Search

Background: Alpha-fetoprotein-producing gastric cancer (AFPGC) represents a particularly aggressive subtype of gastric carcinoma characterized by elevated rates of vascular invasion, lymphatic dissemination, hepatic metastasis, and an unfavorable clinical outcome. Treatment strategies for AFPGC have historically lacked specificity. Herein, a case is presented involving AFPGC in which the patient exhibited a notable response to combined anti-PD-1 antibody immunotherapy and SOX chemotherapy, potentially achieving a cure. This report marks the first application of this regimen in neoadjuvant therapy for AFP gastric cancer, followed by radical resection and postoperative adjuvant therapy. Case summary: A 62-year-old male patient presented with persistent upper abdominal distension and discomfort lasting over 2 months. Initial investigations revealed markedly elevated serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) levels, and subsequent pathological examination confirmed the diagnosis of AFPGC via gastroscopy. Due to the patient's condition, surgical resection was initially deemed unfeasible. Therefore, a chemo-immunotherapy regimen consisting of SOX chemotherapy and the PD-1 inhibitor tislelizumab was administered for 3 cycles. Following this, successful laparoscopic radical gastrectomy was performed. The treatment protocol was continued with an additional 3 cycles postoperatively. At the time of this case report, the patient maintained a good quality of life with no evidence of disease recurrence or adverse events. Conclusion: The present report highlights a case of AFPGC where significant therapeutic success was achieved through a combined regimen of chemotherapy and immunotherapy, both before and after surgery. The use of anti-PD-1 antibody (tislelizumab) in combination with SOX regimen (S-1 and oxaliplatin) demonstrated effective treatment of AFPGC, potentially offering a curative approach. This approach represents a promising targeted therapy option for patients with AFPGC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Extramammary Paget disease (EMPD) is a rare epithelial adenocarcinoma in apocrine-gland rich skin, involving the vulva, the scrotum, and the penis. with distant metastases and a poor prognosis. Local EMPD patients generally have a good prognosis, with expected 5-year survival of 60%–92%, but distant metastasis represents poor prognosis and 5-year survival of 10%. Treatment approaches for advanced EMPD are chemotherapy and biological agents, which carry limited efficacy. We report the case of a 57-year-old man diagnosed with metastatic EMPD, who showed a long-term disease control with a combination therapy (an immune checkpoint inhibitor - tislelizumab plus chemotherapy – paclitaxel albumin and cisplatin). This patient underwent a wide penile scrotal lesion excision and six cycles of tislelizumab plus chemotherapy. The patient achieved partial response for the metastatic lesions according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (version 1.1). This case report supports further investigation of the combination treatment of chemotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors in the management of metastatic EMPD, which currently has an abysmal prognosis and no standardized treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Older patients with advanced cholangiocarcinoma lack systemic therapy standards. These people have a high risk of chemotherapy, accompanied by adverse reactions and even discontinuation of treatment. Case presentation: We report a 78-year-old female subject with advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma presenting with unresectable lesions involving the hepatic veins, along with extensive metastatic lymph nodes. After the geriatric assessment, capecitabine was utilized for only one cycle owing to adverse events (AEs). Next, a combination of low-dose lenvatinib and tislelizumab was administrated as a second-line treatment, which resulted in remarkable early tumor shrinkage. The following individual lenvatinib taper enabled a manageable safety profile and durable deep response. A near-complete response was achieved, with the primary tumor significantly reducing from 5.6 cm × 4.7 cm to nearly complete disappearance, accompanied by complete regression of lymph nodes, and both progression-free survival and overall survival exceeding 24 months. Conclusion: The case provides valuable insights that could influence future treatment strategies for older patients with advanced cholangiocarcinoma who are unsuitable for chemotherapy. The dose-individualized chemotherapy-free regime of lenvatinib and tislelizumab might be used in similar cases to improve their outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Comparing the efficacy of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with lenvatinib plus tislelizumab (TLT) with TACE combined with lenvatinib (TL) for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma, particularly in determining which patients can benefit more from the TLT treatment. Methods: From March 2021 to September 2023, a total of 169 patients from three centers were included in this study, with 103 patients receiving TLT and 66 patients receiving TL. The Kaplan-Meier method was utilized to evaluate the cumulative overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) between the two groups and were assessed using the log-rank test. Subgroup analysis on tumor number, maximum tumor diameter, presence of portal vein thrombosis, AFP level, and Child-Pugh class were conducted. Results: The median OS was 26 months in the TLT group, and 20 months in the TL group. The median PFS was 14 months in the TLT group and 9 months in the TL group. The Kaplan-Meier curve demonstrated a significantly superior OS and PFS in the TLT group compared to the TL group. Subgroup analysis showed that for patients with a maximum tumor diameter greater than 7 cm, AFP > 400 ng/ml and accompanied by portal vein tumor thrombus, and Child-Pugh class A, there was a statistically significant difference in OS between TLT and TL groups. Conclusions: OS and PFS were significantly improved in patients who received TLT compared to those who received TL, patients with a largest tumor diameter greater than 7 cm, AFP > 400 ng/ml, Child-Pugh class A and PVTT appeared to derive more benefit. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Pulmonary sarcomatoid carcinoma (PSC), a rare non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) subtype, poses diagnostic and treatment difficulties. Current research explores targeted therapies and immunotherapy to improve patient outcomes. This case report details a male patient diagnosed with PSC via pathology. Tests revealed high levels of PD-L1, a marker suggesting potential benefit from immune checkpoint inhibitors. However, despite bronchoscopic intervention, his advanced stage IIIB cancer (cT3N2bM0) progressed quickly, with progression-free survival (PFS) under 3 months. Following progression, the patient received tislelizumab (anti-PD-1 antibody) and anlotinib (an anti-angiogenic drug) as second-line therapy. This combination showed promise, achieving near-partial remission after the first cycle. Subsequent scans documented continued tumor shrinkage until the patient experienced fatal hemoptysis. This case highlights the potential benefits of combining tislelizumab with anlotinib for PSC. However, it also represents the first reported case of fatal hemoptysis with this specific treatment regimen. This finding emphasizes the need for increased awareness of this potential complication, especially in patients with centrally located PSC treated with anti-angiogenic agents like anlotinib. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Older patients with advanced cholangiocarcinoma lack systemic therapy standards. These people have a high risk of chemotherapy, accompanied by adverse reactions and even discontinuation of treatment. Case presentation: We report a 78-year-old female subject with advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma presenting with unresectable lesions involving the hepatic veins, along with extensive metastatic lymph nodes. After the geriatric assessment, capecitabine was utilized for only one cycle owing to adverse events (AEs). Next, a combination of low-dose lenvatinib and tislelizumab was administrated as a second-line treatment, which resulted in remarkable early tumor shrinkage. The following individual lenvatinib taper enabled a manageable safety profile and durable deep response. A near-complete response was achieved, with the primary tumor significantly reducing from 5.6 cm × 4.7 cm to nearly complete disappearance, accompanied by complete regression of lymph nodes, and both progression-free survival and overall survival exceeding 24 months. Conclusion: The case provides valuable insights that could influence future treatment strategies for older patients with advanced cholangiocarcinoma who are unsuitable for chemotherapy. The dose-individualized chemotherapy-free regime of lenvatinib and tislelizumab might be used in similar cases to improve their outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by total mesorectal excision is a standard treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer. Mismatch repair-deficient locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) was highly sensitive to PD-1 blockade. However, most rectal cancers are microsatellite stable (MSS) or mismatch repair-proficient (pMMR) subtypes for which PD-1 blockade is ineffective. Radiation can trigger the activation of CD8 + T cells, further enhancing the responses of MSS/pMMR rectal cancer to PD-1 blockade. Radioimmunotherapy offers a promising therapeutic modality for rectal cancer. Progenitor T exhausted cells are abundant in tumour-draining lymph nodes and play an important role in immunotherapy. Conventional irradiation fields include the mesorectum and regional lymph nodes, which might cause considerable damage to T lymphocytes and radiation-induced fibrosis, ultimately leading to a poor response to immunotherapy and rectal fibrosis. This study investigated whether node-sparing modified short-course irradiation combined with chemotherapy and PD-1 blockade could be effective in patients with MSS/ pMMR LARC. Methods: This was a open-label, single-arm, multicentre, prospective phase II trial. 32 LARC patients with MSS/pMMR will receive node-sparing modified short-course radiotherapy (the irradiated planned target volume only included the primary tumour bed but not the tumour-draining lymph nodes, 25 Gy/5f, 5 Gy/f) followed by CAPOX and tislelizumab. CAPOX and tislelizumab will be started two days after the completion of radiotherapy: oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 intravenous infusion, day 1; capecitabine 1000 mg/m2 oral administration, days 1–14; and tislelizumab 200 mg, intravenous infusion, day 1. There will be four 21-day cycles. TME will be performed at weeks 14–15. We will collect blood, tumour, and lymphoid specimens; perform flow cytometry and in situ multiplexed immunofluorescence detection; and analyse the changes in various lymphocyte subsets. The primary endpoint is the rate of pathological complete response. The organ preservation rate, tumour regression grade, local recurrence rate, disease-free survival, overall survival, adverse effects, and quality of life will also be analysed. Discussion: In our research, node-sparing modified radiotherapy combined with immunotherapy probably increased the responsiveness of immunotherapy for MSS/pMMR rectal cancer patients, reduced the occurrence of postoperative rectal fibrosis, and improved survival and quality of life. This is the first clinical trial to utilize a node-sparing radiation strategy combined with chemotherapy and PD-1 blockade in the neoadjuvant treatment of rectal cancer, which may result in a breakthrough in the treatment of MSS/pMMR rectal cancer. Trial registration: This study was registered at . Trial registration number: NCT05972655. Date of registration: 31 July 2023. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Programmed death receptor‐1 monoclonal antibodies (PD‐1 mAbs) have been applied in the treatment of different kinds of malignant tumors. However, a streamlined and expedited evaluation method for certain tumor types without approved indications is currently lacking in terms of their expandable applications. In this study, a novel evaluation method for the expandability of PD‐1 mAb was established for the first time. Clinical trial data of PD‐1 mAb in first‐line treatment for advanced gastric cancer were collected for comparison. For the first time, the clinical trial outcomes were analyzed through the entropy weight method and the technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) method to evaluate the effectiveness and safety. The accessibility was assessed using the World Health Organization/Health Action International (WHO/HAI) standard survey method. Combining the results of effectiveness, safety, and accessibility, the recommendation for expandability of PD‐1 mAb was provided. Tislelizumab ranks seventh in effectiveness, higher than the chemotherapy group and the pembrolizumab group, and ranks fourth in safety evaluation and first in the combination chemotherapy groups. The annual drug cost of tislelizumab is 0.497 times the annual household income for urban residents of Shaanxi Province. 56.67% of medical institutions are equipped with tislelizumab in Shaanxi Province. These results indicate the promising efficacy and safety profile of tislelizumab in combination with chemotherapy as a first‐line treatment option for advanced gastric cancer. Notably, tislelizumab emerges as a more accessible alternative to sintilimab and boasts greater affordability compared to nivolumab and pembrolizumab. Consequently, tislelizumab should be considered a viable option for expandable application in first‐line treatment of advanced gastric cancer, contingent upon clinical necessity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The efficacy of a regimen combining Tegafur, Gimeracil and Oteracil Potassium Capsules (S-1), oxaliplatin (SOX) with trastuzumab and tislelizumab chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer (GC) has not been reported. Case summary: A 56-year-old male was diagnosed with GC combined with peripheral lymph node metastasis. The patient received neoadjuvant chemotherapy, including SOX, tislelizumab and trastuzumab. After 4 cycles of chemotherapy, the tumor shrank significantly, and radical surgery was performed with good clinical results. To date, the patient has been followed up for 6 months with no significant side effects. Conclusion: In this study, the patient received combination chemotherapy with SOX trastuzumab and tislelizumab and successfully underwent radical surgery with good clinical outcomes. Combined SOX with trastuzumab and tislelizumab may be an effective neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimen. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The combination therapy of Tislelizumab plus Lenvatinib has recently emerged as the new standard of care for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This treatment has demonstrated a significant reduction in tumor burden, raising the possibility of conversion therapy. However, the full safety and efficacy of this combination in real-world settings are not yet fully understood. We recently reported the case of a 36-year-old man with initially unresectable massive HCC, for whom radical surgery (RS) was contraindicated. After receiving Tislelizumab/Lenvatinib plus transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), the patient achieved complete pathological remission and subsequently underwent RS. The patient did not experience postoperative severe complications, and there was no recurrence during the follow-up period. Tislelizumab/Lenvatinib plus TACE therapy may lead to a complete pathological response in advanced HCC. Nevertheless, the safety of prolonged treatment needs to be assessed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and aim: The prognosis of microsatellite stable (MSS)-colorectal cancer liver metastasis (CRCLM) following failure of multi-line therapy remains dismal. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) plus fruquintinib and tislelizumab (HAIC-FT treatment) for MSS-CRCLM which failed from multiple-line therapy. Methods: From February 2021 to June 2023, 45 patients with MSS-CRCLM after failure of multiple-line therapy who received HAIC combined with fruquintinib and tislelizumab (HAIC-F-T triple treatment) were enrolled. The combination therapy included HAIC regimens with oxaliplatin and 5-fluorouracil or irinotecan, oxaliplatin, and 5-fluorouracil on days 1-2, intravenous tislelizumab (200 mg) before HAIC on day 1, and oral fruquintinb (3 mg/d) on day 3-21, every 4 weeks. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: The follow-up ended on June 22, 2024, with a median follow-up time of 17.5 months. The objective response rate was 42.2%, and the disease control rate was 82.2%. The median OS was 15.3 months (95% confidence interval [CI]:12.634-17.966), and the median PFS was 7.5 months (95% CI:5.318-9.682). The independent risk factors related to worse OS were previous PD-1 immunotherapy (P = 0.021) and the number of HAIC-F-T triple treatment cycles of = 2 (P = 0.007). The incidence of grade 3 or higher adverse events (AEs) was 20%, with the most frequent grade 3 or higher AEs being abdominal pain (3/45, 6.7%). Conclusion: HAIC combined with fruquintinib and tislelizumab may be an alternative salvage treatment for patients with MSS-CRCLM following failure of multiple-line therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: RATIONALE-301 (NCT03412773) was a global, phase 3 study comparing the efficacy and safety of tislelizumab with sorafenib as first-line (1L) treatment in adult patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) that met its primary endpoint of noninferiority in overall survival (OS). This analysis compared health-related quality-of-life (HRQOL) outcomes between the arms. Methods: Systemic therapy-naive adults with HCC were randomized 1:1 to receive tislelizumab (n = 342) or sorafenib (n = 332). HRQOL was assessed using EORTC QLQ-C30, QLQ-HCC18, and EQ-5D-5L. At cycles 4 and 6, a mixed model for repeated measures was performed using key-prespecified patient-reported outcome (PRO) endpoints of the QLQ-C30 and the QLQ-HCC18. Time to deterioration was analyzed with the Kaplan-Meier method using the PRO endpoints. Results: At cycles 4 and 6, patients in the tislelizumab arm had better HRQOL outcomes than the patients in the sorafenib arm per mean-change difference in GHS/QOL, QLQ-C30 physical functioning and fatigue, and QLQ-HCC18 symptom index; however, no differences for pain were observed. Patients in the tislelizumab arm had lower risk of deterioration in GHS/QOL (HR: 0.68; 95% CI: 0.49–0.94), QLQ-C30 physical functioning (HR: 0.45; 95% CI: 0.32–0.63) and fatigue (HR: 0.47; 95% CI: 0.36–0.61), QLQ-HCC18 symptom index (HR: 0.52; 95% CI: 0.34–0.81), and HCC-specific fatigue (HR: 0.59; 95% CI: 0.45–0.79). For pain, both arms had similar risk of deterioration (HR: 0.78; 95% CI: 0.56–1.09). At cycles 4 and 6, patients in the tislelizumab arm maintained in EQ-5D-5L visual analog scale, whereas scores decreased for the patients in the sorafenib arm. Conclusion: Patients with 1L HCC treated with tislelizumab had favorable HRQOL outcomes compared with patients treated with sorafenib, particularly in fatigue and physical functioning. These results, along with favorable safety profile, better response rate, and OS noninferiority, support tislelizumab as a potential 1L treatment option for unresectable HCC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy has been widely investigated in urothelial carcinoma; however, the utility of ICI therapy in the treatment of organ transplant recipients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) is unclear. We herein report the first case of a first-line anti-programmed cell death-1 (anti-PD-1) monotherapy for a kidney transplant patient with mUC. Case presentation A 71-year-old woman who received a kidney transplant in 2003 was diagnosed with urothelial carcinoma in 2018. After operation of the tumor, the patient developed local recurrence at the site of the right kidney and bladder and multiple distant metastases in May 2020. Considering the intolerance of chemotherapy and high tumor mutation burden, we administered the anti-PD-1 agent tislelizumab (200 mg every three weeks). Partial response was achieved after two cycles of therapy and sustained until 18th cycles. There were no signs of kidney graft rejection. The immunotherapy was temporarily stopped after the 18th course because of a suspicious immune-related pneumonitis and was continued in December 2021. Conclusions This case demonstrates the feasibility of safely achieving stable cancer control in a kidney transplant patient with mUC without encountering graft rejection by using single-agent anti-PD-1 treatment.

Abstract Background Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by total mesorectal excision is a standard treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer. Mismatch repair-deficient locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) was highly sensitive to PD-1 blockade. However, most rectal cancers are microsatellite stable (MSS) or mismatch repair-proficient (pMMR) subtypes for which PD-1 blockade is ineffective. Radiation can trigger the activation of CD8 + T cells, further enhancing the responses of MSS/pMMR rectal cancer to PD-1 blockade. Radioimmunotherapy offers a promising therapeutic modality for rectal cancer. Progenitor T exhausted cells are abundant in tumour-draining lymph nodes and play an important role in immunotherapy. Conventional irradiation fields include the mesorectum and regional lymph nodes, which might cause considerable damage to T lymphocytes and radiation-induced fibrosis, ultimately leading to a poor response to immunotherapy and rectal fibrosis. This study investigated whether node-sparing modified short-course irradiation combined with chemotherapy and PD-1 blockade could be effective in patients with MSS/ pMMR LARC. Methods This was a open-label, single-arm, multicentre, prospective phase II trial. 32 LARC patients with MSS/pMMR will receive node-sparing modified short-course radiotherapy (the irradiated planned target volume only included the primary tumour bed but not the tumour-draining lymph nodes, 25 Gy/5f, 5 Gy/f) followed by CAPOX and tislelizumab. CAPOX and tislelizumab will be started two days after the completion of radiotherapy: oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 intravenous infusion, day 1; capecitabine 1000 mg/m2 oral administration, days 1–14; and tislelizumab 200 mg, intravenous infusion, day 1. There will be four 21-day cycles. TME will be performed at weeks 14–15. We will collect blood, tumour, and lymphoid specimens; perform flow cytometry and in situ multiplexed immunofluorescence detection; and analyse the changes in various lymphocyte subsets. The primary endpoint is the rate of pathological complete response. The organ preservation rate, tumour regression grade, local recurrence rate, disease-free survival, overall survival, adverse effects, and quality of life will also be analysed. Discussion In our research, node-sparing modified radiotherapy combined with immunotherapy probably increased the responsiveness of immunotherapy for MSS/pMMR rectal cancer patients, reduced the occurrence of postoperative rectal fibrosis, and improved survival and quality of life. This is the first clinical trial to utilize a node-sparing radiation strategy combined with chemotherapy and PD-1 blockade in the neoadjuvant treatment of rectal cancer, which may result in a breakthrough in the treatment of MSS/pMMR rectal cancer. Trial registration This study was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov . Trial registration number: NCT05972655. Date of registration: 31 July 2023.

Background: Tislelizumab combined with chemotherapy has shown significant clinical benefits in improving overall survival compared to chemotherapy alone for patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC). Aim: This study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of tislelizumab plus chemotherapy versus standard chemotherapy as a first-line treatment for ES-SCLC from the US payer perspective and the perspective of the Chinese healthcare system. Method: We conducted an economic evaluation using a Markov state-transition model, reflecting the US payer perspective and the perspective of the Chinese healthcare system. Baseline patient characteristics and essential clinical data were obtained from the RATIONALE-312 trial. The costs and utilities were derived from open-access databases and published literature. The primary outcomes measured included quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), incremental net health benefit (INHB), and incremental net monetary benefit (INMB). Uncertainties in the model were addressed by probabilistic sensitivity analysis (PSA) and one-way sensitivity analysis (OWSA). Results: In the base-case analysis, the addition of tislelizumab to chemotherapy provided an incremental gain of 0.16 QALYs at an additional cost of $7430.73, resulting in an ICER of $46,132.33 per QALY. Although above the willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of China of $38,042.49 per QALY, the cost-effectiveness was marginal, with an INHB of − 0.03 QALYs and an INMB of $− 1303.06. In the US, despite a slightly higher effectiveness gain of 0.28 QALYs, the increased cost of $45,157.35 resulted in an unfavorable ICER of $163,885.06 per QALY, exceeding the US WTP threshold of $150,000.00. PSA showed probabilities of cost-effectiveness of tislelizumab plus chemotherapy at 17.18% in China and 40.41% in the US. Conclusion: Tislelizumab combined with chemotherapy was not a cost-effective first-line treatment option for ES-SCLC in China or the US; however, the margin of cost-effectiveness was narrow. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: This study reported the safety and efficacy of a phase 2, open-label, single-arm, exploratory clinical trial of induction immunochemotherapy in patients with initially unresectable advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Patients and Methods: Patients underwent three cycles of induction therapy with tislelizumab, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil. The primary endpoints were the safety, major pathological response (MPR), and pathological complete response (pCR). Secondary endpoints included the R0 resection rate, disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS). Genomic data and immune microenvironment data were analyzed exploratively. Results: The treatment was safe, with a grade 3 or higher adverse event rate of 14.9% (7/47). Of the total 47 patients enrolled in the study, 19 (40.4%) achieved MPR, 12 (25.5%) achieved pCR, 4 (8.5%) achieved complete clinical response (cCR) and declined surgery, and 23 (48.94%) underwent successful resection. Median follow-up was 18 months, with a median DFS of 24 months, a median OS of 36 months. A high tumor mutation burden was associated with a better prognosis for patients who underwent surgery. Patients who achieved pCR had higher levels of immune cell infiltration and a greater proportion and concentration of tertiary lymphoid structures compared with those who experienced a major pathological response. Conclusions: Tislelizumab combined with chemotherapy is effective for ESCC, yielding high cCR, pCR, surgical conversion, and R0 resection rates, and tolerable adverse events. Trial Registration: NCT05469061. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Objectives This retrospective study evaluated the individual benefits of tislelizumab and surgery, as well as their synergistic effect on progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of stage II-III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Methods From September 2019 to June 2022, all participants with potentially resectable NSCLC who received chemotherapy (C) or tislelizumab plus chemotherapy (T) were included in the study. Participants were categorized into four groups based on surgery or not (S or NS) and the utilization of tislelizumab (T or C). Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated using the Kaplan–Meier method and log-rank test, as well as Cox proportional hazards models. Results Compared to C, T was associated with significantly higher objective response rate (64.54% vs. 34.78%, p = 0.003), higher pathological complete response rate (40.00% vs. 14.06%, p = 0.007), and higher major pathological response rate (60.00% vs. 20.31%, p

Jiayun Jiang,1 Hui Zhang,1 Jiejuan Lai,1 Shiyu Zhang,1 Yanjiao Ou,1 Yu Fu,2,&ast; Leida Zhang1,&ast; 1Institute of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University), Chongqing, People’s Republic of China; 2Medical Research Institute, College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Southwest University, Chongqing, People’s Republic of China&ast;These authors contributed equally to this workCorrespondence: Leida Zhang, Institute of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University), No. 30, Gaotanyan Street, Shapingba District, Chongqing, 400038, People’s Republic of China, Email 2518569931@qq.com Yu Fu, Medical Research Institute, College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Southwest University, No. 2, Tiansheng Road, Beibei District, Chongqing, 400715, People’s Republic of China, Email fuyu2020@swu.edu.cnPurpose: To compare the efficacy and safety of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) plus lenvatinib and tislelizumab (TACE-Len-T) versus TACE plus lenvatinib (TACE-Len) as the first-line treatment for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC).Patients and Methods: This retrospective study included 136 uHCC patients treated with TACE-Len-T or TACE-Len from January 1, 2021, to June 30, 2023. Clinical outcomes including overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), tumor response and adverse events (AEs) were compared between the two groups. The risk factors affecting OS and PFS were also analyzed.Results: The median OS and PFS of the TACE-Len-T group were significantly longer than those of the TACE-Len group (Median OS: not reached vs 13.8 months, P< 0.001; Median PFS: 13.0 months vs 2.7 months, P< 0.001). The best overall objective response rate (ORR) was also better with TACE-Len-T treatment (ORR: 72.1% vs 29.4%, P< 0.001), and the disease control rate (DCR) significantly increased in the TACE-Len-T group (88.2% vs 48.5%, P< 0.001). Multivariate analyses revealed that TACE-Len treatment, tumor number > 3, and cTACE were independent risk factors for OS, whereas TACE-Len treatment was the only independent risk factor for PFS. The frequency and severity of AEs in the TACE-Len-T group were comparable to those in the TACE-Len group (any grade: 92.6% vs 91.2%, P=0.753; grade 3 or 4: 33.8% vs 32.3%, P=0.855).Conclusion: TACE-Len-T treatment significantly improved OS, PFS, ORR, and DCR over TACE-Len treatment, with a manageable safety profile in uHCC.Keywords: unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma, transarterial chemoembolization, lenvatinib, tislelizumab, immunotherapy

Abstract Background Chronic nonspecific cheilitis is a complex condition characterized by persistent lip peeling and discomfort. This case report explores the clinical progression of a patient with history of tongue squamous cell carcinoma and subsequent Tislelizumab treatment, presenting with persistent lip peeling. Case presentation A patient with a history of tongue squamous cell carcinoma (T2N0M0), treated with chemotherapy, surgery, and Tislelizumab, presented with six months of persistent lip peeling. Clinical examination revealed distinct features of chronic nonspecific cheilitis with infectious angular cheilitis (Oral Candidiasis). A tailored treatment plan, emphasizing oral hygiene practices and local treatments with Sodium Bicarbonate, Tacrolimus ointment, and Chlortetracycline ointment. Follow-up visits demonstrated sustained improvement, highlighting the significance of individualized approaches. Conclusions This case underscores the importance of recognizing and managing oral manifestations in patients with a history of cancer and immunotherapy. The patient’s response to treatment suggests that a multifaceted approach, combining local therapy with lifestyle modifications, can be effective in managing chronic nonspecific cheilitis associated with immunotherapy. Routine follow-up appointments, guided by personalized medicine principles, contribute to sustained patient well-being.

Abstract The RATIONALE-306 study revealed that patients with advanced or metastatic oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) could benefit from treatment with tislelizumab plus chemotherapy. This study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of tislelizumab plus chemotherapy for treating OSCC from the perspective of the Chinese healthcare system. Partitioned survival model estimated the cost-effectiveness of tislelizumab plus chemotherapy compared with chemotherapy alone for treating OSCC using RATIONALE-306 data. Costs and utilities were obtained from local databases and published studies. Costs, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), life-years, incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER), incremental net health benefits (INHB), and incremental net monetary benefits (INMB) were outcomes. Price simulation were conducted at the willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold. Sensitivity and subgroup analyses were performed to assess model robustness. Compared with chemotherapy alone, tislelizumab plus chemotherapy yielded an ICER of USD 27,896/QALY, gained an additional 0.414 QALYs and 0.751 life-years, and increased the cost by USD 11,560. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis revealed that tislelizumab plus chemotherapy was cost-effective at the WTP of USD 38,258/QALY with probability of 94.43%. When the price in China was less than USD 3.714 per mg, the price simulation results indicated that tislelizumab plus chemotherapy was cost-effective at a WTP threshold of USD 38,258. Tislelizumab plus chemotherapy yielded an INHB of 0.112 QALYs and an INMB of USD 4,279 compared with chemotherapy alone at a WTP threshold of USD 38,258. Based on the sensitivity analyses, the above results were stable. A general trend was observed for subgroups with better survival benefits related to a higher probability of cost-effectiveness. From the Chinese healthcare perspective, tislelizumab plus chemotherapy is more cost-effective than chemotherapy alone as a first-line therapy for OSCC. These findings can help clinicians make optimal clinical decisions and assist decision-makers in evaluating the cost-effectiveness of tislelizumab in clinical practice.

Abstract Background Despite adequate transurethral resection of the bladder tumor (TURBT) followed by intravesical bacillus-calmette guérin (BCG), high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (HR-NMIBC) is associated with high rates of recurrence and progression. Immune checkpoint inhibitors can improve antitumor activity in bladder cancer, but relevant evidence in HR-NMIBC is limited. Thus, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of the tislelizumab-based combination regimen in HR-NMIBC. Methods A retrospective study included 21 patients diagnosed with HR-NMIBC between July 2020 and September 2022. All patients underwent TURBT followed by combination regimens of tislelizumab plus BCG with or without gemcitabine/cisplatin (GC) chemotherapy. Clinical Data on demographics and characteristics, treatment information, outcomes, and safety were collected and analyzed. Results Among the 21 patients with HR-NMIBC, the median age was 63 years (range 39–85), with the majority of patients with stage T1 (16/21, 76.19%). The median treatment of tislelizumab was 5 cycles (range 1–12) and the median number of BCG instillations was 12 times (range 2–19). Of the 21 patients, 15 (71.43%) received combination chemotherapy with GC, with a median treatment of 2 cycles (range 0–7); others did not. Overall, after the median follow-up of 25 months (range 7–31), the estimated 2-year bladder recurrence-free survival rate was 78.64% (95% confidence intervals [CIs], 50.79–91.83%), 2-year cystectomy-free survival rate was 83.00% (95% CI 53.53–94.59%), and 2-year disease-free survival rate was 73.39% (95% CI 46.14–88.36%). Sixteen stage T1 patients achieved a distant metastasis-free survival rate of 95.45% (95% CI 71.87–99.34%) at 2 years. Fourteen (66.67%) patients experienced at least one treatment related-AEs (TRAEs), with 9.52% (2/21) of grade 3–4. Grade ≥ 3 TRAEs were hypophysitis (1/21, 4.76%) and myasthenia (1/21, 4.76%). No treatment-related deaths were observed. Conclusions The study demonstrated promising clinical benefits and a manageable safety profile of tislelizumab-based combination regimen as a bladder-sparing treatment of HR-NMIBC.

Abstract Background The standard care for resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) involves perioperative therapy combining chemotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors, typically lasting 6 to 12 months. However, the optimal treatment strategies for potentially resectable squamous cell lung carcinoma (SCC) remain unclear. This Phase 2 trial aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of a condensed four-cycle perioperative treatment regimen with tislelizumab combined with chemotherapy in patients with potentially resectable stage III SCC. Methods Patients with potentially resectable stage IIIA-IIIB (N2) SCC received intravenous tislelizumab, albumin-bound paclitaxel, and carboplatin for up to four cycles. The primary endpoints were major pathologic response (MPR) and incidence of treatment-related adverse events. Safety and potential biomarkers for efficacy prediction were also assessed. Results Among 35 enrolled patients, 32 underwent surgery with R0 resection achieved in all cases. MPR was achieved in 24 patients and pathological complete response (pCR) in 14 patients. Radiographic objective response was observed in 31 patients. The 12-month and 24-month event-free survival rate was 85.7 and 61.0%, respectively. Four patients experienced grade 3 or 4 adverse events. Tumor tissue based next-generation sequencing revealed the potential associations between several biomarkers and pathological response, including tumor neoantigen burden score, 18-gene expression profile score, CD8 + T cells, M1/M2 macrophages ratio and interferon‐gamma expression level. Besides, circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) dynamics and concentration were also associated with pathological response and the presence of ctDNA at postoperative month 1 was a strong predictor for disease relapse. Furthermore, metagenomic sequencing in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid demonstrated Streptococcus was the most abundant genus in the pCR group. Conclusions A condensed four-cycle perioperative treatment regimen of tislelizumab combined with chemotherapy demonstrated promising efficacy and manageable toxicities in potentially resectable stage III SCC. Specific biomarkers showed potential for predicting treatment efficacy and the mechanism of superior antitumor response of pCR patients was preliminarily and indirectly explored. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05024266. Registered August 27, 2021.

Xianmin Zhu,1 Shuang Dong,1 Jing Tang,1 Rong Xie,1 Huijing Wu,1 Jun Guan,2 Sheng Hu1 1Department of Medical Oncology, Hubei Cancer Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, People’s Republic of China; 2Department of Hematology, Wuhan NO.1 Hospital, Wuhan, People’s Republic of ChinaCorrespondence: Sheng Hu, Department of Medical Oncology, Hubei Cancer Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 116 South Road, Wuhan, 430079, People’s Republic of China, Email ehusmn@163.comAbstract: In recent years, there have been limited reports on the efficacy of later-line anti-programmed cell death − 1 (PD-1) therapy in achieving prolonged and complete remission in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Tislelizumab, a humanized anti-PD-1 monoclonal IgG4 antibody, has shown promising results in the treatment of HCC. This report highlights the case of a patient with HCC who experienced the development of lung metastatic lesions following HCC resection and chemotherapy, but achieved a prolonged complete response (CR) after receiving tislelizumab treatment. In April 2017, a 56-year-old male diagnosed with primary HCC underwent hepatectomy and hepatic arterial infusion pump placement. Following the surgery, the patient received adjuvant hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) with 4 cycles of cisplatin+5-fluorouracil (PF) regimen starting in June 2017. In May 2018, lung metastatic lesions were detected, and the patient underwent 4 cycles of oxaliplatin+leucovorin+5-fluorouracil (FOLFOX) chemotherapy. However, the disease progressed in August 2018, leading to the administration of arsenic trioxide treatment. Despite this, further progression was observed in October 2018, prompting the patient’s enrollment in a clinical trial for tislelizumab therapy. Initially, the patient achieved a partial response (PR) to tislelizumab, which was followed by a CR that lasted for almost 4 years. Unfortunately, tislelizumab treatment had to be discontinued due to immune-related adverse events (AE). Subsequently, the patient received lenvatinib and maintained a CR until July 2023. Tislelizumab monotherapy, when used as a third-line treatment, has demonstrated remarkable efficacy in facilitating patients with advanced HCC to attain a durable CR.Keywords: hepatocellular carcinoma, complete response, immune checkpoint inhibitor, tislelizumab, chemotherapy failure, metastasis

Objectives: This retrospective study evaluated the individual benefits of tislelizumab and surgery, as well as their synergistic effect on progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of stage II-III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Methods: From September 2019 to June 2022, all participants with potentially resectable NSCLC who received chemotherapy (C) or tislelizumab plus chemotherapy (T) were included in the study. Participants were categorized into four groups based on surgery or not (S or NS) and the utilization of tislelizumab (T or C). Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated using the Kaplan–Meier method and log-rank test, as well as Cox proportional hazards models. Results: Compared to C, T was associated with significantly higher objective response rate (64.54% vs. 34.78%, p = 0.003), higher pathological complete response rate (40.00% vs. 14.06%, p = 0.007), and higher major pathological response rate (60.00% vs. 20.31%, p < 0.001). The T + S group exhibited a proportionately higher reduction in the risk of disease progression or death compared to the sum of the T + NS group and C + S group. Regardless of C or T, surgery was associated with improved OS (p < 0.01). Without surgery, T did not show significant improvement in PFS or OS. However, with surgery, T significantly improved both PFS and OS (ps < 0.01). Conclusion: Tislelizumab with subsequent surgery synergistically improves the survival benefits in patients with NSCLC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Chronic nonspecific cheilitis is a complex condition characterized by persistent lip peeling and discomfort. This case report explores the clinical progression of a patient with history of tongue squamous cell carcinoma and subsequent Tislelizumab treatment, presenting with persistent lip peeling. Case presentation: A patient with a history of tongue squamous cell carcinoma (T2N0M0), treated with chemotherapy, surgery, and Tislelizumab, presented with six months of persistent lip peeling. Clinical examination revealed distinct features of chronic nonspecific cheilitis with infectious angular cheilitis (Oral Candidiasis). A tailored treatment plan, emphasizing oral hygiene practices and local treatments with Sodium Bicarbonate, Tacrolimus ointment, and Chlortetracycline ointment. Follow-up visits demonstrated sustained improvement, highlighting the significance of individualized approaches. Conclusions: This case underscores the importance of recognizing and managing oral manifestations in patients with a history of cancer and immunotherapy. The patient's response to treatment suggests that a multifaceted approach, combining local therapy with lifestyle modifications, can be effective in managing chronic nonspecific cheilitis associated with immunotherapy. Routine follow-up appointments, guided by personalized medicine principles, contribute to sustained patient well-being. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The RATIONALE-306 study revealed that patients with advanced or metastatic oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) could benefit from treatment with tislelizumab plus chemotherapy. This study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of tislelizumab plus chemotherapy for treating OSCC from the perspective of the Chinese healthcare system. Partitioned survival model estimated the cost-effectiveness of tislelizumab plus chemotherapy compared with chemotherapy alone for treating OSCC using RATIONALE-306 data. Costs and utilities were obtained from local databases and published studies. Costs, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), life-years, incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER), incremental net health benefits (INHB), and incremental net monetary benefits (INMB) were outcomes. Price simulation were conducted at the willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold. Sensitivity and subgroup analyses were performed to assess model robustness. Compared with chemotherapy alone, tislelizumab plus chemotherapy yielded an ICER of USD 27,896/QALY, gained an additional 0.414 QALYs and 0.751 life-years, and increased the cost by USD 11,560. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis revealed that tislelizumab plus chemotherapy was cost-effective at the WTP of USD 38,258/QALY with probability of 94.43%. When the price in China was less than USD 3.714 per mg, the price simulation results indicated that tislelizumab plus chemotherapy was cost-effective at a WTP threshold of USD 38,258. Tislelizumab plus chemotherapy yielded an INHB of 0.112 QALYs and an INMB of USD 4,279 compared with chemotherapy alone at a WTP threshold of USD 38,258. Based on the sensitivity analyses, the above results were stable. A general trend was observed for subgroups with better survival benefits related to a higher probability of cost-effectiveness. From the Chinese healthcare perspective, tislelizumab plus chemotherapy is more cost-effective than chemotherapy alone as a first-line therapy for OSCC. These findings can help clinicians make optimal clinical decisions and assist decision-makers in evaluating the cost-effectiveness of tislelizumab in clinical practice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Coinfection with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and the hepatitis B virus (HBV) occurs in 5-67% of patients with HIV. HIV weakens the human immune system and leads to various tumors. Patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and HIV experience poor treatment efficacy and have a short survival period. Approximately 70% of cases of HCC are diagnosed at advanced stages due to the subtle onset of the disease. As a result, most cases are not suits for curative therapy. Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) is the first-line treatment for intermediate-stage HCC and is commonly used to treat unresectable HCC in China. Recent advancements in systemic treatments have significantly enhanced the effectiveness of unresectable HCC treatment. Several previous study showed that combination treatment combination therapy can enhance the efficacy. Notably, studies proposed that TACE combined targeted drugs with immune checkpoint inhibitors results in a high objective response rate and overall survival. However, the novelty of this study lies in its report of a complete response using a triple combination in patients with HIV and HCC with main trunk portal vein tumor thrombus. Case presentation: A 57-year-old woman was diagnosed with HCC with a main trunk portal vein tumor thrombus combined with HIV infection, cirrhosis, and chronic viral hepatitis. She underwent TACE and was administered donafenib and tislelizumab. This triple therapy treatment regimen resulted in a clinical complete response according to the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST) based on contrast-enhanced computed tomography. Conclusion: We first used TACE combined with donafenib and tislelizumab for HCC patients with main trunk portal vein tumor thrombus and HIV-HBV coinfection and achieved complete response. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Sinonasal squamous cell carcinoma (SNSCC) is the most common, highaggressive sinonasal malignancies that have remained relatively stable poor outcomes over the past decade. As a first-line treatment for SNSCC, surgery plus adjuvant radiotherapy is recommended. However, complete surgical resection may not be appropriate due to the proximity of the nasal cavity and sinuses to key structures such as orbit or intracranial. Currently, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been established as one of the first-line therapies for many solid tumors with unresectable stage. However, evidence on the efficacy of ICIs in sinonasal malignancy is scarce and no ICIs are approved for use in SNSCC up to day. In this report, we report a case of a 64-year-old man with SNSCC treated by multi-protocol exploration. The patient achieved pathological complete response (pCR) after receiving two cycles of Docetaxel and cisplatin combined with tislelizumab. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first case of SNSCC treated with tislelizumab that achieved pCR. This case offers real-world evidence that chemotherapy plus immunotherapy is a promising treatment for SNSCC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Periampullary carcinoma is a malignant gastrointestinal tumor originating from the head of the pancreas, distal bile duct, duodenum, or the ampulla of Vater. Currently, surgery remains the primary treatment option, yet the postoperative recurrence rate remains high. Chemotherapy is the main approach for controlling postoperative recurrence. Histologically, periampullary carcinoma is categorized into two types: intestinal (IN) and pancreaticobiliary (PB) subtype. Each subtype requires different therapeutic approaches, with the PB type primarily treated with gemcitabine and the IN type with 5-FU. Despite these options, patient outcomes are still unsatisfactory. In recent years, the feasibility of immunotherapy in tumor treatment has been increasingly evidenced, although research on its efficacy in periampullary carcinoma treatment is still limited. In this report, we present a case of a periampullary carcinoma patient who experienced recurrence and metastasis after undergoing radical pancreatoduodenectomy and receiving gemcitabine-based chemotherapy post-surgery. Through next-generation sequencing (NGS), we identified high expression levels of programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) with a combined positive score (CPS) of 35, high tumor mutation burden (TMB-H), and high microsatellite instability (MSI-H) in this patient. Therefore, we implemented a combination therapy using Tislelizumab and chemotherapy. According to the latest follow-up, the tumors are effectively controlled. Our utilization of immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy holds significant implication for the treatment of periampullary carcinoma. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Despite adequate transurethral resection of the bladder tumor (TURBT) followed by intravesical bacillus-calmette guérin (BCG), high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (HR-NMIBC) is associated with high rates of recurrence and progression. Immune checkpoint inhibitors can improve antitumor activity in bladder cancer, but relevant evidence in HR-NMIBC is limited. Thus, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of the tislelizumab-based combination regimen in HR-NMIBC. Methods: A retrospective study included 21 patients diagnosed with HR-NMIBC between July 2020 and September 2022. All patients underwent TURBT followed by combination regimens of tislelizumab plus BCG with or without gemcitabine/cisplatin (GC) chemotherapy. Clinical Data on demographics and characteristics, treatment information, outcomes, and safety were collected and analyzed. Results: Among the 21 patients with HR-NMIBC, the median age was 63 years (range 39–85), with the majority of patients with stage T1 (16/21, 76.19%). The median treatment of tislelizumab was 5 cycles (range 1–12) and the median number of BCG instillations was 12 times (range 2–19). Of the 21 patients, 15 (71.43%) received combination chemotherapy with GC, with a median treatment of 2 cycles (range 0–7); others did not. Overall, after the median follow-up of 25 months (range 7–31), the estimated 2-year bladder recurrence-free survival rate was 78.64% (95% confidence intervals [CIs], 50.79–91.83%), 2-year cystectomy-free survival rate was 83.00% (95% CI 53.53–94.59%), and 2-year disease-free survival rate was 73.39% (95% CI 46.14–88.36%). Sixteen stage T1 patients achieved a distant metastasis-free survival rate of 95.45% (95% CI 71.87–99.34%) at 2 years. Fourteen (66.67%) patients experienced at least one treatment related-AEs (TRAEs), with 9.52% (2/21) of grade 3–4. Grade ≥ 3 TRAEs were hypophysitis (1/21, 4.76%) and myasthenia (1/21, 4.76%). No treatment-related deaths were observed. Conclusions: The study demonstrated promising clinical benefits and a manageable safety profile of tislelizumab-based combination regimen as a bladder-sparing treatment of HR-NMIBC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Histiocytic sarcoma (HS) is an extremely rare but aggressive hematopoietic malignancy, and the prognosis has been reported to be rather unfavorable with a median overall survival of merely 6 months. We presented a 58-year-old female patient complaining of abdominal pain and fever, who was admitted to our institution in September 2021. Fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography–computed tomography (PET/CT) scan showed enlargement of generalized multiple lymph nodes. Subsequently, laparoscopic retroperitoneal lesion biopsy and bone marrow aspiration were performed. The pathological findings indicated the diagnosis of HS concurrent with follicular lymphoma. The immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining of the tumor lesion revealed a high expression of CD38 and PD-L1 proteins. Furthermore, KRAS gene mutation was identified by means of next-generation sequencing. The patient exhibited poor treatment response to both first- and second-line cytotoxic chemotherapies. Therefore, she underwent six cycles of Daratumumab (anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody), Pazopanib (multi-target receptor tyrosine kinases inhibitor) combined with third-line chemotherapy, followed by involved-site radiotherapy and maintenance therapy with the PD-1 inhibitor Tislelizumab. Long-term partial remission was finally achieved after multi-modality treatment. Duration of remission and overall survival reached 22 and 32 months, respectively. Our case indicated that immuno-targeted treatment coupled with chemotherapy and radiotherapy might constitute a potential therapeutic option for HS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BACKGROUND: How to comprehensively evaluate the rationality of drug use is a challenging issue. OBJECTIVE: To establish the evaluation index of the effective use of tislelizumab, so as to ensure its higher rationality and normalization in clinical application. METHODS: Based on the indications, drug instructions, and relevant guidelines of the National Basic Medical Insurance Restriction Catalogue, a retrospective analysis and evaluation of 286 cases of using tislelizumab injection in our hospital from January to December 2022 were conducted using the weighted technique for order of preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) method. RESULTS: Among the 286 medical records evaluated, the main irrational manifestations were inappropriate indications (90 cases, 31.47%), auxiliary examination and laboratory examination did not meet the minimum requirements of combination chemotherapy drugs (40 cases, 13.99%), the drug course was not standard (39 cases, 13.64%). Among the included cases, 57.34% were reasonable cases ( C i ⩾ 0.8), 10.84% were basic reasonable cases (0.6 ⩽ C i < 0.8), and 31.82% were unreasonable cases ( C i < 0.6). CONCLUSION: The TOPSIS method, with its attribute hierarchical model (AHM)-weighted approach, can be employed as the rational assessment technique for the injection of tislelizumab. The clinical application of tislelizumab in our hospital is still insufficient, which needs to be further improved management. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Breast cancer remains one of the predominant malignancies worldwide. In the context of inoperable advanced or metastatic human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer, systemic management primarily relies on HER2-targeting monoclonal antibodies. With the successful development of anti-HER2 antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs), these agents have been increasingly integrated into therapeutic regimens for metastatic breast cancer. Here, we present the case of a 42-year-old female patient with HER2-positive pulmonary metastatic breast cancer who underwent an extensive treatment protocol. This protocol included chemotherapy, radiation therapy, hormonal therapy, surgical intervention on the breast, and anti-HER2 therapies. The antiHER2 therapies involved both singular and dual targeting strategies using trastuzumab and the ADC disitamab vedotin (RC48) over an 8-year period. After experiencing disease progression following HER2-targeted therapy with RC48, the patient achieved noticeable partial remission through a therapeutic regimen that combined trastuzumab deruxtecan (DS8201) and tislelizumab. The data suggest a promising role for DS8201 in managing advanced stages of HER2- amplified metastatic breast cancer, especially in cases that demonstrate progression after initial HER2-directed therapies using ADCs. Furthermore, its combination with anti-PD-1 agents enhances therapeutic efficacy by augmenting the anti-tumoral immune response. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

SMARCA4-deficient undifferentiated tumor (SMARCA4-dUT) is a devastating subtype of thoracic tumor with SMARCA4 inactivation and is characterized by rapid progression, poor prognosis, and high risk of postoperative recurrence. However, effective treatments for SMARCA4-dUT are lacking. Herein, we describe a patient with SMARCA4-dUT who exhibited an impressive response to the anti-programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) antibody (tislelizumab) in combination with conventional chemotherapy (etoposide and cisplatin). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first case of SMARCA4-dUT treated with chemotherapy, comprising etoposide and cisplatin, combined with anti-PD-1 inhibitors. Immunotherapy combined with etoposide and cisplatin may be a promising strategy to treat SMARCA4-dUT. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The standard care for resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) involves perioperative therapy combining chemotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors, typically lasting 6 to 12 months. However, the optimal treatment strategies for potentially resectable squamous cell lung carcinoma (SCC) remain unclear. This Phase 2 trial aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of a condensed four-cycle perioperative treatment regimen with tislelizumab combined with chemotherapy in patients with potentially resectable stage III SCC. Methods: Patients with potentially resectable stage IIIA-IIIB (N2) SCC received intravenous tislelizumab, albumin-bound paclitaxel, and carboplatin for up to four cycles. The primary endpoints were major pathologic response (MPR) and incidence of treatment-related adverse events. Safety and potential biomarkers for efficacy prediction were also assessed. Results: Among 35 enrolled patients, 32 underwent surgery with R0 resection achieved in all cases. MPR was achieved in 24 patients and pathological complete response (pCR) in 14 patients. Radiographic objective response was observed in 31 patients. The 12-month and 24-month event-free survival rate was 85.7 and 61.0%, respectively. Four patients experienced grade 3 or 4 adverse events. Tumor tissue based next-generation sequencing revealed the potential associations between several biomarkers and pathological response, including tumor neoantigen burden score, 18-gene expression profile score, CD8 + T cells, M1/M2 macrophages ratio and interferon‐gamma expression level. Besides, circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) dynamics and concentration were also associated with pathological response and the presence of ctDNA at postoperative month 1 was a strong predictor for disease relapse. Furthermore, metagenomic sequencing in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid demonstrated Streptococcus was the most abundant genus in the pCR group. Conclusions: A condensed four-cycle perioperative treatment regimen of tislelizumab combined with chemotherapy demonstrated promising efficacy and manageable toxicities in potentially resectable stage III SCC. Specific biomarkers showed potential for predicting treatment efficacy and the mechanism of superior antitumor response of pCR patients was preliminarily and indirectly explored. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05024266. Registered August 27, 2021. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Several economic studies have assessed the cost-effectiveness of programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) inhibitors compared to second-line chemotherapy in treating esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). However, there is a lack of economic comparisons among the different PD-1 inhibitors. Aim: This study aimed to assess the cost-effectiveness of PD-1 inhibitors (nivolumab, pembrolizumab, camrelizumab, and tislelizumab) in second-line treatment for advanced or metastatic ESCC within the Chinese healthcare system. Method: The clinical trials were systematically retrieved from PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library. We established a fractional polynomials model to conduct a network meta-analysis, enabling the calculation of hazard ratios and expected survival rates. Economic outcomes were estimated using a partitioned survival model. The costs and utilities were gathered from published sources. The threshold for willingness-to-pay (WTP) for a quality-adjusted life year (QALY) was set at three times China's per capita gross domestic product in 2022. Sensitivity analyses (SA) were performed to address uncertainties in the model. Results: Four phase III randomized controlled trials were included, evaluating the cost-effectiveness of four PD-1 inhibitors, camrelizumab, nivolumab, tislelizumab, and pembrolizumab, compared to chemotherapy for the second-line treatment of advanced or metastatic ESCC. For camrelizumab, nivolumab, tislelizumab, and pembrolizumab, the corresponding incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were $27,375.43/QALY, $205,312.19/QALY, $9,266.73/QALY, and $220,368.10/QALY, respectively. The SA results indicated the robustness of the base analysis findings. Conclusion: From the Chinese healthcare system, under the WTP of $38,253.48/QALY, tislelizumab is a cost-effective treatment option for the second-line treatment of advanced or metastatic ESCC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This work was designed to assess the cost-effectiveness of front-line tislelizumab plus chemotherapy (TIS+Chemo) in advanced gastric cancer (GC) or gastroesophageal junction cancer (GEJC) with positive expression of programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) from the perspective of Chinese healthcare system. A 10-year partitioned survival model was undertaken utilizing clinical data from RATIONALE 305. Costs and utilities were both discounted at an annual rate of 5%. The primary outcome was incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) and calculated as the cost per quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). The willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold was set as $18,625/QALY. Only direct medical costs were considered. Sensitivity analyses and subgroup analyses were performed to evaluate the robustness of the model. In the base-case analysis, the incremental cost and effectiveness associated with TIS+Chemo vs Chemo was 7,361 and 0.38 QALYs, respectively, leading to an ICER of 19,371/QALY. At the WTP threshold of $18,625/QALY, the TIS+Chemo was not a cost-effective first-line treatment option. The model outcomes were robust. TIS+Chemo did not provide a cost-effective approach for PD-L1 positive advanced GC/GEJC in China setting. However, TIS+Chemo might be cost-effective in provinces with higher WTP threshold. RATIONALE 305, , identifier is NCT03777657. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This case report highlights the immune-related adverse events (irAEs) that occurred during the treatment of esophageal cancer with Tislelizumab and discusses management strategies, indicating that photodynamic therapy (PDT) may be an optimal adjunctive treatment option. Following Tislelizumab therapy, the patient demonstrated significant tumor reduction; however, subsequent irAEs related to immunotherapy emerged, including eyelid muscle weakness and myocardial and skeletal muscle injury. Methylprednisolone successfully alleviated these symptoms, with early intervention being crucial for controlling irAEs. The patient then underwent PDT, which not only further helped manage irAEs but also inhibited tumor progression. This case underscores the specific adverse reactions, such as eyelid ptosis, skeletal muscle, and myocardial damage associated with Tislelizumab, and the importance of early corticosteroid intervention. It also emphasizes the significance of PDT as an adjunctive treatment for controlling tumors and alleviating immune-related adverse reactions.

PurposeThe efficacy of tislelizumab plus chemotherapy in improving progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in unresectable gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer (GC/GEJC) has recently been emphasized. This study compared the cost-effectiveness of tislelizumab plus chemotherapy versus placebo plus chemotherapy for the United States (US) and Chinese populations.MethodsUsing data from the RATIONALE-305 phase 3 trial, a Markov model was developed to analyze quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs), incremental net health benefits (INHBs), and incremental net monetary benefits (INMBs). The health state utilities and direct medical costs were obtained from the relevant literature and local cost databases. The model uncertainty was evaluated using sensitivity analyses.FindingsIn the base-case analysis, the addition of tislelizumab to chemotherapy yielded an ICER of $37,768.48 per QALY in China, slightly below the willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of $38,042.49 per QALY, showing marginal cost-effectiveness with an INHB of 0.05 QALYs and an INMB of $1,852.49. Subgroup analyses revealed ICERs of $23,853.52 for patients with a PD-L1 TAP score ≥ 5% (TAP ≥ 5%). In the US, the ICER was $502,786.22 per QALY in the intent-to-treat (ITT) and $321,395.28 per QALY in the TAP ≥ 5% subgroup, exceeding the US WTP threshold of $150,000.00.ImplicationsIn China, tislelizumab plus chemotherapy is a cost-effective first-line therapy for unresectable GC/GEJC in both ITT and TAP ≥ 5% subgroups. In the US, tislelizumab plus chemotherapy is not cost-effective.

Abstrcat: Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) of the prostate is a rare and enigmatic tumor with uncertain biological behavior and treatment modalities. Some studies suggest that BCC exhibits invasive characteristics and a high degree of malignancy, necessitating proactive management and vigilant monitoring. Notably, there is a lack of reported effective treatment utilizing programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) inhibitors for advanced BCC of the prostate. This study explores the efficacy of tislelizumab, as a single-agent therapy, in the successful treatment of advanced prostate BCC.

IntroductionGemcitabine and cisplatin remain the cornerstone for the treatment of advanced or unresectable biliary tract cancers, but the incidence rate of the grade 3 or 4 toxic effects is high (70.7%). In recent years, significant progress has been achieved in the systemic treatment of cholangiocarcinoma with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), targeted therapy, and hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy (HAIC). HAIC may elevate the local drug concentration in the liver to 10–100 times the drug plasma concentration; therefore, it may enhance tumor cytotoxicity while minimizing systemic adverse effects. HAIC combined with immunotherapy and targeted therapy resulted in acceptable tumor responses and tolerable toxic effects in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, whether this combination strategy can benefit patients with unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma remains unclear.Methods and AnalysisWe describe a single-arm, open label, prospective clinical trial of HAIC sequential transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE) combined with tislelizumab and surufatinib in patients with unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. TAE + HAIC was performed at an interval of at least 3 weeks, and oxaliplatin (85 mg/m2) and rituximab (3 mg/m2) were infused. TAE was performed using undrugged microspheres. Tislelizumab was infused every 3 weeks and surufatinib was administered orally once a day, with 3-5 capsules (50 mg/capsule) each time. We plan to enroll 28 participants in this study. The primary study endpoint was objective response rate (ORR). The secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), conversion to surgical resection rate, overall survival (OS), 1-year OS rate, disease control rate (DCR), quality of life (QoL), and incidence of adverse events.Trial registration numberNCT06239532.

BackgroundRecently, the clinical benefits of neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy have been observed in patients with locally advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction (G/GEJ) cancer; however, the pathological complete response (pCR) and long-term survival rates are still unsatisfactory. The aim of this study is to investigate the efficacy and safety of chemotherapy combined with tislelizumab and low-dose radiation therapy (LDRT) for the neoadjuvant treatment of locally advanced G/GEJ cancer.MethodsThis is a prospective, multicenter, single-arm, phase Ib/II trial. In the phase Ib study, 5 patients will be enrolled in each treatment group with different radiation doses. In the phase II study, a total of 44 patients will be enrolled. Eligible patients will be registered and receive three cycles of SOX regimen chemotherapy (S-1: 40-60 mg Bid, d1-14, q3w; oxaliplatin: 130 mg/m2, iv drip, d1, q3w) plus tislelizumab (200 mg, iv drip, d1, q3w). Simultaneously, LDRT will be planned and administered after the first cycle of systemic therapy. Radical D2 gastrectomy will be performed 4-6 weeks after the last administration of chemotherapy plus tislelizumab. The primary endpoint of phase Ib study is to determine the optimal radiation dose for phase II study. The primary endpoint of phase II is the pCR rate. The secondary endpoints include R0 resection rate, major pathological response (MPR) rate, 2-year event-free survival (EFS) rate, 2-year overall survival (OS) rate and safety profile. Moreover, we will also explore potential molecular markers for predicting the benefit and safety of this neoadjuvant regimen. Written informed consent should be provided by all patients enrolled in the study. The study protocol was approved by the independent ethics committee at each institution.DiscussionThis is the first study to explore the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with tislelizumab and LDRT in G/GEJ cancer patients, the results of which may provide novel treatment strategy for patients with locally advanced G/GEJ adenocarcinoma.Clinical trial registrationClinicalTrials.Gov, identifier NCT06266871.

BackgroundAlpha-fetoprotein-producing gastric cancer (AFPGC) represents a particularly aggressive subtype of gastric carcinoma characterized by elevated rates of vascular invasion, lymphatic dissemination, hepatic metastasis, and an unfavorable clinical outcome. Treatment strategies for AFPGC have historically lacked specificity. Herein, a case is presented involving AFPGC in which the patient exhibited a notable response to combined anti-PD-1 antibody immunotherapy and SOX chemotherapy, potentially achieving a cure. This report marks the first application of this regimen in neoadjuvant therapy for AFP gastric cancer, followed by radical resection and postoperative adjuvant therapy.Case summaryA 62-year-old male patient presented with persistent upper abdominal distension and discomfort lasting over 2 months. Initial investigations revealed markedly elevated serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) levels, and subsequent pathological examination confirmed the diagnosis of AFPGC via gastroscopy. Due to the patient’s condition, surgical resection was initially deemed unfeasible. Therefore, a chemo-immunotherapy regimen consisting of SOX chemotherapy and the PD-1 inhibitor tislelizumab was administered for 3 cycles. Following this, successful laparoscopic radical gastrectomy was performed. The treatment protocol was continued with an additional 3 cycles postoperatively. At the time of this case report, the patient maintained a good quality of life with no evidence of disease recurrence or adverse events.ConclusionThe present report highlights a case of AFPGC where significant therapeutic success was achieved through a combined regimen of chemotherapy and immunotherapy, both before and after surgery. The use of anti-PD-1 antibody (tislelizumab) in combination with SOX regimen (S-1 and oxaliplatin) demonstrated effective treatment of AFPGC, potentially offering a curative approach. This approach represents a promising targeted therapy option for patients with AFPGC.

Extramammary Paget disease (EMPD) is a rare epithelial adenocarcinoma in apocrine-gland rich skin, involving the vulva, the scrotum, and the penis. with distant metastases and a poor prognosis. Local EMPD patients generally have a good prognosis, with expected 5-year survival of 60%–92%, but distant metastasis represents poor prognosis and 5-year survival of 10%. Treatment approaches for advanced EMPD are chemotherapy and biological agents, which carry limited efficacy. We report the case of a 57-year-old man diagnosed with metastatic EMPD, who showed a long-term disease control with a combination therapy (an immune checkpoint inhibitor - tislelizumab plus chemotherapy – paclitaxel albumin and cisplatin). This patient underwent a wide penile scrotal lesion excision and six cycles of tislelizumab plus chemotherapy. The patient achieved partial response for the metastatic lesions according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (version 1.1). This case report supports further investigation of the combination treatment of chemotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors in the management of metastatic EMPD, which currently has an abysmal prognosis and no standardized treatment.

Background: The efficacy of immunotherapy plus neoadjuvant chemotherapy and concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) for locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LA-NPC) has not been reported. This study retrospectively compared the efficacy of tislelizumab plus neoadjuvant chemotherapy and CCRT with neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by CCRT. Methods: Ninety patients with stages III–IVa NPC were identified between January 2020 and March 2021 at the Affiliate Hospital of Guangdong Medical University. Forty-three patients in the observation group (OG) received tislelizumab plus nano albumin–paclitaxel and cisplatin (nab-TP) regimen, followed by CCRT, while forty-seven patients in the control group (CG) received nab-TP regimen followed by CCRT. Results: The complete response rate after neoadjuvant therapy was significantly higher in the OG compared to the CG (37.2% vs. 12.8 %). The objective response rates were 88.4 % in the OG and 70.2 % in the CG. The 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) rates for OG and CG patients were 93.0 % and 78.7 %, respectively (P = 0.04, HR = 0.31). The overall survival (OS) rates for the OG and the CG were 95.3 % and 87.2 %, respectively (P = 0.15, HR = 0.36). Locoregional relapse-free survival (LRFS) rates were 90.7 % for the OG and 72.3 % for the CG (P = 0.04, HR = 0.38), and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) rates were 95.3 % for the OG, and 80.9 % for the CG (P = 0.04, HR = 0.30). For PD-L1 high-expression and low-expression rates, the 3-year PFS rates were 89.2 % and 85.7 % (P = 0.77, HR = 1.21), and the OS rates were 90.2 % and 89.2 % (P = 0.65, HR = 1.36), respectively. Conclusion: Tislelizumab combined with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and CCRT showed encouraging therapeutic effects and good tolerability in patients with LA-NPC compared to the standard treatment.

Abstract Background Esophageal carcinoma is a type of cancer that occurs in the esophagus. For patients with locally advanced or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma who have either experienced disease progression following first-line standard chemotherapy or are intolerant to it, the prognosis is typically poor. Additionally, these patients often bear a substantial economic burden during the course of their treatment. Tislelizumab is a selective PD-1 inhibitor with efficacy proven in locally advanced or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. The study aims to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of tislelizumab versus camrelizumab as the second-line treatment in locally advanced or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients in China. Methods From the perspective of China’s healthcare system, the partitioned survival model with three health states was established in a 3-week cycle and a lifetime horizon. Anchored matching adjusted indirect comparison was used for survival analyses based on individual patient data from RATIONALE 302 trial and the published ESCORT study due to the lack of head-to-head clinical trials. Only direct medical costs were included. Costs and utility values were derived from local charges, the published literature, and related databases. Sensitivity analyses and a scenario analysis were also performed to verify the robustness of the model results. Results Compared with camrelizumab monotherapy, tislelizumab monotherapy incurred a lower lifetime cost ($8,346 vs. $8,851) and yielded higher quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) (0.87 vs. 0.63), which resulted in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of -$2,051/QALY. Tislelizumab monotherapy is a dominant option over camrelizumab monotherapy in China. The three primary parameters upon which this result was most sensitive were the unit cost of camrelizumab, the unit cost of tislelizumab, and the duration of reactive cutaneous capillary endothelial proliferation (RCCEP). According to the probabilistic sensitivity analysis (PSA), tislelizumab monotherapy was 100% cost-effective when the WTP was 1–3 times GDP per capita in China($11,207/QALY∼$33,621/QALY). Scenario analysis showed that the result was consistent. Conclusion Tislelizumab monotherapy is a dominant option compared with camrelizumab monotherapy as the second-line treatment for locally advanced or metastatic ESCC in China.

Abstract Background Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have demonstrated superior clinical efficacy in prolonging overall survival (OS) as the second-line treatment for advanced or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), and were recommended by the guidelines. However, it remains uncertain which ICI is the most cost-effective. This study assessed the cost-effectiveness of ICIs as the second-line treatment for ESCC based on the perspective of the Chinese healthcare system. Methods A network meta-analysis (NMA) was performed to obtain the Hazard ratios (HRs) for indirect comparisons. A three-state Markov model with a 10-year time horizon was conducted to assess the cost-effectiveness. The state transition probabilities were calculated with Kaplan-Meier (KM) curves data from clinical trial and HRs from the NMA. Utilities and costs were derived from local charges or previously published studies. Univariate and probabilistic sensitivity analyses (PSA) were performed to examine model robustness. The results were assessed based on the total costs, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). Results Five clinical trials (ATTRACTION-3, ESCORT, KEYNOTE-181, ORIENT-2, RATIONALE-302) with a total of 1797 patients were included in the NMA. The NMA showed that both camrelizumab and tislelizumab received relatively high rankings for progression-free survival (PFS) and OS. Compared with sintilimab, treatment with tislelizumab and camrelizumab gained 0.018 and 0.034 additional QALYs, resulting in incremental ICERs of $75,472.65/QALY and $175,681.9/QALY, respectively. Nivolumab and pembrolizumab produced lower QALYs and greater costs, suggesting that both were dominated in comparison to sintilimab. HRs and health state utilities were the most influential parameters in most univariate sensitivity analyses of paired comparisons. PSA results suggested that sintilimab had an 84.4% chance of being the most cost-effective treatment regimen at the WTP threshold of $38,223.34/QALY. In the scenario analysis, sintilimab would no longer be cost-effective, if the price of camrelizumab was assumed to decrease by 64.6% or the price of tislelizumab was assumed to decrease by 16.9%. Conclusions and relevance Among the five potential competing ICIs, sintilimab was likely to be the most cost-effective regimen as the second-line treatment for locally advanced or metastatic ESCC in China.

A 66-year-old female patient presenting with dysphagia was diagnosed with stage IV unresectable gastric cancer (cTxN+M1). Multiple liver metastases were identified. The patient subsequently underwent five courses of chemotherapy and immunotherapy, including the capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (XELOX) regimen combined with tislelizumab. After fifth course treatment, it was confirmed that the liver metastases had completely disappeared and the primary tumor had significantly reduced in size. Consequently, a laparoscopy was performed, revealing a retraction-like response in the primary tumor and no obvious metastases in the abdominal cavity. Subsequently, a radical total gastrectomy was carried out through open abdominal surgery. Pathological analysis showed no remaining cancer or lymph node metastases, and the tumor regression was classified as grade 0. The patient has been now receiving additional chemotherapy and immunotherapy to manage any potential residual metastases. This case illustrated the rare and significant impact of combining chemotherapy with tislelizumab, transitioning the treatment approach from palliative to curative. It highlighted the critical role of immunotherapy in managing advanced gastric cancer with liver metastases.