Search

Trehalose is commonly used as a protein stabilizer in spray dried protein formulations delivered via the pulmonary route. Spray dried trehalose formulations are highly hygroscopic, which makes them prone to deliquescence and recrystallization when exposed to moisture, leading to impairment in aerosolization performance. The main aim of this study was to investigate and compare the effect of hydrophobic amino acids (i.e. L-leucine and L-isoleucine) in enhancing aerosolization performance and in mitigating moisture-induced changes in spray dried trehalose formulations. Trehalose was spray dried with 20-60% w/w of amino acid (i.e. L-leucine or L-isoleucine). The spray dried formulations were stored at 25 °C/50% RH for 28 days. Solid state characterization and in vitro aerosolization performance studies were performed on the spray dried formulations before and after storage. The addition of 20-60% w/w of amino acid (i.e. L-leucine or L-isoleucine) improved the emitted fractions of spray dried trehalose formulations from a dry powder inhaler. However, ≥ 40% w/w of L-leucine/L-isoleucine was needed to prevent recrystallization of trehalose in the formulations when exposed to 25 °C/50% RH for 28 days. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) demonstrated that samples with 40-60% w/w L-isoleucine had more amino acid on the surfaces of the particles compared to their L-leucine counterparts. This may explain the greater ability of the L-isoleucine (40-60% w/w) samples to cope with elevated humidity compared to L-leucine samples of the same concentrations, as observed in the dynamic vapour sorption (DVS) studies. In conclusion, this study demonstrated that both L-leucine and L-isoleucine were effective in enhancing aerosolization performance and mitigating moisture-induced reduction in aerosolization performance in spray dried trehalose formulations. L-isoleucine proved to be superior to L-leucine in terms of its moisture protectant effect when incorporated at the same concentra

AimsThe abdominal region is the most common location for continuous glucose monitor (CGM) sensor insertion. However, a paucity of post-marketing data is available to demonstrate intra-individual consistency of CGM readings at different abdominal insertion sites.MethodsHealthy adults (fasting glucose (FG) < 5.5 mmol/L; BMI < 30 kg/m²) were recruited and a CGM sensor was placed on each side of the abdomen. Postprandial and continuous 48-h interstitial glucose levels were analyzed.ResultsThere was no significant difference in the 3-h postprandial glucose (PPG) level derived from the left versus right CGM, which remained non-significant after adjusting for waist circumference or FG. Among the glucose levels recorded over 48-h, values on the left site were greater in 3.6% of the data points (p < 0.05). After adjusting for waist circumference, only 0.5% of the glucose values remained significantly greater on the left (p < 0.05). When adjusted for FG, similar results were observed. For both PPG and 48-h readings, the mean absolute relative difference was not significant between the two abdominal sites.ConclusionsCGM-derived glucose measures were highly consistent between the left and right abdomen during both the postprandial and post-absorptive periods.