Search

Objectives: The evolution of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2) necessitates rapid methods for assessing monoclonal antibody (mAb) potency against emerging variants. Authentic virus neutralisation assays are considered the gold standard for measuring virus‐neutralising antibody (nAb) titres in serum. However, authentic virus‐based assays pose inherent practical challenges for measuring nAb titres against emerging SARS‐CoV‐2 variants (e.g. storing infectious viruses and testing at biosafety level‐3 facilities). Here, we demonstrate the utility of pseudovirus neutralisation assay data in conjunction with serum mAb concentrations to robustly predict nAb titres in serum. Methods: SARS‐CoV‐2 nAb titres were determined via authentic‐ and lentiviral pseudovirus‐based neutralisation assays using serological data from three AZD7442 (tixagevimab–cilgavimab) studies: PROVENT (NCT04625725), TACKLE (NCT04723394) and a phase 1 dose‐ranging study (NCT04507256). AZD7442 serum concentrations were assessed using immunocapture. Serum‐based half‐maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) values were derived from pseudovirus nAb titres and serum mAb concentrations, and compared with in vitro IC50 measurements. Results: nAb titres measured via authentic‐ and lentiviral pseudovirus‐based neutralisation assays were strongly correlated for the ancestral SARS‐CoV‐2 virus and SARS‐CoV‐2 Alpha. Serum AZD7442 concentrations and pseudovirus nAb titres were strongly correlated for multiple SARS‐CoV‐2 variants with all Spearman correlation coefficients ≥ 0.78. Serum‐based IC50 values were similar to in vitro IC50 values for AZD7442, for ancestral SARS‐CoV‐2 and Alpha, Delta, Omicron BA.2 and Omicron BA.4/5 variants. Conclusions: These data highlight that serum mAb concentrations and pseudovirus in vitro IC50 values can be used to rapidly predict nAb titres in serum for emerging and historical SARS‐CoV‐2 variants. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Nirsevimab is an extended half-life (M252Y/S254T/T256E [YTE]-modified) monoclonal antibody to the pre-fusion conformation of the respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) Fusion protein, with established efficacy in preventing RSV-associated lower respiratory tract infection in infants for the duration of a typical RSV season. Previous studies suggest that nirsevimab confers protection via direct virus neutralization. Here we use preclinical models to explore whether fragment crystallizable (Fc)-mediated effector functions contribute to nirsevimab-mediated protection. Methods: Nirsevimab, MEDI8897* (i.e., nirsevimab without the YTE modification), and MEDI8897*-TM (i.e., MEDI8897* without Fc effector functions) binding to Fc γ receptors (FcγRs) was evaluated using surface plasmon resonance. Antibodydependent neutrophil phagocytosis (ADNP), antibody-dependent cellular phagocytosis (ADCP), antibody-dependent complement deposition (ADCD), and antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) were assessed through in vitro and ex vivo serological analyses. A cotton rat challenge study was performed with MEDI8897* and MEDI8897*-TM to explore whether Fc effector functions contribute to protection from RSV. Results: Nirsevimab and MEDI8897* exhibited binding to a range of FcγRs, with expected reductions in FcgR binding affinities observed for MEDI8897*-TM. Nirsevimab exhibited in vitro ADNP, ADCP, ADCD, and ADCC activity above background levels, and similar ADNP, ADCP, and ADCD activity to palivizumab. Nirsevimab administration increased ex vivo ADNP, ADCP, and ADCD activity in participant serum from the MELODY study (NCT03979313). However, ADCC levels remained similar between nirsevimab and placebo. MEDI8897* and MEDI8897*-TM exhibited similar dose-dependent reduction in lung and nasal turbinate RSV titers in the cotton rat model. Conclusion: Nirsevimab possesses Fc effector activity comparable with the current standard of care, palivizumab. However, despite possessing the capacity for Fc effector activity, data from RSV challenge experiments illustrate that nirsevimab-mediated protection is primarily dependent on direct virus neutralization. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background We report spike protein-based lineage and AZD7442 (tixagevimab/cilgavimab) neutralizing activity of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) variants identified from breakthrough infections in the PROVENT preexposure prophylaxis trial. Methods Variants identified from PROVENT participants with reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction-positive symptomatic illness were phenotypically assessed to determine neutralization susceptibility of variant-specific pseudotyped virus-like particles. Results At completion of 6 months' follow-up, no AZD7442-resistant variants were observed in breakthrough coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) cases. SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibody titers were similar in breakthrough and nonbreakthrough cases. Conclusions Symptomatic COVID-19 breakthrough cases in PROVENT were not due to resistance-associated substitutions in AZD7442 binding sites or lack of AZD7442 exposure. Clinical Trials Registration NCT04625725. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Nirsevimab is an extended half-life monoclonal antibody (mAb) licensed for the prevention of respiratory syncytial virus (RSV)-associated lower respiratory tract disease in neonates, infants and medically vulnerable children. We characterized RSV isolates recovered from participants enrolled in MEDLEY: a randomized, palivizumab-controlled phase 2/3 trial of nirsevimab in infants born preterm and/or with congenital heart disease or chronic lung disease of prematurity. Participants were assessed in two RSV seasons (Season 1 and 2). Season 1 participants were randomized (2:1) to receive a single dose of nirsevimab (50 mg if weight <5 kg or 100 mg if weight ≥5 kg in Season 1; 200 mg in Season 2) followed by four monthly doses of placebo, or five once-monthly doses of palivizumab (15 mg/kg weight per dose). Season 2 participants continued nirsevimab and placebo (nirsevimab/nirsevimab) or were re-randomized (1:1) to switch to nirsevimab (palivizumab/nirsevimab) or continue palivizumab (palivizumab/palivizumab). Cases of RSV infection were identified by central testing of nasal swabs from participants seeking medical attention for respiratory illnesses. Nirsevimab and palivizumab binding site substitutions were assessed via microneutralization assay. Twenty-five cases of confirmed RSV infection were observed during the trial and sequenced: 12 in nirsevimab recipients and 10 in palivizumab recipients during Season 1, and 1 case in each Season 2 group. Molecular sequencing of RSV A (n = 14) isolates detected no nirsevimab binding site substitutions, and 3 palivizumab neutralization-resistant substitutions (Lys272Met, Lys272Thr, Ser275Leu). The nirsevimab binding site Ile206Met:Gln209Arg and Ile206Met:Gln209Arg:Ser211Asn substitutions were the only anti-RSV mAb binding site substitutions detected among RSV B isolates (n = 11). Nirsevimab neutralized all nirsevimab and palivizumab binding site substitutions in RSV A and B isolates recovered from MEDLEY participants. No binding site substitution detected during MEDLEY affected RSV susceptibility to nirsevimab neutralization. • Nirsevimab and palivizumab are mAbs used to prevent severe pediatric RSV disease. • Ongoing evolution necessitates the surveillance of mAb epitopes in circulating RSVs. • We present an exploratory analysis of RSV variants identified in the MEDLEY study. • Nirsevimab neutralized all RSVs with substitutions in anti-RSV mAb binding sites. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: Robust, quantitative serology assays are required to accurately measure antibody levels following vaccination and natural infection. We present validation of a quantitative, multiplex, SARS‐CoV‐2, electrochemiluminescent (ECL) serology assay; show correlation with two established SARS‐CoV‐2 immunoassays; and present calibration results for two SARS‐CoV‐2 reference standards. Methods: Precision, dilutional linearity, ruggedness, analytical sensitivity and specificity were evaluated. Clinical sensitivity and specificity were assessed using serum from prepandemic and SARS‐CoV‐2 polymerase chain reaction (PCR)‐positive patient samples. Assay concordance to the established Roche Elecsys® Anti‐SARS‐CoV‐2 immunoassay and a live‐virus microneutralisation (MN) assay was evaluated. Results: Standard curves demonstrated the assay can quantify SARS‐CoV‐2 antibody levels over a broad range. Assay precision (10.2−15.1% variability), dilutional linearity (≤ 1.16‐fold bias per 10‐fold increase in dilution), ruggedness (0.89−1.18 overall fold difference), relative accuracy (107−118%) and robust selectivity (102−104%) were demonstrated. Analytical sensitivity was 7, 13 and 7 arbitrary units mL−1 for SARS‐CoV‐2 spike (S), receptor‐binding domain (RBD) and nucleocapsid (N) antigens, respectively. For all antigens, analytical specificity was > 90% and clinical specificity was 99.0%. Clinical sensitivities for S, RBD and N antigens were 100%, 98.8% and 84.9%, respectively. Comparison with the Elecsys® immunoassay showed ≥ 87.7% agreement and linear correlation (Pearson r of 0.85, P < 0.0001) relative to the MN assay. Conversion factors for the WHO International Standard and Meso Scale Discovery® Reference Standard are presented. Conclusions: The multiplex SARS‐CoV‐2 ECL serology assay is suitable for efficient, reproducible measurement of antibodies to SARS‐CoV‐2 antigens in human sera, supporting its use in clinical trials and sero‐epidemiology studies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Despite the success of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccines, there remains a need for more prevention and treatment options for individuals remaining at risk of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) against the viral spike protein have potential to both prevent and treat COVID-19 and reduce the risk of severe disease and death. Here, we describe AZD7442, a combination of two mAbs, AZD8895 (tixagevimab) and AZD1061 (cilgavimab), that simultaneously bind to distinct, nonoverlapping epitopes on the spike protein receptor binding domain to neutralize SARS-CoV-2. Initially isolated from individuals with prior SARS-CoV-2 infection, the two mAbs were designed to extend their half-lives and reduce effector functions. The AZD7442 mAbs individually prevent the spike protein from binding to angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 receptor, blocking virus cell entry, and neutralize all tested SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern. In a nonhuman primate model of SARS-CoV-2 infection, prophylactic AZD7442 administration prevented infection, whereas therapeutic administration accelerated virus clearance from the lung. In an ongoing phase 1 study in healthy participants (NCT04507256), a 300-mg intramuscular injection of AZD7442 provided SARS-CoV-2 serum geometric mean neutralizing titers greater than 10-fold above those of convalescent serum for at least 3 months, which remained threefold above those of convalescent serum at 9 months after AZD7442 administration. About 1 to 2% of serum AZD7442 was detected in nasal mucosa, a site of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Extrapolation of the time course of serum AZD7442 concentration suggests AZD7442 may provide up to 12 months of protection and benefit individuals at high-risk of COVID-19. Long-lasting antibodies: Although monoclonal antibody therapeutics have considerably improved outcomes for individuals with COVID-19, their utility as a prophylactic intervention is restricted by the emergence of variants of concern (VOCs) and by short half-lives. To address this, Loo et al. evaluated a pair of antibodies, collectively termed AZD7442, which bind to two distinct epitopes on the receptor binding domain of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein and have been modified to have an extended half-life. The antibody combination protected nonhuman primates from infection with SARS-CoV-2 when administered prophylactically or therapeutically. The antibodies were also resistant to all tested VOC, including the delta variant. Last, the authors showed that AZD7442 administration to healthy adults resulted in neutralizing antibody titers that were projected to confer long-term protection. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Cytoskeleton-associated protein 4 (CKAP4; also known as p63, CLIMP-63, or ERGIC-63) is a 63 kDa, reversibly palmitoylated and phosphorylated, type II transmembrane (TM) protein, originally identified as a resident of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER)/Golgi intermediate compartment (ERGIC).When localized to the ER, amajor function of CKAP4 is to anchor rough ER to microtubules, organizing the overall structure of ER with respect to the microtubule network. There is also steadily accumulating evidence for diverse roles for CKAP4 localized outside the ER, including data demonstrating functionality of cell surface forms of CKAP4 in various cell types and of CKAP4 in the nucleus. We will review the recent studies that provide evidence for the existence of CKAP4 in multiple cellular compartments (i.e., ER, plasma membrane, and the nucleus) and discuss CKAP4's role in the regulation of various physiological and pathological processes, such as interstitial cystitis, drug-induced cytotoxicity, pericullar proteolytic activity, and lung lipid homeostasis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The ability of the retroviral Gag protein of Rous sarcoma virus (RSV) to transiently traffic through the nucleus is well-established and has been implicated in genomic RNA (gRNA) packaging Although other retroviral Gag proteins (human immunodeficiency virus type 1, HIV-1; feline immunodeficiency virus, FIV; Mason-Pfizer monkey virus, MPMV; mouse mammary tumor virus, MMTV; murine leukemia virus, MLV; and prototype foamy virus, PFV) have also been observed in the nucleus, little is known about what, if any, role nuclear trafficking plays in those viruses. In the case of HIV-1, the Gag protein interacts in nucleoli with the regulatory protein Rev, which facilitates nuclear export of gRNA. Based on the knowledge that RSV Gag forms viral ribonucleoprotein (RNPs) complexes with unspliced viral RNA (USvRNA) in the nucleus, we hypothesized that the interaction of HIV-1 Gag with Rev could be mediated through vRNA to form HIV-1 RNPs. Using inducible HIV-1 proviral constructs, we visualized HIV-1 Gag and USvRNA in discrete foci in the nuclei of HeLa cells by confocal microscopy. Two-dimensional co-localization and RNA-immunoprecipitation of fractionated cells revealed that interaction of nuclear HIV-1 Gag with USvRNA was specific. Interestingly, treatment of cells with transcription inhibitors reduced the number of HIV-1 Gag and USvRNA nuclear foci, yet resulted in an increase in the degree of Gag co-localization with USvRNA, suggesting that Gag accumulates on newly synthesized viral transcripts. Three-dimensional imaging analysis revealed that HIV-1 Gag localized to the perichromatin space and associated with USvRNA and Rev in a tripartite RNP complex. To examine a more biologically relevant cell, latently infected CD4+ T cells were treated with prostratin to stimulate NF-κB mediated transcription, demonstrating striking localization of full-length Gag at HIV-1 transcriptional burst site, which was labelled with USvRNA-specific riboprobes. In addition, smaller HIV-1 RNPs were observed in the nuclei of these cells. These data suggest that HIV-1 Gag binds to unspliced viral transcripts produced at the proviral integration site, forming vRNPs in the nucleus. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: The evolution of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) necessitates rapid methods for assessing monoclonal antibody (mAb) potency against emerging variants. Authentic virus neutralisation assays are considered the gold standard for measuring virus-neutralising antibody (nAb) titres in serum. However, authentic virus-based assays pose inherent practical challenges for measuring nAb titres against emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants (e.g. storing infectious viruses and testing at biosafety level-3 facilities). Here, we demonstrate the utility of pseudovirus neutralisation assay data in conjunction with serum mAb concentrations to robustly predict nAb titres in serum., Methods: SARS-CoV-2 nAb titres were determined via authentic- and lentiviral pseudovirus-based neutralisation assays using serological data from three AZD7442 (tixagevimab-cilgavimab) studies: PROVENT (NCT04625725), TACKLE (NCT04723394) and a phase 1 dose-ranging study (NCT04507256). AZD7442 serum concentrations were assessed using immunocapture. Serum-based half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC 50 ) values were derived from pseudovirus nAb titres and serum mAb concentrations, and compared with in vitro IC 50 measurements., Results: nAb titres measured via authentic- and lentiviral pseudovirus-based neutralisation assays were strongly correlated for the ancestral SARS-CoV-2 virus and SARS-CoV-2 Alpha. Serum AZD7442 concentrations and pseudovirus nAb titres were strongly correlated for multiple SARS-CoV-2 variants with all Spearman correlation coefficients ≥ 0.78. Serum-based IC 50 values were similar to in vitro IC 50 values for AZD7442, for ancestral SARS-CoV-2 and Alpha, Delta, Omicron BA.2 and Omicron BA.4/5 variants., Conclusions: These data highlight that serum mAb concentrations and pseudovirus in vitro IC 50 values can be used to rapidly predict nAb titres in serum for emerging and historical SARS-CoV-2 variants., Competing Interests: The authors of this report are all current employees of AstraZeneca and may own AstraZeneca stock or stock options. SM is a contractor to AstraZeneca via Exploristics (Belfast, UK). MTE is a named inventor on patents planned, issued or pending relating to AZD7442., (© 2024 The Author(s). Clinical & Translational Immunology published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Australian and New Zealand Society for Immunology, Inc.)

Background: Nirsevimab is an extended half-life monoclonal antibody to the respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) fusion protein that has been developed to protect infants for an entire RSV season. Previous studies have shown that the nirsevimab binding site is highly conserved. However, investigations of the geotemporal evolution of potential escape variants in recent (ie, 2015-2021) RSV seasons have been minimal. Here, we examine prospective RSV surveillance data to assess the geotemporal prevalence of RSV A and B, and functionally characterise the effect of the nirsevimab binding-site substitutions identified between 2015 and 2021., Methods: We assessed the geotemporal prevalence of RSV A and B and nirsevimab binding-site conservation between 2015 and 2021 from three prospective RSV molecular surveillance studies (the US-based OUTSMART-RSV, the global INFORM-RSV, and a pilot study in South Africa). Nirsevimab binding-site substitutions were assessed in an RSV microneutralisation susceptibility assay. We contextualised our findings by assessing fusion-protein sequence diversity from 1956 to 2021 relative to other respiratory-virus envelope glycoproteins using RSV fusion protein sequences published in NCBI GenBank., Findings: We identified 5675 RSV A and RSV B fusion protein sequences (2875 RSV A and 2800 RSV B) from the three surveillance studies (2015-2021). Nearly all (25 [100%] of 25 positions of RSV A fusion proteins and 22 [88%] of 25 positions of RSV B fusion proteins) amino acids within the nirsevimab binding site remained highly conserved between 2015 and 2021. A highly prevalent (ie, >40·0% of all sequences) nirsevimab binding-site Ile206Met:Gln209Arg RSV B polymorphism arose between 2016 and 2021. Nirsevimab neutralised a diverse set of recombinant RSV viruses, including new variants containing binding-site substitutions. RSV B variants with reduced susceptibility to nirsevimab neutralisation were detected at low frequencies (ie, prevalence <1·0%) between 2015 and 2021. We used 3626 RSV fusion-protein sequences published in NCBI GenBank between 1956 and 2021 (2024 RSV and 1602 RSV B) to show that the RSV fusion protein had lower genetic diversity than influenza haemagglutinin and SARS-CoV-2 spike proteins., Interpretation: The nirsevimab binding site was highly conserved between 1956 and 2021. Nirsevimab escape variants were rare and have not increased over time., Funding: AstraZeneca and Sanofi., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests DW, CM, BA, AAA, TB, VG, EJK, KMT, and MTE are current employees of and hold stock or stock options in AstraZeneca. MEA and DET are former employees of and hold stock or stock options in AstraZeneca. EB has received honoraria from AstraZeneca and Sanofi for lectures, presentations, speaker bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events. TH has participated in Data Safety Monitoring Boards and ad-hoc advisory boards for Sanofi, Data Safety Monitoring Boards for Enanta, and ad-hoc advisory boards for Janssen and has received honoraria from Janssen and Merck, Sharp & Dohme (MSD) for lectures at academic meetings. CK has received honoraria from F Hoffmann-La Roche for lectures. FM-T's research activities are supported by grants from Instituto de Salud Carlos III (grant numbers: PI16/01569, PI19/01090, PI22/00406, and CB21/06/00103), GEN-COVID (grant number: IN845D 2020/23), and Grupos de Referencia Competitiva (grant number: IIN607A2021/05), and he has received additional grants to his institution from AstraZeneca and Sanofi; he also received honoraria from GlaxoSmithKline, Pfizer, Sanofi Pasteur, MSD, Seqirus, Biofabri, and Janssen for taking part in advisory boards and expert meetings and for acting as speaker in congresses outside the scope of the submitted work, in addition to travel support from GlaxoSmithKline, MSD, Pfizer, and Sanofi. FM-T has also participated in advisory boards for Pfizer, MSD, Sanofi, and GlaxoSmithKline, and in Data Safety Monitoring Boards for Biofabri; is a member of The European Technical Advisory Group of Experts—WHO Europe and the Spanish Paediatric Infectious Diseases Society; and has also acted as principal investigator in randomised controlled trials for AstraZeneca, Biofabri Seqirus, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, MSD, Novavax, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Regeneron, and Sanofi Pasteur with honoraria paid to his institution. MCN has received grants from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, European and Developing Countries Clinical Trials, Pfizer, and Sanofi Pasteur; honoraria from Sanofi for lectures presentations, speakers' bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events; payment for expert testimony from Pfizer and Sanofi Pasteur; and is a board member for Gavi vaccine alliance. JMP has received payments to his institution from the Canadian Paediatric Review and Yearly RSV Coordinators Workshop and is an unpaid co-chair of the Ontario Immunization Advisory Committee. PR has received investigator-initiated research grants to his institution from MSD and has received institutional funding from GlaxoSmithKline for local and international lectures and from AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, MSD, Sanofi, and Pfizer for participation in advisory boards. RTS has received payment or honoraria for lectures for AstraZeneca, Pfizer, and Sanofi Pasteur. CV has received payment or honoraria for lectures from AstraZeneca. LJB has not received personal fees or other personal benefits from pharmaceutical companies. His institution, University Medical Center Utrecht (UMCU), has received major funding (>€100 000 per industrial partner) from AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Sanofi, Janssen, Pfizer, MSD, and MeMed Diagnostics for investigator-initiated studies. UMCU has received major funding for the RSV-GOLD study from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. UMCU has received major funding as part of the public private partnership IMI-funded RESCEU and PROMISE projects with partners GlaxoSmithKline, Novavax, Janssen, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, and Sanofi Pasteur. UMCU has received major funding by Julius Clinical for participating in clinical studies sponsored by AstraZeneca and Pfizer. UMCU has received minor funding (€1 000–25 000 per industrial partner) for consultation and invited lectures by AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Ablynx, Bavaria Nordic, MabXience, GlaxoSmithKline, Novavax, Pfizer, Moderna, AstraZeneca, MSD, Sanofi, Genzyme, and Janssen. LJB is the founding chairman of the ReSViNET Foundation. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Therapeutic anti-severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) provide immunosuppressed and vulnerable populations with prophylactic and treatment interventions against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). AZD7442 (tixagevimab-cilgavimab) is a combination of extended-half-life neutralizing MAbs that bind to distinct epitopes on the receptor binding domain (RBD) of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein. The Omicron variant of concern carries mutations at >35 positions in the spike protein and has undergone further genetic diversification since its emergence in November 2021. Here, we characterize the in vitro neutralization activity of AZD7442 toward major viral subvariants circulating worldwide during the first 9 months of the Omicron wave. BA.2 and its derived subvariants showed the highest susceptibility to AZD7442, while BA.1 and BA.1.1 showed a lower susceptibility. BA.4/BA.5 had a susceptibility level intermediate between BA.1 and BA.2. Mutagenesis of parental Omicron subvariant spike proteins was performed to establish a molecular model to describe the underlying determinants of neutralization by AZD7442 and its component MAbs. The concurrent mutation of residues at positions 446 and 493, located in the tixagevimab and cilgavimab binding sites, was sufficient to enhance in vitro susceptibility of BA.1 to AZD7442 and its component MAbs to levels similar to the Wuhan-Hu-1+D614G virus. AZD7442 maintained neutralization activity against all Omicron subvariants tested up to and including BA.5. The evolving nature of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic warrants continuing real-time molecular surveillance and assessment of in vitro activity of MAbs used in prophylaxis against and the treatment of COVID-19. IMPORTANCE MAbs are key therapeutic options for COVID-19 prophylaxis and treatment in immunosuppressed and vulnerable populations. Due to the emergence of SARS-CoV-2 variants, including Omicron, it is vital to ensure that neutralization is maintained for MAb-based interventions. We studied the in vitro neutralization of AZD7442 (tixagevimab-cilgavimab), a cocktail of two long-acting MAbs targeting the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, toward Omicron subvariants circulating from November 2021 to July 2022. AZD7442 neutralized major Omicron subvariants up to and including BA.5. The mechanism of action responsible for the lower in vitro susceptibility of BA.1 to AZD7442 was investigated using in vitro mutagenesis and molecular modeling. A combination of mutations at two spike protein positions, namely, 446 and 493, was sufficient to enhance BA.1 susceptibility to AZD7442 to levels similar to the Wuhan-Hu-1+D614G ancestral virus. The evolving nature of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic warrants continuing real-time global molecular surveillance and mechanistic studies of therapeutic MAbs for COVID-19.

AZD7442, a combination of two long-acting monoclonal antibodies (tixagevimab [AZD8895] and cilgavimab [AZD1061]), has been authorized for the prevention and treatment of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). The rapid emergence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) variants requires methods capable of quickly characterizing resistance to AZD7442. To support AZD7442 resistance monitoring, a biolayer interferometry (BLI) assay was developed to screen the binding of tixagevimab and cilgavimab to SARS-CoV-2 spike proteins to reduce the number of viral variants for neutralization susceptibility verification. Six spike variants were chosen to assess the assay's performance: four with decreased affinity for tixagevimab (F486S:D614G and F486W:D614G proteins) or cilgavimab (S494L:D614G and K444R:D614G proteins) and two reference proteins (wild-type HexaPro and D614G protein). Equilibrium dissociation constant ( K D ) values from each spike protein were used to determine shifts in binding affinity. The assay's precision, range, linearity, and limits of quantitation were established. Qualification acceptance criteria determined whether the assay was fit for purpose. By bypassing protein purification, the BLI assay provided increased screening throughput. Although limited correlation between pseudotype neutralization and BLI data (50% inhibitory concentration versus K D ) was observed for full immunoglobulins (IgGs), the correlations for antibody fragments (Fabs) were stronger and reflected a better comparison of antibody binding kinetics with neutralization potency. Therefore, despite strong assay performance characteristics, the use of full IgGs limited the screening utility of the assay; however, the Fab approach warrants further exploration as a rapid, high-throughput variant-screening method for future resistance-monitoring programs. IMPORTANCE SARS-CoV-2 variants harbor multiple substitutions in their spike trimers, potentially leading to breakthrough infections and clinical resistance to immune therapies. For this reason, a BLI assay was developed and qualified to evaluate the reliability of screening SARS-CoV-2 spike trimer variants against anti-SARS-CoV-2 monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) tixagevimab and cilgavimab, the components of AZD7442, prior to in vitro pseudovirus neutralization susceptibility verification testing. The assay bypasses protein purification with rapid assessment of the binding affinity of each MAb for each recombinant protein, potentially providing an efficient preliminary selection step, thus allowing a reduced testing burden in the more technically complex viral neutralization assays. Despite precise and specific measures, an avidity effect associated with MAb binding to the trimer confounded correlation with neutralization potency, negating the assay's utility as a surrogate for neutralizing antibody potency. Improved correlation with Fabs suggests that assay optimization could overcome any avidity limitation, warranting further exploration to support future resistance-monitoring programs.

Packaging of genomic RNA (gRNA) by retroviruses is essential for infectivity, yet the subcellular site of the initial interaction between the Gag polyprotein and gRNA remains poorly defined. Because retroviral particles are released from the plasma membrane, it was previously thought that Gag proteins initially bound to gRNA in the cytoplasm or at the plasma membrane. However, the Gag protein of the avian retrovirus Rous sarcoma virus (RSV) undergoes active nuclear trafficking, which is required for efficient gRNA encapsidation (L. Z. Scheifele, R. A. Garbitt, J. D. Rhoads, and L. J. Parent, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99:3944-3949, 2002, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.062652199; R. Garbitt-Hirst, S. P. Kenney, and L. J. Parent, J Virol 83:6790-6797, 2009, https://doi.org/10.1128/JVI.00101-09). These results raise the intriguing possibility that the primary contact between Gag and gRNA might occur in the nucleus. To examine this possibility, we created a RSV proviral construct that includes 24 tandem repeats of MS2 RNA stem-loops, making it possible to track RSV viral RNA (vRNA) in live cells in which a fluorophore-conjugated MS2 coat protein is coexpressed. Using confocal microscopy, we observed that both wild-type Gag and a nuclear export mutant (Gag.L219A) colocalized with vRNA in the nucleus. In live-cell time-lapse images, the wild-type Gag protein trafficked together with vRNA as a single ribonucleoprotein (RNP) complex in the nucleoplasm near the nuclear periphery, appearing to traverse the nuclear envelope into the cytoplasm. Furthermore, biophysical imaging methods suggest that Gag and the unspliced vRNA physically interact in the nucleus. Taken together, these data suggest that RSV Gag binds unspliced vRNA to export it from the nucleus, possibly for packaging into virions as the viral genome. IMPORTANCE Retroviruses cause severe diseases in animals and humans, including cancer and acquired immunodeficiency syndromes. To propagate infection, retroviruses assemble new virus particles that contain viral proteins and unspliced vRNA to use as gRNA. Despite the critical requirement for gRNA packaging, the molecular mechanisms governing the identification and selection of gRNA by the Gag protein remain poorly understood. In this report, we demonstrate that the Rous sarcoma virus (RSV) Gag protein colocalizes with unspliced vRNA in the nucleus in the interchromatin space. Using live-cell confocal imaging, RSV Gag and unspliced vRNA were observed to move together from inside the nucleus across the nuclear envelope, suggesting that the Gag-gRNA complex initially forms in the nucleus and undergoes nuclear export into the cytoplasm as a viral ribonucleoprotein (vRNP) complex., (Copyright © 2020 Maldonado et al.)

Unlabelled: Influenza A and B viruses cocirculate in humans and together cause disease and seasonal epidemics. These two types of influenza viruses are evolutionarily divergent, and exchange of genetic segments inside coinfected cells occurs frequently within types but never between influenza A and B viruses. Possible mechanisms inhibiting the intertypic reassortment of genetic segments could be due to incompatible protein functions of segment homologs, a lack of processing of heterotypic segments by influenza virus RNA-dependent RNA polymerase, an inhibitory effect of viral proteins on heterotypic virus function, or an inability to specifically incorporate heterotypic segments into budding virions. Here, we demonstrate that the full-length hemagglutinin (HA) of prototype influenza B viruses can complement the function of multiple influenza A viruses. We show that viral noncoding regions were sufficient to drive gene expression for either type A or B influenza virus with its cognate or heterotypic polymerase. The native influenza B virus HA segment could not be incorporated into influenza A virus virions. However, by adding the influenza A virus packaging signals to full-length influenza B virus glycoproteins, we rescued influenza A viruses that possessed HA, NA, or both HA and NA of influenza B virus. Furthermore, we show that, similar to single-cycle infectious influenza A virus, influenza B virus cannot incorporate heterotypic transgenes due to packaging signal incompatibilities. Altogether, these results demonstrate that the lack of influenza A and B virus reassortants can be attributed at least in part to incompatibilities in the virus-specific packaging signals required for effective segment incorporation into nascent virions., Importance: Reassortment of influenza A or B viruses provides an evolutionary strategy leading to unique genotypes, which can spawn influenza A viruses with pandemic potential. However, the mechanism preventing intertypic reassortment or gene exchange between influenza A and B viruses is not well understood. Nucleotides comprising the coding termini of each influenza A virus gene segment are required for specific segment incorporation during budding. Whether influenza B virus shares a similar selective packaging strategy or if packaging signals prevent intertypic reassortment remains unknown. Here, we provide evidence suggesting a similar mechanism of influenza B virus genome packaging. Furthermore, by appending influenza A virus packaging signals onto influenza B virus segments, we rescued recombinant influenza A/B viruses that could reassort in vitro with another influenza A virus. These findings suggest that the divergent evolution of packaging signals aids with the speciation of influenza A and B viruses and is in part responsible for the lack of intertypic viral reassortment., (Copyright © 2014, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.)