Search

Arm and hand function play a critical role in the successful completion of everyday tasks. Lost function due to neurological impairment impacts millions of lives worldwide. Despite improvements in the ability to assess and rehabilitate arm deficits, knowledge about underlying sources of impairment and related sequela remains limited. The comprehensive assessment of function requires the measurement of both biomechanics and neuromuscular contributors to performance during the completion of tasks that often use multiple joints and span three-dimensional workspaces. To our knowledge, the complexity of movement and diversity of measures required are beyond the capabilities of existing assessment systems. To bridge current gaps in assessment capability, a new exoskeleton instrument is developed with comprehensive bilateral assessment in mind. The development of the BiLateral Upper-limb Exoskeleton for Simultaneous Assessment of Biomechanical and Neuromuscular Output (BLUE SABINO) expands on prior iterations toward full-arm assessment during reach-and-grasp tasks through the development of a dual-arm and dual-hand system, with 9 active degrees of freedom per arm and 12 degrees of freedom (six active, six passive) per hand. Joints are powered by electric motors driven by a real-time control system with input from force and force/torque sensors located at all attachment points between the user and exoskeleton. Biosignals from electromyography and electroencephalography can be simultaneously measured to provide insight into neurological performance during unimanual or bimanual tasks involving arm reach and grasp. Design trade-offs achieve near-human performance in exoskeleton speed and strength, with positional measurement at the wrist having an error of less than 2 mm and supporting a range of motion approximately equivalent to the 50th-percentile human. The system adjustability in seat height, shoulder width, arm length, and orthosis width accommodate subjects from approximately the 5th-percentile female to the 95th-percentile male. Integration between precision actuation, human–robot-interaction force-torque sensing, and biosignal acquisition systems successfully provide the simultaneous measurement of human movement and neurological function. The bilateral design enables use with left- or right-side impairments as well as intra-subject performance comparisons. With the resulting instrument, the authors plan to investigate underlying neural and physiological correlates of arm function, impairment, learning, and recovery.

Bilateral proprioception includes the ability to sense the position and motion of one hand relative to the other, without looking. This sensory ability allows us to perform daily activities seamlessly, and its impairment is observed in various neurological disorders such as cerebral palsy and stroke. It can undergo experience-dependent plasticity, as seen in trained piano players. If its neural correlates were better understood, it would provide a useful assay and target for neurorehabilitation for people with impaired proprioception. We designed a non-invasive electroencephalography-based paradigm to assess the neural features relevant to proprioception, especially focusing on bilateral proprioception, i.e., assessing the limb distance from the body with the other limb. We compared it with a movement-only task, with and without the visibility of the target hand. Additionally, we explored proprioceptive accuracy during the tasks. We tested eleven Controls and nine Skilled musicians to assess whether sensorimotor event-related spectral perturbations in μ (8-12Hz) and low-β (12-18Hz) rhythms differ in people with musical instrument training, which intrinsically involves a bilateral proprioceptive component, or when new sensor modalities are added to the task. The Skilled group showed significantly reduced μ and low-β suppression in bilateral tasks compared to movement-only, a significative difference relative to Controls. This may be explained by reduced top-down control due to intensive training, despite this, proprioceptive errors were not smaller for this group. Target visibility significantly reduced proprioceptive error in Controls, while no change was observed in the Skilled group. During visual tasks, Controls exhibited significant μ and low-β power reversals, with significant differences relative to proprioceptive-only tasks compared to the Skilled group-possibly due to reduced uncertainty and top-down control. These results provide support for sensorimotor μ and low-β suppression as potential neuromarkers for assessing proprioceptive ability. The identification of these features is significant as they could be used to quantify altered proprioceptive neural processing in skill and movement disorders. This in turn can be useful as an assay for pre and post sensory-motor intervention research.

Abstract Background Significant clinician training is required to mitigate the subjective nature and achieve useful reliability between measurement occasions and therapists. Previous research supports that robotic instruments can improve quantitative biomechanical assessments of the upper limb, offering reliable and more sensitive measures. Furthermore, combining kinematic and kinetic measurements with electrophysiological measurements offers new insights to unlock targeted impairment-specific therapy. This review presents common methods for analyzing biomechanical and neuromuscular data by describing their validity and reporting their reliability measures. Methods This paper reviews literature (2000–2021) on sensor-based measures and metrics for upper-limb biomechanical and electrophysiological (neurological) assessment, which have been shown to correlate with clinical test outcomes for motor assessment. The search terms targeted robotic and passive devices developed for movement therapy. Journal and conference papers on stroke assessment metrics were selected using PRISMA guidelines. Intra-class correlation values of some of the metrics are recorded, along with model, type of agreement, and confidence intervals, when reported. Results A total of 60 articles are identified. The sensor-based metrics assess various aspects of movement performance, such as smoothness, spasticity, efficiency, planning, efficacy, accuracy, coordination, range of motion, and strength. Additional metrics assess abnormal activation patterns of cortical activity and interconnections between brain regions and muscle groups; aiming to characterize differences between the population who had a stroke and the healthy population. Conclusion Range of motion, mean speed, mean distance, normal path length, spectral arc length, number of peaks, and task time metrics have all demonstrated good to excellent reliability, as well as provide a finer resolution compared to discrete clinical assessment tests. EEG power features for multiple frequency bands of interest, specifically the bands relating to slow and fast frequencies comparing affected and non-affected hemispheres, demonstrate good to excellent reliability for populations at various stages of stroke recovery. Further investigation is needed to evaluate the metrics missing reliability information. In the few studies combining biomechanical measures with neuroelectric signals, the multi-domain approaches demonstrated agreement with clinical assessments and provide further information during the relearning phase. Combining the reliable sensor-based metrics in the clinical assessment process will provide a more objective approach, relying less on therapist expertise. This paper suggests future work on analyzing the reliability of metrics to prevent biasedness and selecting the appropriate analysis.