Search

Surface melting occurs during summer on the Antarctic and Greenland ice sheets, but the volume of stored surface meltwater has been difficult to quantify due to a lack of accurate depth estimates. NASA's ICESat‐2 laser altimeter brings a new capability: photons penetrate water and are reflected from both the water and the underlying ice; the difference provides a depth estimate. ICESat‐2 sampled Amery Ice Shelf on January 2, 2019 and showed double returns from surface depressions, indicating meltwater. For four melt features, we compared depth estimates from eight algorithms: six based on ICESat‐2 and two from coincident Landsat‐8 and Sentinel‐2 imagery. All algorithms successfully identified surface water at the same locations. Algorithms based on ICESat‐2 produced the most accurate depths; the image‐based algorithms underestimated depths (by 30%–70%). This implies that ICESat‐2 depths can be used to tune image‐based algorithms, moving us closer to quantifying stored meltwater volumes across Antarctica and Greenland. Summer surface melting on Antarctica's ice shelves is a small component of overall ice sheet mass loss but can be important for individual ice shelves and may increase as the climate warms. However, the volume of meltwater has been difficult to monitor because depth estimates are challenging. NASA's ICESat‐2 laser altimetry mission brings a new capability to this problem. ICESat‐2 532 nm photons (green light) are able to pass through water and reflect from both the water surface and the underlying ice surface; the difference in elevation provides meltwater depth estimates. In this pilot study, we compared depths from eight algorithms (six ICESat‐2 and two image based) over four Amery Ice Shelf meltwater lakes for an ICESat‐2 pass in early January 2019. The ICESat‐2 algorithms all produced more reliable depth estimates, and the image‐based algorithms underestimated the depths. This implies that ICESat‐2 water depths can be used to tune image‐based depth retrieval algorithms, enabling improved performance and allowing us to estimate more accurately how much surface melt is stored in melt ponds on the ice sheets each summer. ICESat‐2 photons penetrate surface melt lakes and reflect from both the water surface and the underlying ice, providing depth estimatesWe compared depths from eight algorithms (six ICESat‐2 and two image‐based) for four lakes present on Amery Ice Shelf in January 2019Depths from ICESat‐2 were more accurate than from imagery (30%–70% too low); merging these data will improve estimates ice‐sheet wide ICESat‐2 photons penetrate surface melt lakes and reflect from both the water surface and the underlying ice, providing depth estimates We compared depths from eight algorithms (six ICESat‐2 and two image‐based) for four lakes present on Amery Ice Shelf in January 2019 Depths from ICESat‐2 were more accurate than from imagery (30%–70% too low); merging these data will improve estimates ice‐sheet wide