Search

Background: The prevalence of rotator cuff repair is increasing; however, no study has assessed patients who have returned to golf activity after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Methods: The subjects of the survey were 633 patients who were at least two years postoperative after rotator cuff repair from January 2005 to December 2017. From August 2019 to October 2019, survey responses were collected via an online questionnaire or phone calls and a total of 197 patients were reviewed retrospectively to study about returning to golf after rotator cuff repair. The detailed survey included 12 questions specific to the patient's golf career, performance, time of return to play, and symptoms related to golf activity. Depending on the size of the rotator cuff tear, each question was statistically analyzed to determine whether there were differences in the time of return to golf, uncomfortable symptoms when golfing, and distance of the driving. Results: Of the 197 patients who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair, there were 145 patients (73.6%) returned to golf. In the analysis results of 145 patients, the longer the golf career, the greater the chance of returning to golf. Sixty (30.5%) people returned to golf at 1 year after surgery. Twenty-one patients (10.7%) improved and 46 patients (23.4%) maintained their driving distance, whereas 78 patients (39.6%) had a worse driving distance after surgery. Ten patients (5.1%) improved and 97 patients (49.2%) maintained their golf score, but 38 patients (19.3%) had worse golf scores after surgery. Symptoms when playing golf were reported in the order of no symptoms (62.1%), a limited range of motion (13.1%), muscle weakness (11.1%), and anxious about their operated shoulder (10.3 %). Men were 6.9 times more likely to return to golf than women (odds ratio, 6.9; 95% confidence interval, 3.2-14.8). The younger the age and the shorter the time since surgery, the higher the golfing return rate. The rate of returning to golf was high in the group of patients with good tissue quality during surgery (odds ratio, 3.9; 95% confidence interval, 0.01–2.6). Conclusion: The golfing return rate after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair was higher than expected (73.6%) and most players returned at 1 year after surgery. Especially, in the case of young males, their golf scores were maintained or improved and they were able to return to golf earlier after surgery. Better tissue quality in the intraoperative torn tendon was associated with a greater chance of returning to golf.

Abstract Background Advances in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) have made it possible to find the vertebral body bruise (VBB), which was not found in computed tomography (CT) after trauma. There has been only one study with adult patients about whether traumatic VBB will cause a collapse of the vertebral body or not. The purpose is to elucidate the progression of VBB in non-osteoporotic adult patients and to identify the possible factors influencing the progression. Method The VBB was defined on MRI as band-like or diffuse zones of high signal intensity on T2-weighted sequences without fracture of the cortex based on CT. The study population with traumatic VBB associated with non-osteoporotic spinal fracture was composed of 15 females and 21 males. The minimal follow-up period was 6 months. The ratio of anterior to posterior heights of the VBB, the ratio of anterior heights of the VBB to the average of those of cranial and caudal adjacent vertebral bodies, the anterior wedge angle of the VBB, and the focal angle around the VBB were compared between the initial and final visits. We evaluated the age of the patients, the C2 plumb line distance, the regional location of VBB, the etiology of VBB, and the treatment methods of the fractures as possible risk factors influencing the progression. Results There was no difference in the ratios and angles between the initial and final visits. The differences in the ratios and angles between the initial and final visits were not dependent on the possible risk factors. The anterior superior area is the most common in the distribution of VBB. Conclusions Unlike compression fractures, the vertebral body with traumatic VBB found in adult patients with non-osteoporotic spinal fractures of AO classification A or B types did not develop collapse. In clinical practice, it is reasonable to diagnose it as a spinal fracture rather than a VBB if the collapse of a possible VBB occurs.

There has been a wide interest in using platelet-rich plasma (PRP) as a therapeutic agent to enhance spinal fusion. There are two review articles based only on clinical studies regarding the effect of PRP on spinal fusion. However, with regard to both animal model studies and clinical studies, there is no review studies regarding its effect on spinal fusion and no review studies focusing on the platelet count and the concentration of the growth factor in the PRP. The purpose is to review the literatures about the effect of PRP on spinal fusion according to the animal model studies and clinical studies, focusing on the effect of the platelet count and the concentration of the growth factor in the PRP. A PubMed search was performed for English-language articles. We identified 20 articles regarding the effect of PRP on fusion in animal model studies and clinical studies, of which 16 articles met the study criteria of case–control studies or prospective randomized studies for the spinal fusion. The articles were categorized into small-sized animal model, middle-sized animal model, and clinical studies. Studies have shown both beneficial and inhibitory effects. The conclusion that PRP has the stimulating effect on spinal fusion was not reached. However, PRP might promote the human spinal fusion if the platelet count or the concentration of growth factors in the PRP increases.

Background We hypothesized in this study that the characteristics of retear cases vary according to surgeon volume and that surgical outcomes differ between primary and revision arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (revisional ARCR). Methods Surgeons performing more than 12 rotator cuff repairs (RCRs) per year were defined as high-volume surgeons, and those performing fewer than 12 RCRs were considered low-volume surgeons. Of the 47 patients who underwent revisional ARCR at our clinic enrolled in this study, 21 cases were treated by high-volume surgeons and 26 cases by low-volume surgeons. In all cases, the interval between primary surgery and revisional ARCR, degree of “acromial scuffing,” number of anchors, RCR technique, retear pattern, fatty infiltration, retear size, operating time, and clinical outcome were recorded. Results During primary surgery, significantly more lateral anchors (p=0.004) were used, and the rate of use of the double-row repair technique was significantly higher (p