6 results on '"Zrubka, Mark"'
Number of results to display per page
Search Results
2. Interpreting nonsignificant findings in psychological research
- Author
-
Palfi, Bence, Szollosi, Aba, Szaszi, Barnabas, Kovacs, Marton, Zrubka, Mark, Szecsi, Peter, Aczel, Balazs, and Wagenmakers, Eric-Jan
- Abstract
In this study, we examined the current practice and alternative methods for interpreting nonsignificant findings inpsychological research. The traditional null-hypothesis testing presents a challenge for researchers to interpret nonsignificantfindings. We reviewed the abstracts of all empirical articles published in three high-esteem psychological journals in 2015and selected those which referred to a nonsignificant result (N=134).We found that the majority of the statements interpretedthe results only within the sample, yet in 23% the authors inferred from the results to the absence of an effect. Bayes factoranalyses on these statistics indicated that the support of these results for the null-hypothesis is strong only in 4%, moderate in70% and anecdotal in 26%. The results revealed that Bayes factor analysis can help researchers in interpreting nonsignificantresults and also highlight that psychological studies with traditional sample sizes are unlikely to present strong evidence for thenull-hypothesis.
- Published
- 2017
3. Registered Replication Report : Dijksterhuis and van Knippenberg (1998)
- Author
-
O’Donnell, Michael, Nelson, Leif D., Ackermann, Evi, Aczel, Balazs, Akhtar, Athfah, Aldrovandi, Silvio, Alshaif, Nasseem, Andringa, Ronald, Aveyard, Mark, Babincak, Peter, Balatekin, Nursena, Baldwin, Scott A., Banik, Gabriel, Baskin, Ernest, Bell, Raoul, Białobrzeska, Olga, Birt, Angie R., Boot, Walter R., Braithwaite, Scott R., Briggs, Jessie C., Buchner, Axel, Budd, Desiree, Budzik, Kathryn, Bullens, Lottie, Bulley, Richard L., Cannon, Peter R., Cantarero, Katarzyna, Cesario, Joseph, Chambers, Stephanie, Chartier, Christopher R., Chekroun, Peggy, Chong, Clara, Cleeremans, Axel, Coary, Sean P., Coulthard, Jacob, Cramwinckel, Florien M., Denson, Thomas F., Díaz-Lago, Marcos, DiDonato, Theresa E., Drummond, Aaron, Eberlen, Julia, Ebersbach, Titus, Edlund, John E., Finnigan, Katherine M., Fisher, Justin, Frankowska, Natalia, García-Sánchez, Efraín, Golom, Frank D., Graves, Andrew J., Greenberg, Kevin, Hanioti, Mando, Hansen, Heather A., Harder, Jenna A., Harrell, Erin R., Hartanto, Andree, Inzlicht, Michael, Johnson, David J., Karpinski, Andrew, Keller, Victor N., Klein, Olivier, Koppel, Lina, Krahmer, Emiel, Lantian, Anthony, Larson, Michael J., Légal, Jean-Baptiste, Lucas, Richard E., Lynott, Dermot, Magaldino, Corey M., Massar, Karlijn, McBee, Matthew T., McLatchie, Neil, Melia, Nadhilla, Mensink, Michael C., Mieth, Laura, Moore-Berg, Samantha, Neeser, Geraldine, Newell, Ben R., Noordewier, Marret K., Özdogru, Asil Ali, Pantazi, Myrto, Parzuchowski, Michał, Peters, Kim, Philipp, Michael C., Pollmann, Monique M. H., Rentzelas, Panagiotis, Rodríguez-Bailón, Rosa, Röer, Jan Philipp, Ropovik, Ivan, Roque, Nelson A., Rueda, Carolina, Rutjens, Bastiaan T., Sackett, Katey, Salamon, Janos, Sánchez-Rodríguez, Ángel, Saunders, Blair, Schaafsma, Juliette, Schulte-Mecklenbeck, Michael, Shanks, David R., Sherman, Martin F., Steele, Kenneth M., Steffens, Niklas K., Sun, Jessie, Susa, Kyle J., Szaszi, Barnabas, Szollosi, Aba, Tamayo, Ricardo M., Tinghög, Gustav, Tong, Yuk-yue, Tweten, Carol, Vadillo, Miguel A., Valcarcel, Deisy, Van der Linden, Nicolas, van Elk, Michiel, van Harreveld, Frenk, Västfjäll, Daniel, Vazire, Simine, Verduyn, Philippe, Williams, Matt N., Willis, Guillermo B., Wood, Sarah E., Yang, Chunliang, Zerhouni, Oulmann, Zheng, Robert, and Zrubka, Mark
- Published
- 2018
4. Correction to: 'Raising the value of research studies in psychological science by increasing the credibility of research reports: The Transparent Psi Project' (2023) by Kekecs et al.
- Author
-
Kekecs Z, Palfi B, Szaszi B, Szecsi P, Zrubka M, Kovacs M, Bakos BE, Cousineau D, Tressoldi P, Schmidt K, Grassi M, Evans TR, Yamada Y, Miller JK, Liu H, Yonemitsu F, Dubrov D, Röer JP, Becker M, Schnepper R, Ariga A, Arriaga P, Oliveira R, Põldver N, Kreegipuu K, Hall B, Wiechert S, Verschuere B, Girán K, and Aczel B
- Abstract
[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1098/rsos.191375.][This corrects the article DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2022.2500.]., (© 2023 The Authors.)
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
5. Raising the value of research studies in psychological science by increasing the credibility of research reports: the transparent Psi project.
- Author
-
Kekecs Z, Palfi B, Szaszi B, Szecsi P, Zrubka M, Kovacs M, Bakos BE, Cousineau D, Tressoldi P, Schmidt K, Grassi M, Evans TR, Yamada Y, Miller JK, Liu H, Yonemitsu F, Dubrov D, Röer JP, Becker M, Schnepper R, Ariga A, Arriaga P, Oliveira R, Põldver N, Kreegipuu K, Hall B, Wiechert S, Verschuere B, Girán K, and Aczel B
- Abstract
The low reproducibility rate in social sciences has produced hesitation among researchers in accepting published findings at their face value. Despite the advent of initiatives to increase transparency in research reporting, the field is still lacking tools to verify the credibility of research reports. In the present paper, we describe methodologies that let researchers craft highly credible research and allow their peers to verify this credibility. We demonstrate the application of these methods in a multi-laboratory replication of Bem's Experiment 1 (Bem 2011 J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 100 , 407-425. (doi:10.1037/a0021524)) on extrasensory perception (ESP), which was co-designed by a consensus panel including both proponents and opponents of Bem's original hypothesis. In the study we applied direct data deposition in combination with born-open data and real-time research reports to extend transparency to protocol delivery and data collection. We also used piloting, checklists, laboratory logs and video-documented trial sessions to ascertain as-intended protocol delivery, and external research auditors to monitor research integrity. We found 49.89% successful guesses, while Bem reported 53.07% success rate, with the chance level being 50%. Thus, Bem's findings were not replicated in our study. In the paper, we discuss the implementation, feasibility and perceived usefulness of the credibility-enhancing methodologies used throughout the project., (© 2023 The Authors.)
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
6. Registered Replication Report: Dijksterhuis and van Knippenberg (1998).
- Author
-
O'Donnell M, Nelson LD, Ackermann E, Aczel B, Akhtar A, Aldrovandi S, Alshaif N, Andringa R, Aveyard M, Babincak P, Balatekin N, Baldwin SA, Banik G, Baskin E, Bell R, Białobrzeska O, Birt AR, Boot WR, Braithwaite SR, Briggs JC, Buchner A, Budd D, Budzik K, Bullens L, Bulley RL, Cannon PR, Cantarero K, Cesario J, Chambers S, Chartier CR, Chekroun P, Chong C, Cleeremans A, Coary SP, Coulthard J, Cramwinckel FM, Denson TF, Díaz-Lago M, DiDonato TE, Drummond A, Eberlen J, Ebersbach T, Edlund JE, Finnigan KM, Fisher J, Frankowska N, García-Sánchez E, Golom FD, Graves AJ, Greenberg K, Hanioti M, Hansen HA, Harder JA, Harrell ER, Hartanto A, Inzlicht M, Johnson DJ, Karpinski A, Keller VN, Klein O, Koppel L, Krahmer E, Lantian A, Larson MJ, Légal JB, Lucas RE, Lynott D, Magaldino CM, Massar K, McBee MT, McLatchie N, Melia N, Mensink MC, Mieth L, Moore-Berg S, Neeser G, Newell BR, Noordewier MK, Ali Özdoğru A, Pantazi M, Parzuchowski M, Peters K, Philipp MC, Pollmann MMH, Rentzelas P, Rodríguez-Bailón R, Philipp Röer J, Ropovik I, Roque NA, Rueda C, Rutjens BT, Sackett K, Salamon J, Sánchez-Rodríguez Á, Saunders B, Schaafsma J, Schulte-Mecklenbeck M, Shanks DR, Sherman MF, Steele KM, Steffens NK, Sun J, Susa KJ, Szaszi B, Szollosi A, Tamayo RM, Tinghög G, Tong YY, Tweten C, Vadillo MA, Valcarcel D, Van der Linden N, van Elk M, van Harreveld F, Västfjäll D, Vazire S, Verduyn P, Williams MN, Willis GB, Wood SE, Yang C, Zerhouni O, Zheng R, and Zrubka M
- Subjects
- Female, Humans, Male, Intelligence, Prejudice, Social Perception
- Abstract
Dijksterhuis and van Knippenberg (1998) reported that participants primed with a category associated with intelligence ("professor") subsequently performed 13% better on a trivia test than participants primed with a category associated with a lack of intelligence ("soccer hooligans"). In two unpublished replications of this study designed to verify the appropriate testing procedures, Dijksterhuis, van Knippenberg, and Holland observed a smaller difference between conditions (2%-3%) as well as a gender difference: Men showed the effect (9.3% and 7.6%), but women did not (0.3% and -0.3%). The procedure used in those replications served as the basis for this multilab Registered Replication Report. A total of 40 laboratories collected data for this project, and 23 of these laboratories met all inclusion criteria. Here we report the meta-analytic results for those 23 direct replications (total N = 4,493), which tested whether performance on a 30-item general-knowledge trivia task differed between these two priming conditions (results of supplementary analyses of the data from all 40 labs, N = 6,454, are also reported). We observed no overall difference in trivia performance between participants primed with the "professor" category and those primed with the "hooligan" category (0.14%) and no moderation by gender.
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
Catalog
Books, media, physical & digital resources
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.