Search

Background: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) has become prevalent in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), but its long-term prognostic advantages remain unclear. The latest prognostic outcomes in clinical Stage (cStage) II/III ESCC with NAC were herein elucidated. Patients and Methods: NAC prior to curative treatment was done in 115 cStage II/III ESCC patients with either cisplatin (CDDP)/5-fluorouracil (5-FU; CF) (n = 41) or docetaxel/CDDP/5-FU (DCF) NAC (n = 74) between 2007 and 2013. Results: (1) Esophagectomy was finally performed in 35 of the 41 CF NAC cases and in 48 of the 74 DCF NAC cases. The preservation rate of the esophagus was higher in the DCF NAC than in the CF NAC (p = 0.018). (2) The overall survival was better in DCF NAC than in CF NAC (p = 0.071), and progression-free survivals were 58.3% with DCF and 30.5% with CF (p = 0.0060). DCF NAC was associated with fewer cases of progression than CF NAC (p = 0.0040), largely due to excellent control of the preoperative disease (p = 0.018) and postoperative lymph node recurrence (p = 0.014). Conclusion: DCF NAC in cStage II/III ESCC could have a great potential to achieve a better prognosis due to suppression of specific progression events with a higher preservation rate of the esophagus. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Curative synchronous double primary cancers of the head and neck and the esophagus (CSC-HE) are frequently detected, but a standard treatment remains to be established. We studied the clinical course to explore appropriate treatment strategies.Methods: We retrospectively studied consecutive 33 patients who had CSC-HE. The disease stage was classified into 4 groups: group A, early head and neck cancer (HNC) and early esophageal cancer (EC); group B, early HNC and advanced EC; group C, advanced HNC and early EC; and group D, advanced HNC and advanced EC. As induction chemotherapy, the patients received 3 courses of TPF therapy (docetaxel 75mg/m2 on day 1, cisplatin 75mg/m2 on day 1, and 5-fluorouracil 750mg/m2 on days 1-5) at 3-week intervals. The clinical courses and treatment outcomes were studied according to the disease stage of CSC-HE.Results: The disease stage of CSC-HE was group A in 1 patient (3%), group B in 9 patients (27.3%), group C in 3 patients (9.1%), and group D in 20 patients (60.6%). The median follow-up was 26months, and the 2-year overall survival rate was 67.4%. In groups A, B, and C, the 2-year overall survival rate was 83.3%. In group D, the 2-year overall survival rate was 62.6%. Ten of 20 patients in group D received induction chemotherapy with TPF, and 6 patients were alive and disease free at the time of this writing.Conclusion: The treatment outcomes of patients with CSC-HE were relatively good. TPF induction chemotherapy might be an effective treatment for patients with advanced HNC and advanced EC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Dexamethasone (DEX) is administered for multiple days to prevent chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting for patients receiving highly emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC); however, its notorious side effects have been widely reported. Although our multicentre randomised double-blind comparative study verified non-inferiority of sparing DEX after day 2 of chemotherapy when combined with neurokinin-1 receptor antagonist (NK1-RA) and palonosetron (Palo) for patients receiving HEC regimen, DEX sparing was not non-inferior in patients receiving cisplatin (CDDP)-based HEC regimens in subgroup analysis. Recently, the efficacy of the addition of olanzapine (OLZ) to standard triple antiemetic therapy on HEC has been demonstrated by several phase III trials. This study aims to confirm non-inferiority of DEX sparing when it is combined with NK-1RA, Palo and OLZ in patients receiving CDDP-based HEC regimens., Methods and Analysis: This is a randomised, double-blind, phase III trial. Patients who are scheduled to receive CDDP ≥50 mg/m 2 as initial chemotherapy are eligible. Patients are randomly assigned to receive either DEX on days 1-4 or DEX on day 1 combined with NK1-RA, Palo and OLZ (5 mg). The primary endpoint is complete response (CR) rate, defined as no emesis and no rescue medications during the delayed phase (24-120 hours post-CDDP administration). The non-inferiority margin is set at -15.0%. We assume that CR rates would be 75% in both arms. Two hundred and sixty-two patients are required for at least 80% power to confirm non-inferiority at a one-sided significance level of 2.5%. After considering the possibility of attrition, we set our final required sample size of 280., Ethics and Dissemination: The institutional review board approved the study protocol at each of the participating centres. The trial result will be presented at international conferences and published in peer-reviewed journals., Trial Registration Number: UMIN000032269., Competing Interests: Competing interests: NI has received honoraria from Takeda Pharma CO., Ltd, Eli Lilly, Japan, Ono Pharma CO., Ltd, and Daiichi Sankyo Company. Author HA has received grant from Taiho, Chugai and Nippon Kayaku; personal fees from Novartis, Sanofi, Ono, Kyowa Kirin and Takeda. TY has received grant and personal fees from Ono Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. TEN has received grant and personal fee from Taiho Pharmaceutical Co., Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Takeda Pharmaceutical Co., Sanofi K.K., Daiichi Sankyo Co., Eli Lilly Japan K.K., Nippon Kayaku Co., Ono Pharmaceutical Co. and MSD K.K.; personal fees from Mochida Pharmaceutical, Celltrion Healthcare Japan, Merck Serono Co., Sawai Pharmaceutical Co., Bayer Yakuhin, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Teijin Pharma, Pfizer Japan Inc., Novartis Japan, Yakult Honsha Co. and Nipro Co; grant from Astellas Pharma Inc., Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma Co., Eisai Co and Solasia Pharma K.K. The other authors have declared no conflicts of interest., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) has become prevalent in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), but its long-term prognostic advantages remain unclear. The latest prognostic outcomes in clinical Stage (cStage) II/III ESCC with NAC were herein elucidated., Patients and Methods: NAC prior to curative treatment was done in 115 cStage II/III ESCC patients with either cisplatin (CDDP)/5-fluorouracil (5-FU; CF) (n = 41) or docetaxel/CDDP/5-FU (DCF) NAC (n = 74) between 2007 and 2013., Results: (1) Esophagectomy was finally performed in 35 of the 41 CF NAC cases and in 48 of the 74 DCF NAC cases. The preservation rate of the esophagus was higher in the DCF NAC than in the CF NAC (p = 0.018). (2) The overall survival was better in DCF NAC than in CF NAC (p = 0.071), and progression-free survivals were 58.3% with DCF and 30.5% with CF (p = 0.0060). DCF NAC was associated with fewer cases of progression than CF NAC (p = 0.0040), largely due to excellent control of the preoperative disease (p = 0.018) and postoperative lymph node recurrence (p = 0.014)., Conclusion: DCF NAC in cStage II/III ESCC could have a great potential to achieve a better prognosis due to suppression of specific progression events with a higher preservation rate of the esophagus., (© 2017 S. Karger AG, Basel.)