Search

IMPORTANCE: Data describing the early additional protection afforded by the recently recommended BNT162b2 XBB vaccine (Pfizer-BioNTech; 2023-2024 formulation) are limited. OBJECTIVE: To estimate the association between receipt of the BNT162b2 XBB vaccine and medically attended COVID-19 outcomes among US adults 18 years and older. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This test-negative case-control study was performed to estimate the effectiveness of the BNT162b2 XBB vaccine against COVID-19–associated hospitalization and emergency department (ED) or urgent care (UC) encounters among adults in the Kaiser Permanente Southern California health system between October 10, 2023, and December 10, 2023. Cases were those presenting with an acute respiratory illness and who had a positive SARS-CoV-2 polymerase chain reaction test; controls had an acute respiratory illness but tested negative for SARS-CoV-2. EXPOSURE: The primary exposure was receipt of the BNT162b2 XBB vaccine compared with not receiving an XBB vaccine of any kind, regardless of prior COVID-19 vaccination or SARS-CoV-2 infection history. Receipt of prior (non-XBB) versions of COVID-19 vaccines was also compared with being unvaccinated to estimate remaining protection from older vaccines. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Analyses for cases and controls were conducted separately for COVID-19 hospital admissions and ED/UC encounters. Adjusted odds ratios and 95% CIs were estimated from multivariable logistic regression models that were adjusted for patient demographic and clinical characteristics. Estimation of vaccine effectiveness was calculated as 1 − odds ratio × 100%. RESULTS: Among 2854 cases and 15 345 controls (median [IQR] age, 56 [37-72] years; 10 658 [58.6%] female), adjusted estimation of effectiveness of the BNT162b2 XBB vaccine received a median of 34 days prior vs not having received an XBB vaccine of any kind was 62% (95% CI, 32%-79%) against COVID-19 hospitalization and 58% (95% CI, 48%-67%) for ED/UC visits. Compared with being unvaccinated, those who had received only older versions of COVID-19 vaccines did not show statistically significant reduced risk of COVID-19 outcomes, including hospital admission. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Findings of this case-control study reaffirm current recommendations for broad age-based use of annually updated COVID-19 vaccines given that (1) the BNT162b2 XBB vaccine provided statistically significant additional protection against a range of COVID-19 outcomes and (2) older versions of COVID-19 vaccines offered little, if any, long-term protection, including against hospital admission, regardless of the number or type of prior doses received.

XBB-related omicron sublineages have recently replaced BA.4/5 as the predominant omicron sublineages in the USA and other regions globally. Despite preliminary signs of immune evasion of XBB sublineages, few data exist describing the real-world effectiveness of bivalent COVID-19 vaccines, especially against XBB-related illness. We aimed to investigate the effectiveness of the Pfizer-–BioNTech BNT162b2 BA.4/5 bivalent vaccine against both BA.4/5-related and XBB-related disease in adults aged 18 years or older.

Introduction: Nearly all existing respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) incidence estimates are based on real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT–PCR) testing of nasal or nasopharyngeal (NP) swabs. Adding testing of additional specimen types to NP swab RT–PCR increases RSV detection. However, prior studies only made pairwise comparisons and the synergistic effect of adding multiple specimen types has not been quantified. We compared RSV diagnosis by NP swab RT–PCR alone versus NP swab plus saliva, sputum, and serology. Methods: This was a prospective cohort study over two study periods (27 December 2021 to 1 April 2022 and 22 August 2022 to 11 November 2022) of patients aged ≥ 40 years hospitalized for acute respiratory illness (ARI) in Louisville, KY. NP swab, saliva, and sputum specimens were collected at enrollment and PCR tested (Luminex ARIES platform). Serology specimens were obtained at acute and convalescent timepoints (enrollment and 30–60-day visit). RSV detection rate was calculated for NP swab alone and for NP swab plus all other specimen type/test. Results: Among 1766 patients enrolled, 100% had NP swab, 99% saliva, 34% sputum, and 21% paired serology specimens. RSV was diagnosed in 56 (3.2%) patients by NP swab alone, and in 109 (6.2%) patients by NP swab plus additional specimens, corresponding to a 1.95 times higher rate [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.62, 2.34]. Limiting the comparison to the 150 subjects with all four specimen types available (i.e., NP swab, saliva, sputum, and serology), there was a 2.60-fold increase (95% CI 1.31, 5.17) compared to NP swab alone (3.3% versus 8.7%). Sensitivities by specimen type were: NP swab 51%, saliva 70%, sputum 72%, and serology 79%. Conclusions: Diagnosis of RSV in adults was several-fold greater when additional specimen types were added to NP swab, even with a relatively low percentage of subjects with sputum and serology results available. Hospitalized RSV ARI burden estimates in adults based solely on NP swab RT–PCR should be adjusted for underestimation.

The SARS-CoV-2 omicron (B.1.1.529 BA.1) lineage was first detected in November, 2021, and is associated with reduced vaccine effectiveness. By March, 2022, BA.1 had been replaced by sub-lineage BA.2 in the USA. As new variants evolve, vaccine performance must be continually assessed. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and durability of BNT162b2 (Pfizer–BioNTech) against hospital and emergency department admissions for BA.1 and BA.2.

The duration of protection against the omicron (B.1.1.529) variant for current COVID-19 vaccines is not well characterised. Vaccine-specific estimates are especially needed. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and durability of two and three doses of the BNT162b2 (Pfizer–BioNTech) mRNA vaccine against hospital and emergency department admissions due to the delta (B.1.617.2) and omicron variants.

Following the emergency use authorisation of the Pfizer–BioNTech mRNA COVID-19 vaccine BNT162b2 (international non-proprietary name tozinameran) in Israel, the Ministry of Health (MoH) launched a campaign to immunise the 6·5 million residents of Israel aged 16 years and older. We estimated the real-world effectiveness of two doses of BNT162b2 against a range of SARS-CoV-2 outcomes and to evaluate the nationwide public-health impact following the widespread introduction of the vaccine.

Introduction: Limited changes in serotype 3 invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD) incidence rates after a decade of 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV13) introduction into several national immunization programs (NIP) have raised questions about PCV13's effectiveness against this serotype. Methods: We analyzed the impact of pediatric PCV programs on serotype 3 IPD with two approaches. First, we reviewed the publicly available surveillance data from countries identified in two recently published reviews to describe the population impact of pediatric PCV13 or PCV10 vaccination programs on serotype 3 IPD. We then compared the observed trends in PCV10 and PCV13 countries to a previously described dynamic transmission model that simulates the spread of pneumococcal carriage and development of IPD in a population over time. Results: When serotype 3 disease rates are compared from countries that have introduced either a 10-valent (PCV10) vaccine that does not contain serotype 3 in its formulation or PCV13 in their pediatric NIP, over time, serotype 3 incidence rate trends are markedly different. Countries with a PCV10 NIP showed a substantial linear increase in serotype 3 pneumococcal disease among all age groups since the time of PCV10 introduction, whereas countries with a PCV13 NIP experienced a modest decline during the 3–4 years after vaccine introduction followed by an inflection upward in subsequent years. Conclusion: These data suggest that PCV13 provides a certain degree of direct and indirect protection against serotype 3 at the population level and direct adult vaccination with a serotype 3-containing vaccine is likely to provide substantial benefit in the context of a pediatric PCV NIP. Further research around serotype 3 transmission patterns and epidemiology is nonetheless warranted.

ABSTRACTBackground: In September 2014, 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV13) was universally recommended for all US adults aged ≥65 years. Adult PCV13 coverage, including whether disparities in uptake exist, however, is not well-described.Methods: We used a monthly series of cross-sectional analyses of administrative medical and prescription claims data collected by IQVIA and linked to sociodemographic data collected by Experian to estimate overall and subpopulation-level uptake of PCV13 among US adults aged ≥65 years.Results: Among adults aged ≥65 years, 43.3% received PCV13 by the end of November 2017. Race/ethnicity, annual household income, education status, and neighborhood urbanicity were strongly related to PCV13 uptake among adults aged ≥65 years. Lower uptake of PCV13 was observed for non-Hispanic black (36.3%) and Hispanic (30.0%) adults (vs45.6% for non-Hispanic whites, P< .01), the poor (30.7% vs54.2% among lowest vshighest income deciles, P< .01), adults with low educational status (33.0% vs49.0% among those without high school education vscollege educated, P< .01), and those living in rural communities (22.9%) or urban/inner-city (33.8%) areas (vs45.8% in suburban areas, P< .01).Conclusions: PCV13 uptake among adults aged ≥65 occurred rapidly in the three years after universal recommendation in September 2014. Yet, poor and minority communities, rural and urban/inner-city areas, and communities with low educational attainment had substantially lower PCV13 coverage. These same populations are at increased risk of pneumococcal disease. In order to maximize the benefits of pneumococcal vaccination, further targeted and tailored interventions to increase PCV13 uptake in these underserved populations are still necessary.

ABSTRACTThirteen-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV13) was licensed in adults to address the unmet medical need of vaccine-type community acquired pneumonia (CAP) and the limitations of previous plain-polysaccharide vaccines. Since then, some have questioned the utility of adult PCV13 use, arguing that: i) high PCV13 uptake in young children would provide indirect effects that, by themselves, would sufficiently protect unvaccinated adults and ii) no data describing the real-world effectiveness of PCV13 use in adults, especially with immunocompromising conditions, exist. Even in countries like the United States where PCV13 has been routinely recommended for all adults aged ≥ 65 years, the recommendation is contingent on a re-evaluation to determine if continued use is needed in the context of a mature PCV13 pediatric immunization program. Emerging evidence, however, suggests that i) a meaningful burden of PCV13-type pneumococcal pneumonia still persists in adults at increased risk for pneumococcal disease, despite indirect effects from long-standing pediatric PCV13 use, ii) adult PCV13 use is effective and has reduced pneumococcal CAP, even in the elderly and those with chronic medical or immunocompromising conditions – and disease could come back if PCV13 were removed, and iii) ethical and pragmatic vaccine policy considerations support continued adult PCV13 use in countries that have already introduced the vaccine (eg, disparities in adult PCV13 uptake, confusion stemming from removing a previously-recommended vaccine for a non-safety-related concern, and the reality that next-generation PCVs are only a few years away). Together, these findings suggest that continued PCV13 vaccination in adults is needed to control vaccine-type CAP.

ABSTRACTIn response to escalating cases of serogroup W (MenW) invasive meningococcal disease (IMD), multiple countries introduced quadrivalent conjugate MenACWY vaccines into their national immunization programs (NIPs). Here, we summarize the real-world impact and vaccine effectiveness (VE) data of MenACWY-TT from Chile, England, the Netherlands, and Australia. Incidence rate reductions (IRRs) and VE from baseline to post-NIP period were extracted from publications or calculated. After the administration of a single dose of MenACWY-TT, substantial IRRs of MenCWY were observed across the countries in vaccine-eligible age groups (83%-85%) and via indirect protection in non-vaccine-eligible age groups (45%-53%). The impact of MenACWY-TT was primarily driven by MenW IRRs, as seen in vaccine-eligible age groups (65%-92%) and non-vaccine-eligible age groups (41%-57%). VE against MenW was reported in vaccine-eligible toddlers (92%) in the Netherlands and in vaccine-eligible adolescents/young adults (94%) in England. These real-world data support the implementation and continued use of MenACWY-TT in NIPs.

ABSTRACTUse of pneumococcal conjugate vaccines (PCVs) has led to substantial reductions in the global burden of pediatric pneumococcal disease. Expansion of serotype coverage has been achieved by increasing PCV valency, but this may carry the potential risk of antibody interference. A complementary 7-valent PCV (cPCV7) including polysaccharide conjugates from 7 non–13-valent (PCV13) serotypes was developed to potentially complement PCV13-mediated protection and expand serotype coverage. This study evaluated cPCV7 and PCV13 coadministered in separate limbs or separated in time in infants. This phase 2, multicenter, open-label study included 512 infants randomized 1:1:1 to receive cPCV7 coadministered with PCV13 at ages 2, 4, 6, and 12 months (cPCV7 Coadministered); cPCV7 given at ages 3, 5, 7, and 13 months, 3‒5 weeks after PCV13 (cPCV7 Separated); or PCV13 at ages 2, 4, 6, and 12 months followed by a single supplemental dose of cPCV7 at 13 months (PCV13 Control). Safety evaluations included local reactions, systemic events, and adverse events. Serotype-specific immunoglobulin G concentrations and opsonophagocytic activity titers were assessed. The safety profile of cPCV7 was similar to that of PCV13. cPCV7 was well-tolerated in infants when coadministered with or given separately from PCV13. Robust and functional immune responses for all cPCV7 serotypes were observed in both cPCV7 groups. No immunologic interference was observed for either the cPCV7 or PCV13 serotypes with coadministration. A single cPCV7 dose induced immune responses in toddlers. These findings support potential coadministration of a complementary PCV to supplement protection provided by existing PCVs.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03550313.

ABSTRACTThe aim of this post hoc analysis was to describe the immunogenicity of the 20-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV20) in adults with chronic medical conditions or smoking that place them at increased risk of developing pneumococcal disease. Data from 2 phase 3, randomized, active-controlled, double-blind studies in pneumococcal vaccine-naive adults were analyzed. Study 1: adults ≥18 years were enrolled in 1 of 3 age-based cohorts (18‒49, 50‒59, and ≥60 years) and randomized (1:1, adults ≥60 years; 3:1, younger cohorts) to receive 1 dose of PCV20 or 13-valent PCV (PCV13). Participants ≥60 years who received PCV13 were administered 23-valent polysaccharide vaccine 1 month later. Study 2: adults 18‒49 years were randomized (2:2:2:1) to receive 1 dose of PCV20 from 1 of 3 lots or PCV13. Opsonophagocytic activity (OPA) titers were measured in sera collected before and 1 month after vaccination. We investigated immune responses of PCV20 among participants 18‒64 and 18‒49 years of age with ≥1 medical condition or other factor (smoking) that increases the risk of serious pneumococcal disease. Of 4369 participants overall (PCV20, n = 2975; PCV13, n = 1394), 1329 participants (30%) had ≥1 risk factor; most commonly smoking, diabetes, and chronic pulmonary disease. Among participants with risk factors, substantial increases in OPA geometric mean titers were observed across the 20 vaccine serotypes from before vaccination to 1 month after PCV20. Robust immune responses to all 20 vaccine serotypes 1 month after PCV20 were observed in adults with increased risk of serious pneumococcal disease.Clinical trial registrationNCT03760146, NCT03828617.

Streptococcus pneumoniaeis a major cause of community-acquired pneumonia, bacteremia, and meningitis in older adults worldwide. Two pneumococcal vaccines containing S. pneumoniaecapsular polysaccharides are in current use: the polysaccharide vaccine PPSV23 and the glycoconjugate vaccine PCV13. In clinical trials, both vaccines elicit similar opsonophagocytic killing activity. In contrast to polysaccharide vaccines, conjugate vaccines have shown consistent efficacy against nasopharyngeal carriage and noninvasive pneumonia overall and for some prevalent individual serotypes. Given these different clinical profiles, it is crucial to understand the differential immunological responses induced by these two vaccines. Here, we used a high-throughput systems serology approach to profile the biophysical and functional features of serum antibodies induced by PCV13 and PPSV23 at 1 month and 1 year. In comparison with PPSV23, PCV13 induced higher titers across antibody isotypes; more durable antibody responses across immunoglobulin G (IgG), IgA, and IgM isotypes; and increased antigenic breadth. Although titers measured in opsonophagocytic activity (OPA) assays were similar between the two groups, confirming what was observed in clinical studies, serum samples from PCV13 vaccinees could induce additional non-OPA antibody-dependent functions, including monocyte phagocytosis and natural killer cell activation. In a multivariate modeling approach, distinct humoral profiles were demonstrated in each arm. Together, these results demonstrate that the glycoconjugate PCV13 vaccine induces an antigenically broader, more durable, polyfunctional antibody response. These findings may help explain the increased protection against S. pneumoniaecolonization and noninvasive pneumonia and the longer duration of protection against invasive pneumococcal disease, mediated by PCV13.

Globally, recommendations are expanding for third (booster) doses of BNT162b2 (Pfizer–BioNTech). In the United States, as of November 19, 2021, boosters were recommended for all adults aged 18 years and older. We evaluated the effectiveness of a third dose of BNT162b2 among adults in a large US integrated health system.

On Dec 14, 2020, the United States initiated a nationwide COVID-19 vaccination campaign. Demonstrating clear population-level impact following vaccine introduction helps to further elucidate and quantify the public-health benefits of vaccination.

Cholera remains as a global public health threat affecting most of the developing world. In endemic areas, young children are most affected. Outbreaks are reported increasingly from more countries. Improvements in water and sanitation may be the mainstays of cholera prevention but in the short term, vaccines provide an alternative in cholera control. Since 1999, the World Health Organization has advocated the use of oral cholera vaccines as an adjunct in the control of cholera. Although internationally available, oral cholera vaccines are not extensively used in public health settings in developing countries where they are most needed. We review oral cholera vaccines that are currently available and in the pipeline including the need for policies that will ensure more extensive usage of these vaccines.

Vaccine effectiveness studies have not differentiated the effect of the delta (B.1.617.2) variant and potential waning immunity in observed reductions in effectiveness against SARS-CoV-2 infections. We aimed to evaluate overall and variant-specific effectiveness of BNT162b2 (tozinameran, Pfizer–BioNTech) against SARS-CoV-2 infections and COVID-19-related hospital admissions by time since vaccination among members of a large US health-care system.