Search

The European arrest warrants issued by the Spanish courts in relation to those involved in the attempted repeal of the Constitution in Catalonia in 2017 have been a test for the instrument.This paper analyses the reasons why in the different countries in which there have been decisions about the case (Belgium, Germany, the United Kingdom and Italy) the arrest warrants have not been executed, thus showing what errors the authorities of these countries have made and how these errors influence the deterioration of mutual trust between the EU Member States., Las órdenes europeas de detención y entrega emitidas por los tribunales españoles con relación a los implicados en el intento de derogación de la Constitución en Cataluña en el año 2017 han supuesto una prueba para el instrumento.En este trabajo se analizan las razones por las que en los distintos países que han conocido del caso (Bélgica, Alemania, Reino Unido e Italia) no han sido ejecutadas, mostrando de esta forma en qué errores han incurrido las autoridades de estos países y cómo influyen estos errores en el deterioro de la confianza mutua entre los Estados miembros de la UE.

Las órdenes europeas de detención y entrega emitidas por los tribunales españoles con relación a los implicados en el intento de derogación de la Constitución en Cataluña en el año 2017 han supuesto una prueba para el instrumento. En este trabajo se analizan las razones por las que en los distintos países que han conocido del caso (Bélgica, Alemania, Reino Unido e Italia) no han sido ejecutadas, mostrando de esta forma en qué errores han incurrido las autoridades de estos países y cómo influyen estos errores en el deterioro de la confianza mutua entre los Estados miembros de la UE., The European arrest warrants issued by the Spanish courts in relation to those involved in the attempted repeal of the Constitution in Catalonia in 2017 have been a test for the instrument. This paper analyses the reasons why in the different countries in which there have been decisions about the case (Belgium, Germany, the United Kingdom and Italy) the arrest warrants have not been executed, thus showing what errors the authorities of these countries have made and how these errors influence the deterioration of mutual trust between the EU Member States.

Las órdenes europeas de detención y entrega emitidas por los tribunales españoles con relación a los implicados en el intento de derogación de la Constitución en Cataluña en el año 2017 han supuesto una prueba para el instrumento. En este trabajo se analizan las razones por las que en los distintos países que han conocido del caso (Bélgica, Alemania, Reino Unido e Italia) no han sido ejecutadas, mostrando de esta forma en qué errores han incurrido las autoridades de estos países y cómo influyen estos errores en el deterioro de la confianza mutua entre los Estados miembros de la UE., The European arrest warrants issued by the Spanish courts in relation to those involved in the attempted repeal of the Constitution in Catalonia in 2017 have been a test for the instrument. This paper analyses the reasons why in the different countries in which there have been decisions about the case (Belgium, Germany, the United Kingdom and Italy) the arrest warrants have not been executed, thus showing what errors the authorities of these countries have made and how these errors influence the deterioration of mutual trust between the EU Member States.

El estudio acerca del impacto de los sistemas de inteligencia artificial en el ámbito de la Administración de Justicia no es, en absoluto, una cuestión novedosa. Como tampoco lo es hablar hoy en día de la digitalización de la cooperación judicial penal internacional. Es por ello por lo que, partiendo de la consolidación del uso de las nuevas tecnologías para el intercambio de información entre las autoridades judiciales y policiales en relación con in-vestigaciones penales transfronterizas, nos adentramos en la incidencia de las nuevas soluciones de inteligencia artificial en este ámbito de la cooper-ación entre Estados., The study of the impact of artificial intelligence systems in the field of the administration of justice is by no means a new issue. Nor is talking about the digitisation of international judicial cooperation in criminal matters. This is why, based on the consolidation of the use of new technologies for the exchange of information between judicial and police authorities in relation to cross-border criminal investigations, we will examine the impact of new artificial intelligence solutions in this area of cooperation between States.

The European arrest warrants issued by the Spanish courts in relation to those involved in the attempted repeal of the Constitution in Catalonia in 2017 have been a test for the instrument.This paper analyses the reasons why in the different countries in which there have been decisions about the case (Belgium, Germany, the United Kingdom and Italy) the arrest warrants have not been executed, thus showing what errors the authorities of these countries have made and how these errors influence the deterioration of mutual trust between the EU Member States., Las órdenes europeas de detención y entrega emitidas por los tribunales españoles con relación a los implicados en el intento de derogación de la Constitución en Cataluña en el año 2017 han supuesto una prueba para el instrumento.En este trabajo se analizan las razones por las que en los distintos países que han conocido del caso (Bélgica, Alemania, Reino Unido e Italia) no han sido ejecutadas, mostrando de esta forma en qué errores han incurrido las autoridades de estos países y cómo influyen estos errores en el deterioro de la confianza mutua entre los Estados miembros de la UE.

This article sets out some challenges of international cooperation in criminal matters from a perspective of the gathering and use and assessment of evidence. Challenges arising from the actions of new institutional actors, in particular the European Public Prosecutor' s Office and the Court of Justice of the European Union, as well as the intervention of private actors are identified. Challenges in the use and assessment of cross-border evidence are also addressed. The article draws attention to the need for legislative intervention, particularly within Portugal, in the context of the articulation of the new instruments of European Union law with national law, and ends by referring to possible future paradigms in obtaining cross-border evidence, calling upon intervention in this area to be carefully considered and to address the shortcomings present both from the point of view of the defense and of the effectiveness of cross-border investigations., Este artigo enuncia alguns desafios da cooperação internacional em matéria penal de uma perspectiva de obtenção e valoração da prova. São identificados desafios decorrentes da actuação de novos actores institucionais, em particular a Procuradoria Europeia e o Tribunal de Justiça da União Europeia, bem como ao nível da intervenção de actores privados. São ainda tratados desafios em matéria de valoração da prova transfronteiriça. O artigo chama a atenção para a necessidade de intervenção legislativa, sobretudo a nível interno em Portugal, no âmbito da articulação dos novos instrumentos do direito da União Europeia com o direito interno, e termina deixando referidos possíveis futuros paradigmas na obtenção de prova transfronteiriça, lançando o repto para que a intervenção nesta matéria seja ponderada cautelosamente e procure fazer face às insuficiências presentes, quer da perspectiva da defesa, quer da efectividade das investigações transfronteiriças.

This editorial provides a bird’s eye view of the current relevance of international judicial cooperation in criminal matters, namely in what concerns the issues raised by the growing protection of individual rights, as well as its reconfiguration in politically integrated areas, with a particular emphasis on the European Union. It then proceeds with a short presentation of the articles contained in this volume., Este editorial descreve, a traços largos, a relevância actual da cooperação judiciária em matéria penal, nomeadamente no que diz respeito à sua relação com o incremento da protecção dos direitos e garantias individuais e à sua reconfiguração em espaços politicamente integrados, com particular ênfase na União Europeia. Seguidamente, procede-se a uma apresentação sumária dos artigos contidos neste volume.