Search

Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) has emerged as one of the most important angiogenic growth factors from experimental in vitro and in vivo studies. In the present study, we investigated the relationship between VEGF expression and microvessel density (MVD) and defined their prognostic relevance on a series of 242 patients with node-negative breast cancer, using immunohistochemical methods. In parallel, estrogen and progesterone receptors were quantitatively assessed using the dextran-charcoal technique and cell proliferation was evaluated as S-phase cell fraction according to ³H-thymidine-labeling index (TLI). The percentage of VEGF-expressing cells varied from 0–95% in the different tumors and was unrelated to menopausal status, tumor size or steroid receptor status. Conversely, a significant inverse relation was observed with patient age or tumor cell proliferation, albeit with very poor correlation coefficients. A significant relation was observed between VEGF expression and MVD (rs = 0.55, p < 0.001). Clinical outcome analyzed as a function of high and low VEGF expression showed slight differences in terms of both disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) that never reached statistical significance. Moreover, the trend was paradoxically in favor of patients with highly VEGF-expressing tumors. Finally, DFS and OS curves, when analyzed as a function of VEGF expression or MVD, were superimposable. In conclusion, our study did not highlight a prognostic relevance of VEGF expression in patients with node-negative breast cancer, as already observed for MVD. © 2001 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Introduction: The aim of the present study was to analyze the relationship between the expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) in breast cancer cells and the corresponding serum levels in individual patients. The study also evaluated the potential of serum levels of the two growth factors as diagnostic markers in a case–control study. Methods: VEGF expression and bFGF expression were determined in 62 and 63 tumor samples, respectively. Serum VEGF and bFGF levels were determined in 54 and 65 healthy women and in 69 and 73 breast cancer patients, respectively, using a quantitative sandwich enzyme immunoassay technique. Results: A direct correlation was observed between VEGF expression and bFGF expression in individual tumors (P= 0.001) and between serum levels (P= 0.038) in individual patients, but not between tumor cell expression and the corresponding serum level for either growth factor. Median values of serum levels in healthy women and breast cancer patients were not different for VEGF (P= 0.055), but were significantly different for bFGF (P< 0.001). The receiver operating characteristic curve identified a serum bFGF concentration of 1.0 pg/ml, with 84.9% sensitivity and 63.1% specificity, as the best cut-off value to discriminate between healthy women and breast cancer patients. An age-based subgroup analysis showed that serum values of patients older than 70 years of age mainly contributed to the high accuracy. Conclusions: Our data repropose bFGF as a noninvasive diagnostic tool for breast cancer.