Search

Microvascular decompression is considered to be the most effective and only etiological surgical treatment for classical trigeminal neuralgia, relieving the neurovascular compression found in up to 95% of cases. This study aims to report the long-term outcomes and to identify prognostic factors in a series of patients with trigeminal neuralgia treated by microvascular decompression.

La safinamida es un nuevo fármaco para el tratamiento de pacientes con enfermedad de Parkinson (EP) con fluctuaciones como tratamiento complementario a levodopa. Dado que por el momento aún no existen estudios de fase IV postautorización debido a la reciente incorporación de la safinamida a la práctica clínica habitual, el interés de este proyecto radica en el desarrollo de una guía de manejo clínico de la safinamida basada en las opiniones de expertos de trastornos del movimiento. Este proyecto se desarrolló en 2fases: una primera fase que constó de 16 reuniones locales y una segunda fase que consistió en una reunión nacional. Dichas reuniones siguieron un guion de trabajo preestablecido. Tras la reunión nacional se recopilaron las principales conclusiones de los expertos, que han supuesto la base para redactar la presente guía clínica. Se concluyó que la safinamida es eficaz en la reducción de las fluctuaciones motoras y no motoras. Los pacientes con EP con fluctuaciones leves-moderadas son los que más se benefician del tratamiento, si bien el fármaco puede contribuir a mejorar diversos problemas clínicos en pacientes con EP avanzada. Se ha destacado la posibilidad de reducir la dosis de otros fármacos dopaminérgicos tras la introducción de la safinamida, lo cual contribuiría a reducir efectos adversos como el trastorno de control de impulsos. Se hipotetizó sobre el posible efecto de la safinamida sobre la mejoría de las discinesias a dosis más altas de las habitualmente utilizadas. Se ha consensuado que la safinamida es bien tolerada y presenta un perfil de efectos adversos favorable frente a placebo.

Comparar las características de los pacientes con enfermedad de Parkinson avanzada en tratamiento con infusión intestinal continua de levodopa-carbidopa (IICLC) y los datos de efectividad y seguridad de IICLC entre diferentes comunidades autónomas (CC. AA.).

Copyright of Neurologia (Grupo ARS XXI de Comunicacion, S.A.) is the property of Grupo ARS XXI de Comunicacion, S.A. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

To identify putative risk factors for levodopa-induced dyskinesias we studied the effect of several clinical variables on the occurrence of dyskinesias in a series of 168 consecutive patients with Parkinson’s disease treated for at least 6 months with levodopa. Of these, 108 (64%) developed dyskinesias after a mean duration of levodopa treatment of 51.4 ± 43.3 months. Patients tended to suffer dyskinesias on the side of the body first affected by Parkinson’s disease. The overall probability of developing dyskinesias increased with levodopa treatment duration, about 10% per year during the first 7 years. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis identified the age at onset of Parkinson’s disease (OR 0.923; 95% CI 0.883–0.964) and the initial levodopa dose (mean dose of the first 6 months of treatment; OR 1.004; 95% CI 1.002–1.006) as the main independent predictors. Survival curves showed that onset of Parkinson’s disease at age 50 years or before (logrank, P< 0.05) and initial levodopa treatment with more than 600 mg/day (logrank, P< 0.05) were associated with a higher risk for the appearance of dyskinesias.

Behavioral hyposensitivity to repeated apomorphine administration occurs in fluctuating parkinsonian patients. To determine to what extent the interval between doses influences the response, we administered equal paired apomorphine injections to 10 fluctuating parkinsonian patients. Subjects received two apomorphine injections at 2-hour and at 4-hour intervals on different days after a 10- to 12-hour overnight period without levodopa. Following apomorphine doses at 2-hour intervals, the duration of response was reduced by 40 (61 versus 42 minutes, p< 0.001) but was of equal duration when the doses were given at 4-hour intervals. These findings indicate that the interval between doses is a critical determinant of motor response. We postulate a time-dependent period of partial hyposensitivity to pulsatile DA stimulation.

Abstract: Conversion from standard levodopa to Sinemet CR was performed in a series of 450 patients with Parkinson’s disease. Of these, 299 experienced motor complications (group A) and 151 showed stable motor response (group B). There was significant improvement in various parameters of efficacy (Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale, Hoehn-Yahr staging, Schwab-England scale) particularly in those related to functional aspects such as activities of daily living of the Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale, sleep questionnaires and the Nottingham Health Profile. Adverse effects were usually mild or moderate, and only 10% of patients discontinued Sinemet CR due to side effects. Sinemet CR treatment was preferred by 81% of patients in group A and by 73.8% of patients in group B.