Search

The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate the immediate effects of calibration on inter‐rater agreement to a gold standard (GS) and to determine whether the effects can be sustained over a ten‐week period. Valid criteria for a Class II amalgam preparation, a three‐point rating scale, and a grade form were developed. Three tests were administered: prior to calibration training, immediately following training, and ten weeks later. Each test consisted of faculty independently evaluating ten prepared teeth. Agreement with GS scores for most of the grading criteria improved as a result of training and did not deteriorate over time. The overall percent agreement was 54.5, 66.9, and 64.6 percent across test periods. The most impressive gains in agreement occurred when the criteria evaluated had a GS score of either “standard not met” or “ideal.” There was very little gain when the gold standard score was “acceptable.” It is concluded that, with training, inter‐rater agreement with a gold standard can improve and such improvement is reasonably resistant to deterioration after ten weeks. Nevertheless, future training ought to consider the use of a mastery approach in calibration training to ensure that a satisfactory degree of agreement with the GS is obtained.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether the home care of noncompliant adolescent orthodontic patients with “poor” oral hygiene could be improved through the use of a deception strategy designed to intentionally induce the Hawthorne effect. This effect is often cited as being responsible for oral health improvements of control groups that receive placebo treatments. It is thought that participating in and fulfilling the requirements of a study alters subjects' behavior, thereby contributing to the improvement. Forty patients with histories of poor oral hygiene were assigned, in a quasi‐random fashion, to two groups. Experimental subjects (n = 20) were presented with a situation that simulated participation in an experiment. These included the use of a consent form; distribution of tubes of toothpaste labeled “experimental”; instructions to brush twice a day for two minutes using a timer; and a request to return unused toothpaste. Control subjects (n = 20) had no knowledge of study participation. Tooth surface area covered with plaque was used as a proxy measure of home care behavior. It was measured at baseline, three months, and six months. Mean percentages of tooth surface covered with plaque for the experimental and control groups were 71 (11.52) and 74 (11.46) at baseline; 54 (13.79) and 78 (12.18) at three months; and 52 (13.04) and 79 (10.76) at six months. No statistically significant difference (p > .05) was obtained between groups at baseline. Statistically significant differences (p < .05) were found between groups at three and six months. Significant differences (p < .05) were also found only for the experimental subjects between baseline and each of the two subsequent observation periods. The efficiency and potential effectiveness of this strategy suggest that additional research be conducted to assess oral health improvements and possible applications to the private practice setting.

In 1995, a survey requesting information about the utilization of certain prosthodontic techniques was mailed to 3,544 graduates of a midwestern dental school. Responses were received from 1,455 alumni, representing a 41 percent return rate. In general, the results are consistent with international and national trends and show significant disparity in the utilization rates of certain procedures between general dentists and prosthodontists, as well as a disconnect between what is taught in the undergraduate dental educational program and what is applied in practice. For example, while prosthodontists typically apply what was taught in their educational program, utilization rates of general dentists for the facebow was 29.64 percent; the custom tray 68.48 percent; border molding 58.67 percent; altered casts 24.10 percent; custom posts 49.29 percent; prefabricated posts 67.54 percent; and semi‐adjustable articulators 50.64 percent. While no solutions to this disconnect are offered, the authors do pose important questions that must be addressed by the dental educational community.