Search

Your search keyword '"Piro VC"' showing total 4 results
Start Over Author "Piro VC" Publication Type Electronic Resources

Refine your results

4 results on '"Piro VC"'

1. Critical Assessment of Metagenome Interpretation: the second round of challenges

Author

Meyer, F, Fritz, A, Deng, Z-L, Koslicki, D, Lesker, TR, Gurevich, A, Robertson, G, Alser, M, Antipov, D, Beghini, F, Bertrand, D, Brito, JJ, Brown, CT, Buchmann, J, Buluc, A, Chen, B, Chikhi, R, Clausen, PTLC, Cristian, A, Dabrowski, PW, Darling, AE, Egan, R, Eskin, E, Georganas, E, Goltsman, E, Gray, MA, Hansen, LH, Hofmeyr, S, Huang, P, Irber, L, Jia, H, Jorgensen, TS, Kieser, SD, Klemetsen, T, Kola, A, Kolmogorov, M, Korobeynikov, A, Kwan, J, LaPierre, N, Lemaitre, C, Li, C, Limasset, A, Malcher-Miranda, F, Mangul, S, Marcelino, VR, Marchet, C, Marijon, P, Meleshko, D, Mende, DR, Milanese, A, Nagarajan, N, Nissen, J, Nurk, S, Oliker, L, Paoli, L, Peterlongo, P, Piro, VC, Porter, JS, Rasmussen, S, Rees, ER, Reinert, K, Renard, B, Robertsen, EM, Rosen, GL, Ruscheweyh, H-J, Sarwal, V, Segata, N, Seiler, E, Shi, L, Sun, F, Sunagawa, S, Sorensen, SJ, Thomas, A, Tong, C, Trajkovski, M, Tremblay, J, Uritskiy, G, Vicedomini, R, Wang, Z, Warren, A, Willassen, NP, Yelick, K, You, R, Zeller, G, Zhao, Z, Zhu, S, Zhu, J, Garrido-Oter, R, Gastmeier, P, Hacquard, S, Haeussler, S, Khaledi, A, Maechler, F, Mesny, F, Radutoiu, S, Schulze-Lefert, P, Smit, N, Strowig, T, Bremges, A, Sczyrba, A, McHardy, AC, Meyer, F, Fritz, A, Deng, Z-L, Koslicki, D, Lesker, TR, Gurevich, A, Robertson, G, Alser, M, Antipov, D, Beghini, F, Bertrand, D, Brito, JJ, Brown, CT, Buchmann, J, Buluc, A, Chen, B, Chikhi, R, Clausen, PTLC, Cristian, A, Dabrowski, PW, Darling, AE, Egan, R, Eskin, E, Georganas, E, Goltsman, E, Gray, MA, Hansen, LH, Hofmeyr, S, Huang, P, Irber, L, Jia, H, Jorgensen, TS, Kieser, SD, Klemetsen, T, Kola, A, Kolmogorov, M, Korobeynikov, A, Kwan, J, LaPierre, N, Lemaitre, C, Li, C, Limasset, A, Malcher-Miranda, F, Mangul, S, Marcelino, VR, Marchet, C, Marijon, P, Meleshko, D, Mende, DR, Milanese, A, Nagarajan, N, Nissen, J, Nurk, S, Oliker, L, Paoli, L, Peterlongo, P, Piro, VC, Porter, JS, Rasmussen, S, Rees, ER, Reinert, K, Renard, B, Robertsen, EM, Rosen, GL, Ruscheweyh, H-J, Sarwal, V, Segata, N, Seiler, E, Shi, L, Sun, F, Sunagawa, S, Sorensen, SJ, Thomas, A, Tong, C, Trajkovski, M, Tremblay, J, Uritskiy, G, Vicedomini, R, Wang, Z, Warren, A, Willassen, NP, Yelick, K, You, R, Zeller, G, Zhao, Z, Zhu, S, Zhu, J, Garrido-Oter, R, Gastmeier, P, Hacquard, S, Haeussler, S, Khaledi, A, Maechler, F, Mesny, F, Radutoiu, S, Schulze-Lefert, P, Smit, N, Strowig, T, Bremges, A, Sczyrba, A, and McHardy, AC

Abstract

Evaluating metagenomic software is key for optimizing metagenome interpretation and focus of the Initiative for the Critical Assessment of Metagenome Interpretation (CAMI). The CAMI II challenge engaged the community to assess methods on realistic and complex datasets with long- and short-read sequences, created computationally from around 1,700 new and known genomes, as well as 600 new plasmids and viruses. Here we analyze 5,002 results by 76 program versions. Substantial improvements were seen in assembly, some due to long-read data. Related strains still were challenging for assembly and genome recovery through binning, as was assembly quality for the latter. Profilers markedly matured, with taxon profilers and binners excelling at higher bacterial ranks, but underperforming for viruses and Archaea. Clinical pathogen detection results revealed a need to improve reproducibility. Runtime and memory usage analyses identified efficient programs, including top performers with other metrics. The results identify challenges and guide researchers in selecting methods for analyses.

Published
2022

2. Critical Assessment of Metagenome Interpretation: the second round of challenges.

Author

Meyer, F, Fritz, A, Deng, Z-L, Koslicki, D, Lesker, TR, Gurevich, A, Robertson, G, Alser, M, Antipov, D, Beghini, F, Bertrand, D, Brito, JJ, Brown, CT, Buchmann, J, Buluç, A, Chen, B, Chikhi, R, Clausen, PTLC, Cristian, A, Dabrowski, PW, Darling, AE, Egan, R, Eskin, E, Georganas, E, Goltsman, E, Gray, MA, Hansen, LH, Hofmeyr, S, Huang, P, Irber, L, Jia, H, Jørgensen, TS, Kieser, SD, Klemetsen, T, Kola, A, Kolmogorov, M, Korobeynikov, A, Kwan, J, LaPierre, N, Lemaitre, C, Li, C, Limasset, A, Malcher-Miranda, F, Mangul, S, Marcelino, VR, Marchet, C, Marijon, P, Meleshko, D, Mende, DR, Milanese, A, Nagarajan, N, Nissen, J, Nurk, S, Oliker, L, Paoli, L, Peterlongo, P, Piro, VC, Porter, JS, Rasmussen, S, Rees, ER, Reinert, K, Renard, B, Robertsen, EM, Rosen, GL, Ruscheweyh, H-J, Sarwal, V, Segata, N, Seiler, E, Shi, L, Sun, F, Sunagawa, S, Sørensen, SJ, Thomas, A, Tong, C, Trajkovski, M, Tremblay, J, Uritskiy, G, Vicedomini, R, Wang, Z, Warren, A, Willassen, NP, Yelick, K, You, R, Zeller, G, Zhao, Z, Zhu, S, Zhu, J, Garrido-Oter, R, Gastmeier, P, Hacquard, S, Häußler, S, Khaledi, A, Maechler, F, Mesny, F, Radutoiu, S, Schulze-Lefert, P, Smit, N, Strowig, T, Bremges, A, Sczyrba, A, McHardy, AC, Meyer, F, Fritz, A, Deng, Z-L, Koslicki, D, Lesker, TR, Gurevich, A, Robertson, G, Alser, M, Antipov, D, Beghini, F, Bertrand, D, Brito, JJ, Brown, CT, Buchmann, J, Buluç, A, Chen, B, Chikhi, R, Clausen, PTLC, Cristian, A, Dabrowski, PW, Darling, AE, Egan, R, Eskin, E, Georganas, E, Goltsman, E, Gray, MA, Hansen, LH, Hofmeyr, S, Huang, P, Irber, L, Jia, H, Jørgensen, TS, Kieser, SD, Klemetsen, T, Kola, A, Kolmogorov, M, Korobeynikov, A, Kwan, J, LaPierre, N, Lemaitre, C, Li, C, Limasset, A, Malcher-Miranda, F, Mangul, S, Marcelino, VR, Marchet, C, Marijon, P, Meleshko, D, Mende, DR, Milanese, A, Nagarajan, N, Nissen, J, Nurk, S, Oliker, L, Paoli, L, Peterlongo, P, Piro, VC, Porter, JS, Rasmussen, S, Rees, ER, Reinert, K, Renard, B, Robertsen, EM, Rosen, GL, Ruscheweyh, H-J, Sarwal, V, Segata, N, Seiler, E, Shi, L, Sun, F, Sunagawa, S, Sørensen, SJ, Thomas, A, Tong, C, Trajkovski, M, Tremblay, J, Uritskiy, G, Vicedomini, R, Wang, Z, Warren, A, Willassen, NP, Yelick, K, You, R, Zeller, G, Zhao, Z, Zhu, S, Zhu, J, Garrido-Oter, R, Gastmeier, P, Hacquard, S, Häußler, S, Khaledi, A, Maechler, F, Mesny, F, Radutoiu, S, Schulze-Lefert, P, Smit, N, Strowig, T, Bremges, A, Sczyrba, A, and McHardy, AC

Abstract

Evaluating metagenomic software is key for optimizing metagenome interpretation and focus of the Initiative for the Critical Assessment of Metagenome Interpretation (CAMI). The CAMI II challenge engaged the community to assess methods on realistic and complex datasets with long- and short-read sequences, created computationally from around 1,700 new and known genomes, as well as 600 new plasmids and viruses. Here we analyze 5,002 results by 76 program versions. Substantial improvements were seen in assembly, some due to long-read data. Related strains still were challenging for assembly and genome recovery through binning, as was assembly quality for the latter. Profilers markedly matured, with taxon profilers and binners excelling at higher bacterial ranks, but underperforming for viruses and Archaea. Clinical pathogen detection results revealed a need to improve reproducibility. Runtime and memory usage analyses identified efficient programs, including top performers with other metrics. The results identify challenges and guide researchers in selecting methods for analyses.

Published
2022

3. Critical Assessment of Metagenome Interpretation - A benchmark of metagenomics software

Author

Sczyrba, A, Hofmann, P, Belmann, P, Koslicki, D, Janssen, S, Dröge, J, Gregor, I, Majda, S, Fiedler, J, Dahms, E, Bremges, A, Fritz, A, Garrido-Oter, R, Jørgensen, TS, Shapiro, N, Blood, PD, Gurevich, A, Bai, Y, Turaev, D, Demaere, MZ, Chikhi, R, Nagarajan, N, Quince, C, Meyer, F, Balvočiutė, M, Hansen, LH, Sørensen, SJ, Chia, BKH, Denis, B, Froula, JL, Wang, Z, Egan, R, Don Kang, D, Cook, JJ, Deltel, C, Beckstette, M, Lemaitre, C, Peterlongo, P, Rizk, G, Lavenier, D, Wu, YW, Singer, SW, Jain, C, Strous, M, Klingenberg, H, Meinicke, P, Barton, MD, Lingner, T, Lin, HH, Liao, YC, Silva, GGZ, Cuevas, DA, Edwards, RA, Saha, S, Piro, VC, Renard, BY, Pop, M, Klenk, HP, Göker, M, Kyrpides, NC, Woyke, T, Vorholt, JA, Schulze-Lefert, P, Rubin, EM, Darling, AE, Rattei, T, McHardy, AC, Sczyrba, A, Hofmann, P, Belmann, P, Koslicki, D, Janssen, S, Dröge, J, Gregor, I, Majda, S, Fiedler, J, Dahms, E, Bremges, A, Fritz, A, Garrido-Oter, R, Jørgensen, TS, Shapiro, N, Blood, PD, Gurevich, A, Bai, Y, Turaev, D, Demaere, MZ, Chikhi, R, Nagarajan, N, Quince, C, Meyer, F, Balvočiutė, M, Hansen, LH, Sørensen, SJ, Chia, BKH, Denis, B, Froula, JL, Wang, Z, Egan, R, Don Kang, D, Cook, JJ, Deltel, C, Beckstette, M, Lemaitre, C, Peterlongo, P, Rizk, G, Lavenier, D, Wu, YW, Singer, SW, Jain, C, Strous, M, Klingenberg, H, Meinicke, P, Barton, MD, Lingner, T, Lin, HH, Liao, YC, Silva, GGZ, Cuevas, DA, Edwards, RA, Saha, S, Piro, VC, Renard, BY, Pop, M, Klenk, HP, Göker, M, Kyrpides, NC, Woyke, T, Vorholt, JA, Schulze-Lefert, P, Rubin, EM, Darling, AE, Rattei, T, and McHardy, AC

Abstract

Methods for assembly, taxonomic profiling and binning are key to interpreting metagenome data, but a lack of consensus about benchmarking complicates performance assessment. The Critical Assessment of Metagenome Interpretation (CAMI) challenge has engaged the global developer community to benchmark their programs on highly complex and realistic data sets, generated from ∼700 newly sequenced microorganisms and ∼600 novel viruses and plasmids and representing common experimental setups. Assembly and genome binning programs performed well for species represented by individual genomes but were substantially affected by the presence of related strains. Taxonomic profiling and binning programs were proficient at high taxonomic ranks, with a notable performance decrease below family level. Parameter settings markedly affected performance, underscoring their importance for program reproducibility. The CAMI results highlight current challenges but also provide a roadmap for software selection to answer specific research questions.

Published
2017

4. Critical Assessment of Metagenome Interpretation - A benchmark of metagenomics software

Author

Sczyrba, A, Hofmann, P, Belmann, P, Koslicki, D, Janssen, S, Dröge, J, Gregor, I, Majda, S, Fiedler, J, Dahms, E, Bremges, A, Fritz, A, Garrido-Oter, R, Jørgensen, TS, Shapiro, N, Blood, PD, Gurevich, A, Bai, Y, Turaev, D, Demaere, MZ, Chikhi, R, Nagarajan, N, Quince, C, Meyer, F, Balvočiutė, M, Hansen, LH, Sørensen, SJ, Chia, BKH, Denis, B, Froula, JL, Wang, Z, Egan, R, Don Kang, D, Cook, JJ, Deltel, C, Beckstette, M, Lemaitre, C, Peterlongo, P, Rizk, G, Lavenier, D, Wu, YW, Singer, SW, Jain, C, Strous, M, Klingenberg, H, Meinicke, P, Barton, MD, Lingner, T, Lin, HH, Liao, YC, Silva, GGZ, Cuevas, DA, Edwards, RA, Saha, S, Piro, VC, Renard, BY, Pop, M, Klenk, HP, Göker, M, Kyrpides, NC, Woyke, T, Vorholt, JA, Schulze-Lefert, P, Rubin, EM, Darling, AE, Rattei, T, McHardy, AC, Sczyrba, A, Hofmann, P, Belmann, P, Koslicki, D, Janssen, S, Dröge, J, Gregor, I, Majda, S, Fiedler, J, Dahms, E, Bremges, A, Fritz, A, Garrido-Oter, R, Jørgensen, TS, Shapiro, N, Blood, PD, Gurevich, A, Bai, Y, Turaev, D, Demaere, MZ, Chikhi, R, Nagarajan, N, Quince, C, Meyer, F, Balvočiutė, M, Hansen, LH, Sørensen, SJ, Chia, BKH, Denis, B, Froula, JL, Wang, Z, Egan, R, Don Kang, D, Cook, JJ, Deltel, C, Beckstette, M, Lemaitre, C, Peterlongo, P, Rizk, G, Lavenier, D, Wu, YW, Singer, SW, Jain, C, Strous, M, Klingenberg, H, Meinicke, P, Barton, MD, Lingner, T, Lin, HH, Liao, YC, Silva, GGZ, Cuevas, DA, Edwards, RA, Saha, S, Piro, VC, Renard, BY, Pop, M, Klenk, HP, Göker, M, Kyrpides, NC, Woyke, T, Vorholt, JA, Schulze-Lefert, P, Rubin, EM, Darling, AE, Rattei, T, and McHardy, AC

Abstract

Methods for assembly, taxonomic profiling and binning are key to interpreting metagenome data, but a lack of consensus about benchmarking complicates performance assessment. The Critical Assessment of Metagenome Interpretation (CAMI) challenge has engaged the global developer community to benchmark their programs on highly complex and realistic data sets, generated from ∼700 newly sequenced microorganisms and ∼600 novel viruses and plasmids and representing common experimental setups. Assembly and genome binning programs performed well for species represented by individual genomes but were substantially affected by the presence of related strains. Taxonomic profiling and binning programs were proficient at high taxonomic ranks, with a notable performance decrease below family level. Parameter settings markedly affected performance, underscoring their importance for program reproducibility. The CAMI results highlight current challenges but also provide a roadmap for software selection to answer specific research questions.

Published
2017

Catalog

Books, media, physical & digital resources
See catalog results