Search

Diabetic bladder dysfunction (DBD) comprises a wide spectrum of lower urinary tract symptoms that impact diabetic patients' lives, including urinary frequency, urgency, incontinence, and incomplete bladder emptying. To relieve symptoms, anticholinergics have been widely prescribed and are considered an effective treatment. There is increasing evidence that diabetic patients may benefit from the use of phosphodiesterase 5 (PDE5) inhibitors. This narrative review aims to provide a brief overview of the pathophysiology of DBD along with a focus on cholinergic and phosphodiesterase inhibitors as therapies that benefit DBD. An examination of the literature suggests compelling avenues of research and underscores critical gaps in understanding the mechanisms underlying DBD. New tools and models, especially rodent models, are required to further elucidate the mechanisms of action of current therapies in the treatment of DBS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: Renal artery infarction (RI) is the presence of blood clot in the main renal artery or its branches causing complete or partial obstruction of the blood supply. Its etiology is either related with disorders of the renal vasculature or with cardiovascular diseases. Recently, the SARSCoV-2 virus is an emerging cause of thromboembolic events and the incidence of RI is anticipated to increase after the pandemic. Methods: A systematic review based on COVID-19 associated RI was conducted. Protocol: A systematic review of the Medline/Pubmed and Scopus databases was conducted in accordance to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (the PRISMA statement). Search strategy and information sources: A hand-search was performed using the terms “SARS-Cov-2” OR “COVID-19” AND “renal thrombosis” OR “renal infarction” OR “renal “thromboembolism”. Eligibility criteria: all types of publications (case reports, case series, letters to the editor, short communications) were evaluated for relevance. Inclusion criteria were: confirmed SARS-Cov-2 infection irrespectively of the age, diagnosis of RI during or after the onset of viral infection, and exclusion of other potential causes of thromboembolic event except of SARS-Cov-2. Patients with renal transplantation were also considered. Study criteria selection: after checking for relevance based on the title and the abstract, the full texts of the selected papers were retrieved and were further evaluated. Duplicated and irrelevant cases were excluded. Any disagreement was resolved by consensus with the involvement of a third reviewer. Quality of studies: The assessment of the quality case reports was based on four different domains: selection, ascertainment, casualty and reporting. Each paper was classified as “Good”, “Moderate” and “Poor” for any of the four domains. Data extractions: Crucial data for the conduct of the study were extracted including: age, sex, time from SARS-Cov-2 infection till RI development, medical history, previous or current antithrombotic protection or treatment, laterality and degree of obstruction, other sites of thromboembolism, treatment for thromboembolism and SARS-Cov-2 and final outcome. Data analysis: methods of descriptive statistics were implicated for analysis and presentation of the data. Results: The systematic review retrieved 35 cases in 33 reports. In most cases, RI was diagnosed within a month from the SARSCov-2 infection albeit 17 out of 35 patients were receiving or had recently received thromboprophylaxis. Right, left, bilateral and allograft obstruction was diagnosed in 7, 15, 8 and 5 patients respectively. 17 cases experienced additional extrarenal thromboembolism primarily in aorta, spleen, brain and lower limbs. Low molecular weight heparins (LMWH) (usually 60-80 mg enoxaparine bid) was the primary treatment, followed by combinations of unfractionated heparin and salicylic acid, apixaban and rivaraxaban, warfarin, acenocoumarol or clopidogrel. Kidney replacement therapy was offered to five patients while invasive therapies with thrombus aspiration or catheter directed thrombolysis were performed in two. Regarding the outcomes, five of the patients died. The total renal function was preserved in 17 cases and renal impairment with or without hemodialysis was recorded in 5 patients, two of them having lost their kidney allografts. Limitations: The majority of included studies are of moderate quality. The results and the conclusions are based on case-reports only and crucial data are dissimilarly presented or missing through the relevant publications. Conclusions: Thromboprophylaxis may not offer adequate protection against SARS-Cov-2 induced thrombosis. Most patients could be effectively treated with conservative measures, while in more severe cases aggressive treatment could be recommended. Implications of key findings: Therapeutic doses of LMWH could be considered for protection against RI in SARS-Cov-2 cases. Interventional treatment could be offered in a minority of more severe cases after carful balancing the risks and benefits. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To investigate prognostic factors of outcome of acute obstructive pyelonephritis (AOP). Materials and Methods: Patients with AOP were prospectively evaluated and logistic regression analysis was applied to identify factors associated with the duration of hospital stay and occurrence of sepsis and septic shock. Results: Based on CT scan findings, 62 patients were found to have AOP and subjected to emergency drainage. The main etiology of obstruction was lithiasis (70.9%). Double-J stent and percutaneous nephrostomy were introduced in 48 and 14 patients, respectively. Urosepsis and septic shock were diagnosed in 20 (32%) and 6 (9.7%) patients, respectively. None of the patients died of sepsis. In univariative analysis, older age, high neutrophils, increased serum creatinine, higher Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) score, any CCI score ≥1, diabetes mellitus (DM) longer operation time (OT), and multiresistant stains were risk factors of sepsis. Gender, type of drainage, laterality, white blood cell count, neutrophils rate >80%, C-reactive protein, and the presence of malignancy or lithiasis were not. Age, DM, and CCI score ≥1 were associated with prolonged hospitalization. None of the factors was associated with shock. In multivariative models, age (odds ratio [OR]: 1.09, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.02–1.16, p = 0.010), multiresistant strains (OR: 16.36, 95% CI: 1.97–135.71, p = 0.006), OT >20 minutes (OR: 1.03, 95% CI: 1.00–1.07, p = 0.048), and elevated creatinine (OR: 1.68, 95% CI: 1.001–2.84, p = 0.049) were independent prognostic factors of sepsis, and DM (OR: 30.8%, CI: 8.86%–52.8%, p = 0.007) was a prognostic factor of longer hospitalization. Conclusions: One-third of AOP patients will develop sepsis. Older age, elevated serum creatinine, longer OT presence of multiresistant strains, and DM are independent factors of worse outcome. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To present the results and complications of retrograde ureteroscopic lithotripsy for treatment of large ureteral stones. Methods: Nineteen patients were treated for ureteral stones ≥15 mm detected in CT or plain KUB film. Endoscopy was performed with either a semirigid or flexible ureteroscope. Stone fragmentation was performed using a 30 W Holmium laser. Results: The mean stone size was 20.7 mm (range 15–30). The mean duration of the operation was 82 min (45–140). Measures to prevent retropulsion of fragments into the kidney were not routinely applied. A subsequent RIRS during the same session was necessary in 2 cases. After a single procedure a stone free state was achieved in 15 cases (78.9%), while 4 others required a second session (ESWL or second ureterolithotripsy, 2 cases each). In only 1 patient, the stone-free state was not achieved after a 1.2 procedure per patient (overall success rate 94.7%). The mean duration of hospitalization was 1.9 days (range 1–5). Three patients experienced postoperative pyelonephritis and 2 others prolonged hematuria. Conclusion: Endoscopic lithotripsy is safe and effective in treating large ureteral stones. After a single endoscopic procedure, approximately 4 out of 5 patients are expected to become stone free. This rate increases to 95% with a second session of lithotripsy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Prostate cancer (PCa) is one of the most frequently diagnosed malignancies worldwide. Hormonal deprivation therapy is a well-established treatment for locally advanced or metastatic diseases but exposes patients to the risk of osteoporosis and fragility fractures. Furthermore, the tropism of the PCa cells to osseous metastases increases the incidence of skeletal-related events (SREs).Methods: A nonsystematic review of the international literature was performed in respect to the use of osteoclast inhibitors zoledronic acid (ZA) and denosumab (DEN) in PCa patients.Results: DEN and ZA have proved their efficacy in preventing osteoporosis and bone mass loss in patients treated with hormonal therapy with no proven superiority of one agent over the other. However, the effectiveness in reducing fragility fractures has been proved only for DEN so far. In metastatic-free castrate-sensitive high-risk PCa patients, ZA has not shown any efficacy in preventing osseous metastasis, and evidence is lacking in favor or against the use of DEN. The use of osteoclasts inhibitors had no evident positive effect in overall and disease-specific survival in this group of patients. In advanced castrate-refractory malignancy, DEN has shown clinical superiority over ZA in preventing new SRE but not in overall survival.Conclusion: Superiority of DEN over ZA has been proved only in advanced castrate refractory disease in terms of preventing new SRE. In the rest of the cases, the selection of either agent should be based on the clinical condition of each patient and the cost of the treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Treatment of large and multiple stones located in the ureter and/or the kidney may be challenging. The aim of the current study was to evaluate the results and complications of retrograde endoscopic lithotripsy for stones located in the urinary tract and to determine prognostic factors for treatment outcome. From April 2017 to March 2020, eligible patients for the active treatment of ureterolithiasis with or without concomitant nephrolithiasis <20 mm were enrolled in the study. The prognostic factors for the stone free rate (SFR) after the 1st and subsequent sessions and overall complications were assessed. Patients were divided into single or multiple lithiasis groups (groups A and B respectively). A comparison between these two groups was then conducted. Overall, 237 stones were detected in 155 patients, representing a mean burden of 1.53 stone per patient. The mean total stone size was 14.7 mm, the initial SFR was 80% and the final SFR (after a mean of 1.23 session per patient) was 94.2%. The rate of complications was 26.4%. Multivariative analysis revealed that preoperative stenting and total stone size were independent prognostic factors of initial SFR, while no independent factors were determined for final SFR. Age, total size and stones in the lower calyx were independent factors for complications. In group A and B, 114 and 41 cases with solitary and multiple stones were included, respectively. Excluding operation time (P=0.002), no significant differences were recorded in terms of initial (P=0.255) and final SFR (P=0.056), hospital stay (P=0.308), mean number of treatments (P=0.757) and the rate of complications (P=0.218) between the two groups. In conclusion, retrograde endoscopic management of multiple lithiasis has a favorable outcome irrespective of stone location. Older patients with higher burdens and stones in the lower calyx should be treated with caution. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A 76 year-old male presented with urosepsis and acute renal injury secondary to obstruction by a 13 mm stone located in the common segment of a bifid left ureter. A second 10 mm stone was detected in the mid calyx of the lower moiety of the kidney. Drainage of both moieties with two double-J stents was initially performed. Following recovery from urosepsis a retrograde endoscopic semirigid and flexible laser lithotripsy of the distal and proximal stone respectively was performed resulting in stone clearance. Although retrograde ureterolithotripsy has been presented in the past, to the best of the authors' knowledge, this is the first description of flexible retrograde intrarenal lithotripsy performed through a bifid ureter. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: Renal artery infarction (RI) is the presence of blood clot in the main renal artery or its branches causing complete or partial obstruction of the blood supply. Its etiology is either related with disorders of the renal vasculature or with cardiovascular diseases. Recently, the SARSCoV- 2 virus is an emerging cause of thromboembolic events and the incidence of RI is anticipated to increase after the pandemic., Methods: A systematic review based on COVID-19 associated RI was conducted., Protocol: A systematic review of the Medline/Pubmed and Scopus databases was conducted in accordance to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (the PRISMA statement). Search strategy and information sources: A hand-search was performed using the terms "SARS-Cov-2" OR "COVID-19" AND "renal thrombosis" OR "renal infarction" OR "renal "thromboembolism"., Eligibility Criteria: all types of publications (case reports, case series, letters to the editor, short communications) were evaluated for relevance. Inclusion criteria were: confirmed SARS-Cov-2 infection irrespectively of the age, diagnosis of RI during or after the onset of viral infection, and exclusion of other potential causes of thromboembolic event except of SARS-Cov-2. Patients with renal transplantation were also considered. Study criteria selection: after checking for relevance based on the title and the abstract, the full texts of the selected papers were retrieved and were further evaluated. Duplicated and irrelevant cases were excluded. Any disagreement was resolved by consensus with the involvement of a third reviewer. Quality of studies: The assessment of the quality case reports was based on four different domains: selection, ascertainment, casualty and reporting. Each paper was classified as "Good", "Moderate" and "Poor" for any of the four domains. Data extractions: Crucial data for the conduct of the study were extracted including: age, sex, time from SARS-Cov-2 infection till RI development, medical history, previous or current antithrombotic protection or treatment, laterality and degree of obstruction, other sites of thromboembolism, treatment for thromboembolism and SARS-Cov-2 and final outcome., Data Analysis: methods of descriptive statistics were implicated for analysis and presentation of the data., Results: The systematic review retrieved 35 cases in 33 reports. In most cases, RI was diagnosed within a month from the SARSCov- 2 infection albeit 17 out of 35 patients were receiving or had recently received thromboprophylaxis. Right, left, bilateral and allograft obstruction was diagnosed in 7, 15, 8 and 5 patients respectively. 17 cases experienced additional extrarenal thromboembolism primarily in aorta, spleen, brain and lower limbs. Low molecular weight heparins (LMWH) (usually 60-80 mg enoxaparine bid) was the primary treatment, followed by combinations of unfractionated heparin and salicylic acid, apixaban and rivaraxaban, warfarin, acenocoumarol or clopidogrel. Kidney replacement therapy was offered to five patients while invasive therapies with thrombus aspiration or catheter directed thrombolysis were performed in two. Regarding the outcomes, five of the patients died. The total renal function was preserved in 17 cases and renal impairment with or without hemodialysis was recorded in 5 patients, two of them having lost their kidney allografts., Limitations: The majority of included studies are of moderate quality. The results and the conclusions are based on case-reports only and crucial data are dissimilarly presented or missing through the relevant publications., Conclusions: Thromboprophylaxis may not offer adequate protection against SARS-Cov-2 induced thrombosis. Most patients could be effectively treated with conservative measures, while in more severe cases aggressive treatment could be recommended., Implications of Key Findings: Therapeutic doses of LMWH could be considered for protection against RI in SARS-Cov-2 cases. Interventional treatment could be offered in a minority of more severe cases after carful balancing the risks and benefits.