Author: "Chacon E" / Publication Type: Electronic Resources - Searchworks@Jio Institute Digital Library Search Results

Your search keyword '"Chacon E"' showing total 29 results

Start Over Author "Chacon E" Publication Type Electronic Resources

29 results on '"Chacon E"'

1. SENECA study: staging endometrial cancer based on molecular classification

Author: Chacon, E, Boria, F, Lyer, R, Fanfani, F, Malzoni, M, Bretova, P, Luzarraga Aznar, A, Fruscio, R, Jedryka, M, Toth, R, Perrone, A, Kakkos, A, Cristobal Quevedo, I, Congedo, L, Zanagnolo, V, Fernandez-Gonzalez, S, Ferro, B, Narducci, F, Hovhannisyan, T, Aksahin, E, Cardenas, L, Oliver, M, Nozaleda, G, Arnaez, M, Misiek, M, Ferrero, A, Pain, F, Zarragoitia, J, Diaz, C, Ceppi, L, Mehdiyev, S, Roldan-Rivas, F, Guijarro-Campillo, A, Amengual, J, Manzour, N, Sanchez Lorenzo, L, Nunez-Cordoba, J, Gonzalez Martin, A, Minguez, J, Chiva, L, Chacon E., Boria F., Lyer R. R., Fanfani F., Malzoni M., Bretova P., Luzarraga Aznar A., Fruscio R., Jedryka M. A., Toth R., Perrone A. M., Kakkos A., Cristobal Quevedo I., Congedo L., Zanagnolo V., Fernandez-Gonzalez S., Ferro B., Narducci F., Hovhannisyan T., Aksahin E., Cardenas L., Oliver M. R., Nozaleda G., Arnaez M., Misiek M., Ferrero A., Pain F. A., Zarragoitia J., Diaz C., Ceppi L., Mehdiyev S., Roldan-Rivas F., Guijarro-Campillo A. R., Amengual J., Manzour N., Sanchez Lorenzo L., Nunez-Cordoba J. M., Gonzalez Martin A., Minguez J. A., Chiva L., Chacon, E, Boria, F, Lyer, R, Fanfani, F, Malzoni, M, Bretova, P, Luzarraga Aznar, A, Fruscio, R, Jedryka, M, Toth, R, Perrone, A, Kakkos, A, Cristobal Quevedo, I, Congedo, L, Zanagnolo, V, Fernandez-Gonzalez, S, Ferro, B, Narducci, F, Hovhannisyan, T, Aksahin, E, Cardenas, L, Oliver, M, Nozaleda, G, Arnaez, M, Misiek, M, Ferrero, A, Pain, F, Zarragoitia, J, Diaz, C, Ceppi, L, Mehdiyev, S, Roldan-Rivas, F, Guijarro-Campillo, A, Amengual, J, Manzour, N, Sanchez Lorenzo, L, Nunez-Cordoba, J, Gonzalez Martin, A, Minguez, J, Chiva, L, Chacon E., Boria F., Lyer R. R., Fanfani F., Malzoni M., Bretova P., Luzarraga Aznar A., Fruscio R., Jedryka M. A., Toth R., Perrone A. M., Kakkos A., Cristobal Quevedo I., Congedo L., Zanagnolo V., Fernandez-Gonzalez S., Ferro B., Narducci F., Hovhannisyan T., Aksahin E., Cardenas L., Oliver M. R., Nozaleda G., Arnaez M., Misiek M., Ferrero A., Pain F. A., Zarragoitia J., Diaz C., Ceppi L., Mehdiyev S., Roldan-Rivas F., Guijarro-Campillo A. R., Amengual J., Manzour N., Sanchez Lorenzo L., Nunez-Cordoba J. M., Gonzalez Martin A., Minguez J. A., and Chiva L.
Abstract: OBJECTIVE: Management of endometrial cancer is advancing, with accurate staging crucial for guiding treatment decisions. Understanding sentinel lymph node (SLN) involvement rates across molecular subgroups is essential. To evaluate SLN involvement in early-stage (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2009 I-II) endometrial cancer, considering molecular subtypes and new European Society of Gynaecological Oncology (ESGO) risk classification. METHODS: The SENECA study retrospectively reviewed data from 2139 women with stage I-II endometrial cancer across 66 centers in 16 countries. Patients underwent surgery with SLN assessment following ESGO guidelines between January 2021 and December 2022. Molecular analysis was performed on pre-operative biopsies or hysterectomy specimens. RESULTS: Among the 2139 patients, the molecular subgroups were as follows: 272 (12.7%) p53 abnormal (p53abn, 1191 (55.7%) non-specific molecular profile (NSMP), 581 (27.2%) mismatch repair deficient (MMRd), 95 (4.4%) POLE mutated (POLE-mut). Tracer diffusion was detected in, at least one side, in 97.2% of the cases; with a bilateral diffusion observed in 82.7% of the cases. By ultrastaging (90.7% of the cases) or one-step nucleic acid amplification (198 (9.3%) of the cases), 205 patients were identified with affected sentinel lymph nodes, representing 9.6% of the sample. Of these, 139 (67.8%) had low-volume metastases (including micrometastases, 42.9%; and isolated tumor cells, 24.9%) while 66 (32.2%) had macrometastases. Significant differences in SLN involvement were observed between molecular subtypes, with p53abn and MMRd groups having the highest rates (12.50% and 12.40%, respectively) compared with NSMP (7.80%) and POLE-mut (6.30%), (p=0.004); (p53abn, OR=1.69 (95% CI 1.11 to 2.56), p=0.014; MMRd, OR=1.67 (95% CI 1.21 to 2.31), p=0.002). Differences were also noted among ESGO risk groups (2.84% for low-risk patients, 6.62% for intermediate-risk patients, 21.63% for high-inte
Published: 2024

2. SUCCOR morbidity: Complications in minimally invasive versus open radical hysterectomy in early cervical cancer

Author: Vazquez-Vicente, D, Boria, F, Castellanos, T, Gutierrez, M, Chacon, E, Manzour, N, Minguez, J, Martin-Calvo, N, Alcazar, J, Chiva, L, Fruscio, R, Vazquez-Vicente D., Boria F., Castellanos T., Gutierrez M., Chacon E., Manzour N., Minguez J. A., Martin-Calvo N., Alcazar J. L., Chiva L., Fruscio R, Vazquez-Vicente, D, Boria, F, Castellanos, T, Gutierrez, M, Chacon, E, Manzour, N, Minguez, J, Martin-Calvo, N, Alcazar, J, Chiva, L, Fruscio, R, Vazquez-Vicente D., Boria F., Castellanos T., Gutierrez M., Chacon E., Manzour N., Minguez J. A., Martin-Calvo N., Alcazar J. L., Chiva L., and Fruscio R
Abstract: Objective The aim of this study was to compare the incidence of intra-operative and post-operative complications in open and minimally invasive radical hysterectomy for patients with early-stage cervical cancer. Methods Data were collected from the SUCCOR database of 1272 patients with stage IB1 cervical cancer (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO), 2009) who underwent radical hysterectomy in Europe between January 2013 and December 2014. We reviewed the duration of the surgeries, estimated blood loss, length of hospital stay, intra-operative and post-operative complications. The inclusion criteria were age ≥18 years and histologic type (squamous cell carcinoma, adenocarcinoma, or adenosquamous carcinoma). Pelvic MRI confirming a tumor diameter ≤4 cm with no parametrial invasion and a pre-operative CT scan, MRI, or positron emission tomography CT demonstrating no extra-cervical metastatic disease were mandatory. Outcomes of interest were any grade >3 adverse events, intra-operative adverse events, post-operative adverse events, length of hospital stay, length of operation, and blood loss. Results The study included 1156 patients, 633 (54%) in the open surgery group and 523 (46%) in the minimally invasive surgery group. Median age was 46 years (range 18-82), median body mass index 25 kg/m 2 (range 15-68), and 1022 (88.3%) patients were considered to have an optimal performance status (ECOG Performance Status 0). The most common histologic tumor type was squamous carcinoma (n=794, 68.7%) and the most frequent FIGO staging was IB1 (n=510, 44.1%). In the minimally invasive surgery group the median duration of surgery was longer (240 vs 187 min, p<0.01), median estimated blood loss was lower (100 vs 300 mL, p<0.01), and median length of hospital stay was shorter (4 vs 7 days, p<0.01) compared with the abdominal surgery group. There was no difference in the overall incidence of intra-operative and post-operative complications between th
Published: 2024

3. Consensus on surgical technique for sentinel lymph node dissection in cervical cancer

Author: Bizzarri, Nicolo', Obermair, A., Hsu, H. -C., Chacon, E., Collins, A., Tsibulak, I., Mutombo, A., Abu-Rustum, N. R., Balaya, V., Buda, A., Cibula, D., Covens, A., Fanfani, Francesco, Ferron, G., Frumovitz, M., Guani, B., Kocian, R., Kohler, C., Leblanc, E., Lecuru, F., Leitao, M. M., Mathevet, P., Mueller, M. D., Papadia, A., Pareja, R., Plante, M., Querleu, D., Scambia, Giovanni, Tanner, E., Zapardiel, I., Garcia, J. R., Ramirez, P. T., Bizzarri N., Fanfani F. (ORCID:0000-0003-1991-7284), Scambia G. (ORCID:0000-0003-2758-1063), Bizzarri, Nicolo', Obermair, A., Hsu, H. -C., Chacon, E., Collins, A., Tsibulak, I., Mutombo, A., Abu-Rustum, N. R., Balaya, V., Buda, A., Cibula, D., Covens, A., Fanfani, Francesco, Ferron, G., Frumovitz, M., Guani, B., Kocian, R., Kohler, C., Leblanc, E., Lecuru, F., Leitao, M. M., Mathevet, P., Mueller, M. D., Papadia, A., Pareja, R., Plante, M., Querleu, D., Scambia, Giovanni, Tanner, E., Zapardiel, I., Garcia, J. R., Ramirez, P. T., Bizzarri N., Fanfani F. (ORCID:0000-0003-1991-7284), and Scambia G. (ORCID:0000-0003-2758-1063)
Abstract: Objective: The purpose of this study was to establish a consensus on the surgical technique for sentinel lymph node (SLN) dissection in cervical cancer. Methods: A 26 question survey was emailed to international expert gynecological oncology surgeons. A two-step modified Delphi method was used to establish consensus. After a first round of online survey, the questions were amended and a second round, along with semistructured interviews was performed. Consensus was defined using a 70% cut-off for agreement. Results: Twenty-five of 38 (65.8%) experts responded to the first and second rounds of the online survey. Agreement ≥70% was reached for 13 (50.0%) questions in the first round and for 15 (57.7%) in the final round. Consensus agreement identified 15 recommended, three optional, and five not recommended steps. Experts agreed on the following recommended procedures: use of indocyanine green as a tracer; superficial (with or without deep) injection at 3 and 9 o'clock; injection at the margins of uninvolved mucosa avoiding vaginal fornices; grasping the cervix with forceps only in part of the cervix is free of tumor; use of a minimally invasive approach for SLN biopsy in the case of simple trachelectomy/conization; identification of the ureter, obliterated umbilical artery, and external iliac vessels before SLN excision; commencing the dissection at the level of the uterine artery and continuing laterally; and completing dissection in one hemi-pelvis before proceeding to the contralateral side. Consensus was also reached in recommending against injection at 6 and 12 o'clock, and injection directly into the tumor in cases of the tumor completely replacing the cervix; against removal of nodes through port without protective maneuvers; absence of an ultrastaging protocol; and against modifying tracer concentration at the time of re-injection after mapping failure. Conclusion: Recommended, optional, and not recommended steps of SLN dissection in cervical cancer have been
Published: 2024

4. SUCCOR Nodes: May Sentinel Node Biopsy Determine the Need for Adjuvant Treatment?

Author: Berasaluce Gomez, A, Martin-Calvo, N, Boria, F, Manzour, N, Chacon, E, Bizzarri, N, Chiva, L, Martinez, A, Quesada, A, Kucukmetin, A, Vazquez, A, Mandic, A, Casajuana, A, Kavallaris, A, Fagotti, A, Perrone, A, Ferrero, A, Lekuona, A, Uppin, A, Stepanyan, A, Chiofalo, B, Morillas, B, Tauste, C, Andrade, C, Mom, C, Brucker, C, Sarac, C, Vazquez-Vicente, D, Cibula, D, Querleu, D, Erasun, D, Kaidarova, D, Tsolakidis, D, Haidopoulos, D, Golub, D, Bonci, E, Aksahin, E, Goncalves, E, Moratalla, E, Karaman, E, Myriokefalitaki, E, Ghezzi, F, Narducci, F, Roldan, F, Raspagliesi, F, Goffin, F, Grandjean, F, Guyon, F, Demirkiran, F, Fiol, G, Chakalova, G, Mancebo, G, Vorgias, G, Gebauer, G, Meili, G, Hernandez-Cortes, G, Bogani, G, Cordeiro, G, Vujic, G, Mendinhos, G, Trum, H, Bonsang-Kitzis, H, Haller, H, Vergote, I, Zapardiel, I, Aluloski, I, Berlev, I, Pete, I, Kalogiannidis, I, Kotsopoulos, I, Yezhova, I, Diez, J, Feron, J, Scharf, J, Beltman, J, Haesen, J, Ponce, J, Cea, J, Minguez, J, Garcia, J, Arevalo-Serrano, J, Gilabert, J, Alcazar, J, Kukk, K, Galaal, K, Cardenas, L, Pirtea, L, Mereu, L, Anchora, L, Dostalek, L, Klasa, L, Pakizimre, M, Undurraga, M, Jedryka, M, Bernardino, M, Alonso-Espias, M, Martin-Salamanca, M, Cuadra, M, Tavares, M, Malzoni, M, Fehr, M, Luyckx, M, Lanner, M, Leht, M, Meydanli, M, Mallmann, M, Capilna, M, Redecha, M, Mitrovic, M, Maenpaa, M, Guijarro, M, Abdalla, N, Gomes, N, Povolotskaya, N, Badzakov, N, Arencibia, O, Akbayir, O, Cavalle, P, Zusterzeel, P, Rolland, P, Coronado, P, Bharathan, R, Saaron, R, Sousa, R, Fruscio, R, Jach, R, Poka, R, Barrachina, R, Domingo, S, Morales, S, Akgol, S, Fernandez-Gonzalez, S, Aliyev, S, Herrero, S, Fidalgo, S, Prader, S, Smrkolj, S, Petousis, S, Kovachev, S, Turan, T, Toptas, T, Castellanos, T, da Costa, T, Marina, T, Zanagnolo, V, Martin, V, Gonzalez, V, Student, V, Sukhin, V, Berasaluce Gomez A., Martin-Calvo N., Boria F., Manzour N., Chacon E., Bizzarri N., Chiva L., Martinez A., Quesada A., Kucukmetin A., Vazquez A., Mandic A., Casajuana A., Kavallaris A., Fagotti A., Perrone A., Ferrero A., Lekuona A., Uppin A., Stepanyan A., Chiofalo B., Morillas B., Tauste C., Andrade C., Mom C., Brucker C., Sarac C. -P., Vazquez-Vicente D., Cibula D., Querleu D., Erasun D., Kaidarova D., Tsolakidis D., Haidopoulos D., Golub D., Bonci E. -A., Aksahin E., Goncalves E., Moratalla E., Karaman E., Myriokefalitaki E., Ghezzi F., Narducci F., Roldan F., Raspagliesi F., Goffin F., Grandjean F., Guyon F., Demirkiran F., Fiol G., Chakalova G., Mancebo G., Vorgias G., Gebauer G., Meili G., Hernandez-Cortes G., Bogani G., Cordeiro G., Vujic G., Mendinhos G., Trum H., Bonsang-Kitzis H., Haller H., Vergote I., Zapardiel I., Aluloski I., Berlev I., Pete I., Kalogiannidis I., Kotsopoulos I., Yezhova I., Diez J., Feron J. G., Scharf J. -P., Beltman J., Haesen J., Ponce J., Cea J., Minguez J. A., Garcia J., Arevalo-Serrano J., Gilabert J., Alcazar J. L., Kukk K., Galaal K., Cardenas L., Pirtea L., Mereu L., Anchora L. P., Dostalek L., Klasa L., PakizImre M., Undurraga M., Jedryka M., Bernardino M., Alonso-Espias M., Martin-Salamanca M. B., Cuadra M., Tavares M., Malzoni M., Fehr M., Luyckx M., Lanner M., Leht M., Meydanli M., Mallmann M., Capilna M., Redecha M., Mitrovic M., Maenpaa M. M., Guijarro M., Abdalla N., Gomes N., Povolotskaya N., Badzakov N., Arencibia O., Akbayir O., Cavalle P., Zusterzeel P., Rolland P., Coronado P., Bharathan R., Saaron R., Sousa R., Fruscio R., Jach R., Poka R., Barrachina R., Domingo S., Morales S., Akgol S., Fernandez-Gonzalez S., Aliyev S., Herrero S., Fidalgo S., Prader S., Smrkolj S., Petousis S., Kovachev S., Turan T., Toptas T., Castellanos T., da Costa T. D., Marina T., Zanagnolo V., Martin V., Gonzalez V., Student V., Sukhin V., Berasaluce Gomez, A, Martin-Calvo, N, Boria, F, Manzour, N, Chacon, E, Bizzarri, N, Chiva, L, Martinez, A, Quesada, A, Kucukmetin, A, Vazquez, A, Mandic, A, Casajuana, A, Kavallaris, A, Fagotti, A, Perrone, A, Ferrero, A, Lekuona, A, Uppin, A, Stepanyan, A, Chiofalo, B, Morillas, B, Tauste, C, Andrade, C, Mom, C, Brucker, C, Sarac, C, Vazquez-Vicente, D, Cibula, D, Querleu, D, Erasun, D, Kaidarova, D, Tsolakidis, D, Haidopoulos, D, Golub, D, Bonci, E, Aksahin, E, Goncalves, E, Moratalla, E, Karaman, E, Myriokefalitaki, E, Ghezzi, F, Narducci, F, Roldan, F, Raspagliesi, F, Goffin, F, Grandjean, F, Guyon, F, Demirkiran, F, Fiol, G, Chakalova, G, Mancebo, G, Vorgias, G, Gebauer, G, Meili, G, Hernandez-Cortes, G, Bogani, G, Cordeiro, G, Vujic, G, Mendinhos, G, Trum, H, Bonsang-Kitzis, H, Haller, H, Vergote, I, Zapardiel, I, Aluloski, I, Berlev, I, Pete, I, Kalogiannidis, I, Kotsopoulos, I, Yezhova, I, Diez, J, Feron, J, Scharf, J, Beltman, J, Haesen, J, Ponce, J, Cea, J, Minguez, J, Garcia, J, Arevalo-Serrano, J, Gilabert, J, Alcazar, J, Kukk, K, Galaal, K, Cardenas, L, Pirtea, L, Mereu, L, Anchora, L, Dostalek, L, Klasa, L, Pakizimre, M, Undurraga, M, Jedryka, M, Bernardino, M, Alonso-Espias, M, Martin-Salamanca, M, Cuadra, M, Tavares, M, Malzoni, M, Fehr, M, Luyckx, M, Lanner, M, Leht, M, Meydanli, M, Mallmann, M, Capilna, M, Redecha, M, Mitrovic, M, Maenpaa, M, Guijarro, M, Abdalla, N, Gomes, N, Povolotskaya, N, Badzakov, N, Arencibia, O, Akbayir, O, Cavalle, P, Zusterzeel, P, Rolland, P, Coronado, P, Bharathan, R, Saaron, R, Sousa, R, Fruscio, R, Jach, R, Poka, R, Barrachina, R, Domingo, S, Morales, S, Akgol, S, Fernandez-Gonzalez, S, Aliyev, S, Herrero, S, Fidalgo, S, Prader, S, Smrkolj, S, Petousis, S, Kovachev, S, Turan, T, Toptas, T, Castellanos, T, da Costa, T, Marina, T, Zanagnolo, V, Martin, V, Gonzalez, V, Student, V, Sukhin, V, Berasaluce Gomez A., Martin-Calvo N., Boria F., Manzour N., Chacon E., Bizzarri N., Chiva L., Martinez A., Quesada A., Kucukmetin A., Vazquez A., Mandic A., Casajuana A., Kavallaris A., Fagotti A., Perrone A., Ferrero A., Lekuona A., Uppin A., Stepanyan A., Chiofalo B., Morillas B., Tauste C., Andrade C., Mom C., Brucker C., Sarac C. -P., Vazquez-Vicente D., Cibula D., Querleu D., Erasun D., Kaidarova D., Tsolakidis D., Haidopoulos D., Golub D., Bonci E. -A., Aksahin E., Goncalves E., Moratalla E., Karaman E., Myriokefalitaki E., Ghezzi F., Narducci F., Roldan F., Raspagliesi F., Goffin F., Grandjean F., Guyon F., Demirkiran F., Fiol G., Chakalova G., Mancebo G., Vorgias G., Gebauer G., Meili G., Hernandez-Cortes G., Bogani G., Cordeiro G., Vujic G., Mendinhos G., Trum H., Bonsang-Kitzis H., Haller H., Vergote I., Zapardiel I., Aluloski I., Berlev I., Pete I., Kalogiannidis I., Kotsopoulos I., Yezhova I., Diez J., Feron J. G., Scharf J. -P., Beltman J., Haesen J., Ponce J., Cea J., Minguez J. A., Garcia J., Arevalo-Serrano J., Gilabert J., Alcazar J. L., Kukk K., Galaal K., Cardenas L., Pirtea L., Mereu L., Anchora L. P., Dostalek L., Klasa L., PakizImre M., Undurraga M., Jedryka M., Bernardino M., Alonso-Espias M., Martin-Salamanca M. B., Cuadra M., Tavares M., Malzoni M., Fehr M., Luyckx M., Lanner M., Leht M., Meydanli M., Mallmann M., Capilna M., Redecha M., Mitrovic M., Maenpaa M. M., Guijarro M., Abdalla N., Gomes N., Povolotskaya N., Badzakov N., Arencibia O., Akbayir O., Cavalle P., Zusterzeel P., Rolland P., Coronado P., Bharathan R., Saaron R., Sousa R., Fruscio R., Jach R., Poka R., Barrachina R., Domingo S., Morales S., Akgol S., Fernandez-Gonzalez S., Aliyev S., Herrero S., Fidalgo S., Prader S., Smrkolj S., Petousis S., Kovachev S., Turan T., Toptas T., Castellanos T., da Costa T. D., Marina T., Zanagnolo V., Martin V., Gonzalez V., Student V., and Sukhin V.
Abstract: Background: The SUCCOR cohort was developed to analyse the overall and disease-free survival at 5 years in women with FIGO 2009 stage IB1 cervical cancer. The aim of this study was to compare the use of adjuvant therapy in these women, depending on the method used to diagnose lymphatic node metastasis. Patients and Methods: We used data from the SUCCOR cohort, which collected information from 1049 women with FIGO 2009 stage IB1 cervical cancer who were operated on between January 2013 and December 2014 in Europe. We calculated the adjusted proportion of women who received adjuvant therapy depending on the lymph node diagnosis method and compared disease free and overall survival using Cox proportional-hazards regression models. Inverse probability weighting was used to adjust for baseline potential confounders. Results: The adjusted proportion of women who received adjuvant therapy was 33.8% in the sentinel node biopsy + lymphadenectomy (SNB+LA) group and 44.7% in the LA group (p = 0.02), although the proportion of positive nodal status was similar (p = 0.30). That difference was greater in women with negative nodal status and positive Sedlis criteria (difference 31.2%, p = 0.01). Here, those who underwent a SNB+LA had an increased risk of relapse [hazard ratio (HR) 2.49, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.98–6.33, p = 0.056] and risk of death (HR 3.49, 95% CI 1.04–11.7, p = 0.042) compared with those who underwent LA. Conclusions: Women in this study were less likely to receive adjuvant therapy if their nodal invasion was determined using SNB+LA compared with LA. These results suggest a lack of therapeutic measures available when a negative result is obtained by SNB+LA, which may have an impact on the risk of recurrence and survival.
Published: 2023

5. SUCCOR quality: validation of ESGO quality indicators for surgical treatment of cervical cancer

Author: Boria, F, Chiva, L, Chacon, E, Zanagnolo, V, Fagotti, A, Kucukmetin, A, Mom, C, Chakalova, G, Shamistan, A, Malzoni, M, Narducci, F, Arencibia, O, Raspagliesi, F, Toptas, T, Cibula, D, Kaidarova, D, Meydanli, M, Tavares, M, Golub, D, Perrone, A, Poka, R, Zusterzeel, P, Aluloski, I, Goffin, F, Haidopoulos, D, Haller, H, Jach, R, Yezhova, I, Bernardino, M, Bharathan, R, Maenpaa, M, Sukhin, V, Feron, J, Fruscio, R, Kukk, K, Ponce, J, Demirkiran, F, Vorgias, G, Povolotskaya, N, Coronado Martin, P, Marina, T, Zapardiel, I, Bizzarri, N, Gorostidi, M, Gutierrez, M, Manzour, N, Berasaluce, A, Boria F., Chiva L., Chacon E., Zanagnolo V., Fagotti A., Kucukmetin A., Mom C., Chakalova G., Shamistan A., Malzoni M., Narducci F., Arencibia O., Raspagliesi F., Toptas T., Cibula D., Kaidarova D., Meydanli M. M., Tavares M., Golub D., Perrone A. M., Poka R., Zusterzeel P. L. M., Aluloski I., Goffin F., Haidopoulos D., Haller H., Jach R., Yezhova I., Bernardino M., Bharathan R., Maenpaa M. M., Sukhin V., Feron J. -G., Fruscio R., Kukk K., Ponce J., Demirkiran F., Vorgias G., Povolotskaya N., Coronado Martin P. J., Marina T., Zapardiel I., Bizzarri N., Gorostidi M., Gutierrez M., Manzour N., Berasaluce A., Boria, F, Chiva, L, Chacon, E, Zanagnolo, V, Fagotti, A, Kucukmetin, A, Mom, C, Chakalova, G, Shamistan, A, Malzoni, M, Narducci, F, Arencibia, O, Raspagliesi, F, Toptas, T, Cibula, D, Kaidarova, D, Meydanli, M, Tavares, M, Golub, D, Perrone, A, Poka, R, Zusterzeel, P, Aluloski, I, Goffin, F, Haidopoulos, D, Haller, H, Jach, R, Yezhova, I, Bernardino, M, Bharathan, R, Maenpaa, M, Sukhin, V, Feron, J, Fruscio, R, Kukk, K, Ponce, J, Demirkiran, F, Vorgias, G, Povolotskaya, N, Coronado Martin, P, Marina, T, Zapardiel, I, Bizzarri, N, Gorostidi, M, Gutierrez, M, Manzour, N, Berasaluce, A, Boria F., Chiva L., Chacon E., Zanagnolo V., Fagotti A., Kucukmetin A., Mom C., Chakalova G., Shamistan A., Malzoni M., Narducci F., Arencibia O., Raspagliesi F., Toptas T., Cibula D., Kaidarova D., Meydanli M. M., Tavares M., Golub D., Perrone A. M., Poka R., Zusterzeel P. L. M., Aluloski I., Goffin F., Haidopoulos D., Haller H., Jach R., Yezhova I., Bernardino M., Bharathan R., Maenpaa M. M., Sukhin V., Feron J. -G., Fruscio R., Kukk K., Ponce J., Demirkiran F., Vorgias G., Povolotskaya N., Coronado Martin P. J., Marina T., Zapardiel I., Bizzarri N., Gorostidi M., Gutierrez M., Manzour N., and Berasaluce A.
Abstract: Objective To evaluate whether compliance with European Society of Gynaecological Oncology (ESGO) surgery quality indicators impacts disease-free survival in patients undergoing radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer. Methods In this retrospective cohort study, 15 ESGO quality indicators were assessed in the SUCCOR database (patients who underwent radical hysterectomy for International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage 2009 IB1, FIGO 2018 IB1, and IB2 cervical cancer between January 2013 and December 2014), and the final score ranged between 0 and 16 points. Centers with more than 13 points were classified as high-quality indicator compliance centers. We constructed a weighted cohort using inverse probability weighting to adjust for the variables. We compared disease-free survival and overall survival using Cox proportional hazards regression analysis in the weighted cohort. Results A total of 838 patients were included in the study. The mean number of quality indicators compliance in this cohort was 13.6 (SD 1.45). A total of 479 (57.2%) patients were operated on at high compliance centers and 359 (42.8%) patients at low compliance centers. High compliance centers performed more open surgeries (58.4% vs 36.7%, p<0.01). Women who were operated on at centers with high compliance with quality indicators had a significantly lower risk of relapse (HR=0.39; 95% CI 0.25 to 0.61; p<0.001). The association was reduced, but remained significant, after further adjustment for conization, surgical approach, and use of manipulator surgery (HR=0.48; 95% CI 0.30 to 0.75; p=0.001) and adjustment for adjuvant therapy (HR=0.47; 95% CI 0.30 to 0.74; p=0.001). Risk of death from disease was significantly lower in women operated on at centers with high adherence to quality indicators (HR=0.43; 95% CI 0.19 to 0.97; p=0.041). However, the association was not significant after adjustment for conization, surgical approach, use of manipulator surgery, and adjuvant t
Published: 2022

6. SUCCOR Risk: Design and Validation of a Recurrence Prediction Index for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer

Author: Manzour, N, Chiva, L, Chacon, E, Martin-Calvo, N, Boria, F, Minguez, J, Alcazar, J, Zanagnolo, V, Querleu, D, Capilna, M, Fagotti, A, Kucukmetin, A, Mom, C, Chakalova, G, Aliyev, S, Malzoni, M, Narducci, F, Arencibia, O, Raspagliesi, F, Toptas, T, Cibula, D, Kaidarova, D, Meydanli, M, Tavares, M, Golub, D, Perrone, A, Poka, R, Tsolakidis, D, Vujic, G, Jedryka, M, Zusterzeel, P, Beltman, J, Goffin, F, Haidopoulos, D, Haller, H, Jach, R, Yezhova, I, Berlev, I, Bernardino, M, Bharathan, R, Lanner, M, Sukhin, V, Feron, J, Fruscio, R, Kukk, K, Ponce, J, Abdalla, N, Akbayir, O, Akgol, S, Aksahin, E, Alonso-Espias, M, Aluloski, I, Andrade, C, Badzakov, N, Barrachina, R, Bogani, G, Bonci, E, Bonsang-Kitzis, H, Brucker, C, Cardenas, L, Casajuana, A, Cavalle, P, Cea, J, Chiofalo, B, Cordeiro, G, Coronado, P, Cuadra, M, Diez, J, da Costa, T, Domingo, S, Dostalek, L, Demirkiran, F, Erasun, D, Fehr, M, Fernandez-Gonzalez, S, Fidalgo, S, Fiol, G, Galaal, K, Garcia, J, Gebauer, G, Ghezzi, F, Gilabert, J, Gomes, N, Goncalves, E, Gonzalez, V, Grandjean, F, Guijarro, M, Guyon, F, Haesen, J, Hernandez-Cortes, G, Herrero, S, Pete, I, Kalogiannidis, I, Karaman, E, Kavallaris, A, Klasa, L, Kotsopoulos, I, Kovachev, S, Leht, M, Lekuona, A, Luyckx, M, Mallmann, M, Mancebo, G, Mandic, A, Marina, T, Martin, V, Martin-Salamanca, M, Martinez, A, Meili, G, Mendinhos, G, Mereu, L, Mitrovic, M, Morales, S, Moratalla, E, Morillas, B, Myriokefalitaki, E, Pakizimre, M, Petousis, S, Pirtea, L, Povolotskaya, N, Prader, S, Quesada, A, Redecha, M, Roldan, F, Rolland, P, Saaron, R, Sarac, C, Scharf, J, Smrkolj, S, Sousa, R, Stepanyan, A, Student, V, Tauste, C, Trum, H, Turan, T, Undurraga, M, Uppin, A, Vazquez, A, Vergote, I, Vorgias, G, Zapardiel, I, Manzour N., Chiva L., Chacon E., Martin-Calvo N., Boria F., Minguez J. A., Alcazar J. L., Zanagnolo V., Querleu D., Capilna M., Fagotti A., Kucukmetin A., Mom C., Chakalova G., Aliyev S., Malzoni M., Narducci F., Arencibia O., Raspagliesi F., Toptas T., Cibula D., Kaidarova D., Meydanli M., Tavares M., Golub D., Perrone A., Poka R., Tsolakidis D., Vujic G., Jedryka M., Zusterzeel P., Beltman J., Goffin F., Haidopoulos D., Haller H., Jach R., Yezhova I., Berlev I., Bernardino M., Bharathan R., Lanner M., Sukhin V., Feron J. G., Fruscio R., Kukk K., Ponce J., Abdalla N., Akbayir O., Akgol S., Aksahin E., Alonso-Espias M., Aluloski I., Andrade C., Badzakov N., Barrachina R., Bogani G., Bonci E. -A., Bonsang-Kitzis H., Brucker C., Cardenas L., Casajuana A., Cavalle P., Cea J., Chiofalo B., Cordeiro G., Coronado P., Cuadra M., Diez J., da Costa T. D., Domingo S., Dostalek L., Demirkiran F., Erasun D., Fehr M., Fernandez-Gonzalez S., Fidalgo S., Fiol G., Galaal K., Garcia J., Gebauer G., Ghezzi F., Gilabert J., Gomes N., Goncalves E., Gonzalez V., Grandjean F., Guijarro M., Guyon F., Haesen J., Hernandez-Cortes G., Herrero S., Pete I., Kalogiannidis I., Karaman E., Kavallaris A., Klasa L., Kotsopoulos I., Kovachev S., Leht M., Lekuona A., Luyckx M., Mallmann M., Mancebo G., Mandic A., Marina T., Martin V., Martin-Salamanca M. B., Martinez A., Meili G., Mendinhos G., Mereu L., Mitrovic M., Morales S., Moratalla E., Morillas B., Myriokefalitaki E., PakizImre M., Petousis S., Pirtea L., Povolotskaya N., Prader S., Quesada A., Redecha M., Roldan F., Rolland P., Saaron R., Sarac C. -P., Scharf J. -P., Smrkolj S., Sousa R., Stepanyan A., Student V., Tauste C., Trum H., Turan T., Undurraga M., Uppin A., Vazquez A., Vergote I., Vorgias G., Zapardiel I., Manzour, N, Chiva, L, Chacon, E, Martin-Calvo, N, Boria, F, Minguez, J, Alcazar, J, Zanagnolo, V, Querleu, D, Capilna, M, Fagotti, A, Kucukmetin, A, Mom, C, Chakalova, G, Aliyev, S, Malzoni, M, Narducci, F, Arencibia, O, Raspagliesi, F, Toptas, T, Cibula, D, Kaidarova, D, Meydanli, M, Tavares, M, Golub, D, Perrone, A, Poka, R, Tsolakidis, D, Vujic, G, Jedryka, M, Zusterzeel, P, Beltman, J, Goffin, F, Haidopoulos, D, Haller, H, Jach, R, Yezhova, I, Berlev, I, Bernardino, M, Bharathan, R, Lanner, M, Sukhin, V, Feron, J, Fruscio, R, Kukk, K, Ponce, J, Abdalla, N, Akbayir, O, Akgol, S, Aksahin, E, Alonso-Espias, M, Aluloski, I, Andrade, C, Badzakov, N, Barrachina, R, Bogani, G, Bonci, E, Bonsang-Kitzis, H, Brucker, C, Cardenas, L, Casajuana, A, Cavalle, P, Cea, J, Chiofalo, B, Cordeiro, G, Coronado, P, Cuadra, M, Diez, J, da Costa, T, Domingo, S, Dostalek, L, Demirkiran, F, Erasun, D, Fehr, M, Fernandez-Gonzalez, S, Fidalgo, S, Fiol, G, Galaal, K, Garcia, J, Gebauer, G, Ghezzi, F, Gilabert, J, Gomes, N, Goncalves, E, Gonzalez, V, Grandjean, F, Guijarro, M, Guyon, F, Haesen, J, Hernandez-Cortes, G, Herrero, S, Pete, I, Kalogiannidis, I, Karaman, E, Kavallaris, A, Klasa, L, Kotsopoulos, I, Kovachev, S, Leht, M, Lekuona, A, Luyckx, M, Mallmann, M, Mancebo, G, Mandic, A, Marina, T, Martin, V, Martin-Salamanca, M, Martinez, A, Meili, G, Mendinhos, G, Mereu, L, Mitrovic, M, Morales, S, Moratalla, E, Morillas, B, Myriokefalitaki, E, Pakizimre, M, Petousis, S, Pirtea, L, Povolotskaya, N, Prader, S, Quesada, A, Redecha, M, Roldan, F, Rolland, P, Saaron, R, Sarac, C, Scharf, J, Smrkolj, S, Sousa, R, Stepanyan, A, Student, V, Tauste, C, Trum, H, Turan, T, Undurraga, M, Uppin, A, Vazquez, A, Vergote, I, Vorgias, G, Zapardiel, I, Manzour N., Chiva L., Chacon E., Martin-Calvo N., Boria F., Minguez J. A., Alcazar J. L., Zanagnolo V., Querleu D., Capilna M., Fagotti A., Kucukmetin A., Mom C., Chakalova G., Aliyev S., Malzoni M., Narducci F., Arencibia O., Raspagliesi F., Toptas T., Cibula D., Kaidarova D., Meydanli M., Tavares M., Golub D., Perrone A., Poka R., Tsolakidis D., Vujic G., Jedryka M., Zusterzeel P., Beltman J., Goffin F., Haidopoulos D., Haller H., Jach R., Yezhova I., Berlev I., Bernardino M., Bharathan R., Lanner M., Sukhin V., Feron J. G., Fruscio R., Kukk K., Ponce J., Abdalla N., Akbayir O., Akgol S., Aksahin E., Alonso-Espias M., Aluloski I., Andrade C., Badzakov N., Barrachina R., Bogani G., Bonci E. -A., Bonsang-Kitzis H., Brucker C., Cardenas L., Casajuana A., Cavalle P., Cea J., Chiofalo B., Cordeiro G., Coronado P., Cuadra M., Diez J., da Costa T. D., Domingo S., Dostalek L., Demirkiran F., Erasun D., Fehr M., Fernandez-Gonzalez S., Fidalgo S., Fiol G., Galaal K., Garcia J., Gebauer G., Ghezzi F., Gilabert J., Gomes N., Goncalves E., Gonzalez V., Grandjean F., Guijarro M., Guyon F., Haesen J., Hernandez-Cortes G., Herrero S., Pete I., Kalogiannidis I., Karaman E., Kavallaris A., Klasa L., Kotsopoulos I., Kovachev S., Leht M., Lekuona A., Luyckx M., Mallmann M., Mancebo G., Mandic A., Marina T., Martin V., Martin-Salamanca M. B., Martinez A., Meili G., Mendinhos G., Mereu L., Mitrovic M., Morales S., Moratalla E., Morillas B., Myriokefalitaki E., PakizImre M., Petousis S., Pirtea L., Povolotskaya N., Prader S., Quesada A., Redecha M., Roldan F., Rolland P., Saaron R., Sarac C. -P., Scharf J. -P., Smrkolj S., Sousa R., Stepanyan A., Student V., Tauste C., Trum H., Turan T., Undurraga M., Uppin A., Vazquez A., Vergote I., Vorgias G., and Zapardiel I.
Abstract: Objective: Based on the SUCCOR study database, our primary objective was to identify the independent clinical pathological variables associated with the risk of relapse in patients with stage IB1 cervical cancer who underwent a radical hysterectomy. Our secondary goal was to design and validate a risk predictive index (RPI) for classifying patients depending on the risk of recurrence. Methods: Overall, 1116 women were included from January 2013 to December 2014. We randomly divided our sample into two cohorts: discovery and validation cohorts. The test group was used to identify the independent variables associated with relapse, and with these variables, we designed our RPI. The index was applied to calculate a relapse risk score for each participant in the validation group. Results: A previous cone biopsy was the most significant independent variable that lowered the rate of relapse (odds ratio [OR] 0.31, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.17–0.60). Additionally, patients with a tumor diameter >2 cm on preoperative imaging assessment (OR 2.15, 95% CI 1.33–3.5) and operated by the minimally invasive approach (OR 1.61, 95% CI 1.00–2.57) were more likely to have a recurrence. Based on these findings, patients in the validation cohort were classified according to the RPI of low, medium, or high risk of relapse, with rates of 3.4%, 9.8%, and 21.3% observed in each group, respectively. With a median follow-up of 58 months, the 5-year disease-free survival rates were 97.2% for the low-risk group, 88.0% for the medium-risk group, and 80.5% for the high-risk group (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Previous conization to radical hysterectomy was the most powerful protective variable of relapse. Our risk predictor index was validated to identify patients at risk of recurrence.
Published: 2022

7. Radical hysterectomy in early cervical cancer in Europe: Characteristics, outcomes and evaluation of ESGO quality indicators

Author: Boria, F, Chiva, L, Zanagnolo, V, Querleu, D, Martin-Calvo, N, CA Pilna, M, Fagotti, A, Kucukmetin, A, Mom, C, Chakalova, G, Shamistan, A, Malzoni, M, Narducci, F, Arencibia, O, Raspagliesi, F, Toptas, T, Cibula, D, Kaidarova, D, Meydanli, M, Tavares, M, Golub, D, Perrone, A, Poka, R, Tsolakidis, D, Vujic, G, Jedryka, M, Zusterzeel, P, Beltman, J, Goffin, F, Haidopoulos, D, Haller, H, Jach, R, Yezhova, I, Berlev, I, Bernardino, M, Bharathan, R, Lanner, M, Maenpaa, M, Sukhin, V, Feron J.,, Fruscio, R, Kukk, K, Ponce, J, Alonso-Espias, M, Minguez, J, Vazquez-Vicente, D, Manzour, N, Jurado, M, Castellanos, T, Chacon, E, Alcazar, J, Boria F, Chiva L, Zanagnolo V, Querleu D, Martin-Calvo N, CA Pilna M. E, Fagotti A, Kucukmetin A, Mom C, Chakalova G., Shamistan A., Malzoni M., Narducci F., Arencibia O., Raspagliesi F., Toptas T., Cibula D., Kaidarova D., Meydanli M. M., Tavares M., Golub D., Perrone A. M., Poka R., Tsolakidis D., Vujic G., Jedryka M. A., Zusterzeel P. L. M., Beltman J. J., Goffin F., Haidopoulos D., Haller H., Jach R., Yezhova I., Berlev I., Bernardino M., Bharathan R, Lanner M, Maenpaa M. M, Sukhin V, Feron J. -G, Fruscio R, Kukk K, Ponce J, Alonso-Espias M, Minguez J. A, Vazquez-Vicente D, Manzour N, Jurado M, Castellanos T, Chacon E, Alcazar J. L., Boria, F, Chiva, L, Zanagnolo, V, Querleu, D, Martin-Calvo, N, CA Pilna, M, Fagotti, A, Kucukmetin, A, Mom, C, Chakalova, G, Shamistan, A, Malzoni, M, Narducci, F, Arencibia, O, Raspagliesi, F, Toptas, T, Cibula, D, Kaidarova, D, Meydanli, M, Tavares, M, Golub, D, Perrone, A, Poka, R, Tsolakidis, D, Vujic, G, Jedryka, M, Zusterzeel, P, Beltman, J, Goffin, F, Haidopoulos, D, Haller, H, Jach, R, Yezhova, I, Berlev, I, Bernardino, M, Bharathan, R, Lanner, M, Maenpaa, M, Sukhin, V, Feron J.,, Fruscio, R, Kukk, K, Ponce, J, Alonso-Espias, M, Minguez, J, Vazquez-Vicente, D, Manzour, N, Jurado, M, Castellanos, T, Chacon, E, Alcazar, J, Boria F, Chiva L, Zanagnolo V, Querleu D, Martin-Calvo N, CA Pilna M. E, Fagotti A, Kucukmetin A, Mom C, Chakalova G., Shamistan A., Malzoni M., Narducci F., Arencibia O., Raspagliesi F., Toptas T., Cibula D., Kaidarova D., Meydanli M. M., Tavares M., Golub D., Perrone A. M., Poka R., Tsolakidis D., Vujic G., Jedryka M. A., Zusterzeel P. L. M., Beltman J. J., Goffin F., Haidopoulos D., Haller H., Jach R., Yezhova I., Berlev I., Bernardino M., Bharathan R, Lanner M, Maenpaa M. M, Sukhin V, Feron J. -G, Fruscio R, Kukk K, Ponce J, Alonso-Espias M, Minguez J. A, Vazquez-Vicente D, Manzour N, Jurado M, Castellanos T, Chacon E, and Alcazar J. L.
Abstract: Introduction Comprehensive updated information on cervical cancer surgical treatment in Europe is scarce. Objective To evaluate baseline characteristics of women with early cervical cancer and to analyze the outcomes of the ESGO quality indicators after radical hysterectomy in the SUCCOR database. Methods The SUCCOR database consisted of 1272 patients who underwent radical hysterectomy for stage IB1 cervical cancer (FIGO 2009) between January 2013 and December 2014. After exclusion criteria, the final sample included 1156 patients. This study first described the clinical, surgical, pathological, and follow-up variables of this population and then analyzed the outcomes (disease-free survival and overall survival) after radical hysterectomy. Surgical-related ESGO quality indicators were assessed and the accomplishment of the stated recommendations was verified. Results The mean age of the patients was 47.1 years (SD 10.8), with a mean body mass index of 25.4 kg/m 2 (SD 4.9). A total of 423 (36.6%) patients had a previous cone biopsy. Tumor size (clinical examination) <2 cm was observed in 667 (57.7%) patients. The most frequent histology type was squamous carcinoma (794 (68.7%) patients), and positive lymph nodes were found in 143 (12.4%) patients. A total of 633 (54.8%) patients were operated by open abdominal surgery. Intra-operative complications occurred in 108 (9.3%) patients, and post-operative complications during the first month occurred in 249 (21.5%) patients, with bladder dysfunction as the most frequent event (119 (10.3%) patients). Clavien-Dindo grade III or higher complication occurred in 56 (4.8%) patients. A total of 510 (44.1%) patients received adjuvant therapy. After a median follow-up of 58 months (range 0-84), the 5-year disease-free survival was 88.3%, and the overall survival was 94.9%. In our population, 10 of the 11 surgical-related quality indicators currently recommended by ESGO were fully fulfilled 5 years before its implementation. Conc
Published: 2021

8. SUCCOR cone study: conization before radical hysterectomy

Author: Chacon, E., Manzour, N., Zanagnolo, V., Querleu, D., Núñez-Córdoba, J.M., Martin-Calvo, N., Căpîlna, M.E., Fagotti, A., Kucukmetin, A., Mom, C., Chakalova, G., Shamistan, A., Moreno, A., Malzoni, M., Narducci, F., Arencibia, O., Raspagliesi, F., Toptas, T., Cibula, D., Kaidarova, D., Meydanli, M.M., Tavares, M., Golub, D., Perrone, A.M., Poka, R., Tsolakidis, D., Vujić, G., Jedryka, M.A., Zusterzeel, P.L.M., Beltman, J.J., Goffin, F., Haidopoulos, D., Haller, H., Jach, R., Yezhova, I., Berlev, I., Bernardino, M., Bharathan, R., Lanner, M., Maenpaa, M.M., Sukhin, V., Feron, J.G., Fruscio, R., Kukk, K., Ponce, J., Minguez, J.A., Vázquez-Vicente, D., Castellanos, T., Boria, F., Alcazar, J.L., Chiva, L., Chacon, E., Manzour, N., Zanagnolo, V., Querleu, D., Núñez-Córdoba, J.M., Martin-Calvo, N., Căpîlna, M.E., Fagotti, A., Kucukmetin, A., Mom, C., Chakalova, G., Shamistan, A., Moreno, A., Malzoni, M., Narducci, F., Arencibia, O., Raspagliesi, F., Toptas, T., Cibula, D., Kaidarova, D., Meydanli, M.M., Tavares, M., Golub, D., Perrone, A.M., Poka, R., Tsolakidis, D., Vujić, G., Jedryka, M.A., Zusterzeel, P.L.M., Beltman, J.J., Goffin, F., Haidopoulos, D., Haller, H., Jach, R., Yezhova, I., Berlev, I., Bernardino, M., Bharathan, R., Lanner, M., Maenpaa, M.M., Sukhin, V., Feron, J.G., Fruscio, R., Kukk, K., Ponce, J., Minguez, J.A., Vázquez-Vicente, D., Castellanos, T., Boria, F., Alcazar, J.L., and Chiva, L.
Abstract: Item does not contain fulltext, OBJECTIVE: To evaluate disease-free survival of cervical conization prior to radical hysterectomy in patients with stage IB1 cervical cancer (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) 2009). METHODS: A multicenter retrospective observational cohort study was conducted including patients from the Surgery in Cervical Cancer Comparing Different Surgical Aproaches in Stage IB1 Cervical Cancer (SUCCOR) database with FIGO 2009 IB1 cervical carcinoma treated with radical hysterectomy between January 1, 2013, and December 31, 2014. We used propensity score matching to minimize the potential allocation biases arising from the retrospective design. Patients who underwent conization but were similar for other measured characteristics were matched 1:1 to patients from the non-cone group using a caliper width ≤0.2 standard deviations of the logit odds of the estimated propensity score. RESULTS: We obtained a weighted cohort of 374 patients (187 patients with prior conization and 187 non-conization patients). We found a 65% reduction in the risk of relapse for patients who had cervical conization prior to radical hysterectomy (hazard ratio (HR) 0.35, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.16 to 0.75, p=0.007) and a 75% reduction in the risk of death for the same sample (HR 0.25, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.90, p=0.033). In addition, patients who underwent minimally invasive surgery without prior conization had a 5.63 times higher chance of relapse compared with those who had an open approach and previous conization (HR 5.63, 95% CI 1.64 to 19.3, p=0.006). Patients who underwent minimally invasive surgery with prior conization and those who underwent open surgery without prior conization showed no differences in relapse rates compared with those who underwent open surgery with prior cone biopsy (reference) (HR 1.94, 95% CI 0.49 to 7.76, p=0.349 and HR 2.94, 95% CI 0.80 to 10.86, p=0.106 respectively). CONCLUSIONS: In this retrospective study, patients undergoing cervical conizatio
Published: 2022

9. SUCCOR quality: validation of ESGO quality indicators for surgical treatment of cervical cancer

Author: Boria, F., Chiva, L., Chacon, E., Zanagnolo, V., Fagotti, A., Kucukmetin, A., Mom, C., Chakalova, G., Shamistan, A., Malzoni, M., Narducci, F., Arencibia, O., Raspagliesi, F., Toptas, T., Cibula, D., Kaidarova, D., Meydanli, M.M., Tavares, M., Golub, D., Perrone, A.M., Poka, R., Zusterzeel, P.L.M., Aluloski, I., Goffin, F., Haidopoulos, D., Haller, H., Jach, R., Yezhova, I., Bernardino, M., Bharathan, R., Maenpaa, M.M., Sukhin, V., Feron, J.G., Fruscio, R., Kukk, K., Ponce, J., Demirkiran, F., Vorgias, G., Povolotskaya, N., Martín, P.J. Coronado, Marina, T., Zapardiel, I., Bizzarri, N., Gorostidi, M., Gutierrez, M., Manzour, N., Berasaluce, A., Martin-Calvo, N., Boria, F., Chiva, L., Chacon, E., Zanagnolo, V., Fagotti, A., Kucukmetin, A., Mom, C., Chakalova, G., Shamistan, A., Malzoni, M., Narducci, F., Arencibia, O., Raspagliesi, F., Toptas, T., Cibula, D., Kaidarova, D., Meydanli, M.M., Tavares, M., Golub, D., Perrone, A.M., Poka, R., Zusterzeel, P.L.M., Aluloski, I., Goffin, F., Haidopoulos, D., Haller, H., Jach, R., Yezhova, I., Bernardino, M., Bharathan, R., Maenpaa, M.M., Sukhin, V., Feron, J.G., Fruscio, R., Kukk, K., Ponce, J., Demirkiran, F., Vorgias, G., Povolotskaya, N., Martín, P.J. Coronado, Marina, T., Zapardiel, I., Bizzarri, N., Gorostidi, M., Gutierrez, M., Manzour, N., Berasaluce, A., and Martin-Calvo, N.
Abstract: Item does not contain fulltext, OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether compliance with European Society of Gynaecological Oncology (ESGO) surgery quality indicators impacts disease-free survival in patients undergoing radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, 15 ESGO quality indicators were assessed in the SUCCOR database (patients who underwent radical hysterectomy for International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage 2009 IB1, FIGO 2018 IB1, and IB2 cervical cancer between January 2013 and December 2014), and the final score ranged between 0 and 16 points. Centers with more than 13 points were classified as high-quality indicator compliance centers. We constructed a weighted cohort using inverse probability weighting to adjust for the variables. We compared disease-free survival and overall survival using Cox proportional hazards regression analysis in the weighted cohort. RESULTS: A total of 838 patients were included in the study. The mean number of quality indicators compliance in this cohort was 13.6 (SD 1.45). A total of 479 (57.2%) patients were operated on at high compliance centers and 359 (42.8%) patients at low compliance centers. High compliance centers performed more open surgeries (58.4% vs 36.7%, p<0.01). Women who were operated on at centers with high compliance with quality indicators had a significantly lower risk of relapse (HR=0.39; 95% CI 0.25 to 0.61; p<0.001). The association was reduced, but remained significant, after further adjustment for conization, surgical approach, and use of manipulator surgery (HR=0.48; 95% CI 0.30 to 0.75; p=0.001) and adjustment for adjuvant therapy (HR=0.47; 95% CI 0.30 to 0.74; p=0.001). Risk of death from disease was significantly lower in women operated on at centers with high adherence to quality indicators (HR=0.43; 95% CI 0.19 to 0.97; p=0.041). However, the association was not significant after adjustment for conization, surgical approach, use of manipulator surgery, and adjuvant ther
Published: 2022

10. SUCCOR cone study: conization before radical hysterectomy

Author: Chacon, E., Manzour, N., Zanagnolo, V., Querleu, D., Núñez-Córdoba, J.M., Martin-Calvo, N., Căpîlna, M.E., Fagotti, A., Kucukmetin, A., Mom, C., Chakalova, G., Shamistan, A., Moreno, A., Malzoni, M., Narducci, F., Arencibia, O., Raspagliesi, F., Toptas, T., Cibula, D., Kaidarova, D., Meydanli, M.M., Tavares, M., Golub, D., Perrone, A.M., Poka, R., Tsolakidis, D., Vujić, G., Jedryka, M.A., Zusterzeel, P.L.M., Beltman, J.J., Goffin, F., Haidopoulos, D., Haller, H., Jach, R., Yezhova, I., Berlev, I., Bernardino, M., Bharathan, R., Lanner, M., Maenpaa, M.M., Sukhin, V., Feron, J.G., Fruscio, R., Kukk, K., Ponce, J., Minguez, J.A., Vázquez-Vicente, D., Castellanos, T., Boria, F., Alcazar, J.L., Chiva, L., Chacon, E., Manzour, N., Zanagnolo, V., Querleu, D., Núñez-Córdoba, J.M., Martin-Calvo, N., Căpîlna, M.E., Fagotti, A., Kucukmetin, A., Mom, C., Chakalova, G., Shamistan, A., Moreno, A., Malzoni, M., Narducci, F., Arencibia, O., Raspagliesi, F., Toptas, T., Cibula, D., Kaidarova, D., Meydanli, M.M., Tavares, M., Golub, D., Perrone, A.M., Poka, R., Tsolakidis, D., Vujić, G., Jedryka, M.A., Zusterzeel, P.L.M., Beltman, J.J., Goffin, F., Haidopoulos, D., Haller, H., Jach, R., Yezhova, I., Berlev, I., Bernardino, M., Bharathan, R., Lanner, M., Maenpaa, M.M., Sukhin, V., Feron, J.G., Fruscio, R., Kukk, K., Ponce, J., Minguez, J.A., Vázquez-Vicente, D., Castellanos, T., Boria, F., Alcazar, J.L., and Chiva, L.
Abstract: Item does not contain fulltext, OBJECTIVE: To evaluate disease-free survival of cervical conization prior to radical hysterectomy in patients with stage IB1 cervical cancer (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) 2009). METHODS: A multicenter retrospective observational cohort study was conducted including patients from the Surgery in Cervical Cancer Comparing Different Surgical Aproaches in Stage IB1 Cervical Cancer (SUCCOR) database with FIGO 2009 IB1 cervical carcinoma treated with radical hysterectomy between January 1, 2013, and December 31, 2014. We used propensity score matching to minimize the potential allocation biases arising from the retrospective design. Patients who underwent conization but were similar for other measured characteristics were matched 1:1 to patients from the non-cone group using a caliper width ≤0.2 standard deviations of the logit odds of the estimated propensity score. RESULTS: We obtained a weighted cohort of 374 patients (187 patients with prior conization and 187 non-conization patients). We found a 65% reduction in the risk of relapse for patients who had cervical conization prior to radical hysterectomy (hazard ratio (HR) 0.35, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.16 to 0.75, p=0.007) and a 75% reduction in the risk of death for the same sample (HR 0.25, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.90, p=0.033). In addition, patients who underwent minimally invasive surgery without prior conization had a 5.63 times higher chance of relapse compared with those who had an open approach and previous conization (HR 5.63, 95% CI 1.64 to 19.3, p=0.006). Patients who underwent minimally invasive surgery with prior conization and those who underwent open surgery without prior conization showed no differences in relapse rates compared with those who underwent open surgery with prior cone biopsy (reference) (HR 1.94, 95% CI 0.49 to 7.76, p=0.349 and HR 2.94, 95% CI 0.80 to 10.86, p=0.106 respectively). CONCLUSIONS: In this retrospective study, patients undergoing cervical conizatio
Published: 2022

11. SUCCOR cone study: conization before radical hysterectomy

Author: Chacon, E., Manzour, N., Zanagnolo, V., Querleu, D., Núñez-Córdoba, J.M., Martin-Calvo, N., Căpîlna, M.E., Fagotti, A., Kucukmetin, A., Mom, C., Chakalova, G., Shamistan, A., Moreno, A., Malzoni, M., Narducci, F., Arencibia, O., Raspagliesi, F., Toptas, T., Cibula, D., Kaidarova, D., Meydanli, M.M., Tavares, M., Golub, D., Perrone, A.M., Poka, R., Tsolakidis, D., Vujić, G., Jedryka, M.A., Zusterzeel, P.L.M., Beltman, J.J., Goffin, F., Haidopoulos, D., Haller, H., Jach, R., Yezhova, I., Berlev, I., Bernardino, M., Bharathan, R., Lanner, M., Maenpaa, M.M., Sukhin, V., Feron, J.G., Fruscio, R., Kukk, K., Ponce, J., Minguez, J.A., Vázquez-Vicente, D., Castellanos, T., Boria, F., Alcazar, J.L., Chiva, L., Chacon, E., Manzour, N., Zanagnolo, V., Querleu, D., Núñez-Córdoba, J.M., Martin-Calvo, N., Căpîlna, M.E., Fagotti, A., Kucukmetin, A., Mom, C., Chakalova, G., Shamistan, A., Moreno, A., Malzoni, M., Narducci, F., Arencibia, O., Raspagliesi, F., Toptas, T., Cibula, D., Kaidarova, D., Meydanli, M.M., Tavares, M., Golub, D., Perrone, A.M., Poka, R., Tsolakidis, D., Vujić, G., Jedryka, M.A., Zusterzeel, P.L.M., Beltman, J.J., Goffin, F., Haidopoulos, D., Haller, H., Jach, R., Yezhova, I., Berlev, I., Bernardino, M., Bharathan, R., Lanner, M., Maenpaa, M.M., Sukhin, V., Feron, J.G., Fruscio, R., Kukk, K., Ponce, J., Minguez, J.A., Vázquez-Vicente, D., Castellanos, T., Boria, F., Alcazar, J.L., and Chiva, L.
Abstract: Item does not contain fulltext, OBJECTIVE: To evaluate disease-free survival of cervical conization prior to radical hysterectomy in patients with stage IB1 cervical cancer (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) 2009). METHODS: A multicenter retrospective observational cohort study was conducted including patients from the Surgery in Cervical Cancer Comparing Different Surgical Aproaches in Stage IB1 Cervical Cancer (SUCCOR) database with FIGO 2009 IB1 cervical carcinoma treated with radical hysterectomy between January 1, 2013, and December 31, 2014. We used propensity score matching to minimize the potential allocation biases arising from the retrospective design. Patients who underwent conization but were similar for other measured characteristics were matched 1:1 to patients from the non-cone group using a caliper width ≤0.2 standard deviations of the logit odds of the estimated propensity score. RESULTS: We obtained a weighted cohort of 374 patients (187 patients with prior conization and 187 non-conization patients). We found a 65% reduction in the risk of relapse for patients who had cervical conization prior to radical hysterectomy (hazard ratio (HR) 0.35, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.16 to 0.75, p=0.007) and a 75% reduction in the risk of death for the same sample (HR 0.25, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.90, p=0.033). In addition, patients who underwent minimally invasive surgery without prior conization had a 5.63 times higher chance of relapse compared with those who had an open approach and previous conization (HR 5.63, 95% CI 1.64 to 19.3, p=0.006). Patients who underwent minimally invasive surgery with prior conization and those who underwent open surgery without prior conization showed no differences in relapse rates compared with those who underwent open surgery with prior cone biopsy (reference) (HR 1.94, 95% CI 0.49 to 7.76, p=0.349 and HR 2.94, 95% CI 0.80 to 10.86, p=0.106 respectively). CONCLUSIONS: In this retrospective study, patients undergoing cervical conizatio
Published: 2022

12. SUCCOR quality: validation of ESGO quality indicators for surgical treatment of cervical cancer

Author: Boria, F., Chiva, L., Chacon, E., Zanagnolo, V., Fagotti, A., Kucukmetin, A., Mom, C., Chakalova, G., Shamistan, A., Malzoni, M., Narducci, F., Arencibia, O., Raspagliesi, F., Toptas, T., Cibula, D., Kaidarova, D., Meydanli, M.M., Tavares, M., Golub, D., Perrone, A.M., Poka, R., Zusterzeel, P.L.M., Aluloski, I., Goffin, F., Haidopoulos, D., Haller, H., Jach, R., Yezhova, I., Bernardino, M., Bharathan, R., Maenpaa, M.M., Sukhin, V., Feron, J.G., Fruscio, R., Kukk, K., Ponce, J., Demirkiran, F., Vorgias, G., Povolotskaya, N., Martín, P.J. Coronado, Marina, T., Zapardiel, I., Bizzarri, N., Gorostidi, M., Gutierrez, M., Manzour, N., Berasaluce, A., Martin-Calvo, N., Boria, F., Chiva, L., Chacon, E., Zanagnolo, V., Fagotti, A., Kucukmetin, A., Mom, C., Chakalova, G., Shamistan, A., Malzoni, M., Narducci, F., Arencibia, O., Raspagliesi, F., Toptas, T., Cibula, D., Kaidarova, D., Meydanli, M.M., Tavares, M., Golub, D., Perrone, A.M., Poka, R., Zusterzeel, P.L.M., Aluloski, I., Goffin, F., Haidopoulos, D., Haller, H., Jach, R., Yezhova, I., Bernardino, M., Bharathan, R., Maenpaa, M.M., Sukhin, V., Feron, J.G., Fruscio, R., Kukk, K., Ponce, J., Demirkiran, F., Vorgias, G., Povolotskaya, N., Martín, P.J. Coronado, Marina, T., Zapardiel, I., Bizzarri, N., Gorostidi, M., Gutierrez, M., Manzour, N., Berasaluce, A., and Martin-Calvo, N.
Abstract: Item does not contain fulltext, OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether compliance with European Society of Gynaecological Oncology (ESGO) surgery quality indicators impacts disease-free survival in patients undergoing radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, 15 ESGO quality indicators were assessed in the SUCCOR database (patients who underwent radical hysterectomy for International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage 2009 IB1, FIGO 2018 IB1, and IB2 cervical cancer between January 2013 and December 2014), and the final score ranged between 0 and 16 points. Centers with more than 13 points were classified as high-quality indicator compliance centers. We constructed a weighted cohort using inverse probability weighting to adjust for the variables. We compared disease-free survival and overall survival using Cox proportional hazards regression analysis in the weighted cohort. RESULTS: A total of 838 patients were included in the study. The mean number of quality indicators compliance in this cohort was 13.6 (SD 1.45). A total of 479 (57.2%) patients were operated on at high compliance centers and 359 (42.8%) patients at low compliance centers. High compliance centers performed more open surgeries (58.4% vs 36.7%, p<0.01). Women who were operated on at centers with high compliance with quality indicators had a significantly lower risk of relapse (HR=0.39; 95% CI 0.25 to 0.61; p<0.001). The association was reduced, but remained significant, after further adjustment for conization, surgical approach, and use of manipulator surgery (HR=0.48; 95% CI 0.30 to 0.75; p=0.001) and adjustment for adjuvant therapy (HR=0.47; 95% CI 0.30 to 0.74; p=0.001). Risk of death from disease was significantly lower in women operated on at centers with high adherence to quality indicators (HR=0.43; 95% CI 0.19 to 0.97; p=0.041). However, the association was not significant after adjustment for conization, surgical approach, use of manipulator surgery, and adjuvant ther
Published: 2022

13. SUCCOR quality: validation of ESGO quality indicators for surgical treatment of cervical cancer

Author: Boria, F., Chiva, L., Chacon, E., Zanagnolo, V., Fagotti, A., Kucukmetin, A., Mom, C., Chakalova, G., Shamistan, A., Malzoni, M., Narducci, F., Arencibia, O., Raspagliesi, F., Toptas, T., Cibula, D., Kaidarova, D., Meydanli, M. M., Tavares, M., Golub, D., Perrone, A. M., Poka, R., Zusterzeel, P. L. M., Aluloski, I., Goffin, F., Haidopoulos, D., Haller, H., Jach, R., Yezhova, I., Bernardino, M., Bharathan, R., Maenpaa, M. M., Sukhin, V., Feron, J. -G., Fruscio, R., Kukk, K., Ponce, J., Demirkiran, F., Vorgias, G., Povolotskaya, N., Coronado Martin, P. J., Marina, T., Zapardiel, I., Bizzarri, N., Gorostidi, M., Gutierrez, M., Manzour, N., Berasaluce, A., Fagotti A. (ORCID:0000-0001-5579-335X), Bizzarri N., Boria, F., Chiva, L., Chacon, E., Zanagnolo, V., Fagotti, A., Kucukmetin, A., Mom, C., Chakalova, G., Shamistan, A., Malzoni, M., Narducci, F., Arencibia, O., Raspagliesi, F., Toptas, T., Cibula, D., Kaidarova, D., Meydanli, M. M., Tavares, M., Golub, D., Perrone, A. M., Poka, R., Zusterzeel, P. L. M., Aluloski, I., Goffin, F., Haidopoulos, D., Haller, H., Jach, R., Yezhova, I., Bernardino, M., Bharathan, R., Maenpaa, M. M., Sukhin, V., Feron, J. -G., Fruscio, R., Kukk, K., Ponce, J., Demirkiran, F., Vorgias, G., Povolotskaya, N., Coronado Martin, P. J., Marina, T., Zapardiel, I., Bizzarri, N., Gorostidi, M., Gutierrez, M., Manzour, N., Berasaluce, A., Fagotti A. (ORCID:0000-0001-5579-335X), and Bizzarri N.
Abstract: Objective To evaluate whether compliance with European Society of Gynaecological Oncology (ESGO) surgery quality indicators impacts disease-free survival in patients undergoing radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer. Methods In this retrospective cohort study, 15 ESGO quality indicators were assessed in the SUCCOR database (patients who underwent radical hysterectomy for International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage 2009 IB1, FIGO 2018 IB1, and IB2 cervical cancer between January 2013 and December 2014), and the final score ranged between 0 and 16 points. Centers with more than 13 points were classified as high-quality indicator compliance centers. We constructed a weighted cohort using inverse probability weighting to adjust for the variables. We compared disease-free survival and overall survival using Cox proportional hazards regression analysis in the weighted cohort. Results A total of 838 patients were included in the study. The mean number of quality indicators compliance in this cohort was 13.6 (SD 1.45). A total of 479 (57.2%) patients were operated on at high compliance centers and 359 (42.8%) patients at low compliance centers. High compliance centers performed more open surgeries (58.4% vs 36.7%, p<0.01). Women who were operated on at centers with high compliance with quality indicators had a significantly lower risk of relapse (HR=0.39; 95% CI 0.25 to 0.61; p<0.001). The association was reduced, but remained significant, after further adjustment for conization, surgical approach, and use of manipulator surgery (HR=0.48; 95% CI 0.30 to 0.75; p=0.001) and adjustment for adjuvant therapy (HR=0.47; 95% CI 0.30 to 0.74; p=0.001). Risk of death from disease was significantly lower in women operated on at centers with high adherence to quality indicators (HR=0.43; 95% CI 0.19 to 0.97; p=0.041). However, the association was not significant after adjustment for conization, surgical approach, use of manipulator surgery, and adjuvant t
Published: 2022

14. SUCCOR cone study: conization before radical hysterectomy

Author: Chacon, E., Manzour, N., Zanagnolo, V., Querleu, D., Nunez-Cordoba, J. M., Martin-Calvo, N., Capilna, M. E., Fagotti, Anna, Kucukmetin, A., Mom, C., Chakalova, G., Shamistan, A., Gil Moreno, A., Malzoni, M., Narducci, F., Arencibia, O., Raspagliesi, F., Toptas, T., Cibula, D., Kaidarova, D., Meydanli, M. M., Tavares, M., Golub, D., Perrone, A. M., Poka, R., Tsolakidis, D., Vujic, G., Jedryka, M. A., Zusterzeel, P. L. M., Beltman, J. J., Goffin, F., Haidopoulos, D., Haller, H., Jach, R., Yezhova, I., Berlev, I., Bernardino, M., Bharathan, R., Lanner, M., Maenpaa, M. M., Sukhin, V., Feron, J. -G., Fruscio, R., Kukk, K., Ponce, J., Minguez, J. A., Vazquez-Vicente, D., Castellanos, T., Boria, F., Alcazar, J. L., Chiva, L., Fagotti A. (ORCID:0000-0001-5579-335X), Chacon, E., Manzour, N., Zanagnolo, V., Querleu, D., Nunez-Cordoba, J. M., Martin-Calvo, N., Capilna, M. E., Fagotti, Anna, Kucukmetin, A., Mom, C., Chakalova, G., Shamistan, A., Gil Moreno, A., Malzoni, M., Narducci, F., Arencibia, O., Raspagliesi, F., Toptas, T., Cibula, D., Kaidarova, D., Meydanli, M. M., Tavares, M., Golub, D., Perrone, A. M., Poka, R., Tsolakidis, D., Vujic, G., Jedryka, M. A., Zusterzeel, P. L. M., Beltman, J. J., Goffin, F., Haidopoulos, D., Haller, H., Jach, R., Yezhova, I., Berlev, I., Bernardino, M., Bharathan, R., Lanner, M., Maenpaa, M. M., Sukhin, V., Feron, J. -G., Fruscio, R., Kukk, K., Ponce, J., Minguez, J. A., Vazquez-Vicente, D., Castellanos, T., Boria, F., Alcazar, J. L., Chiva, L., and Fagotti A. (ORCID:0000-0001-5579-335X)
Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To evaluate disease-free survival of cervical conization prior to radical hysterectomy in patients with stage IB1 cervical cancer (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) 2009). METHODS: A multicenter retrospective observational cohort study was conducted including patients from the Surgery in Cervical Cancer Comparing Different Surgical Aproaches in Stage IB1 Cervical Cancer (SUCCOR) database with FIGO 2009 IB1 cervical carcinoma treated with radical hysterectomy between January 1, 2013, and December 31, 2014. We used propensity score matching to minimize the potential allocation biases arising from the retrospective design. Patients who underwent conization but were similar for other measured characteristics were matched 1:1 to patients from the non-cone group using a caliper width ≤0.2 standard deviations of the logit odds of the estimated propensity score. RESULTS: We obtained a weighted cohort of 374 patients (187 patients with prior conization and 187 non-conization patients). We found a 65% reduction in the risk of relapse for patients who had cervical conization prior to radical hysterectomy (hazard ratio (HR) 0.35, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.16 to 0.75, p=0.007) and a 75% reduction in the risk of death for the same sample (HR 0.25, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.90, p=0.033). In addition, patients who underwent minimally invasive surgery without prior conization had a 5.63 times higher chance of relapse compared with those who had an open approach and previous conization (HR 5.63, 95% CI 1.64 to 19.3, p=0.006). Patients who underwent minimally invasive surgery with prior conization and those who underwent open surgery without prior conization showed no differences in relapse rates compared with those who underwent open surgery with prior cone biopsy (reference) (HR 1.94, 95% CI 0.49 to 7.76, p=0.349 and HR 2.94, 95% CI 0.80 to 10.86, p=0.106 respectively). CONCLUSIONS: In this retrospective study, patients undergoing cervical conizatio
Published: 2022

15. OVA-LEAK: Prognostic score for colo-rectal anastomotic leakage in patients undergoing ovarian cancer surgery

Author: Lago, V., Segarra-Vidal, B., Cappucio, S., Angeles, M. A., Fotopoulou, C., Muallem, M. Z., Manzanedo, I., Iglesias, J. L. S., Chacon, E., Padilla-Iserte, P., Fagotti, Anna, Ferron, G., Kluge, L., Vargiu, V., Del, M., Scambia, Giovanni, Minig, L., Tejerizo, A., Segovia, M. G., Cascales-Campos, P. A., Gil-Moreno, A., Chiva, L., Rinne, N., Martinez, A., Matute, L., Gurrea, M., Sala Climent, L., Montesinos, M., Hervas, D., Domingo, S., Fagotti A. (ORCID:0000-0001-5579-335X), Scambia G. (ORCID:0000-0003-2758-1063), Lago, V., Segarra-Vidal, B., Cappucio, S., Angeles, M. A., Fotopoulou, C., Muallem, M. Z., Manzanedo, I., Iglesias, J. L. S., Chacon, E., Padilla-Iserte, P., Fagotti, Anna, Ferron, G., Kluge, L., Vargiu, V., Del, M., Scambia, Giovanni, Minig, L., Tejerizo, A., Segovia, M. G., Cascales-Campos, P. A., Gil-Moreno, A., Chiva, L., Rinne, N., Martinez, A., Matute, L., Gurrea, M., Sala Climent, L., Montesinos, M., Hervas, D., Domingo, S., Fagotti A. (ORCID:0000-0001-5579-335X), and Scambia G. (ORCID:0000-0003-2758-1063)
Abstract: Objective: The objective of the present study was to define and validate an anastomotic leak prognostic score based on previously described and reported anastomotic leak risk factors (OVA-LEAK: https://n9.cl/ova-leakscore) and to establish if the use of OVA-LEAK score is better than clinical criteria (surgeon's choice) selecting anastomosis to be protected with a diverting ileostomy. Material & methods: This is a retrospective, multicentre cohort study that included patients who underwent cytoreductive surgery for primary advanced or relapsed ovarian cancer with colorectal resection and anastomosis between January 2011 and June 2021. Data from patients already included in the previous predictive model were not considered in the present analysis. To validate the performance of our logistic regression model, we used the OVA-LEAK formula (Annex I: https://n9.cl/ova-leakscore) for estimating leakage probabilities in a new independent cohort. Then, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed and area under the curve (AUC) was used to measure the performance of the model. Additionally, the Brier score was also estimated. 95% confidence intervals (CI) for each of the estimated performance measures were also calculated. Results: 848 out of 1159 recruited patients were finally included in the multivariable logistic regression model validation. The AUC of the new cohort was 0.63 for predicting anastomotic leak. Considering a cut-off point of 22.1% to be ‘positive’ (to get a leak) this would provide a sensitivity of 0.45, specificity of 0.80, positive predictive value of 0.09 and negative predictive value of 0.97 for anastomotic leak. If we consider this cut-off point to select patients at risk of leak for bowel diversion, up to 22.5% of the sampled patients would undergo a diverting ileostomy and 47% (18/40) of the anastomotic leaks would be ‘protected’ with the stoma. Nevertheless, if we consider only the ‘clinical criteria’ for performing or not a div
Published: 2022

16. SUCCOR Risk: Design and Validation of a Recurrence Prediction Index for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer

Author: Manzour, N., Chiva, L., Chacon, E., Martin-Calvo, N., Boria, F., Minguez, J. A., Alcazar, J. L., Zanagnolo, V., Querleu, D., Capilna, M., Fagotti, Anna, Kucukmetin, A., Mom, C., Chakalova, G., Aliyev, S., Malzoni, M., Narducci, F., Arencibia, O., Raspagliesi, F., Toptas, T., Cibula, D., Kaidarova, D., Meydanli, M., Tavares, M., Golub, D., Perrone, A., Poka, R., Tsolakidis, D., Vujic, G., Jedryka, M., Zusterzeel, P., Beltman, J., Goffin, F., Haidopoulos, D., Haller, H., Jach, R., Yezhova, I., Berlev, I., Bernardino, M., Bharathan, R., Lanner, M., Sukhin, V., Feron, J. G., Fruscio, R., Kukk, K., Ponce, J., Abdalla, N., Akbayir, O., Akgol, S., Aksahin, E., Alonso-Espias, M., Aluloski, I., Andrade, C., Badzakov, N., Barrachina, R., Bogani, G., Bonci, E. -A., Bonsang-Kitzis, H., Brucker, C., Cardenas, L., Casajuana, A., Cavalle, P., Cea, J., Chiofalo, B., Cordeiro, G., Coronado, P., Cuadra, M., Diez, J., da Costa, T. D., Domingo, S., Dostalek, L., Demirkiran, F., Erasun, D., Fehr, M., Fernandez-Gonzalez, S., Fidalgo, S., Fiol, G., Galaal, K., Garcia, J., Gebauer, G., Ghezzi, F., Gilabert, J., Gomes, N., Goncalves, E., Gonzalez, V., Grandjean, F., Guijarro, M., Guyon, F., Haesen, J., Hernandez-Cortes, G., Herrero, S., Pete, I., Kalogiannidis, I., Karaman, E., Kavallaris, A., Klasa, L., Kotsopoulos, I., Kovachev, S., Leht, M., Lekuona, A., Luyckx, M., Mallmann, M., Mancebo, G., Mandic, A., Marina, T., Martin, V., Martin-Salamanca, M. B., Martinez, A., Meili, G., Mendinhos, G., Mereu, L., Mitrovic, M., Morales, S., Moratalla, E., Morillas, B., Myriokefalitaki, E., Pakizimre, M., Petousis, S., Pirtea, L., Povolotskaya, N., Prader, S., Quesada, A., Redecha, M., Roldan, F., Rolland, P., Saaron, R., Sarac, C. -P., Scharf, J. -P., Smrkolj, S., Sousa, R., Stepanyan, A., Student, V., Tauste, C., Trum, H., Turan, T., Undurraga, M., Uppin, A., Vazquez, A., Vergote, I., Vorgias, G., Zapardiel, I., Fagotti A. (ORCID:0000-0001-5579-335X), Manzour, N., Chiva, L., Chacon, E., Martin-Calvo, N., Boria, F., Minguez, J. A., Alcazar, J. L., Zanagnolo, V., Querleu, D., Capilna, M., Fagotti, Anna, Kucukmetin, A., Mom, C., Chakalova, G., Aliyev, S., Malzoni, M., Narducci, F., Arencibia, O., Raspagliesi, F., Toptas, T., Cibula, D., Kaidarova, D., Meydanli, M., Tavares, M., Golub, D., Perrone, A., Poka, R., Tsolakidis, D., Vujic, G., Jedryka, M., Zusterzeel, P., Beltman, J., Goffin, F., Haidopoulos, D., Haller, H., Jach, R., Yezhova, I., Berlev, I., Bernardino, M., Bharathan, R., Lanner, M., Sukhin, V., Feron, J. G., Fruscio, R., Kukk, K., Ponce, J., Abdalla, N., Akbayir, O., Akgol, S., Aksahin, E., Alonso-Espias, M., Aluloski, I., Andrade, C., Badzakov, N., Barrachina, R., Bogani, G., Bonci, E. -A., Bonsang-Kitzis, H., Brucker, C., Cardenas, L., Casajuana, A., Cavalle, P., Cea, J., Chiofalo, B., Cordeiro, G., Coronado, P., Cuadra, M., Diez, J., da Costa, T. D., Domingo, S., Dostalek, L., Demirkiran, F., Erasun, D., Fehr, M., Fernandez-Gonzalez, S., Fidalgo, S., Fiol, G., Galaal, K., Garcia, J., Gebauer, G., Ghezzi, F., Gilabert, J., Gomes, N., Goncalves, E., Gonzalez, V., Grandjean, F., Guijarro, M., Guyon, F., Haesen, J., Hernandez-Cortes, G., Herrero, S., Pete, I., Kalogiannidis, I., Karaman, E., Kavallaris, A., Klasa, L., Kotsopoulos, I., Kovachev, S., Leht, M., Lekuona, A., Luyckx, M., Mallmann, M., Mancebo, G., Mandic, A., Marina, T., Martin, V., Martin-Salamanca, M. B., Martinez, A., Meili, G., Mendinhos, G., Mereu, L., Mitrovic, M., Morales, S., Moratalla, E., Morillas, B., Myriokefalitaki, E., Pakizimre, M., Petousis, S., Pirtea, L., Povolotskaya, N., Prader, S., Quesada, A., Redecha, M., Roldan, F., Rolland, P., Saaron, R., Sarac, C. -P., Scharf, J. -P., Smrkolj, S., Sousa, R., Stepanyan, A., Student, V., Tauste, C., Trum, H., Turan, T., Undurraga, M., Uppin, A., Vazquez, A., Vergote, I., Vorgias, G., Zapardiel, I., and Fagotti A. (ORCID:0000-0001-5579-335X)
Abstract: Objective: Based on the SUCCOR study database, our primary objective was to identify the independent clinical pathological variables associated with the risk of relapse in patients with stage IB1 cervical cancer who underwent a radical hysterectomy. Our secondary goal was to design and validate a risk predictive index (RPI) for classifying patients depending on the risk of recurrence. Methods: Overall, 1116 women were included from January 2013 to December 2014. We randomly divided our sample into two cohorts: discovery and validation cohorts. The test group was used to identify the independent variables associated with relapse, and with these variables, we designed our RPI. The index was applied to calculate a relapse risk score for each participant in the validation group. Results: A previous cone biopsy was the most significant independent variable that lowered the rate of relapse (odds ratio [OR] 0.31, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.17–0.60). Additionally, patients with a tumor diameter >2 cm on preoperative imaging assessment (OR 2.15, 95% CI 1.33–3.5) and operated by the minimally invasive approach (OR 1.61, 95% CI 1.00–2.57) were more likely to have a recurrence. Based on these findings, patients in the validation cohort were classified according to the RPI of low, medium, or high risk of relapse, with rates of 3.4%, 9.8%, and 21.3% observed in each group, respectively. With a median follow-up of 58 months, the 5-year disease-free survival rates were 97.2% for the low-risk group, 88.0% for the medium-risk group, and 80.5% for the high-risk group (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Previous conization to radical hysterectomy was the most powerful protective variable of relapse. Our risk predictor index was validated to identify patients at risk of recurrence.
Published: 2022

17. SUCCOR cone study: conization before radical hysterectomy

Author: Chacon, E, Manzour, N, Zanagnolo, V, Querleu, D, Núñez-Córdoba, J, Martin-Calvo, N, Căpîlna, M, Fagotti, A, Kucukmetin, A, Mom, C, Chakalova, G, Shamistan, A, Gil Moreno, A, Malzoni, M, Narducci, F, Arencibia, O, Raspagliesi, F, Toptas, T, Cibula, D, Kaidarova, D, Meydanli, M, Tavares, M, Golub, D, Perrone, A, Poka, R, Tsolakidis, D, Vujić, G, Jedryka, M, Zusterzeel, P, Beltman, J, Goffin, F, Haidopoulos, D, Haller, H, Jach, R, Yezhova, I, Berlev, I, Bernardino, M, Bharathan, R, Lanner, M, Maenpaa, M, Sukhin, V, Feron, J, Fruscio, R, Kukk, K, Ponce, J, Minguez, J, Vázquez-Vicente, D, Castellanos, T, Boria, F, Alcazar, J, Chiva, L, Chacon, Enrique, Manzour, Nabil, Zanagnolo, Vanna, Querleu, Denis, Núñez-Córdoba, Jorge M, Martin-Calvo, Nerea, Căpîlna, Mihai Emil, Fagotti, Anna, Kucukmetin, Ali, Mom, Constantijne, Chakalova, Galina, Shamistan, Aliyev, Gil Moreno, Antonio, Malzoni, Mario, Narducci, Fabrice, Arencibia, Octavio, Raspagliesi, Francesco, Toptas, Tayfun, Cibula, David, Kaidarova, Dilyara, Meydanli, Mehmet Mutlu, Tavares, Mariana, Golub, Dmytro, Perrone, Anna Myriam, Poka, Robert, Tsolakidis, Dimitrios, Vujić, Goran, Jedryka, Marcin A, Zusterzeel, Petra L M, Beltman, Jogchum Jan, Goffin, Frederic, Haidopoulos, Dimitrios, Haller, Herman, Jach, Robert, Yezhova, Iryna, Berlev, Igor, Bernardino, Margarida, Bharathan, Rasiah, Lanner, Maximilian, Maenpaa, Minna M, Sukhin, Vladyslav, Feron, Jean-Guillaume, Fruscio, Robert, Kukk, Kersti, Ponce, Jordi, Minguez, Jose Angel, Vázquez-Vicente, Daniel, Castellanos, Teresa, Boria, Felix, Alcazar, Juan Luis, Chiva, Luis, Chacon, E, Manzour, N, Zanagnolo, V, Querleu, D, Núñez-Córdoba, J, Martin-Calvo, N, Căpîlna, M, Fagotti, A, Kucukmetin, A, Mom, C, Chakalova, G, Shamistan, A, Gil Moreno, A, Malzoni, M, Narducci, F, Arencibia, O, Raspagliesi, F, Toptas, T, Cibula, D, Kaidarova, D, Meydanli, M, Tavares, M, Golub, D, Perrone, A, Poka, R, Tsolakidis, D, Vujić, G, Jedryka, M, Zusterzeel, P, Beltman, J, Goffin, F, Haidopoulos, D, Haller, H, Jach, R, Yezhova, I, Berlev, I, Bernardino, M, Bharathan, R, Lanner, M, Maenpaa, M, Sukhin, V, Feron, J, Fruscio, R, Kukk, K, Ponce, J, Minguez, J, Vázquez-Vicente, D, Castellanos, T, Boria, F, Alcazar, J, Chiva, L, Chacon, Enrique, Manzour, Nabil, Zanagnolo, Vanna, Querleu, Denis, Núñez-Córdoba, Jorge M, Martin-Calvo, Nerea, Căpîlna, Mihai Emil, Fagotti, Anna, Kucukmetin, Ali, Mom, Constantijne, Chakalova, Galina, Shamistan, Aliyev, Gil Moreno, Antonio, Malzoni, Mario, Narducci, Fabrice, Arencibia, Octavio, Raspagliesi, Francesco, Toptas, Tayfun, Cibula, David, Kaidarova, Dilyara, Meydanli, Mehmet Mutlu, Tavares, Mariana, Golub, Dmytro, Perrone, Anna Myriam, Poka, Robert, Tsolakidis, Dimitrios, Vujić, Goran, Jedryka, Marcin A, Zusterzeel, Petra L M, Beltman, Jogchum Jan, Goffin, Frederic, Haidopoulos, Dimitrios, Haller, Herman, Jach, Robert, Yezhova, Iryna, Berlev, Igor, Bernardino, Margarida, Bharathan, Rasiah, Lanner, Maximilian, Maenpaa, Minna M, Sukhin, Vladyslav, Feron, Jean-Guillaume, Fruscio, Robert, Kukk, Kersti, Ponce, Jordi, Minguez, Jose Angel, Vázquez-Vicente, Daniel, Castellanos, Teresa, Boria, Felix, Alcazar, Juan Luis, and Chiva, Luis
Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To evaluate disease-free survival of cervical conization prior to radical hysterectomy in patients with stage IB1 cervical cancer (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) 2009). METHODS: A multicenter retrospective observational cohort study was conducted including patients from the Surgery in Cervical Cancer Comparing Different Surgical Aproaches in Stage IB1 Cervical Cancer (SUCCOR) database with FIGO 2009 IB1 cervical carcinoma treated with radical hysterectomy between January 1, 2013, and December 31, 2014. We used propensity score matching to minimize the potential allocation biases arising from the retrospective design. Patients who underwent conization but were similar for other measured characteristics were matched 1:1 to patients from the non-cone group using a caliper width ≤0.2 standard deviations of the logit odds of the estimated propensity score. RESULTS: We obtained a weighted cohort of 374 patients (187 patients with prior conization and 187 non-conization patients). We found a 65% reduction in the risk of relapse for patients who had cervical conization prior to radical hysterectomy (hazard ratio (HR) 0.35, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.16 to 0.75, p=0.007) and a 75% reduction in the risk of death for the same sample (HR 0.25, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.90, p=0.033). In addition, patients who underwent minimally invasive surgery without prior conization had a 5.63 times higher chance of relapse compared with those who had an open approach and previous conization (HR 5.63, 95% CI 1.64 to 19.3, p=0.006). Patients who underwent minimally invasive surgery with prior conization and those who underwent open surgery without prior conization showed no differences in relapse rates compared with those who underwent open surgery with prior cone biopsy (reference) (HR 1.94, 95% CI 0.49 to 7.76, p=0.349 and HR 2.94, 95% CI 0.80 to 10.86, p=0.106 respectively). CONCLUSIONS: In this retrospective study, patients undergoing cervical conizatio
Published: 2022

18. Radical hysterectomy in early cervical cancer in Europe: characteristics, outcomes and evaluation of ESGO quality indicators

Author: Boria, F., Chiva, L., Zanagnolo, V., Querleu, D., Martin-Calvo, N., Căpîlna, M.E., Fagotti, A., Kucukmetin, A., Mom, C., Chakalova, G., Shamistan, A., Malzoni, M., Narducci, F., Arencibia, O., Raspagliesi, F., Toptas, T., Cibula, D., Kaidarova, D., Meydanli, M.M., Tavares, M., Golub, D., Perrone, A.M., Poka, R., Tsolakidis, D., Vujić, G., Jedryka, M.A., Zusterzeel, P.L.M., Beltman, J.J., Goffin, F., Haidopoulos, D., Haller, H., Jach, R., Yezhova, I., Berlev, I., Bernardino, M., Bharathan, R., Lanner, M., Maenpaa, M.M., Sukhin, V., Feron, J.G., Fruscio, R., Kukk, K., Ponce, J., Alonso-Espías, M., Minguez, J.A., Vázquez-Vicente, D., Manzour, N., Jurado, M., Castellanos, T., Chacon, E., Alcazar, J.L., Boria, F., Chiva, L., Zanagnolo, V., Querleu, D., Martin-Calvo, N., Căpîlna, M.E., Fagotti, A., Kucukmetin, A., Mom, C., Chakalova, G., Shamistan, A., Malzoni, M., Narducci, F., Arencibia, O., Raspagliesi, F., Toptas, T., Cibula, D., Kaidarova, D., Meydanli, M.M., Tavares, M., Golub, D., Perrone, A.M., Poka, R., Tsolakidis, D., Vujić, G., Jedryka, M.A., Zusterzeel, P.L.M., Beltman, J.J., Goffin, F., Haidopoulos, D., Haller, H., Jach, R., Yezhova, I., Berlev, I., Bernardino, M., Bharathan, R., Lanner, M., Maenpaa, M.M., Sukhin, V., Feron, J.G., Fruscio, R., Kukk, K., Ponce, J., Alonso-Espías, M., Minguez, J.A., Vázquez-Vicente, D., Manzour, N., Jurado, M., Castellanos, T., Chacon, E., and Alcazar, J.L.
Abstract: Item does not contain fulltext, INTRODUCTION: Comprehensive updated information on cervical cancer surgical treatment in Europe is scarce. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate baseline characteristics of women with early cervical cancer and to analyze the outcomes of the ESGO quality indicators after radical hysterectomy in the SUCCOR database. METHODS: The SUCCOR database consisted of 1272 patients who underwent radical hysterectomy for stage IB1 cervical cancer (FIGO 2009) between January 2013 and December 2014. After exclusion criteria, the final sample included 1156 patients. This study first described the clinical, surgical, pathological, and follow-up variables of this population and then analyzed the outcomes (disease-free survival and overall survival) after radical hysterectomy. Surgical-related ESGO quality indicators were assessed and the accomplishment of the stated recommendations was verified. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 47.1 years (SD 10.8), with a mean body mass index of 25.4 kg/m(2) (SD 4.9). A total of 423 (36.6%) patients had a previous cone biopsy. Tumor size (clinical examination) <2 cm was observed in 667 (57.7%) patients. The most frequent histology type was squamous carcinoma (794 (68.7%) patients), and positive lymph nodes were found in 143 (12.4%) patients. A total of 633 (54.8%) patients were operated by open abdominal surgery. Intra-operative complications occurred in 108 (9.3%) patients, and post-operative complications during the first month occurred in 249 (21.5%) patients, with bladder dysfunction as the most frequent event (119 (10.3%) patients). Clavien-Dindo grade III or higher complication occurred in 56 (4.8%) patients. A total of 510 (44.1%) patients received adjuvant therapy. After a median follow-up of 58 months (range 0-84), the 5-year disease-free survival was 88.3%, and the overall survival was 94.9%. In our population, 10 of the 11 surgical-related quality indicators currently recommended by ESGO were fully fulfilled 5 years before its implementation. CO
Published: 2021

19. Radical hysterectomy in early cervical cancer in Europe: characteristics, outcomes and evaluation of ESGO quality indicators

Author: Boria, F., Chiva, L., Zanagnolo, V., Querleu, D., Martin-Calvo, N., Căpîlna, M.E., Fagotti, A., Kucukmetin, A., Mom, C., Chakalova, G., Shamistan, A., Malzoni, M., Narducci, F., Arencibia, O., Raspagliesi, F., Toptas, T., Cibula, D., Kaidarova, D., Meydanli, M.M., Tavares, M., Golub, D., Perrone, A.M., Poka, R., Tsolakidis, D., Vujić, G., Jedryka, M.A., Zusterzeel, P.L.M., Beltman, J.J., Goffin, F., Haidopoulos, D., Haller, H., Jach, R., Yezhova, I., Berlev, I., Bernardino, M., Bharathan, R., Lanner, M., Maenpaa, M.M., Sukhin, V., Feron, J.G., Fruscio, R., Kukk, K., Ponce, J., Alonso-Espías, M., Minguez, J.A., Vázquez-Vicente, D., Manzour, N., Jurado, M., Castellanos, T., Chacon, E., Alcazar, J.L., Boria, F., Chiva, L., Zanagnolo, V., Querleu, D., Martin-Calvo, N., Căpîlna, M.E., Fagotti, A., Kucukmetin, A., Mom, C., Chakalova, G., Shamistan, A., Malzoni, M., Narducci, F., Arencibia, O., Raspagliesi, F., Toptas, T., Cibula, D., Kaidarova, D., Meydanli, M.M., Tavares, M., Golub, D., Perrone, A.M., Poka, R., Tsolakidis, D., Vujić, G., Jedryka, M.A., Zusterzeel, P.L.M., Beltman, J.J., Goffin, F., Haidopoulos, D., Haller, H., Jach, R., Yezhova, I., Berlev, I., Bernardino, M., Bharathan, R., Lanner, M., Maenpaa, M.M., Sukhin, V., Feron, J.G., Fruscio, R., Kukk, K., Ponce, J., Alonso-Espías, M., Minguez, J.A., Vázquez-Vicente, D., Manzour, N., Jurado, M., Castellanos, T., Chacon, E., and Alcazar, J.L.
Abstract: Item does not contain fulltext, INTRODUCTION: Comprehensive updated information on cervical cancer surgical treatment in Europe is scarce. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate baseline characteristics of women with early cervical cancer and to analyze the outcomes of the ESGO quality indicators after radical hysterectomy in the SUCCOR database. METHODS: The SUCCOR database consisted of 1272 patients who underwent radical hysterectomy for stage IB1 cervical cancer (FIGO 2009) between January 2013 and December 2014. After exclusion criteria, the final sample included 1156 patients. This study first described the clinical, surgical, pathological, and follow-up variables of this population and then analyzed the outcomes (disease-free survival and overall survival) after radical hysterectomy. Surgical-related ESGO quality indicators were assessed and the accomplishment of the stated recommendations was verified. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 47.1 years (SD 10.8), with a mean body mass index of 25.4 kg/m(2) (SD 4.9). A total of 423 (36.6%) patients had a previous cone biopsy. Tumor size (clinical examination) <2 cm was observed in 667 (57.7%) patients. The most frequent histology type was squamous carcinoma (794 (68.7%) patients), and positive lymph nodes were found in 143 (12.4%) patients. A total of 633 (54.8%) patients were operated by open abdominal surgery. Intra-operative complications occurred in 108 (9.3%) patients, and post-operative complications during the first month occurred in 249 (21.5%) patients, with bladder dysfunction as the most frequent event (119 (10.3%) patients). Clavien-Dindo grade III or higher complication occurred in 56 (4.8%) patients. A total of 510 (44.1%) patients received adjuvant therapy. After a median follow-up of 58 months (range 0-84), the 5-year disease-free survival was 88.3%, and the overall survival was 94.9%. In our population, 10 of the 11 surgical-related quality indicators currently recommended by ESGO were fully fulfilled 5 years before its implementation. CO
Published: 2021

20. Radical hysterectomy in early cervical cancer in Europe: characteristics, outcomes and evaluation of ESGO quality indicators

Author: Boria, F., Chiva, L., Zanagnolo, V., Querleu, D., Martin-Calvo, N., Căpîlna, M.E., Fagotti, A., Kucukmetin, A., Mom, C., Chakalova, G., Shamistan, A., Malzoni, M., Narducci, F., Arencibia, O., Raspagliesi, F., Toptas, T., Cibula, D., Kaidarova, D., Meydanli, M.M., Tavares, M., Golub, D., Perrone, A.M., Poka, R., Tsolakidis, D., Vujić, G., Jedryka, M.A., Zusterzeel, P.L.M., Beltman, J.J., Goffin, F., Haidopoulos, D., Haller, H., Jach, R., Yezhova, I., Berlev, I., Bernardino, M., Bharathan, R., Lanner, M., Maenpaa, M.M., Sukhin, V., Feron, J.G., Fruscio, R., Kukk, K., Ponce, J., Alonso-Espías, M., Minguez, J.A., Vázquez-Vicente, D., Manzour, N., Jurado, M., Castellanos, T., Chacon, E., Alcazar, J.L., Boria, F., Chiva, L., Zanagnolo, V., Querleu, D., Martin-Calvo, N., Căpîlna, M.E., Fagotti, A., Kucukmetin, A., Mom, C., Chakalova, G., Shamistan, A., Malzoni, M., Narducci, F., Arencibia, O., Raspagliesi, F., Toptas, T., Cibula, D., Kaidarova, D., Meydanli, M.M., Tavares, M., Golub, D., Perrone, A.M., Poka, R., Tsolakidis, D., Vujić, G., Jedryka, M.A., Zusterzeel, P.L.M., Beltman, J.J., Goffin, F., Haidopoulos, D., Haller, H., Jach, R., Yezhova, I., Berlev, I., Bernardino, M., Bharathan, R., Lanner, M., Maenpaa, M.M., Sukhin, V., Feron, J.G., Fruscio, R., Kukk, K., Ponce, J., Alonso-Espías, M., Minguez, J.A., Vázquez-Vicente, D., Manzour, N., Jurado, M., Castellanos, T., Chacon, E., and Alcazar, J.L.
Abstract: Item does not contain fulltext, INTRODUCTION: Comprehensive updated information on cervical cancer surgical treatment in Europe is scarce. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate baseline characteristics of women with early cervical cancer and to analyze the outcomes of the ESGO quality indicators after radical hysterectomy in the SUCCOR database. METHODS: The SUCCOR database consisted of 1272 patients who underwent radical hysterectomy for stage IB1 cervical cancer (FIGO 2009) between January 2013 and December 2014. After exclusion criteria, the final sample included 1156 patients. This study first described the clinical, surgical, pathological, and follow-up variables of this population and then analyzed the outcomes (disease-free survival and overall survival) after radical hysterectomy. Surgical-related ESGO quality indicators were assessed and the accomplishment of the stated recommendations was verified. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 47.1 years (SD 10.8), with a mean body mass index of 25.4 kg/m(2) (SD 4.9). A total of 423 (36.6%) patients had a previous cone biopsy. Tumor size (clinical examination) <2 cm was observed in 667 (57.7%) patients. The most frequent histology type was squamous carcinoma (794 (68.7%) patients), and positive lymph nodes were found in 143 (12.4%) patients. A total of 633 (54.8%) patients were operated by open abdominal surgery. Intra-operative complications occurred in 108 (9.3%) patients, and post-operative complications during the first month occurred in 249 (21.5%) patients, with bladder dysfunction as the most frequent event (119 (10.3%) patients). Clavien-Dindo grade III or higher complication occurred in 56 (4.8%) patients. A total of 510 (44.1%) patients received adjuvant therapy. After a median follow-up of 58 months (range 0-84), the 5-year disease-free survival was 88.3%, and the overall survival was 94.9%. In our population, 10 of the 11 surgical-related quality indicators currently recommended by ESGO were fully fulfilled 5 years before its implementation. CO
Published: 2021

21. Radical hysterectomy in early cervical cancer in Europe: Characteristics, outcomes and evaluation of ESGO quality indicators

Author: Boria F., Chiva L., Zanagnolo V., Querleu D., Martin-Calvo N., CA Pilna M. E., Kucukmetin A., Mom C., Chakalova, G. , Shamistan, A., Malzoni M., Narducci F., Arencibia O., Raspagliesi F., Toptas T., Cibula D., Kaidarova D., Meydanli M. M., Tavares M., Golub D., Perrone A. M., Poka R., Tsolakidis D., Vujic G., Jedryka M. A., Zusterzeel P. L. M., Beltman J. J., Goffin F., Haidopoulos D., Haller H., Jach R., Yezhova I., Berlev I., Bernardino M., Bharathan R., Lanner M., Maenpaa M. M., Sukhin V., Feron J. -G., Fruscio R., Kukk K., Ponce J., Alonso-Espias M., Minguez J. A., Vazquez-Vicente D., Manzour N., Jurado M., Castellanos T., Chacon E., Alcazar J. L., Fagotti, Anna, Fagotti A. (ORCID:0000-0001-5579-335X), Boria F., Chiva L., Zanagnolo V., Querleu D., Martin-Calvo N., CA Pilna M. E., Kucukmetin A., Mom C., Chakalova, G. , Shamistan, A., Malzoni M., Narducci F., Arencibia O., Raspagliesi F., Toptas T., Cibula D., Kaidarova D., Meydanli M. M., Tavares M., Golub D., Perrone A. M., Poka R., Tsolakidis D., Vujic G., Jedryka M. A., Zusterzeel P. L. M., Beltman J. J., Goffin F., Haidopoulos D., Haller H., Jach R., Yezhova I., Berlev I., Bernardino M., Bharathan R., Lanner M., Maenpaa M. M., Sukhin V., Feron J. -G., Fruscio R., Kukk K., Ponce J., Alonso-Espias M., Minguez J. A., Vazquez-Vicente D., Manzour N., Jurado M., Castellanos T., Chacon E., Alcazar J. L., Fagotti, Anna, and Fagotti A. (ORCID:0000-0001-5579-335X)
Abstract: Introduction Comprehensive updated information on cervical cancer surgical treatment in Europe is scarce. Objective To evaluate baseline characteristics of women with early cervical cancer and to analyze the outcomes of the ESGO quality indicators after radical hysterectomy in the SUCCOR database. Methods The SUCCOR database consisted of 1272 patients who underwent radical hysterectomy for stage IB1 cervical cancer (FIGO 2009) between January 2013 and December 2014. After exclusion criteria, the final sample included 1156 patients. This study first described the clinical, surgical, pathological, and follow-up variables of this population and then analyzed the outcomes (disease-free survival and overall survival) after radical hysterectomy. Surgical-related ESGO quality indicators were assessed and the accomplishment of the stated recommendations was verified. Results The mean age of the patients was 47.1 years (SD 10.8), with a mean body mass index of 25.4 kg/m 2 (SD 4.9). A total of 423 (36.6%) patients had a previous cone biopsy. Tumor size (clinical examination) <2 cm was observed in 667 (57.7%) patients. The most frequent histology type was squamous carcinoma (794 (68.7%) patients), and positive lymph nodes were found in 143 (12.4%) patients. A total of 633 (54.8%) patients were operated by open abdominal surgery. Intra-operative complications occurred in 108 (9.3%) patients, and post-operative complications during the first month occurred in 249 (21.5%) patients, with bladder dysfunction as the most frequent event (119 (10.3%) patients). Clavien-Dindo grade III or higher complication occurred in 56 (4.8%) patients. A total of 510 (44.1%) patients received adjuvant therapy. After a median follow-up of 58 months (range 0-84), the 5-year disease-free survival was 88.3%, and the overall survival was 94.9%. In our population, 10 of the 11 surgical-related quality indicators currently recommended by ESGO were fully fulfilled 5 years before its implementation. Conc
Published: 2021

22. SUCCOR study: an international European cohort observational study comparing minimally invasive surgery versus open abdominal radical hysterectomy in patients with stage IB1 cervical cancer

Author: Chiva, L., Zanagnolo, V., Querleu, D., Martin-Calvo, N., Arévalo-Serrano, J., Căpîlna, M.E., Fagotti, A., Kucukmetin, A., Mom, C., Chakalova, G., Aliyev, S., Malzoni, M., Narducci, F., Arencibia, O., Raspagliesi, F., Toptas, T., Cibula, D., Kaidarova, D., Meydanli, M.M., Tavares, M., Golub, D., Perrone, A.M., Poka, R., Tsolakidis, D., Vujić, G., Jedryka, M.A., Zusterzeel, P.L.M., Beltman, J.J., Goffin, F., Haidopoulos, D., Haller, H., Jach, R., Yezhova, I., Berlev, I., Bernardino, M., Bharathan, R., Lanner, M., Maenpaa, M.M., Sukhin, V., Feron, J.G., Fruscio, R., Kukk, K., Ponce, J., Minguez, J.A., Vázquez-Vicente, D., Castellanos, T., Chacon, E., Alcazar, J.L., Chiva, L., Zanagnolo, V., Querleu, D., Martin-Calvo, N., Arévalo-Serrano, J., Căpîlna, M.E., Fagotti, A., Kucukmetin, A., Mom, C., Chakalova, G., Aliyev, S., Malzoni, M., Narducci, F., Arencibia, O., Raspagliesi, F., Toptas, T., Cibula, D., Kaidarova, D., Meydanli, M.M., Tavares, M., Golub, D., Perrone, A.M., Poka, R., Tsolakidis, D., Vujić, G., Jedryka, M.A., Zusterzeel, P.L.M., Beltman, J.J., Goffin, F., Haidopoulos, D., Haller, H., Jach, R., Yezhova, I., Berlev, I., Bernardino, M., Bharathan, R., Lanner, M., Maenpaa, M.M., Sukhin, V., Feron, J.G., Fruscio, R., Kukk, K., Ponce, J., Minguez, J.A., Vázquez-Vicente, D., Castellanos, T., Chacon, E., and Alcazar, J.L.
Abstract: Contains fulltext : 225380.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Closed access), BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive surgery in cervical cancer has demonstrated in recent publications worse outcomes than open surgery. The primary objective of the SUCCOR study, a European, multicenter, retrospective, observational cohort study was to evaluate disease-free survival in patients with stage IB1 (FIGO 2009) cervical cancer undergoing open vs minimally invasive radical hysterectomy. As a secondary objective, we aimed to investigate the association between protective surgical maneuvers and the risk of relapse. METHODS: We obtained data from 1272 patients that underwent a radical hysterectomy by open or minimally invasive surgery for stage IB1 cervical cancer (FIGO 2009) from January 2013 to December 2014. After applying all the inclusion-exclusion criteria, we used an inverse probability weighting to construct a weighted cohort of 693 patients to compare outcomes (minimally invasive surgery vs open). The first endpoint compared disease-free survival at 4.5 years in both groups. Secondary endpoints compared overall survival among groups and the impact of the use of a uterine manipulator and protective closure of the colpotomy over the tumor in the minimally invasive surgery group. RESULTS: Mean age was 48.3 years (range; 23-83) while the mean BMI was 25.7 kg/m(2) (range; 15-49). The risk of recurrence for patients who underwent minimally invasive surgery was twice as high as that in the open surgery group (HR, 2.07; 95% CI, 1.35 to 3.15; P=0.001). Similarly, the risk of death was 2.42-times higher than in the open surgery group (HR, 2.45; 95% CI, 1.30 to 4.60, P=0.005). Patients that underwent minimally invasive surgery using a uterine manipulator had a 2.76-times higher hazard of relapse (HR, 2.76; 95% CI, 1.75 to 4.33; P<0.001) and those without the use of a uterine manipulator had similar disease-free-survival to the open surgery group (HR, 1.58; 95% CI, 0.79 to 3.15; P=0.20). Moreover, patients that underwent minimally invasive surgery with protective vag
Published: 2020

23. SUCCOR study: an international European cohort observational study comparing minimally invasive surgery versus open abdominal radical hysterectomy in patients with stage IB1 cervical cancer

Author: Chiva, L., Zanagnolo, V., Querleu, D., Martin-Calvo, N., Arévalo-Serrano, J., Căpîlna, M.E., Fagotti, A., Kucukmetin, A., Mom, C., Chakalova, G., Aliyev, S., Malzoni, M., Narducci, F., Arencibia, O., Raspagliesi, F., Toptas, T., Cibula, D., Kaidarova, D., Meydanli, M.M., Tavares, M., Golub, D., Perrone, A.M., Poka, R., Tsolakidis, D., Vujić, G., Jedryka, M.A., Zusterzeel, P.L.M., Beltman, J.J., Goffin, F., Haidopoulos, D., Haller, H., Jach, R., Yezhova, I., Berlev, I., Bernardino, M., Bharathan, R., Lanner, M., Maenpaa, M.M., Sukhin, V., Feron, J.G., Fruscio, R., Kukk, K., Ponce, J., Minguez, J.A., Vázquez-Vicente, D., Castellanos, T., Chacon, E., Alcazar, J.L., Chiva, L., Zanagnolo, V., Querleu, D., Martin-Calvo, N., Arévalo-Serrano, J., Căpîlna, M.E., Fagotti, A., Kucukmetin, A., Mom, C., Chakalova, G., Aliyev, S., Malzoni, M., Narducci, F., Arencibia, O., Raspagliesi, F., Toptas, T., Cibula, D., Kaidarova, D., Meydanli, M.M., Tavares, M., Golub, D., Perrone, A.M., Poka, R., Tsolakidis, D., Vujić, G., Jedryka, M.A., Zusterzeel, P.L.M., Beltman, J.J., Goffin, F., Haidopoulos, D., Haller, H., Jach, R., Yezhova, I., Berlev, I., Bernardino, M., Bharathan, R., Lanner, M., Maenpaa, M.M., Sukhin, V., Feron, J.G., Fruscio, R., Kukk, K., Ponce, J., Minguez, J.A., Vázquez-Vicente, D., Castellanos, T., Chacon, E., and Alcazar, J.L.
Abstract: Contains fulltext : 225380.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Closed access), BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive surgery in cervical cancer has demonstrated in recent publications worse outcomes than open surgery. The primary objective of the SUCCOR study, a European, multicenter, retrospective, observational cohort study was to evaluate disease-free survival in patients with stage IB1 (FIGO 2009) cervical cancer undergoing open vs minimally invasive radical hysterectomy. As a secondary objective, we aimed to investigate the association between protective surgical maneuvers and the risk of relapse. METHODS: We obtained data from 1272 patients that underwent a radical hysterectomy by open or minimally invasive surgery for stage IB1 cervical cancer (FIGO 2009) from January 2013 to December 2014. After applying all the inclusion-exclusion criteria, we used an inverse probability weighting to construct a weighted cohort of 693 patients to compare outcomes (minimally invasive surgery vs open). The first endpoint compared disease-free survival at 4.5 years in both groups. Secondary endpoints compared overall survival among groups and the impact of the use of a uterine manipulator and protective closure of the colpotomy over the tumor in the minimally invasive surgery group. RESULTS: Mean age was 48.3 years (range; 23-83) while the mean BMI was 25.7 kg/m(2) (range; 15-49). The risk of recurrence for patients who underwent minimally invasive surgery was twice as high as that in the open surgery group (HR, 2.07; 95% CI, 1.35 to 3.15; P=0.001). Similarly, the risk of death was 2.42-times higher than in the open surgery group (HR, 2.45; 95% CI, 1.30 to 4.60, P=0.005). Patients that underwent minimally invasive surgery using a uterine manipulator had a 2.76-times higher hazard of relapse (HR, 2.76; 95% CI, 1.75 to 4.33; P<0.001) and those without the use of a uterine manipulator had similar disease-free-survival to the open surgery group (HR, 1.58; 95% CI, 0.79 to 3.15; P=0.20). Moreover, patients that underwent minimally invasive surgery with protective vag
Published: 2020

24. SUCCOR study: an international European cohort observational study comparing minimally invasive surgery versus open abdominal radical hysterectomy in patients with stage IB1 cervical cancer

Author: Chiva, L, Zanagnolo, V, Querleu, D, Martin-Calvo, N, Arévalo-Serrano, J, Căpîlna, M, Fagotti, A, Kucukmetin, A, Mom, C, Chakalova, G, Aliyev, S, Malzoni, M, Narducci, F, Arencibia, O, Raspagliesi, F, Toptas, T, Cibula, D, Kaidarova, D, Meydanli, M, Tavares, M, Golub, D, Perrone, A, Poka, R, Tsolakidis, D, Vujić, G, Jedryka, M, Zusterzeel, P, Beltman, J, Goffin, F, Haidopoulos, D, Haller, H, Jach, R, Yezhova, I, Berlev, I, Bernardino, M, Bharathan, R, Lanner, M, Maenpaa, M, Sukhin, V, Feron, J, Fruscio, R, Kukk, K, Ponce, J, Minguez, J, Vázquez-Vicente, D, Castellanos, T, Chacon, E, Alcazar, J, Chiva, Luis, Zanagnolo, Vanna, Querleu, Denis, Martin-Calvo, Nerea, Arévalo-Serrano, Juan, Căpîlna, Mihai Emil, Fagotti, Anna, Kucukmetin, Ali, Mom, Constantijne, Chakalova, Galina, Aliyev, Shamistan, Malzoni, Mario, Narducci, Fabrice, Arencibia, Octavio, Raspagliesi, Francesco, Toptas, Tayfun, Cibula, David, Kaidarova, Dilyara, Meydanli, Mehmet Mutlu, Tavares, Mariana, Golub, Dmytro, Perrone, Anna Myriam, Poka, Robert, Tsolakidis, Dimitrios, Vujić, Goran, Jedryka, Marcin A, Zusterzeel, Petra L M, Beltman, Jogchum Jan, Goffin, Frederic, Haidopoulos, Dimitrios, Haller, Herman, Jach, Robert, Yezhova, Iryna, Berlev, Igor, Bernardino, Margarida, Bharathan, Rasiah, Lanner, Maximilian, Maenpaa, Minna M, Sukhin, Vladyslav, Feron, Jean-Guillaume, Fruscio, Robert, Kukk, Kersti, Ponce, Jordi, Minguez, Jose Angel, Vázquez-Vicente, Daniel, Castellanos, Teresa, Chacon, Enrique, Alcazar, Juan Luis, Chiva, L, Zanagnolo, V, Querleu, D, Martin-Calvo, N, Arévalo-Serrano, J, Căpîlna, M, Fagotti, A, Kucukmetin, A, Mom, C, Chakalova, G, Aliyev, S, Malzoni, M, Narducci, F, Arencibia, O, Raspagliesi, F, Toptas, T, Cibula, D, Kaidarova, D, Meydanli, M, Tavares, M, Golub, D, Perrone, A, Poka, R, Tsolakidis, D, Vujić, G, Jedryka, M, Zusterzeel, P, Beltman, J, Goffin, F, Haidopoulos, D, Haller, H, Jach, R, Yezhova, I, Berlev, I, Bernardino, M, Bharathan, R, Lanner, M, Maenpaa, M, Sukhin, V, Feron, J, Fruscio, R, Kukk, K, Ponce, J, Minguez, J, Vázquez-Vicente, D, Castellanos, T, Chacon, E, Alcazar, J, Chiva, Luis, Zanagnolo, Vanna, Querleu, Denis, Martin-Calvo, Nerea, Arévalo-Serrano, Juan, Căpîlna, Mihai Emil, Fagotti, Anna, Kucukmetin, Ali, Mom, Constantijne, Chakalova, Galina, Aliyev, Shamistan, Malzoni, Mario, Narducci, Fabrice, Arencibia, Octavio, Raspagliesi, Francesco, Toptas, Tayfun, Cibula, David, Kaidarova, Dilyara, Meydanli, Mehmet Mutlu, Tavares, Mariana, Golub, Dmytro, Perrone, Anna Myriam, Poka, Robert, Tsolakidis, Dimitrios, Vujić, Goran, Jedryka, Marcin A, Zusterzeel, Petra L M, Beltman, Jogchum Jan, Goffin, Frederic, Haidopoulos, Dimitrios, Haller, Herman, Jach, Robert, Yezhova, Iryna, Berlev, Igor, Bernardino, Margarida, Bharathan, Rasiah, Lanner, Maximilian, Maenpaa, Minna M, Sukhin, Vladyslav, Feron, Jean-Guillaume, Fruscio, Robert, Kukk, Kersti, Ponce, Jordi, Minguez, Jose Angel, Vázquez-Vicente, Daniel, Castellanos, Teresa, Chacon, Enrique, and Alcazar, Juan Luis
Abstract: Background: Minimally invasive surgery in cervical cancer has demonstrated in recent publications worse outcomes than open surgery. The primary objective of the SUCCOR study, a European, multicenter, retrospective, observational cohort study was to evaluate disease-free survival in patients with stage IB1 (FIGO 2009) cervical cancer undergoing open vs minimally invasive radical hysterectomy. As a secondary objective, we aimed to investigate the association between protective surgical maneuvers and the risk of relapse. Methods: We obtained data from 1272 patients that underwent a radical hysterectomy by open or minimally invasive surgery for stage IB1 cervical cancer (FIGO 2009) from January 2013 to December 2014. After applying all the inclusion-exclusion criteria, we used an inverse probability weighting to construct a weighted cohort of 693 patients to compare outcomes (minimally invasive surgery vs open). The first endpoint compared disease-free survival at 4.5 years in both groups. Secondary endpoints compared overall survival among groups and the impact of the use of a uterine manipulator and protective closure of the colpotomy over the tumor in the minimally invasive surgery group. Results: Mean age was 48.3 years (range; 23-83) while the mean BMI was 25.7 kg/m2 (range; 15-49). The risk of recurrence for patients who underwent minimally invasive surgery was twice as high as that in the open surgery group (HR, 2.07; 95% CI, 1.35 to 3.15; P=0.001). Similarly, the risk of death was 2.42-times higher than in the open surgery group (HR, 2.45; 95% CI, 1.30 to 4.60, P=0.005). Patients that underwent minimally invasive surgery using a uterine manipulator had a 2.76-times higher hazard of relapse (HR, 2.76; 95% CI, 1.75 to 4.33; P<0.001) and those without the use of a uterine manipulator had similar disease-free-survival to the open surgery group (HR, 1.58; 95% CI, 0.79 to 3.15; P=0.20). Moreover, patients that underwent minimally invasive surgery with protective va
Published: 2020

25. SUCCOR study: An international European cohort observational study comparing minimally invasive surgery versus open abdominal radical hysterectomy in patients with stage IB1 cervical cancer

Author: Chiva, L., Zanagnolo, V., Querleu, D., Martin-Calvo, N., Arevalo-Serrano, J., Capilna, M. E., Fagotti, A., Kucukmetin, A., Mom, C., Chakalova, G., Aliyev, S., Malzoni, M., Narducci, F., Arencibia, O., Raspagliesi, F., Toptas, T., Cibula, D., Kaidarova, D., Meydanli, M. M., Tavares, M., Golub, D., Perrone, A. M., Poka, R., Tsolakidis, D., Vujic, G., Jedryka, M. A., Zusterzeel, P. L. M., Beltman, J. J., Goffin, F., Haidopoulos, D., Haller, H., Jach, R., Yezhova, I., Berlev, I., Bernardino, M., Bharathan, R., Lanner, M., Maenpaa, M. M., Sukhin, V., Feron, J. -G., Fruscio, R., Kukk, K., Ponce, J., Minguez, J. A., Vazquez-Vicente, D., Castellanos, T., Chacon, E., Alcazar, J. L., Fagotti A. (ORCID:0000-0001-5579-335X), Chiva, L., Zanagnolo, V., Querleu, D., Martin-Calvo, N., Arevalo-Serrano, J., Capilna, M. E., Fagotti, A., Kucukmetin, A., Mom, C., Chakalova, G., Aliyev, S., Malzoni, M., Narducci, F., Arencibia, O., Raspagliesi, F., Toptas, T., Cibula, D., Kaidarova, D., Meydanli, M. M., Tavares, M., Golub, D., Perrone, A. M., Poka, R., Tsolakidis, D., Vujic, G., Jedryka, M. A., Zusterzeel, P. L. M., Beltman, J. J., Goffin, F., Haidopoulos, D., Haller, H., Jach, R., Yezhova, I., Berlev, I., Bernardino, M., Bharathan, R., Lanner, M., Maenpaa, M. M., Sukhin, V., Feron, J. -G., Fruscio, R., Kukk, K., Ponce, J., Minguez, J. A., Vazquez-Vicente, D., Castellanos, T., Chacon, E., Alcazar, J. L., and Fagotti A. (ORCID:0000-0001-5579-335X)
Abstract: Background Minimally invasive surgery in cervical cancer has demonstrated in recent publications worse outcomes than open surgery. The primary objective of the SUCCOR study, a European, multicenter, retrospective, observational cohort study was to evaluate disease-free survival in patients with stage IB1 (FIGO 2009) cervical cancer undergoing open vs minimally invasive radical hysterectomy. As a secondary objective, we aimed to investigate the association between protective surgical maneuvers and the risk of relapse. Methods We obtained data from 1272 patients that underwent a radical hysterectomy by open or minimally invasive surgery for stage IB1 cervical cancer (FIGO 2009) from January 2013 to December 2014. After applying all the inclusion-exclusion criteria, we used an inverse probability weighting to construct a weighted cohort of 693 patients to compare outcomes (minimally invasive surgery vs open). The first endpoint compared disease-free survival at 4.5 years in both groups. Secondary endpoints compared overall survival among groups and the impact of the use of a uterine manipulator and protective closure of the colpotomy over the tumor in the minimally invasive surgery group. Results Mean age was 48.3 years (range; 23-83) while the mean BMI was 25.7 kg/m 2 (range; 15-49). The risk of recurrence for patients who underwent minimally invasive surgery was twice as high as that in the open surgery group (HR, 2.07; 95% CI, 1.35 to 3.15; P=0.001). Similarly, the risk of death was 2.42-times higher than in the open surgery group (HR, 2.45; 95% CI, 1.30 to 4.60, P=0.005). Patients that underwent minimally invasive surgery using a uterine manipulator had a 2.76-times higher hazard of relapse (HR, 2.76; 95% CI, 1.75 to 4.33; P<0.001) and those without the use of a uterine manipulator had similar disease-free-survival to the open surgery group (HR, 1.58; 95% CI, 0.79 to 3.15; P=0.20). Moreover, patients that underwent minimally invasive surgery with protective vagi
Published: 2020

26. Geometric probability methods in mineral exploration.

Author: Miguez F., Chacon E., Miguez F., and Chacon E.

27. Prospecting over large areas.

Author: Miguez F., Chacon E., Miguez F., and Chacon E.

28. A methodology to evaluate the topographic visual alteration on surface mining.

Author: Gutierrez del Alamo L.F., Chacon E., Gutierrez del Alamo L.F., and Chacon E.
Abstract: The visual impact of landscape alteration by surface mining has been characterised by analysing variations in topographic features, colour and texture. A model has been developed which allows different design alternatives to be evaluated and appraisals from different positions to be compared., The visual impact of landscape alteration by surface mining has been characterised by analysing variations in topographic features, colour and texture. A model has been developed which allows different design alternatives to be evaluated and appraisals from different positions to be compared.

29. Comparative analysis of toppling behaviour at Chuquicamata open-pit mine, Chile.

Author: Board M., Chacon E., Lorig L., Varona P., Board M., Chacon E., Lorig L., and Varona P.
Abstract: Geomechanical factors at the mine are important and will become even more relevant as the pit expands and deepens. To address these demands a team was assembled to collect geomechanical information and perform numerical analysis. The west wall is the largest and flattest of all the design sectors in the pit and rigorous studies were carried out on this wall. The wall behaviour is controlled mainly by a set of steeply dipping joints within the slope in the Fortuna Granodiorite and a weak zone, the Zona Plastica, that extends vertically near the pit bottom. These features lead to large toppling displacements in the upper portions of the wall. Two numerical models were used to reproduce the general features of failure observed in the wall. The modelling indicated that a toppling mode of failure results from shear on the steeply dipping joints. The toppling leads to slumping or landslides whereby the west wall flows slowly downslope as the Zona Plastica compresses., Geomechanical factors at the mine are important and will become even more relevant as the pit expands and deepens. To address these demands a team was assembled to collect geomechanical information and perform numerical analysis. The west wall is the largest and flattest of all the design sectors in the pit and rigorous studies were carried out on this wall. The wall behaviour is controlled mainly by a set of steeply dipping joints within the slope in the Fortuna Granodiorite and a weak zone, the Zona Plastica, that extends vertically near the pit bottom. These features lead to large toppling displacements in the upper portions of the wall. Two numerical models were used to reproduce the general features of failure observed in the wall. The modelling indicated that a toppling mode of failure results from shear on the steeply dipping joints. The toppling leads to slumping or landslides whereby the west wall flows slowly downslope as the Zona Plastica compresses.

Catalog

Books, media, physical & digital resources

See catalog results

Searchworks

Select search scope, currently: Articles

Catalog

books, media & more in Jio Institute collections

Articles

journal articles & other e-resources

Refine your results

29 results on '"Chacon E"'

1. SENECA study: staging endometrial cancer based on molecular classification

2. SUCCOR morbidity: Complications in minimally invasive versus open radical hysterectomy in early cervical cancer

3. Consensus on surgical technique for sentinel lymph node dissection in cervical cancer

4. SUCCOR Nodes: May Sentinel Node Biopsy Determine the Need for Adjuvant Treatment?

5. SUCCOR quality: validation of ESGO quality indicators for surgical treatment of cervical cancer

6. SUCCOR Risk: Design and Validation of a Recurrence Prediction Index for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer

7. Radical hysterectomy in early cervical cancer in Europe: Characteristics, outcomes and evaluation of ESGO quality indicators

8. SUCCOR cone study: conization before radical hysterectomy

9. SUCCOR quality: validation of ESGO quality indicators for surgical treatment of cervical cancer

10. SUCCOR cone study: conization before radical hysterectomy

11. SUCCOR cone study: conization before radical hysterectomy

12. SUCCOR quality: validation of ESGO quality indicators for surgical treatment of cervical cancer

13. SUCCOR quality: validation of ESGO quality indicators for surgical treatment of cervical cancer

14. SUCCOR cone study: conization before radical hysterectomy

15. OVA-LEAK: Prognostic score for colo-rectal anastomotic leakage in patients undergoing ovarian cancer surgery

16. SUCCOR Risk: Design and Validation of a Recurrence Prediction Index for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer

17. SUCCOR cone study: conization before radical hysterectomy

18. Radical hysterectomy in early cervical cancer in Europe: characteristics, outcomes and evaluation of ESGO quality indicators

19. Radical hysterectomy in early cervical cancer in Europe: characteristics, outcomes and evaluation of ESGO quality indicators

20. Radical hysterectomy in early cervical cancer in Europe: characteristics, outcomes and evaluation of ESGO quality indicators

21. Radical hysterectomy in early cervical cancer in Europe: Characteristics, outcomes and evaluation of ESGO quality indicators

22. SUCCOR study: an international European cohort observational study comparing minimally invasive surgery versus open abdominal radical hysterectomy in patients with stage IB1 cervical cancer

23. SUCCOR study: an international European cohort observational study comparing minimally invasive surgery versus open abdominal radical hysterectomy in patients with stage IB1 cervical cancer

24. SUCCOR study: an international European cohort observational study comparing minimally invasive surgery versus open abdominal radical hysterectomy in patients with stage IB1 cervical cancer

25. SUCCOR study: An international European cohort observational study comparing minimally invasive surgery versus open abdominal radical hysterectomy in patients with stage IB1 cervical cancer

26. Geometric probability methods in mineral exploration.

27. Prospecting over large areas.

28. A methodology to evaluate the topographic visual alteration on surface mining.

29. Comparative analysis of toppling behaviour at Chuquicamata open-pit mine, Chile.

Catalog

Searchworks

Select search scope, currently: Articles Catalog books, media & more in Jio Institute collections Articles journal articles & other e-resources

Search

Search Constraints

Refine your results

Search Limiters

Publication Year Range

Publication Type

Database

Publisher

29 results on '"Chacon E"'

Search Results

Catalog

Select search scope, currently: Articles

Catalog

books, media & more in Jio Institute collections

Articles

journal articles & other e-resources