1. Implementation of an audit and feedback module targeting low-value clinical practices in a provincial trauma quality assurance program: a cost-effectiveness study.
- Author
-
Conombo, Blanchard, Conombo, Blanchard, Guertin, Jason, Hoch, Jeffrey, Grimshaw, Jeremy, Bérubé, Mélanie, Malo, Christian, Berthelot, Simon, Lauzier, François, Stelfox, Henry, Turgeon, Alexis, Archambault, Patrick, Belcaid, Amina, Moore, Lynne, Conombo, Blanchard, Conombo, Blanchard, Guertin, Jason, Hoch, Jeffrey, Grimshaw, Jeremy, Bérubé, Mélanie, Malo, Christian, Berthelot, Simon, Lauzier, François, Stelfox, Henry, Turgeon, Alexis, Archambault, Patrick, Belcaid, Amina, and Moore, Lynne
- Abstract
BACKGROUND: Audit and Feedback (A&F) interventions based on quality indicators have been shown to lead to significant improvements in compliance with evidence-based care including de-adoption of low-value practices (LVPs). Our primary aim was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of adding a hypothetical A&F module targeting LVPs for trauma admissions to an existing quality assurance intervention targeting high-value care and risk-adjusted outcomes. A secondary aim was to assess how certain A&F characteristics might influence its cost-effectiveness. METHODS: We conducted a cost-effectiveness analysis using a probabilistic static decision analytic model in the Québec trauma care continuum. We considered the Québec Ministry of Health perspective. Our economic evaluation compared a hypothetical scenario in which the A&F module targeting LVPs is implemented in a Canadian provincial trauma quality assurance program to a status quo scenario in which the A&F module is not implemented. In scenarios analyses we assessed the impact of A&F characteristics on its cost-effectiveness. Results are presented in terms of incremental costs per LVP avoided. RESULTS: Results suggest that the implementation of A&F module (Cost = $1,480,850; Number of LVPs = 6,005) is associated with higher costs and higher effectiveness compared to status quo (Cost = $1,124,661; Number of LVPs = 8,228). The A&F module would cost $160 per LVP avoided compared to status quo. The A&F module becomes more cost-effective with the addition of facilitation visits; more frequent evaluation; and when only high-volume trauma centers are considered. CONCLUSION: A&F module targeting LVPs is associated with higher costs and higher effectiveness than status quo and has the potential to be cost-effective if the decision-makers willingness-to-pay is at least $160 per LVP avoided. This likely represents an underestimate of true ICER due to underestimated costs or missed opportunity co
- Published
- 2024