1. The Effects of Interstimulus Interval Length on the Early Directing Attention Negativity (EDAN or CN-375) During Visuospatial Processing.
- Author
-
Keyes, Alvin L.
- Subjects
DISTRACTION ,AROUSAL (Physiology) ,INTERSTIMULUS interval ,THOUGHT & thinking ,INTEREST (Psychology) - Abstract
Considering that the latency range of 250 - 500 ms of a given event-related potential suggests a shift in and focusing of attention, the current study was designed to determine the impact of interstimulus interval length on the resulting component (EDAN or CN-375). A paradigm introduced by Harter and his associates was employed. ERPs were recorded from eight scalp locations while participants processed visuospatial information. That is, once focused on a spatial direction cue (an arrow pointing either to the right or the left), the participant was required to lift his/her finger from a time-locked response key when a second stimulus, target stimulus, appeared in the field that was attended. The length of the interstimulus interval was modified to determine if the contralateral effect - that is, a greater negativity, for the given latency range, occurs over the hemisphere opposite the direction of attention -remained. Indeed, this effect emerged for 1S1 lengths of 600, 1000, and 1400 ms. The data revealed that the contralateral effect was inversely related Io ISI length, as predicted. Thai is, the greatest difference between the ipsilateral, compared to the contralateral, response occurred for the 600 ms ISI, next largest for the 1000 ms ISI, and least for the 1400 ms ISI (p < .01). Further analyses revealed that this effect was robust across all cortical regions from which the data were recorded. Despite the differential effects in amplitude as a function of arrow direction, latency remained consistent for the emergence of the CN-375. It was concluded that lhe constant latency, in the presence of the varying amplitude as a function of ISI, reflects an early processing stage in making the attentional adjustments required for maximal preparation to respond to a target stimulus. The accompanying scalp distribution reflects the fact that the attentional information contained in the arrow cue is processed at higher levels involving associational cortex across all cortex regions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2015
- Full Text
- View/download PDF