Search

Background: Adjuvant treatment of stage II–IV melanoma with PD‐1‐based immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) has improved relapse‐free survival (RFS) and has therefore become a standard‐of‐care treatment option. Approximately 25%–30% of patients still recur within 1 year. Predictive biomarkers reflecting real‐world data are desired. The predictive relevance of tumour tissue PD‐L1 expression in the adjuvant setting remains inconclusive. Objectives: This retrospective, observational study was conducted to evaluate the value of PD‐L1 expression scores in different tumour tissue locations in predicting response towards adjuvant immunotherapeutic treatment. Methods: Tumour tissue taken prior to anti‐PD‐1 adjuvant ICI in 243 stage II–IV melanoma patients was collected at University Skin Cancer Center Hamburg. PD‐L1 expression was evaluated on immune cells (ICS), tumour cells (TPS) and combined (CPS). Scores were determined by independent pathological physician quantification and correlated with therapy outcome at different cut‐off (CO) levels (relapse‐free survival, RFS) for different tumour tissue locations (primary tumour, metastases). Results: A total of 104 patients were eligible for analysis. Positivity of ICS, TPS and CPS showed no predictive RFS outcome association at different CO levels when analysed irrespective of tissue origin. In primary tumours, ICS at CO 1% showed a significantly improved RFS upon positivity (HR 0.22). In contrast, positivity to TPS (CO 1%) correlated significantly and independently with improved RFS when evaluated in metastatic tumour tissue specimens (HR 0.37). Conclusions: PD‐L1 tumour tissue expression may serve as a predictive biomarker for adjuvant ICI treatment response stratification in melanoma, but caution should be spent on the origin of tumour tissue analysed. The cell‐type relevant for the predictive value of PD‐L1 expression is tissue‐specific with immune cells being important in primary tumours while tumour cells are key in metastases. The present results should be validated in a multicentre cohort. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Oral finasteride and topical minoxidil are the current standard of care for male androgenetic alopecia and a combination of the two treatments can be considered for greater efficacy. Clinical trials of topical finasteride have also yielded promising results, but routine care data are lacking. Aims: To examine patient‐reported outcomes of men with androgenetic alopecia who received topical finasteride admixed with minoxidil compared to the current standard of care (oral finasteride). Methods: Retrospective, cross‐sectional study with data from a German direct‐to‐consumer teledermatology platform between December 2021 and January 2023. Patient‐reported outcomes were collected through voluntary follow‐up questionnaires provided after 6 weeks on topical finasteride/minoxidil or oral finasteride treatment. Results: A total of 1545 patients who received topical finasteride/minoxidil treatment were included; 238 (15.4%) participated in the follow‐up questionnaire. At week six, 62.2% (148/238) reported positive changes in their hair appearance, and 44.1% (105/238) reported an improvement of self‐esteem. Treatment‐related adverse events were reported in 11.8% (28/238). Full treatment adherence was observed in 74.4% (177/238). Comparing the topical treatment group to those receiving oral finasteride, lower treatment adherence was reported, along with higher rates of local adverse events; no difference was found in the incidence of sexual adverse events. Conclusion: Based on patient‐reported outcomes, topical finasteride/minoxidil seems to be effective and well tolerated, but not superior to oral finasteride. Lower treatment adherence for topical usage must be considered when considering treatment options. Additional real‐world data are needed to further evaluate the efficacy and safety of topical finasteride/minoxidil. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Summary: Mogamulizumab, a monoclonal antibody directed against CC chemokine receptor 4, is approved as a second‐line treatment of mycosis fungoides and Sézary syndrome. One of the most common side effects is mogamulizumab‐associated rash (MAR), which can present in a variety of clinical and histological types. Clinically, it can be difficult to differentiate between MAR and progression of the underlying disease, so histological examination is crucial for clinicopathological correlation. Current data analyses suggest that MAR is more common in patients with Sézary syndrome and is associated with a significantly better response to treatment, making the distinction from disease progression particularly important. The management of MAR depends on its severity, and therapy may need to be paused. This article presents three cases from our clinic and reviews the current literature on MAR. It emphasizes the importance of understanding MAR in the management of patients with cutaneous lymphomas. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The treatment of melanoma has been revolutionized by the use of immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI), but many patients do not benefit. Furthermore, immune‐related adverse events may occur during therapy. A predictive biomarker is needed to reliably identify patients benefitting. In lung, renal cell and bladder cancer early C‐reactive protein (CRP) kinetics were shown to be a predictive biomarker for ICI. Objective: Here, we investigate early CRP kinetics as predictive biomarker for ICI in melanoma patients. Methods: Two independent prospectively collected cohorts were analysed: Cohort 1 (n = 87) with advanced and Cohort 2 (n = 99) with completely resected melanoma. Patients were stratified by in the dynamics of CRP after ICI initiation: A doubling of baseline CRP within 30 days followed by at least a 30% drop within 3 months was classified as a CRP flare. If no doubling of CRP was reported, but a 30% drop within 3 months, patients were classified as CRP responders and all others as CRP non‐responders. Analysed factors included clinical characteristics like S100B and LDH. Median follow‐up was 1.5 and 1.7 years for Cohorts 1 and 2. Results: In Cohort 1 CRP flare (n = 12), CRP responders (n = 43) and CRP non‐responders (n = 32) with a progression‐free survival (PFS) of 0.7, 0.6 and 0.2 years (p = 0.017) and an overall survival (OS) of 2.2, 1.5 and 1.0 years (p = 0.014), respectively. Multivariable Cox analysis showed an independent risk reduction of progression for CRP responders by 62% compared to CRP non‐responders (p = 0.001). In Cohort 2 CRP flare (n = 13), CRP responders (n = 70) and CRP non‐responders (n = 16) the log‐rank analysis showed a significant difference between OS and recurrence‐free survival (RFS) curves (p = 0.046 and p = 0.049). Conclusion: Early CRP kinetics could indicate a response to ICI with improved OS and RFS/PFS. CRP flare and CRP response indicating significantly improved outcomes compared to CRP non‐responders. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Pulsed‐dye lasers (PDL) are one of the standard therapies for rosacea, but alternatives are needed. Aims: To compare the efficacy and safety of the variable‐sequenced, large‐spot 532 nm KTP laser to the 595 nm PDL in treating rosacea. Materials and Methods: A prospective, controlled, evaluator‐blinded study. Patients were treated with either a KTP or PDL with 1–3 sessions at intervals of 6–8 weeks. A follow‐up visit was scheduled on Week 6 post‐treatment. Clinical outcome was assessed by computer‐assisted analysis and by patients and two blinded dermatologists. Pain intensity during treatment and adverse events were documented. Results: Forty‐five patients (mean age 51 years) were allocated in a 2:1 ratio to either the KTP or PDL. Erythema in both treatment arms decreased significantly (p < 0.01). Clinical evaluation revealed high improvement. Mean pain intensity was significantly lower with the KTP (2.5/10) than with the PDL (4.1/10). Both lasers showed a good safety profile. Relevant purpura was only seen in the PDL group. Conclusions: Both the variable‐sequenced, large‐spot KTP and the PDL demonstrated comparable efficacy in treatment of rosacea. Regarding safety, the KTP exhibited fewer post‐treatment reactions. The KTP might serve as a potential alternative to PDL in the treatment of rosacea. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Pulsed dye lasers (PDL) are currently the first‐line treatment of port‐wine birthmarks (PWB). Due to high maintenance costs and instable technology, alternative methods are needed. Objectives: To compare clinical outcomes of a variable‐sequenced, long‐pulsed 532‐nm potassium titanyl‐phosphate (KTP) laser and PDL on treating PWB. Methods: A prospective, randomized, split‐side study. Patients were treated with a KTP laser and PDL with 1 to 5 sessions at intervals of 6–8 weeks. A follow‐up visit was scheduled 6 weeks post‐treatment. Efficacy was evaluated through colorimetric analysis, area reduction measurements and clinical evaluations by two blinded investigators based on photo documentation. Subjects provided rating of pain intensity during treatment, post‐treatment reactions and satisfaction. Safety was measured by adverse events. Maintenance issues of the laser systems were documented. Results: A total of 35 patients (mean age 42.1 years) were enrolled. 63% were female. Patients received 2.4 (SD 1.4; 1–5) treatment sessions. Colorimetric analysis indicated a comparable clearance effect in PWB of both KTP laser and PDL. Independent investigators rated clinical appearance to be significantly improved compared to baseline. No significant difference was observed between both laser systems. Regarding post‐treatment reactions, the KTP laser caused less swelling, purpura and crusts. 96% would recommend both treatment modalities. Patients were satisfied with both laser systems. During the study, PDL systems malfunctioned for 6.6 months in total. For the KTP laser, we did not observe any system failures. Conclusion: Our data indicate that the KTP laser of the latest generation with large‐spot sizes, subpulse technology and cryogen cooling has a comparable efficacy to the PDL in treating PWB. In addition, KTP laser is associated with greater tolerability, fewer technical failures and lower repair costs. Further prospective studies are required to determine the true effectiveness of the KTP laser in PWB treatment. This study was preregistered in Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT05771298). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This article discusses the use of neoadjuvant therapy with pembrolizumab, an immune checkpoint inhibitor, in the treatment of acrolentiginous melanoma. The article presents a case study of a 79-year-old female patient with a confirmed lymph node metastasis of melanoma. The patient underwent neoadjuvant treatment with pembrolizumab, which resulted in regression of the primary tumor and the metastasis, allowing for the avoidance of amputation. The article highlights the potential benefits of neoadjuvant immunotherapy in reducing the need for mutilating surgery and preserving function. However, it also notes that not all patients respond to neoadjuvant therapy, and further research is needed in this area. [Extracted from the article]

Simple Summary: In this prospective cohort study of metastatic melanoma patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors, we identified a serum chemokine CCL20 increase at baseline with a significantly impaired progression-free and overall survival and as an independent negative prognostic factor for PFS and OS in univariate as well as in multivariate analysis. CCL20 may represent a novel blood biomarker for the prediction of prognosis in advanced melanoma under immunotherapy with a special emphasis on progression. Background: Immune checkpoint inhibition has revolutionized melanoma therapy, but many patients show primary or secondary resistance. Biomarkers are, therefore, urgently required to predict response prior to the initiation of therapy and to monitor disease progression. Methods: In this prospective study, we analyzed the serum C-C motif chemokine ligand 20 (CCL20) concentration using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Blood was obtained at baseline before the initiation of immunotherapy with anti-PD-1 monotherapy or Nivolumab and Ipilimumab in advanced melanoma patients (stages III and IV) enrolled at the University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf. The CCL20 levels were correlated with clinico-pathological parameters and disease-related outcomes. Results: An increased C-C motif chemokine ligand 20 (CCL20) concentration (≥0.34 pg/mL) at baseline was associated with a significantly impaired progression-free survival (PFS) in the high-CCL20 group (3 months (95% CI: 2–6 months) vs. 11 months (95% CI: 6–26 months)) (p = 0.0033) and could be identified as an independent negative prognostic factor for PFS in univariate (Hazard Ratio (HR): 1.98, 95% CI 1.25–3.12, p = 0.004) and multivariate (HR: 1.99, 95% CI 1.21–3.29, p = 0.007) Cox regression analysis, which was associated with a higher risk than S100 (HR: 1.74). Moreover, high CCL20 levels were associated with impaired overall survival (median OS not reached for low-CCL20 group, p = 0.042) with an HR of 1.85 (95% CI 1.02–3.37, p = 0.043) in univariate analysis similar to the established prognostic marker S100 (HR: 1.99, 95% CI: 1.02–3.88, p = 0.043). Conclusions: CCL20 may represent a novel blood-based biomarker for the prediction of resistance to immunotherapy that can be used in combination with established strong clinical predictors (e.g., ECOG performance score) and laboratory markers (e.g., S100) in advanced melanoma patients. Future prospective randomized trials are needed to establish CCL20 as a liquid biopsy-based biomarker in advanced melanoma. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Summary: Background: One of the areas of care in dermatosurgery is the surgical treatment of diseases of the nail organ. Side effects and complications after nail surgery were investigated by telephone follow‐up (TFU), and its suitability for postoperative monitoring and consultation was assessed. Patients and Methods: All patients who underwent nail surgery at the Department of Dermatology at the Ludwigshafen City Hospital from October 2019 to December 2021 in outpatient setting were contacted by telephone on the second to third postoperative day and questioned in a standardized manner about postoperative complaints and counselled if necessary. Results: A total of 100 cases were followed up. The most common procedures performed were phenol matricectomy (41%), nail avulsion (16%), and nail matrix biopsies (9%). 50% and 21% of patients reported pain on the day of the procedure and the day after surgery, respectively. After nail avulsion, pain was statistically significantly more frequently reported on the day following the procedure and pain medication was statistically significantly more frequently required (p = 0.002). Serious adverse events did not occur after nail surgery. 10% of the respondents raised specific questions and needed counseling by TFU. Conclusions: All nail surgeries were well tolerated in the outpatient setting. Pain was the most common side effect, although only half of all patients reported pain on the day of surgery and only 21% on the day after the procedure. The TFU proved to be an effective and practical as well as easy to establish method for postoperative follow‐up and consultation after outpatient nail surgery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Laser‐assisted drug delivery (LADD) is a treatment method to enhance the penetration of pharmaceuticals through the skin. The aim of the present study is to track hyaluronic acid (HA) and analyse its effect on human skin in vivo after ablative fractional laser (AFL) treatment. Healthy male and female subjects were recruited. Four areas were marked on their forearms of each volunteer, and each area was assigned to one of the following treatment options: AFL + HA, AFL only, HA only or untreated control. A carbon dioxide laser was used for the AFL treatment. Follow‐up measurements were scheduled 30 min and 30 days after treatment using multiphoton tomography equipped with fluorescence lifetime imaging (MPT‐FLIM). A total of 11 subjects completed the study. By detecting fluorescence lifetimes, the HA and the anaesthetic ointment were clearly distinguishable from surrounding tissue. After AFL treatment, HA could be visualized in all epidermal and upper dermal layers. In contrast, HA in intact skin was only detected in the superficial layers at distinctly lower levels. The applied HA gel seemed to have beneficial properties for the wound healing process after laser treatment. LADD has proven to be a fast and effective method to increase HA uptake into the skin, allowing for improved hydration and skin rejuvenation over time. Furthermore, LADD could be a beneficial treatment option in laser resurfacing. MPT‐FLIM proved to be an appropriate diagnostic tool for drug delivery tracking and monitoring of treatment response for individualized therapy adjustment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Summary: Necrobiotic xanthogranuloma is a rare disease that is part of the non‐Langerhans cell histiocytoses. It is characterized by yellowish skin lesions, which are typically periorbitally localized. Extracutaneous manifestations of all organs are possible and can cause potentially life‐threatening complications. The disease also belongs to the facultative paraneoplasias and is often associated with paraproteinemia. These aspects should be considered regarding further diagnostics. Due to the rarity of the disease, there are no standardized guidelines for therapy so far. The combination of prednisolone and chlorambucil as well as intravenous immunoglobulins seem to be effective therapeutic options. We present four cases from our clinic as well as the current results of the literature in this mini‐review and would like to highlight the therapeutic challenge as well as the need for the development of guidelines. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background:There is a high demand for dermatological care in Germany. As use of teledermatology has increased significantly, this study aimed to investigate the impact of teledermatology on patient care. Methods:This retrospective cross-sectional study used data from a direct-to-consumer teledermatology platform using store-and-forward technology available in Germany between July 2021 and April 2022. Additional patient characteristics were collected using a voluntary follow-up questionnaire, 28 days after teleconsultation. Results:Data of 1,999 enrolled patients were evaluated. Patients had a mean age of 36 years, and 61.2% (1,223/1,999) lived in a rural residence. The most common diagnoses included eczema (36.0%, 701/1,946), fungal diseases (15.4%, 299/1,946), and acne (12.5%, 243/1,946). The follow-up questionnaire was answered by 166 patients (8.3%, 166/1,999). In total, 42.8% (71/166) of patients had undergone no previous medical consultation. The most frequent reason for using teledermatology was the waiting time for a dermatology outpatient appointment (62.0%, 103/166). A total of 62.0% (103/166) participants rated the treatment success as good or very good, while 86.1% (143/166) rated the quality of telemedical care as equal or better to that of an outpatient visit. Conclusion:This study showed that patients often use teledermatology because of functional barriers (waiting times). In this cohort, the diagnoses strongly corresponded to reasons for outpatient presentation. Most patients rated the quality of teledermatology service as at least equivalent to that of outpatient physician visits and reported treatment success. Thus, teledermatology can relieve the burden of outpatient care while providing high benefits from the patient's perspective. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In this paper we present a microfluidic system based on transparent biocompatible polymers with a porous membrane as substrate for various cell types which allows the simulation of various physiological barriers under continuous laminar flow conditions at distinct tunable shear rates. Besides live cell and fluorescence microscopy, integrated electrodes enable the investigation of the permeability and barrier function of the cell layer as well as their interaction with external manipulations using the Electric Cell-substrate Impedance Sensing (ECIS) method.

This article presents a case study of a 32-year-old woman who developed a rare skin condition called indeterminate cell histiocytosis (ICH) after recovering from a COVID-19 infection. ICH is a group of diseases characterized by the proliferation of certain immune cells. The patient's skin lesions initially resolved on their own but later worsened. Treatment with a combination of prednisolone and narrowband ultraviolet B (NB-UVB) light therapy was ineffective, so the patient was switched to bath psoralen plus ultraviolet A (PUVA) therapy, which resulted in a rapid reduction in skin lesions. This case suggests that systemic PUVA therapy may be an effective treatment option for generalized ICH. [Extracted from the article]

Background: Adherence to dermatological treatment is described as poor. Empathy and open communication in the physician–patient relationship has been proven to improve adherence. As direct-to-consumer teledermatology enables patients to access dermatological consultations without in-person interactions, we hypothesized treatment adherence in teledermatology to be low. Methods: The objective of the study was to examine treatment adherence in teledermatology. This retrospective cross-sectional study used data from patients treated through a German direct-to-consumer teledermatology platform between July 2021 and April 2022. Additional information was collected through voluntary follow-up questionnaires provided to patients to assess individual treatment success, treatment-related adverse events, and treatment adherence. Results: Data collection included 771 patients; 61.6% (475/771) were women (mean age 35 years). In 46% (355/771), skin disease had been present for <3 months before teleconsultation. Of all patients who answered the follow-up questionnaire (n = 228), 28.5% (65/228) reported treatment-related adverse events, with skin dryness being the most common (56.9%, 37/65). Adverse events resulting in treatment discontinuation were reported in 1.3% (3/228) of all cases. Improvement in skin condition on therapy was described by 75.4% (172/228). In 85.5% (195/228), full treatment adherence was reported. Conclusion: This is the first study worldwide to examine data on treatment adherence in direct-to-consumer-teledermatology. Despite the lack of doctor–patient interaction, the results of our study demonstrate that most patients show high treatment adherence. Possible drivers contributing to high compliance rates could be the high proportion of new-onset skin diseases, the high treatment success of the prescribed therapies, and the low rate of serious adverse events. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: The interactions between circulating tumor cells (CTCs) and plasma proteins are critical for hematogenous metastasis, and understanding the molecular mechanisms behind these interactions can improve liquid-biopsy-based diagnostics and cancer therapies. This review summarizes recent literature on the surface molecules of CTCs that interact with coagulation proteins and their biological and clinical relevance. It also discusses future research directions to expand our knowledge of the CTC interactome, which can lead to the discovery of new molecular markers for diagnostics and additional targets for cancer therapies. Cancer metastasis is a complex process. After their intravasation into the circulation, the cancer cells are exposed to a harsh environment of physical and biochemical hazards. Whether circulating tumor cells (CTCs) survive and escape from blood flow defines their ability to metastasize. CTCs sense their environment with surface-exposed receptors. The recognition of corresponding ligands, e.g., fibrinogen, by integrins can induce intracellular signaling processes driving CTCs' survival. Other receptors, such as tissue factor (TF), enable CTCs to induce coagulation. Cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT) is adversely connected to patients' outcome. However, cancer cells have also the ability to inhibit coagulation, e.g., through expressing thrombomodulin (TM) or heparan sulfate (HS), an activator of antithrombin (AT). To that extent, individual CTCs can interact with plasma proteins, and whether these interactions are connected to metastasis or clinical symptoms such as CAT is largely unknown. In the present review, we discuss the biological and clinical relevance of cancer-cell-expressed surface molecules and their interaction with plasma proteins. We aim to encourage future research to expand our knowledge of the CTC interactome, as this may not only yield new molecular markers improving liquid-biopsy-based diagnostics but also additional targets for better cancer therapies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]