Search

Prosthetic iris devices (PIDs) differ profoundly in the difficulty of implant and design. They provide improvement of glare and aesthetics, but surgical indication and PID choice should be evaluated accurately. Surgical correction of traumatic aniridia aims to improve the quality of vision, compartmentalize the anterior and posterior chamber, and re-establish a satisfying cosmetic appearance. Various types of prosthetic iris devices (PIDs) are available, which differ in technical difficulty of implant and design: artificial iris (AI)–intraocular lens prosthesis, endocapsular capsular tension ring–based PID, and customized AI. The choice depends on the preexisting clinical condition after severe ocular trauma and on patient functional and cosmetic expectations. This systematic review of the literature compared anatomical and functional outcomes of various types of PIDs. Of 185 articles found in the literature, 70 fulfilled the eligibility criteria. 5 subgroups of PIDs were Ophtec, artificial iris from Ophtec BV, Morcher GmbH, HumanOptics AG, and other prosthesis. Both glare and aesthetic outcome improved postoperatively; in comparison with other PIDs, intraocular pressure rise was higher in the Morcher group (40%), whereas prosthesis dislocation was higher in the Ophtec group (39%). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To analyse morpho‐functional foveal changes in eyes with lamellar macular hole (LMH) by an integrated assessment of short‐wavelength fundus autofluorescence (SW‐FAF) and microperimetry (SW‐FAF/microperimetry integrated assessment) before and after treatment with a technique of double‐inverted flaps of epiretinal proliferation (EP) and internal limiting membrane (ILM). Methods: Clinical and tomographic parameters were best‐corrected visual acuity (BCVA), LMH size, central retinal thickness (CRT) and outer retinal layer integrity. SW‐FAF/microperimetry integrated assessment allowed to analyse retinal sensitivity (RS) and FAF status of the fovea by an overlay of RS map on SW‐FAF image. Follow‐up was at baseline, 1, 3, 6 and 12 postoperative months. Results: Forty pseudophakic eyes. Hyper‐FAF area was associated with larger LMH size (p = 0.0073) and inversely correlated with CRT (p = 0.021). Lower preoperative RS was observed in hyper‐FAF than normo‐FAF areas (p = 0.0117). External limiting membrane (ELM) defect was associated with worse BCVA (p = 0.0004). After surgery, BCVA improved (p = 0.001) and it was related to ELM recovery (p = 0.00483), hyper‐FAF area decreased (p = 0.001), and RS increased (p = 0.440). Hyper‐FAF points that normalized their FAF were associated with higher RS improvement compared to unchanged points. Conclusion: Short‐wavelength fundus autofluorescence/microperimetry integrated assessment provides important information on the entity of damage of LMH and on postoperative recovery. Double‐inverted EP and ILM flap technique is safe and effective for LMH treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Pathologic myopia (PM) is an ocular disorder characterized by a spherical equivalent (SE) of more than – 6.0 diopters (D) or by an axial length (AL) of more than 26.5 millimeters (mm). PM is associated with myopic maculopathy (MM). The ATN classification describes all the aspects of MM which regroups atrophic, tractional and neovascular consequences to the sclera, choroid and retina of highly myopic eyes. The advent of OCT allowed to define the ultrastructural characteristics of the tractional changes in MM, described by the term myopic traction maculopathy (MTM). They include foveoschisis/maculoschisis/retinoschisis (FS/MS/RS), retinal/foveal detachment (RD/FD), lamellar macular holes (LMH) and full-thickness macular holes (FTMH) with or without RD (MHRD). The MTM staging system (MSS) describes all foveal and retinal changes related to MTM and their natural history interpreting them as different stages of a single progressive disorder. The management of MTM can be just observation for the earliest cases with good vision or surgery for the severe stages with vision loss. There are two possible surgical approaches: ab externo, that acts on the alteration of the scleral shape and includes posterior scleral reinforcement and macular buckle. Ab interno, that targets the alteration of the foveal profile and consists in pars plana vitrectomy with removal of all the epiretinal tractions, maneuvers on the internal limiting membrane, and the use of intravitreal tamponade and laser. As they target two different sides of the same pathology, the two techniques have to be selected on the base of the MTM stage, single or combined. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of surgically induced macular detachment (MD) for the treatment of refractory full-thickness macular hole (FTMH). Materials and Methods: Clinical data were age, gender, lens status, and best corrected visual acuity (BCVA). Preoperative tomographic parameters were: FTMH morphology (intraretinal cyst and elevated or flat edges) and FTMH diameter. Postoperative FTMH closure and outer retinal layer (ORL) restoration were evaluated. Fundus autofluorescence (FAF), optical coherence tomography (OCT) findings, and BCVA were analyzed at the 1st, 3rd, and 6th postoperative month. The interval between the first surgery for idiopathic FTMH and the surgically induced MD for refractory FTMH was collected (intersurgical interval, days). Results: Ten eyes of 10 patients were included. The mean age was 68.8 ± 6.8 years. FTMH closure was obtained in 9 patients; in 8 patients, ORL restoration was detected. BCVA improved from 1.06 ± 0.1 (baseline) to 0.56 ± 0.2 (final) logMAR (p = 0.0001). A negative correlation between the intersurgical interval and postoperative visual gain was demonstrated (r = –0.3618). FAF and OCT showed a permanent retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) damage corresponding to the retinotomy points. Conclusion: This study demonstrates the efficacy of this technique and highlights the risk of RPE damage, suggesting the need to perform the retinotomy points outside the macula. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Outcomes of pneumatic retinopexy (PnR) using surgical microscope, wide-angle viewing system, and chandelier endoilluminator (microscope-assisted pneumatic retinopexy) for primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD)., Methods: Retrospective study. 43 consecutive eyes with RRD undergoing microscope-assisted PnR surgery (MAPR) were analysed. Inclusion criteria comprehend phakic eyes with single retinal break or a group of breaks in detached retina in the same quadrant above 8- and 4-o'clock meridians. Follow-up was at least 6 months., Results: Of the 43 eyes, a total of 25 (58%) presented preoperatively a single retinal break, 15 (35%) had two retinal breaks in the same quadrant and 3 (7%) presented three or more retinal breaks in the same quadrant. Other retinal breaks not observed preoperatively were discovered intraoperatively in 12 eyes (28%). In 9 (21%) the missed retinal breaks were in the same quadrant as the main diagnosed break(s), while 3 (7%) had missed retinal breaks in a different one. These 3 eyes as no longer adhering to the PnR indication criteria switched intraoperatively to other surgical procedures and were excluded in the reattachment rate results. The total primary reattachment rate with MAPR was achieved in 37 eyes (92.5%). No significant BCVA changes were observed postoperatively., Conclusion: MAPR is an effective and safe surgical option, it allows to work with both hands free and provides an adequate visualization of the retina during the procedure minimizing the risk of missed retinal breaks potentially leading to surgical failure.