Search

Copyright of Mitteilungen der Deutschen Bodenkundlichen Gesellschaft is the property of Deutsche Bodenkundliche Gesellschaft (DBG) and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Annual changes in soil organic carbon stocks of eleven experimental field sites in Switzerland in response to a large range of different agricultural practices. • Changes in soil organic carbon (SOC) were assessed in Swiss long-term experiments. • Topsoils lost SOC despite practices expected to enhance SOC stocks. • C inputs to soil were insufficient and some sites were affected by former land-use. • Efforts to sequester soil C need to be intensified and new approaches applied. Soil carbon sequestration (SCS) is one of the cheapest and technically least demanding carbon dioxide (CO 2) removal (CDR) or negative CO 2 emission technologies. For a realistic assessment of SCS, it is critical to evaluate how much carbon (C) can be stored in soil organic matter under actual agricultural practices. This includes typical crop rotations and fertilization strategies, depends on resources that are available (e.g. farmyard manure (FYM)) and are affordable for farmers. Furthermore, it is important to assess SCS based on given climatic and soil conditions. Here, we evaluate changes in soil C storage for Switzerland using data from eleven long-term field experiments on cropland and permanent grassland that include common local practices. At all sites, changes in soil organic carbon (SOC) stocks were measured in topsoil (∼0-0.2 m) in response to a total of 80 different treatments including different types of mineral or organic fertilization (e.g. FYM, slurry, peat, compost) or soil management (tillage vs. no-till). The treatments were applied to different, diverse crop rotations or grass mixtures that are representative for Switzerland. We found that topsoils lost C at an average rate of 0.29 Mg C ha−1 yr−1, although many of the investigated treatments were expected to lead to SOC increases. Based on a linear mixed effects model we showed that SOC change rates (ΔSOC) were driven by C inputs to soil (harvest residues and organic fertilizer), soil cover and initial SOC stocks. The type of land use or soil tillage had no significant effect. Our analysis suggests that current efforts to manage soils sustainably need to be intensified and complemented with further techniques if Switzerland wants to achieve the goal of the 4 per 1000 initiative. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]