Search

Deep neural networks are vulnerable to adversarial attacks. Most $L_{0}$-norm based white-box attacks craft perturbations by the gradient of models to the input. Since the computation cost and memory limitation of calculating the Hessian matrix, the application of Hessian or approximate Hessian in white-box attacks is gradually shelved. In this work, we note that the sparsity requirement on perturbations naturally lends itself to the usage of Hessian information. We study the attack performance and computation cost of the attack method based on the Hessian with a limited number of perturbation pixels. Specifically, we propose the Limited Pixel BFGS (LP-BFGS) attack method by incorporating the perturbation pixel selection strategy and the BFGS algorithm. Pixels with top-k attribution scores calculated by the Integrated Gradient method are regarded as optimization variables of the LP-BFGS attack. Experimental results across different networks and datasets demonstrate that our approach has comparable attack ability with reasonable computation in different numbers of perturbation pixels compared with existing solutions., Comment: 15 pages, 7 figures

A counter-intuitive property of convolutional neural networks (CNNs) is their inherent susceptibility to adversarial examples, which severely hinders the application of CNNs in security-critical fields. Adversarial examples are similar to original examples but contain malicious perturbations. Adversarial training is a simple and effective defense method to improve the robustness of CNNs to adversarial examples. The mechanisms behind adversarial examples and adversarial training are worth exploring. Therefore, this work investigates similarities and differences between normally trained CNNs (NT-CNNs) and adversarially trained CNNs (AT-CNNs) in information extraction from the mutual information perspective. We show that 1) whether NT-CNNs or AT-CNNs, for original and adversarial examples, the trends towards mutual information are almost similar throughout training; 2) compared with normal training, adversarial training is more difficult and the amount of information that AT-CNNs extract from the input is less; 3) the CNNs trained with different methods have different preferences for certain types of information; NT-CNNs tend to extract texture-based information from the input, while AT-CNNs prefer to shape-based information. The reason why adversarial examples mislead CNNs may be that they contain more texture-based information about other classes. Furthermore, we also analyze the mutual information estimators used in this work and find that they outline the geometric properties of the middle layer's output., Comment: initial submit 3

Traditional and deep learning-based fusion methods generated the intermediate decision map to obtain the fusion image through a series of post-processing procedures. However, the fusion results generated by these methods are easy to lose some source image details or results in artifacts. Inspired by the image reconstruction techniques based on deep learning, we propose a multi-focus image fusion network framework without any post-processing to solve these problems in the end-to-end and supervised learning way. To sufficiently train the fusion model, we have generated a large-scale multi-focus image dataset with ground-truth fusion images. What's more, to obtain a more informative fusion image, we further designed a novel fusion strategy based on unity fusion attention, which is composed of a channel attention module and a spatial attention module. Specifically, the proposed fusion approach mainly comprises three key components: feature extraction, feature fusion and image reconstruction. We firstly utilize seven convolutional blocks to extract the image features from source images. Then, the extracted convolutional features are fused by the proposed fusion strategy in the feature fusion layer. Finally, the fused image features are reconstructed by four convolutional blocks. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed approach for multi-focus image fusion achieves remarkable fusion performance compared to 19 state-of-the-art fusion methods., Comment: 17pages,11 figures, 7 tables. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement