Search

ABSTRACT Laboratory diagnosis of Lyme neuroborreliosis (LNB) is challenging, and validated diagnostic algorithms are lacking. Therefore, this retrospective cross-sectional study aimed to compare the diagnostic performance of seven commercial antibody assays for LNB diagnosis. Random forest (RF) modeling was conducted to investigate whether the diagnostic performance using the antibody assays could be improved by including several routine cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) parameters (i.e., leukocyte count, total protein, blood-CSF barrier functionality, and intrathecal total antibody synthesis), two-tier serology on serum, the CSF level of the B-cell chemokine (C-X-C motif) ligand 13 (CXCL13), and a Borrelia species PCR on CSF. In total, 156 patients were included who were classified as definite LNB (n = 10), possible LNB (n = 7), or non-LNB patient (n = 139) according to the criteria of the European Federation of Neurological Societies using a consensus strategy for intrathecal Borrelia-specific antibody synthesis. The seven antibody assays showed sensitivities ranging from 47.1% to 100% and specificities ranging from 95.7% to 100%. RF modeling demonstrated that the sensitivities of most antibody assays could be improved by including other parameters to the diagnostic repertoire for diagnosing LNB (range: 94.1% to 100%), although with slightly lower specificities (range: 92.8% to 96.4%). The most important parameters for LNB diagnosis are the detection of intrathecally produced Borrelia-specific antibodies, two-tier serology on serum, CSF-CXCL13, Reibergram classification, and pleocytosis. In conclusion, this study shows that LNB diagnosis is best supported using multiparameter analysis. Furthermore, a collaborative prospective study is proposed to investigate if a standardized diagnostic algorithm can be developed for improved LNB diagnosis. IMPORTANCE The diagnosis of LNB is established by clinical symptoms, pleocytosis, and proof of intrathecal synthesis of Borrelia-specific antibodies. Laboratory diagnosis of LNB is challenging, and validated diagnostic algorithms are lacking. Therefore, this retrospective cross-sectional study aimed to compare the diagnostic performance of seven commercial antibody assays for LNB diagnosis. Multiparameter analysis was conducted to investigate whether the diagnostic performance using the antibody assays could be improved by including several routine (CSF) parameters. The results of this study show that LNB diagnosis is best supported using the detection of intrathecally produced Borrelia-specific antibodies, two-tier serology on serum, CSF-CXCL13, Reibergram classification, and pleocytosis. Furthermore, we propose a collaborative prospective study to investigate the potential role of constructing a diagnostic algorithm using multiparameter analysis for improved LNB diagnosis.

ABSTRACT In this retrospective study, the performance of nine serological screening assays for Lyme borreliosis (LB) diagnostics was evaluated using a study population of LB cases and controls. Sera derived from 74 well-defined LB cases and 122 controls were included. The LB cases were diagnosed with erythema migrans (EM; n = 11), Lyme neuroborreliosis (LNB; n = 35), Lyme arthritis (LA; n = 20), or acrodermatitis chronica atrophicans (ACA; n = 8). Controls comprised 74 age- and gender-matched healthy individuals and 48 patients with other diseases with anticipated high rates of cross-reactivity. The assays under evaluation were selected based on a literature review and expected continued availability with CE marking under the new in vitro diagnostic regulation (European Union) 2017/746. The overall sensitivity (IgG and IgM results combined) among LB cases ranged between 54.5% (6 of 11) and 90.9% (10 of 11) for EM patients and between 97.1% (34 of 35) and 100% for patients with LNB, LA, and ACA. The positivity rate ranged between 8.1% (6 of 74) and 29.7% (22 of 74) among the healthy controls and between 22.9% (11 of 48) and 64.6% (31 of 48) among the cross-reactivity controls. The IgM results were more heterogeneous than the IgG and IgM/IgG results and did not contribute to the overall sensitivity but substantially increased the positivity rates among the controls. In conclusion, all evaluated Borrelia serological screening assays performed comparably with respect to early- and late-disseminated LB. The addition of an IgM assay to the screening of Borrelia-specific IgG antibodies had no added value for the diagnosis of Lyme borreliosis. IMPORTANCE Serology plays an important role in the diagnosis of Lyme borreliosis. Guidelines prescribe a two-tier testing algorithm in which a highly sensitive screening assay is used for screening and reactive sera are retested with an immunoblot to reduce false positivity rates. Recently, two commonly used screening assays were discontinued, including the very well-performing C6 Lyme enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) (Immunetics). This study provides an evaluation of the performance of nine different Borrelia serology screening assays, eight with expected future availably and the C6 Lyme ELISA, using a well-defined study panel of Lyme borreliosis patients, healthy population controls, and cross-reactivity controls. Evaluation data on multiple assays aid diagnostic laboratories in their choice for a reliable Borrelia serology screening assay to improve their diagnostic algorithm for Lyme borreliosis.

To assess whether the Mycobacterium tuberculosis Beijing genotype is emerging in Vietnam, we analyzed 563 isolates from new cases by spoligotyping and examined the association between the genotype and age, resistance, and BCG vaccination status. Three hundred one (54%) patients were infected with Beijing genotype strains. The genotype was associated with younger age (and hence with active transmission) and with isoniazid and streptomycin resistance, but not with BCG vaccination.