Search

Immunotherapy has emerged as one of the four “standard” cancer therapies, alongside surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy. Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy is an immunotherapy that blocks inhibitory immune checkpoint interactions, allowing T cells and other immune cells to kill tumor cells. In the tumor microenvironment, there is often overexpression of immune checkpoint proteins, whose binding interaction with cytotoxic T cells and other immune cells results in the dampening of the antitumor response. Programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) and T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) are the two most targeted immune checkpoint proteins. Antibodies against PD-1 and CTLA-4, as well as other checkpoint proteins, are approved for clinical use as well as in clinical trials. While ICIs have changed the treatment landscape for many cancers, particularly those with significant immunogenicity, only 20-40% of patients respond to ICI therapy. Many factors are behind the lack of response and resistance, and significant efforts are aimed at improving the response to ICI therapy. One major area is modulating the gut microbiome, as it is well-established that microbial dysbiosis is associated with various human diseases. The concept is that by modulating the microbiome, we might be able to return it to a composition more similar to that seen in healthy individuals or provide microorganisms beneficial to clinical response. In the case of ICI therapy, it is proposed that there is a connection between certain microbial species and the immune system via metabolites and other signaling effects. The microbiome can be manipulated through many methods, including fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT), transferring bacterial isolates or consortia, probiotics, antibiotics, and soluble dietary fiber. For clinical insights, it is important to consider how the pre-treatment microbiome of patients may affect their response to ICI therapy, as well as how their microbiomes can be manipulated to enhance their response. Initial clinical trials have been promising, but this is an emerging field with additional work to be done. Particularly, a better understanding of the microorganisms involved in the response to ICI therapy and the mechanism by which they communicate with the immune system is essential. Future studies will need to be much larger to reduce noise between studies and to allow for emerging computational techniques to be applied.

Background. Clostridium difficile infections (CDI) account for 20-30% of healthcare-acquired infections, resulting in serious patient and economic burdens. CDI incidence has grown rapidly due to overuse of antibiotics and an aging population, posing a significant public health threat. Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) using donor stool has demonstrated clinical efficacy rates up to 94% and long-term restoration of a healthy intestinal microbiome. Challenges with donor screening, lack of research about optimal stool donor characteristics and intestinal microbiome composition, and a poorly fit screening model, create barriers to the availability of FMT. Purpose. This study aimed to generate essential information about FMT donor characteristics predictive of passing the screening and donor intestinal microbiome compositions associated with FMT clinical efficacy. The primary aims were to 1) identify previously unstudied characteristics of prospective FMT donors that are predictive of passing a stool bank’s screening process; and 2) determine whether donor intestinal microbial diversity is related to FMT clinical efficacy in preventing recurrent CDI. Methods. This study was conducted as a secondary analysis on a cohort of previously screened donors (n=770). Aim 1 was tested through a logistic regression of donor characteristics (gender, age, body mass index, frequency of bowel movements, diet, tobacco and alcohol use, and seasonality) with screening outcomes. Aim 2 was tested through a simple regression evaluating donor intestinal microbial diversity and rates of FMT clinical efficacy. Results. One donor characteristic in the logistic regression, frequency of bowel movements (p = 0.018), was significantly predictive of whether a donor passed the screening. Specifically, donors who had fewer than two bowel movements per day were more likely to pass. All other characteristics were not predictive. Similarly, the linear regression evaluating alpha diversity and FMT clinical efficacy was not significantly predictive of clinical efficacy (p = 0.140). Conclusion. Findings were used to support recommendations for improving prospective donor screening that nurses and other clinicians can implement to decrease challenging logistics, reduce costs and barriers, and potentially increase FMT clinical efficacy.

Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) is a disease associated with the wide-spread use of antibiotics and causes 450,000 infections and almost 30,000 deaths in the United States annually. Recurrence is a major problem, with approximately 1/3rd of patients relapsing after antibiotic treatment for CDI. Fecal Microbiota Transplantation (FMT) has emerged as a novel therapy for recurrent CDI, but the majority of the literature to date is made up of uncontrolled case series, so FMT’s true efficacy compared with standard antibiotic regimens remains unknown. Only a few randomized control trials (RCTs) have been published, and these have studied small numbers of patients and exhibited marked methodological heterogeneity. As such, there is uncertainty about the appropriate indications for FMT with respect to recurrent CDI, as well as the best methodology for the procedure, which has been carried our using various fecal preparations and modes of delivery. In particular, questions remain about if FMT should be recommended for patients with a first CDI recurrence, and if minimally invasive methods of performing FMT such as administration of enteric coated capsules are more efficacious than standard antibiotic treatments. We propose a double blind, placebo controlled, RCT that will be run as two parallel RCTs, where Trial 1 will enroll patients experiencing a first CDI recurrence, and Trial 2 will enroll patients experiencing a second or later CDI recurrence. The treatment arms in each trial will receive FMT in the form of orally administered frozen capsules, while the control arms will receive standard antibiotic treatments based on the number of recurrences they have experienced. If shown to be efficacious in a large RCT, oral capsulized FMT alone as treatment for recurrent CDI has the potential to increase access to FMT, decrease unnecessary antibiotic use, and substantially reduce morbidity and mortality attributable to CDI.

Clostridium difficile infection is the most common nosocomial infection in the US and other developed countries, yet standard antibiotic therapy for this infection fails to cure nearly a quarter of patients. These individuals experience a recurrence of the infection, and a large subset of patients with a single recurrence go on to develop recurrent C. difficile infection syndrome (R-CDI), characterized by vicious cycles of repeated antibiotic use and recurrence of disease. Although fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is now widely recognized as an extremely effective therapy for R-CDI, its mechanisms were heretofore unknown. This substantial gap in our knowledge limited both our ability to design novel therapies for R-CDI and our understanding of the role our native intestinal microbes play in our health. The work herein summarizes our efforts to identify and test the mechanisms behind this important treatment. Our findings indicate that fecal bile acid composition, which is significantly altered following FMT, also dramatically impacts C. difficile physiology. Bile acids present after FMT, compared to those present prior to the procedure, prevent germination of C. difficile spores and limit the growth of vegetative cells. With this knowledge, we demonstrated that a bile acid already clinically available, ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA), can also prevent C. difficile germination and growth. Although unfortunately UDCA is a poor treatment option for many patients due to its absorption in the small intestine, we showed both that a non-absorbed derivative of UDCA, C7-sulfated UDCA, may be a promising novel therapy for R-CDI, and that UDCA may still have clinical utility in patients with altered gastrointestinal anatomy. These findings have paved the way for novel treatments for this widespread infection.