8 results on '"Bismilla, Zia"'
Search Results
2. Simulation Fellowship Programs: An International Survey of Program Directors
- Author
-
Natal, Brenda, Szyld, Demian, Pasichow, Scott, Bismilla, Zia, Pirie, Jonathan, and Cheng, Adam
- Abstract
Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
3. Integrating Research, Quality Improvement, and Medical Education for Better Handoffs and Safer Care: Disseminating, Adapting, and Implementing the I-PASS Program
- Author
-
Starmer, Amy J., Spector, Nancy D., West, Daniel C., Srivastava, Rajendu, Sectish, Theodore C., Landrigan, Christopher P., Landrigan, Christopher P., Spector, Nancy D., Starmer, Amy J., Sectish, Theodore C., Srivastava, Rajendu, West, Daniel C., Menon, Aravind Ajakumar, Ali, Arshia, Allair, Brenda K., Allen, April D., Almaddah, Nureddin, Alminde, Claire, Alvarado-Little, Wilma, Anson, Elizabeth, Ashland, Michele, Atsatt, Marisa, Aylor, Megan, Baird, Jennifer D., Bale, James F., Balmer, Dorene, Barber, Aisha, Barton, Kevin, Bates, Kimberly, Beck, Carolyn, Berchelmann, Kathleen, Bhan, Renuka, Bismilla, Zia, Blankenburg, Rebecca L., Boa-Hocbo, Aileen, Bordin-Wosk, Talya, Brooks, Michelle, Calaman, Sharon, Campe, Julie, Campos, Maria Lucia, Chandler, Debra, Cheung, Yvonne, Choudhary, Amanda, Christensen, Eileen, Clark, Katherine, Coffey, Maitreya, Coghlan-McDonald, Sally, Cohen, Ellen, Cole, F. Sessions, Corless, Elizabeth, Cray, Sharon, Da Silva, Roxi, Dahale, Devesh, Dalal, Anuj K., Destino, Lauren A., Doroshow, Jonathan, Dreyer, Benard, duPont, Katharine, Eagle, Steven, Edgar-Zarate, Courtney, Etzenhouser, Angie, Everhart, Jennifer L., Feraco, Angela M., Ferrer, Alexandra, Galardy, Paul, Garcia, Briana M., Gaspar-Oishi, Maria, Goldstein, Jenna, Good, Brian P., Graham, Dionne A, Growdon, Amanda S., Gubler, LeAnn, Guiot, Amy, Hanlon, Charin, Hanna-Attisha, Mona, Harris, Roben, Haskell, Helen, Hecht, Melvyn, Hehn, Rebecca S, Held, Justin, Hepps, Jennifer H., Hillier, Debra, Hiraoka, Mark, Howell, Eric, Hrach, Christine, Hughes, Helen, Huskins, Charles, Kaatz, Scott, Kanala, Vishnu, Kantrowitz, Michael, Kaplan, Peter, Kashiwagi, Deanne, Kaul, Rajat, Keohane, Carol A., Kern, Jeremy, Khan, Alisa, Khan, Nazia Naz S., Kitch, Barry, Kocolas, Irene, Kothari, Lara, Kruvand, Elizabeth, Kuzma, Nicholas, Lacy, Mary, Lane, Michele, Langrish, Kate, Ledford, Christy J.W., LeRoux, Laura, Lewis, Kheyandra, Lipsitz, Stuart, Litterer, Katherine P., Lopreiato, Joseph O., Lyons, Aimee, Mack, Avram, Mallouk, Meghan, Maloney, Christopher G., Mangan, Amanda, Mann, Keith, Markle, Peggy, Marrese, Christine, Marseille, David, Maynard, Greg, Mehta, Bijal, Mendoza, Fernando, Mercer, Alexandra N., Micalizzi, Dale, Mims, Lisa, Mittal, Vineeta, Mueller, Stephanie, Ngo, Thuy L., Nolan, Ann, Nyenpan, Christopher, Obermeyer, Maria, O'Donnell, Katherine, O'Toole, Jennifer K., Ottolini, Mary, Owolabi, Mobola, Patel, Aarti, Patel, Rajesh, Patel, Shilpa J., Perron, Catherine, Pickler, Rita, Popa, Alina, Reppert, Patrick, Riss, Robert, Roesch, Justin, Rogers, Jayne E., Rosenbluth, Glenn, Rothschild, Jeffrey M., Sanders, Lee, Sauder, Kimberly, Schnipper, Jeff, Schnock, Kumiko O, Scholtz, Amy, Seltz, Barry, Serra, Theresa, Serwint, Janet, Shah, Samir, Sharma, Meesha, Sheppard, Kathleen, Simpkin, Arabella, Sloan, Karin A, Solan, Lauren G., Southgate, Michael W, Spackman, Jaime Blank, Stevens, Scott M., Stevenson, Adam, Stevenson, Windy, Subramony, Anupama, Surkis, William, Thangarasu, Sudhagar, Thompson, E. Douglas, Toole, Cheryl, Trueman, Laura, Trujillo, Tanner, Tse, Lisa, Turmelle, Michael P., Vaniawala, Vishwas, Wagner, Tamara, Warnick, Cindy, Webster, John, Webster, Mary, Weinerman, Adina, Welch, Chelsea, White, Andrew J., Wien, Matthew F., Winn, Ariel S., Wintch, Stephanie, Yin, H. Shonna, Yoon, Catherine S., Yu, Clifton E., Zampino, Dominick, and Zigmont, Katherine R.
- Abstract
In 2009 the I-PASS Study Group was formed by patient safety, medical education, health services research, and clinical experts from multiple institutions in the United States and Canada. When the I-PASS Handoff Program, which was developed by the I-PASS Study Group, was implemented in nine hospitals, it was associated with a 30% reduction in injuries due to medical errors and significant improvements in handoff processes, without any adverse effects on provider work flow.
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
4. Resident Experiences With Implementation of the I-PASS Handoff Bundle
- Author
-
Coffey, Maitreya, Thomson, Kelly, Li, Shelly-Anne, Bismilla, Zia, Starmer, Amy J., O'Toole, Jennifer K., Blankenburg, Rebecca L., Rosenbluth, Glenn, Cole, F. Sessions, Yu, Clifton E., Hepps, Jennifer H., Sectish, Theodore C., Spector, Nancy D., Srivastava, Rajendu, Allen, April D., Mahant, Sanjay, and Landrigan, Christopher P.
- Abstract
ABSTRACTBackgroundThe I-PASS Handoff Study found that introduction of a handoff bundle (handoff and teamwork training for residents, a mnemonic, a handoff tool, a faculty development program, and a sustainability campaign) at 9 pediatrics residency programs was associated with improved communication and patient safety.ObjectiveThis parallel qualitative study aimed to understand resident experiences with I-PASS and to inform future implementation and sustainability strategies.MethodsResident experiences with I-PASS were explored in focus groups (N 50 residents) at 8 hospitals throughout 2012–2013. A content analysis of transcripts was conducted following the principles of grounded theory.ResultsResidents generally accepted I-PASS as an ideal format for handoffs, and valued learning a structured approach. Across all sites, residents reported full adherence to I-PASS when observed, but selective adherence in usual practice. Residents adhered more closely when patients were complex, teams were unfamiliar, and during evening handoff. Residents reported using elements of the I-PASS mnemonic variably, with Illness Severityand Action Itemsmost consistently used, but Synthesis by Receiverleast used, except when observed. Most residents were receptive to the electronic handoff tool, but perceptions about usability varied across sites. Experiences with observation and feedback were mixed. Concern about efficiency commonly influenced attitudes about I-PASS.ConclusionsResidents generally supported I-PASS implementation, but adherence was influenced by patient type, context, and individual and team factors. Our findings could inform future implementation, particularly around the areas of resident engagement in change, sensitivity to resident level, perceived efficiency, and faculty observation.
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
5. Families as Partners in Hospital Error and Adverse Event Surveillance
- Author
-
Khan, Alisa, Coffey, Maitreya, Litterer, Katherine P., Baird, Jennifer D., Furtak, Stephannie L., Garcia, Briana M., Ashland, Michele A., Calaman, Sharon, Kuzma, Nicholas C., O’Toole, Jennifer K., Patel, Aarti, Rosenbluth, Glenn, Destino, Lauren A., Everhart, Jennifer L., Good, Brian P., Hepps, Jennifer H., Dalal, Anuj K., Lipsitz, Stuart R., Yoon, Catherine S., Zigmont, Katherine R., Srivastava, Rajendu, Starmer, Amy J., Sectish, Theodore C., Spector, Nancy D., West, Daniel C., Landrigan, Christopher P., Allair, Brenda K., Alminde, Claire, Alvarado-Little, Wilma, Atsatt, Marisa, Aylor, Megan E., Bale, James F., Balmer, Dorene, Barton, Kevin T., Beck, Carolyn, Bismilla, Zia, Blankenburg, Rebecca L., Chandler, Debra, Choudhary, Amanda, Christensen, Eileen, Coghlan-McDonald, Sally, Cole, F. Sessions, Corless, Elizabeth, Cray, Sharon, Da Silva, Roxi, Dahale, Devesh, Dreyer, Benard, Growdon, Amanda S., Gubler, LeAnn, Guiot, Amy, Harris, Roben, Haskell, Helen, Kocolas, Irene, Kruvand, Elizabeth, Lane, Michele Marie, Langrish, Kathleen, Ledford, Christy J. W., Lewis, Kheyandra, Lopreiato, Joseph O., Maloney, Christopher G., Mangan, Amanda, Markle, Peggy, Mendoza, Fernando, Micalizzi, Dale Ann, Mittal, Vineeta, Obermeyer, Maria, O’Donnell, Katherine A., Ottolini, Mary, Patel, Shilpa J., Pickler, Rita, Rogers, Jayne Elizabeth, Sanders, Lee M., Sauder, Kimberly, Shah, Samir S., Sharma, Meesha, Simpkin, Arabella, Subramony, Anupama, Thompson, E. Douglas, Trueman, Laura, Trujillo, Tanner, Turmelle, Michael P., Warnick, Cindy, Welch, Chelsea, White, Andrew J., Wien, Matthew F., Winn, Ariel S., Wintch, Stephanie, Wolf, Michael, Yin, H. Shonna, and Yu, Clifton E.
- Abstract
IMPORTANCE: Medical errors and adverse events (AEs) are common among hospitalized children. While clinician reports are the foundation of operational hospital safety surveillance and a key component of multifaceted research surveillance, patient and family reports are not routinely gathered. We hypothesized that a novel family-reporting mechanism would improve incident detection. OBJECTIVE: To compare error and AE rates (1) gathered systematically with vs without family reporting, (2) reported by families vs clinicians, and (3) reported by families vs hospital incident reports. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: We conducted a prospective cohort study including the parents/caregivers of 989 hospitalized patients 17 years and younger (total 3902 patient-days) and their clinicians from December 2014 to July 2015 in 4 US pediatric centers. Clinician abstractors identified potential errors and AEs by reviewing medical records, hospital incident reports, and clinician reports as well as weekly and discharge Family Safety Interviews (FSIs). Two physicians reviewed and independently categorized all incidents, rating severity and preventability (agreement, 68%-90%; κ, 0.50-0.68). Discordant categorizations were reconciled. Rates were generated using Poisson regression estimated via generalized estimating equations to account for repeated measures on the same patient. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Error and AE rates. RESULTS: Overall, 746 parents/caregivers consented for the study. Of these, 717 completed FSIs. Their median (interquartile range) age was 32.5 (26-40) years; 380 (53.0%) were nonwhite, 566 (78.9%) were female, 603 (84.1%) were English speaking, and 380 (53.0%) had attended college. Of 717 parents/caregivers completing FSIs, 185 (25.8%) reported a total of 255 incidents, which were classified as 132 safety concerns (51.8%), 102 nonsafety-related quality concerns (40.0%), and 21 other concerns (8.2%). These included 22 preventable AEs (8.6%), 17 nonharmful medical errors (6.7%), and 11 nonpreventable AEs (4.3%) on the study unit. In total, 179 errors and 113 AEs were identified from all sources. Family reports included 8 otherwise unidentified AEs, including 7 preventable AEs. Error rates with family reporting (45.9 per 1000 patient-days) were 1.2-fold (95% CI, 1.1-1.2) higher than rates without family reporting (39.7 per 1000 patient-days). Adverse event rates with family reporting (28.7 per 1000 patient-days) were 1.1-fold (95% CI, 1.0-1.2; P = .006) higher than rates without (26.1 per 1000 patient-days). Families and clinicians reported similar rates of errors (10.0 vs 12.8 per 1000 patient-days; relative rate, 0.8; 95% CI, .5-1.2) and AEs (8.5 vs 6.2 per 1000 patient-days; relative rate, 1.4; 95% CI, 0.8-2.2). Family-reported error rates were 5.0-fold (95% CI, 1.9-13.0) higher and AE rates 2.9-fold (95% CI, 1.2-6.7) higher than hospital incident report rates. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Families provide unique information about hospital safety and should be included in hospital safety surveillance in order to facilitate better design and assessment of interventions to improve safety.
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
6. The Creation of Standard-Setting Videos to Support Faculty Observations of Learner Performance and Entrustment Decisions
- Author
-
Calaman, Sharon, Hepps, Jennifer H., Bismilla, Zia, Carraccio, Carol, Englander, Robert, Feraco, Angela, Landrigan, Christopher P., Lopreiato, Joseph O., Sectish, Theodore C., Starmer, Amy J., Yu, Clifton E., Spector, Nancy D., and West, Daniel C.
- Abstract
Entrustable professional activities (EPAs) provide a framework to standardize medical education outcomes and advance competency-based assessment. Direct observation of performance plays a central role in entrustment decisions; however, data obtained from these observations are often insufficient to draw valid high-stakes conclusions. One approach to enhancing the reliability and validity of these assessments is to create videos that establish performance standards to train faculty observers. Little is known about how to create videos that can serve as standards for assessment of EPAs.The authors report their experience developing videos that represent five levels of performance for an EPA for patient handoffs. The authors describe a process that begins with mapping the EPA to the critical competencies needed to make an entrustment decision. Each competency is then defined by five milestones (behavioral descriptors of performance at five advancing levels). Integration of the milestones at each level across competencies enabled the creation of clinical vignettes that were converted into video scripts and ultimately videos. Each video represented a performance standard from novice to expert. The process included multiple assessments by experts to guide iterative improvements, provide evidence of content validity, and ensure that the authors successfully translated behavioral descriptions and vignettes into videos that represented the intended performance level for a learner. The steps outlined are generalizable to other EPAs, serving as a guide for others to develop videos to train faculty. This process provides the level of content validity evidence necessary to support using videos as standards for high-stakes entrustment decisions.
- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
7. Procedural skills in paediatric residency: Re-evaluating the competencies.
- Author
-
Levy, Rebecca, Dubrowski, Adam, Amin, Harish, and Bismilla, Zia
- Abstract
The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada (RCPSC) sets objectives for residency training, including many skills that may not be commonly performed in practice.
- Published
- 2014
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
8. Patient safety after implementation of a coproduced family centered communication programme: multicenter before and after intervention study
- Author
-
Khan, Alisa, Spector, Nancy D, Baird, Jennifer D, Ashland, Michele, Starmer, Amy J, Rosenbluth, Glenn, Garcia, Briana M, Litterer, Katherine P, Rogers, Jayne E, Dalal, Anuj K, Lipsitz, Stuart, Yoon, Catherine S, Zigmont, Katherine R, Guiot, Amy, O’Toole, Jennifer K, Patel, Aarti, Bismilla, Zia, Coffey, Maitreya, Langrish, Kate, Blankenburg, Rebecca L, Destino, Lauren A, Everhart, Jennifer L, Good, Brian P, Kocolas, Irene, Srivastava, Rajendu, Calaman, Sharon, Cray, Sharon, Kuzma, Nicholas, Lewis, Kheyandra, Thompson, E Douglas, Hepps, Jennifer H, Lopreiato, Joseph O, Yu, Clifton E, Haskell, Helen, Kruvand, Elizabeth, Micalizzi, Dale A, Alvarado-Little, Wilma, Dreyer, Benard P, Yin, H Shonna, Subramony, Anupama, Patel, Shilpa J, Sectish, Theodore C, West, Daniel C, and Landrigan, Christopher P
- Abstract
ObjectiveTo determine whether medical errors, family experience, and communication processes improved after implementation of an intervention to standardize the structure of healthcare provider-family communication on family centered rounds.DesignProspective, multicenter before and after intervention study.SettingPediatric inpatient units in seven North American hospitals, 17 December 2014 to 3 January 2017.ParticipantsAll patients admitted to study units (3106 admissions, 13171 patient days); 2148 parents or caregivers, 435 nurses, 203 medical students, and 586 residents.InterventionFamilies, nurses, and physicians coproduced an intervention to standardize healthcare provider-family communication on ward rounds (“family centered rounds”), which included structured, high reliability communication on bedside rounds emphasizing health literacy, family engagement, and bidirectional communication; structured, written real-time summaries of rounds; a formal training programme for healthcare providers; and strategies to support teamwork, implementation, and process improvement.Main outcome measuresMedical errors (primary outcome), including harmful errors (preventable adverse events) and non-harmful errors, modeled using Poisson regression and generalized estimating equations clustered by site; family experience; and communication processes (eg, family engagement on rounds). Errors were measured via an established systematic surveillance methodology including family safety reporting.ResultsThe overall rate of medical errors (per 1000 patient days) was unchanged (41.2 (95% confidence interval 31.2 to 54.5) pre-intervention v35.8 (26.9 to 47.7) post-intervention, P=0.21), but harmful errors (preventable adverse events) decreased by 37.9% (20.7 (15.3 to 28.1) v12.9 (8.9 to 18.6), P=0.01) post-intervention. Non-preventable adverse events also decreased (12.6 (8.9 to 17.9) v5.2 (3.1 to 8.8), P=0.003). Top box (eg, “excellent”) ratings for six of 25 components of family reported experience improved; none worsened. Family centered rounds occurred more frequently (72.2% (53.5% to 85.4%) v82.8% (64.9% to 92.6%), P=0.02). Family engagement 55.6% (32.9% to 76.2%) v66.7% (43.0% to 84.1%), P=0.04) and nurse engagement (20.4% (7.0% to 46.6%) v35.5% (17.0% to 59.6%), P=0.03) on rounds improved. Families expressing concerns at the start of rounds (18.2% (5.6% to 45.3%) v37.7% (17.6% to 63.3%), P=0.03) and reading back plans (4.7% (0.7% to 25.2%) v26.5% (12.7% to 7.3%), P=0.02) increased. Trainee teaching and the duration of rounds did not change significantly.ConclusionsAlthough overall errors were unchanged, harmful medical errors decreased and family experience and communication processes improved after implementation of a structured communication intervention for family centered rounds coproduced by families, nurses, and physicians. Family centered care processes may improve safety and quality of care without negatively impacting teaching or duration of rounds.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT02320175.
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.