1. Evaluation of repair techniques for impact-damaged prestressed beams : final report.
- Author
-
Virginia Transportation Research Council (VTRC), United States. Federal Highway Administration. Virginia Division, Virginia. Dept. of Transportation, United States. Department of Transportation. University Transportation Centers (UTC) Program, Gangi, Michael, Jones, Mark, Liesen, Justin, Zhou, Jiaxing, Pino, Vanessa, Cousins, Thomas E., Roberts-Wollman, C. L., Koutromanos, Ioannis, Nanni, Antonio, Virginia Center for Transportation Innovation and Research, Virginia Transportation Research Council (VTRC), United States. Federal Highway Administration. Virginia Division, Virginia. Dept. of Transportation, United States. Department of Transportation. University Transportation Centers (UTC) Program, Gangi, Michael, Jones, Mark, Liesen, Justin, Zhou, Jiaxing, Pino, Vanessa, Cousins, Thomas E., Roberts-Wollman, C. L., Koutromanos, Ioannis, Nanni, Antonio, and Virginia Center for Transportation Innovation and Research
- Abstract
DTRT12-G-UTC16, Collisions between over height vehicles and bridges occur about 1,000 times per year in the United States. Collision damage to, bridges can range from minor to catastrophic, potentially requiring repair or replacement of a bridge beam. For prestressed concrete, beams, the traditional repair methods are strand splices and Fiber-Reinforced Polymer (FRP) wraps. A new material, Fabric, Reinforced Cementitious Matrix (FRCM), has been developed as an alternative to traditional FRP wrap., The first objective of this project was to damage, repair and test four beams retrieved during the demolition of the overpass of, Arcadia Road over Interstate 81 at Arcadia, VA. The repair techniques evaluated were strand splices, FRP, FRCM and a, combination of FRCM and strand splices. The beams were tested in the lab in simple span configuration with the repair location, placed in a region of constant moment. Loads were applied monotonically to failure. One beam was tested in an undamaged, condition as a control., Several methods were used to calculate strength and behavior. Simple methods from AASHTO and ACI were used for hand, calculations of flexural strength. Conventional strain compatibility was also used. Non-linear beam models and non-linear three, dimensional finite element models were also investigated as tools to evaluate repaired beams. Material characterization was, performed on the concrete, prestressing steel, splice chucks, FRP and FRCM. The material characterization was used to develop the, material models for the analyses., It was found that the greatest percentage of original strength was returned by the FRP repair and the repair with the combination of, FRCM and splice chucks. The lowest percent was returned with only splice chucks when eight of 48 strands were severed and, spliced. The FRCM proved to be a viable repair technique, but should be tested in fatigue before deployment on a bridge with high, truck traffic. The analysis methods were shown to provide good estimates of strength and load-deflection behavior.