Search

Peripherally administered or released substances that modulate memory storage, but do not freely enter the brain, may produce their effects on memory by activating peripheral receptors that send messages centrally through the vagus nerve. Indeed, vagus nerve stimulation enhances memory performance, although it is unclear whether this effect is due to the activation of vagal afferents or efferents. To eliminate the possible influence of descending fibers on memory storage processes, rats were implanted with cuff electrode/catheter systems along the left cervical vagus. Forty-eight hours following surgery, each animal received a 3.0-μl infusion (1.0 μl/min) of either lidocaine hydrochloride (75.0 mM) or isotonic saline below the point of stimulation. Animals were then trained 10 min later on an inhibitory-avoidance task with a 0.75-mA, 1.0-s foot shock. Sham stimulation or vagus nerve stimulation (0.5-ms biphasic pulses; 20.0 Hz; 30 s; 0.2, 0.4, or 0.8 mA) was administered immediately after training. Memory, tested 24 h later, was enhanced by stimulation whether descending vagus nerve fibers were inactivated or not. Both lidocaine- and saline-infused groups showed an intensity-dependent, inverted-U-shaped pattern of retention performance, with the greatest effect observed for 0.4 mA (U= 9,p< .05, andU= 7,p< .01, respectively). Additionally, animals that received lidocaine infusions, but no vagus nerve stimulation, showed impaired memory compared to the performance of saline-infused control animals (U= 11,p< .05). Together, these findings suggest that vagal afferents carry messages about peripheral states that lead to the modulation of memory storage and that the memory-enhancing effect produced by vagus nerve stimulation is not mediated via the activation of vagal efferents.

Many peripherally administered substances which modulate memory do not freely enter the brain. Such compounds may act through peripheral receptors that send messages centrally through vagal afferents. To explore this hypothesis, rats were chronically implanted with cuff electrodes on the left cervical vagus nerve. Each animal was trained 48 h after surgery on a one-trial inhibitory-avoidance task with a 0.75-mA, 1.0-s footshock. Immediately following training, each animal received either no stimulation or vagal stimulation (0.5-ms biphasic pulses; 20 Hz, 30 s) at one of three intensities (0.2, 0.4, 0.8 mA; eight animals per group). Retention was tested 24 h later. Neither the 0.2-in or 0.8-mA groups (22.1-s; 53.7-s median latency) showed altered retention performances, whereas the 0.4-mA group showed significantly improved retention (881.0 s) compared to unstimulated controls (21.1 s; U= 6, p< .01). This inverted-U shaped function indicates that vagal activation during memory consolidation modulates retention for memory tasks.