortened. Our aim was to evaluate the impact of PCI on outcome and length of hospital stay after MI compared to that in the thrombolysis era., Methods: Retrospective evaluation in a Swiss tertiary referral centre of 105 patients with AMI undergoing emergency PCI, who initially were neither in cardiogenic shock nor transferred to another primary or secondary care hospital for further treatment. Main outcome measurement was length of overall hospital stay. Additional measurements included mortality, left ventricular function, and time point of the last major adverse cardiac event (MACE)., Results: Overall hospitalisation time was 11.1 +/- 6.8 days, thus being only 1.5 days shorter than in the thrombolysis era. Age above 70 or type of infarction did not influence hospitalisation time, but age below 60 years did. In-hospital mortality was 1%. Left-ventricular function was considerably impaired (<35%) in 6 patients. After the sixth hospital day, 97% of MACE had occurred. According to a validated risk score, 92% of patients belonged to a low risk group with a 30-day mortality risk of 1.4% or less and could have been discharged not later than day 6., Conclusions: Our data suggest that an early discharge strategy, although safe in low risk patients is not followed at the present time. This approach could further reduce costs without jeopardizing outcome.

Questions Under Study: Many patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), risk factors for stroke and no obvious contraindications do not receive oral anticoagulation. Estimations of the increased rate of stroke due to neglected anticoagulation, particularly in an elderly, non-selected population, are unknown., Methods: Consecutive patients with paroxysmal or permanent atrial fibrillation admitted to the medical or surgical department of our hospital for any reason were studied. Risk factors for stroke and contraindications for anticoagulation were recorded. Estimations of the increased rate of cerebrovascular events due to neglected anticoagulation were based on data of a large meta-analysis. Patients were further stratified into different age and risk groups., Results: 484 patients with a mean age of 75 (12) years were studied, 45% were female. 237 patients had no oral anticoagulation at hospital discharge, despite guideline recommendations. Contraindications for anticoagulation were found in 85 (36%) of these patients, resulting in 152 patients with neglected anticoagulation (31% of all patients with AF). We estimated that, if all those patients would have been treated according to guidelines, 7.4 strokes per year could be prevented in the study population. The estimated rate of preventable events was 4.9%/year (7.4/152)., Conclusions: With better adherence to guidelines for oral anticoagulation in patients with atrial fibrillation and risk factors for stroke, a significant number of strokes could be prevented.

Questions Under Study: CardioCard is a CDROM of credit card size containing medical information on cardiac patients. Patient data acquired during hospital stay are stored in PDF format and secured by a password known to patients only. In a consecutive series of patients, we assessed acceptance and utility of this new information medium., Methods and Results: A questionnaire was sent to all patients who had received CardioCard over a one-year period. The questionnaire was returned by 392 patients (73%). 44% of patients had the card with them all the time. The majority of patients (73%) considered the CardioCard useful (8% not useful, 19% no statement) and most (78%) would even agree to bear additional costs. Only 5% worried about data security. In contrast, 44% would be concerned of data transmission via internet. During an observation period of 6 (SD 3) months, data were accessed by 27% of patients and 12% of their physicians. The proportion of card users was lower among older patients: < or = 50 years (y), 39%; 51.60 y, 38%; 61.70 y, 26%; >70 y, 16% and particularly among older women: 61.70 y, 9%; >70 y, 5%. Technical problems during data access occurred in 34%, mostly due to incorrect handling., Conclusions: A majority of patients considered CardioCard as useful and safe. Lack of hardware equipment or insufficient computer knowledge, but not safety issues were the most important limitations. As patients expressed concerns regarding protection of privacy if data were accessible via internet, this would remain a strong limiting factor for online use.

Objectives: To determine events during follow-up of patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD) and the specific experience cardiologists need for trouble-shooting., Design: Prospective evaluation of all patient visits in an outpatient clinic., Setting: University hospital, single centre performing ICD controls in a region of 1.5 Mio inhabitants., Subjects: A total of 351 patients with 1118 consecutive visits during 14 months., Interventions: Classification of events according to predefined training levels., Main Outcome Measurements: Skill levels A: simple visit, e.g. for switching the device 'off'. B: normal visit, no further measures taken (no device reprogramming), even though the patient might have experienced ICD interventions. C: complex visit, electrophysiologist actively involved. Correlation of these levels with timing (routine, emergency on/off office hours) and reason of visits., Results: Seventy-six per cent of visits were scheduled routine visits, 5% performed within 24 h because of shocks, 19% performed for other reasons (shock tests; switching the device 'off/on'; reported dizziness, syncope, palpitations without ICD interventions). Required skill levels were A in 44 (4%), B in 796 (71%) and C in 278 (25%) visits. Emergency visits were more often classified as level C (60%) than regular visits (20%), Skill level C was more often encountered during emergency (30%) than during regular visits (6%) (both P = 0.001)., Conclusions: Our study suggests that for standard follow-up in patients without obvious problems, a cardiologist might be sufficient, whereas presentations due to/with clinical problems most likely will need the expertise of an electrophysiologist.

Background: The value of an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) for primary prevention in dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) is unclear, as randomized trials could not show a survival benefit compared to drug therapy. It has not been investigated if patients with a very poor left ventricular function (LVEF) could profit from an ICD., Methods: Consecutive patients with DCM who received an ICD between December 1996 and November 2003 were included in this analysis. Patients were divided in group A (secondary prevention) and group B (primary prevention). Both groups were stratified in subgroups with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) below and above 20%., Results: Fifty eight patients were included (male 50, age 56.4+/-12.7 years). Follow-up was 34+/-19 months. There was no difference regarding death (18% vs. 11%), but significant differences (p value <0.05) regarding any adverse events (55% vs. 22%), any ICD intervention (48% vs. 17%) and ICD interventions for life-threatening arrhythmias (27% vs. 0%) between group A and B. LVEF was not predictive for events in group A, whereas in group B only patients with a LVEF <20% had events (p value 0.02). Over time there was an increase of the LVEF of more than 15% determined by echocardiography in 36% of patients, significantly more often in group B., Conclusions: Indication for primary prevention with an ICD in DCM should be made with caution. Larger studies are needed to determine if patients with LVEF of <20% might benefit from an ICD.

Methadone is a synthetic opioid frequently used in drug maintenance programs for heroin addicts. It prolongs the QT-interval and is mainly metabolized by the isoenzyme CYP3A4 of the hepatic cytochrome-P450-system, which is used by numerous other QT-prolonging agents. Its most severe side effect is the development of life-threatening Torsade de pointes ventricular tachycardia in the setting of a prolonged QT-interval. Since drug addicts are prone to concomitant medical conditions requiring additional medication as well as to continued abuse of cocaine, they are at higher risk for developing this major complication of methadone therapy. Before subjecting patients on methadone to other drugs, the QT-interval should be determined and it should be ascertained whether the new agent has the property to prolong the QT-interval or is metabolised by the cytochrome-P450 system.

Study Objectives: To test the short- and long-term performance of a simple algorithm to detect or rule out acute coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients referred with acute chest pain (CP)., Design: Prospective, multicenter study with 30-day and 1-year follow-ups., Setting: Emergency and coronary care units of two university hospitals and four affiliated teaching hospitals in a suburban region of northern Switzerland., Patients: One hundred sixty-one consecutive patients referred with acute CP with a high CAD risk profile underwent exercise testing (ET) within 24 h if results of two troponin tests and ECG remained normal within 6 h. The patients were discharged if ET results were negative or underwent angiography if the results were positive., Measurements and Results: The primary end point was survival free of death, myocardial infarction (MI), and acute coronary syndrome, as well as the correct diagnosis of CAD in need of revascularization. Failure of the algorithm included events not predicted and false-positive ET results. Symptom-limited ET was performed in 142 patients, and stress imaging was performed in 17 patients. Discharge within 24 h was possible in 76%. Angiography in 21 patients showed no CAD in 4 patients, whereas revascularization was necessary in 17 patients. During follow-up, three patients had an MI (one fatal) and two patients had unstable angina, for an event rate of 3.1%/yr. Overall sensitivity of the algorithm to detect CAD was 71%, whereby six of seven false-positive ET results were due to exercise-induced CP without ECG changes. More importantly, the negative predictive value was 96.4%, indicating that this simple algorithm failed to identify only 3.6% of patients at risk for future events., Conclusions: Discharge within 24 h after onset of acute CP in high-risk CAD patients is safe, irrespective of CAD history, if ECG findings remain unchanged and troponin test results are normal within 6 h, and if results of adequate ET are negative.

Background and Purpose: Holter monitoring for the detection of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) is a routine procedure after cerebral ischemic events, although its value is unknown. The aim of this study was to evaluate the incidence of PAF and its impact on drug treatment modifications in this population., Methods: Retrospective evaluation of all Holter ECGs in patients with cerebral ischemic events was done. Chart analysis with regard to drug treatment modification and cardiovascular drug therapy was performed in all patients., Results: Between January 2000 and December 2002, 425 hospitalized patients (median age, 68 years) had routine Holter ECG after a cerebral ischemic event. PAF was diagnosed in 9 patients (2.1%): in 2, oral anticoagulation was contraindicated; 1 had severe carotid stenosis as an additional risk factor; 1 had PAF but was on oral anticoagulation for basilar thrombosis; 2 had had PAF before and were on aspirin; and 3 had a new diagnosis of PAF. The last 5 patients were put on oral anticoagulation. Thus, routine Holter ECG resulted in drug treatment modification in only 5 of 425 patients (1.2%)., Conclusions: PAF in cerebral ischemic event patients has a low incidence and, if diagnosed, rarely leads to drug modification. Therefore, routine Holter monitoring for PAF screening is not recommended in this patient population.

Generally speaking elevated troponin levels are consistent with the diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome and haemodynamically relevant coronary artery stenosis. However, they may also point to minor myocardial injury in other circumstances. Four patients with elevated troponin levels after supraventricular tachycardia without evidence of coronary artery disease and very low risk scores for acute coronary syndrome are described and discussed.