1. A retrospective analysis of 3954 patients in phase 2/3 trials of bortezomib for the treatment of multiple myeloma: towards providing a benchmark for the cardiac safety profile of proteasome inhibition in multiple myeloma.
- Author
-
Laubach, Jacob, Laubach, Jacob, Moslehi, Javid, Francis, Sanjeev, San Miguel, Jesús, Sonneveld, Pieter, Orlowski, Robert, Moreau, Philippe, Rosiñol, Laura, Faber, Edward, Voorhees, Peter, Mateos, Maria-Victoria, Marquez, Loreta, Feng, Huaibao, Desai, Avinash, van de Velde, Helgi, Elliott, Jennifer, Shi, Hongliang, Dow, Edward, Jobanputra, Nishith, Esseltine, Dixie-Lee, Niculescu, Liviu, Anderson, Kenneth, Lonial, Sagar, Richardson, Paul, Laubach, Jacob, Laubach, Jacob, Moslehi, Javid, Francis, Sanjeev, San Miguel, Jesús, Sonneveld, Pieter, Orlowski, Robert, Moreau, Philippe, Rosiñol, Laura, Faber, Edward, Voorhees, Peter, Mateos, Maria-Victoria, Marquez, Loreta, Feng, Huaibao, Desai, Avinash, van de Velde, Helgi, Elliott, Jennifer, Shi, Hongliang, Dow, Edward, Jobanputra, Nishith, Esseltine, Dixie-Lee, Niculescu, Liviu, Anderson, Kenneth, Lonial, Sagar, and Richardson, Paul
- Abstract
This retrospective analysis aimed to establish the overall cardiac safety profile of bortezomib using patient-level data from one phase 2 and seven phase 3 studies in previously untreated and relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (MM). Seven clinically relevant primary [congestive heart failure (CHF), arrhythmias, ischaemic heart disease (IHD), cardiac death] and secondary (hypertension, dyspnoea, oedema) cardiac endpoints were defined based on MedDRA v16.0 preferred terms. 2509 bortezomib-treated patients and 1445 patients in non-bortezomib-based control arms were included. The incidence of grade ≥3 CHF was 1·3-4·0% in studies in relapsed/refractory MM and 1·2-4·7% in previously untreated MM (2·0-7·6% all grades), with no significant differences between bortezomib- and non-bortezomib-based arms in comparative studies. Incidences of arrhythmias (1·3-5·9% grade ≥2; 0·6-4·1% grade ≥3), IHD (1·2-2·9% all grades; 0·4-2·7% grade ≥3) and cardiac death (0-1·4%) were low, with no differences between bortezomib-based and non-bortezomib-based arms. Higher rates of oedema (mostly grade 1/2) were seen in bortezomib-based versus non-bortezomib-based arms in one study and a pooled transplant study analysis. Logistic regression analyses of comparative studies showed no impact on cardiac risk with bortezomib-based versus non-bortezomib-based treatment. Bortezomib-based treatment was associated with low incidences of cardiac events.
- Published
- 2017