Search

Your search keyword '"Urteaga E"' showing total 3 results
Start Over Author "Urteaga E" Publication Type Academic Journals
3 results on '"Urteaga E"'

1. Executive summary of the consensus document on point-of-care ultrasound implementation: recommendations from the Clinical Ultrasound Working Groups of SEMI, SEDAR, SEGG, SEMERGEN, SEMES, SEMFYC, and SEMG

Author

Tung-Chen, Y., Short Apellaniz, J., Alonso Roca, R., Alonso Viladot, J.R., Arnanz González, I., Beltrán Romero, L., Calvo Cebrián, A., Campo Linares, R., Foo Gil, K.A., García Suárez, I., González Delgado, A.D., Hernández Martínez, A., Marchese Ratti, M.F., Martínez Villén, O., Mercadal Mercadal, J., Minguela Puras, E., Montes Belloso, M.E., Reinoso Párraga, P.P., Rodríguez Urteaga, E., Romero Galán, A., Sánchez Barrancos, I.M., Sánchez Rodríguez, J.L., Sánchez Sánchez, J.C., Segura Grau, A., Torres Macho, J., Villén Villegas, T., Vives, M., and García de Casasola Sánchez, G.

Published
2024
Full Text
View/download PDF

2. Resumen ejecutivo del documento de consenso sobre la realización de la ecografía clínica: recomendaciones desde los Grupos de Trabajo de Ecografía Clínica de la SEMI, SEDAR, SEGG, SEMERGEN, SEMES, SEMFYC y SEMG

Author

Tung-Chen, Yale, Beltrán Romero, Luis, Torres Macho, Juan, de Casasola Sánchez, Gonzalo García, Manuel, Ignacio, Short Apellaniz, Jorge, Alonso Roca, Rafael, Calvo Cebrián, Antonio, Villén Villegas, Tomás, Ramón Alonso Viladot, José, Campo Linares, Ricardo, García Suárez, Iván, Marchese Ratti, Martin F., Sánchez Sánchez, José Carlos, Arnanz González, Irene, Albert Foo Gil, Keith, Romero Galán, Alberto, Vives, Marc, González Delgado, Ariel Duilio, Hernández Martínez, Alberto, Mercadal Mercadal, Jordi, Montes Belloso, María Esther, Martínez Villén, Olga, Minguela Puras, Esther, Rodríguez Urteaga, Ecatherine, Segura Grau, Ana, Sánchez Rodríguez, José Luis, Reinoso Párraga, Paola Pastora, Tung-Chen, Y., Short Apellaniz, J., Alonso Roca, R., Alonso Viladot, J.R., Arnanz González, I., Beltrán Romero, L., Calvo Cebrián, A., Campo Linares, R., Foo Gil, K.A., García Suárez, I., González Delgado, A.D., Hernández Martínez, A., Marchese Ratti, M.F., Martínez Villén, O., Mercadal Mercadal, J., Minguela Puras, E., Montes Belloso, Maria Ester, Reinoso Párraga, P.P., Rodríguez Urteaga, E., Romero Galán, A., Sánchez Barrancos, I.M., Sánchez Rodríguez, J.L., Sánchez Sánchez, J.C., Segura Grau, A., Torres Macho, J., Villén Villegas, T., Vives, M., and de Casasola Sánchez, G.G.

Published
2024
Full Text
View/download PDF

3. Assessment of SOAP note evaluation tools in colleges and schools of pharmacy.

Author

Sando KR, Skoy E, Bradley C, Frenzel J, Kirwin J, and Urteaga E

Subjects
Curriculum standards, Documentation methods, Education, Pharmacy methods, Humans, Students, Pharmacy, United States, Universities organization & administration, Documentation standards, Educational Measurement methods, Educational Measurement standards
Abstract

Introduction: To describe current methods used to assess SOAP notes in colleges and schools of pharmacy., Methods: Members of the American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy Laboratory Instructors Special Interest Group were invited to share assessment tools for SOAP notes. Content of submissions was evaluated to characterize overall qualities and how the tools assessed subjective, objective, assessment, and plan information., Results: Thirty-nine assessment tools from 25 schools were evaluated. Twenty-nine (74%) of the tools were rubrics and ten (26%) were checklists. All rubrics included analytic scoring elements, while two (7%) were mixed with holistic and analytic scoring elements. A majority of the rubrics (35%) used a four-item rating scale. Substantial variability existed in how tools evaluated subjective and objective sections. All tools included problem identification in the assessment section. Other assessment items included goals (82%) and rationale (69%). Seventy-seven percent assessed drug therapy; however, only 33% assessed non-drug therapy. Other plan items included education (59%) and follow-up (90%)., Discussion and Conclusions: There is a great deal of variation in the specific elements used to evaluate SOAP notes in colleges and schools of pharmacy. Improved consistency in assessment methods to evaluate SOAP notes may better prepare students to produce standardized documentation when entering practice., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Published
2017
Full Text
View/download PDF

Catalog

Books, media, physical & digital resources
See catalog results