Search

Objective: The study aims to establish an magnetic resonance imaging radiomics signature-based nomogram for predicting the progression-free survival of intermediate and advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients treated with transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) plus radiofrequency ablationMaterials and Methods: A total of 113 intermediate and advanced HCC patients treated with TACE and RFA were eligible for this study. Patients were classified into a training cohort (n = 78 cases) and a validation cohort (n = 35 cases). Radiomics features were extracted from contrast-enhanced T1W images by analysis kit software. Dimension reduction was conducted to select optimal features using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO). A rad-score was calculated and used to classify the patients into high-risk and low-risk groups and further integrated into multivariate Cox analysis. Two prediction models based on radiomics signature combined with or without clinical factors and a clinical model based on clinical factors were developed. A nomogram comcined radiomics signature and clinical factors were established and the concordance index (C-index) was used for measuring discrimination ability of the model, calibration curve was used for measuring calibration ability, and decision curve and clinical impact curve are used for measuring clinical utility.Results: Eight radiomics features were selected by LASSO, and the cut-off of the Rad-score was 1.62. The C-index of the radiomics signature for PFS was 0.646 (95%: 0.582–0.71) in the training cohort and 0.669 (95% CI:0.572–0.766) in validation cohort. The median PFS of the low-risk group [30.4 (95% CI: 19.41–41.38)] months was higher than that of the high-risk group [8.1 (95% CI: 4.41–11.79)] months in the training cohort (log rank test, z = 16.58, p < 0.001) and was verified in the validation cohort. Multivariate Cox analysis showed that BCLC stage [hazard ratio (HR): 2.52, 95% CI: 1.42–4.47, p = 0.002], AFP level (HR: 2.01, 95% CI: 1.01–3.99 p = 0.046), time interval (HR: 0.48, 95% CI: 0.26–0.87, p = 0.016) and radiomics signature (HR 2.98, 95% CI: 1.60–5.51, p = 0.001) were independent prognostic factors of PFS in the training cohort. The C-index of the combined model in the training cohort was higher than that of clinical model for PFS prediction [0.722 (95% CI: 0.657–0.786) vs. 0.669 (95% CI: 0.657–0.786), p＜0.001]. Similarly, The C-index of the combined model in the validation cohort, was higher than that of clinical model [0.821 (95% CI: 0.726–0.915) vs. 0.76 (95% CI: 0.667–0.851), p = 0.004]. The calibration curve, decision curve and clinical impact curve showed that the nomogram can be used to accurately predict the PFS of patients.Conclusion: The radiomics signature was a prognostic risk factor, and a nomogram combined radiomics and clinical factors acts as a new strategy for predicted the PFS of intermediate and advanced HCC treated with TACE plus RFA.

Objective: The study aims to establish an magnetic resonance imaging radiomics signature-based nomogram for predicting the progression-free survival of intermediate and advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients treated with transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) plus radiofrequency ablation Materials and Methods: A total of 113 intermediate and advanced HCC patients treated with TACE and RFA were eligible for this study. Patients were classified into a training cohort ( n = 78 cases) and a validation cohort ( n = 35 cases). Radiomics features were extracted from contrast-enhanced T1W images by analysis kit software. Dimension reduction was conducted to select optimal features using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO). A rad-score was calculated and used to classify the patients into high-risk and low-risk groups and further integrated into multivariate Cox analysis. Two prediction models based on radiomics signature combined with or without clinical factors and a clinical model based on clinical factors were developed. A nomogram comcined radiomics signature and clinical factors were established and the concordance index (C-index) was used for measuring discrimination ability of the model, calibration curve was used for measuring calibration ability, and decision curve and clinical impact curve are used for measuring clinical utility. Results: Eight radiomics features were selected by LASSO, and the cut-off of the Rad-score was 1.62. The C-index of the radiomics signature for PFS was 0.646 (95%: 0.582-0.71) in the training cohort and 0.669 (95% CI:0.572-0.766) in validation cohort. The median PFS of the low-risk group [30.4 (95% CI: 19.41-41.38)] months was higher than that of the high-risk group [8.1 (95% CI: 4.41-11.79)] months in the training cohort (log rank test, z = 16.58, p < 0.001) and was verified in the validation cohort. Multivariate Cox analysis showed that BCLC stage [hazard ratio (HR): 2.52, 95% CI: 1.42-4.47, p = 0.002], AFP level (HR: 2.01, 95% CI: 1.01-3.99 p = 0.046), time interval (HR: 0.48, 95% CI: 0.26-0.87, p = 0.016) and radiomics signature (HR 2.98, 95% CI: 1.60-5.51, p = 0.001) were independent prognostic factors of PFS in the training cohort. The C-index of the combined model in the training cohort was higher than that of clinical model for PFS prediction [0.722 (95% CI: 0.657-0.786) vs. 0.669 (95% CI: 0.657-0.786), p ＜0.001]. Similarly, The C-index of the combined model in the validation cohort, was higher than that of clinical model [0.821 (95% CI: 0.726-0.915) vs. 0.76 (95% CI: 0.667-0.851), p = 0.004]. The calibration curve, decision curve and clinical impact curve showed that the nomogram can be used to accurately predict the PFS of patients. Conclusion: The radiomics signature was a prognostic risk factor, and a nomogram combined radiomics and clinical factors acts as a new strategy for predicted the PFS of intermediate and advanced HCC treated with TACE plus RFA., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2021 Fang, Lai, Zhu, Zheng, Xu, Chen, Wu, Wu, Chen, Weng, Ji, Zhao and Tu.)