Search

The Surpass Evolve flow diverter is a novel 64-wire braided intravascular stent approved to treat unruptured large or giant saccular wide-neck or fusiform intracranial aneurysms of the intracranial internal carotid artery.1-3Flow diverting stents have been used for the treatment of previously stented aneurysms, including residual aneurysms following prior flow diversion.5-8This patient initially presented with a large symptomatic matricidal cavernous ICA aneurysm4that was treated with stand-alone Neuroform Atlas stenting at an outside hospital. Here we present a video demonstrating the placement of sequential Surpass Evolve flow diverter stents within a Neuroform Atlas nitinol stent.

Recently, an interesting study regarding “Dural sinus septum: an underlying cause of cerebral venous sinus stenting failure and complications.” was published, to our knowledge, being the launching point of the clinical/interventional applications of this intraluminal variation. Herein, we wish to highlight paramount anatomical, clinical, and stent placement considerations related to DSS located in the dural venous sinus at the posterior cranial fossa and the interventional complications caused by the presence of this variation during stenting procedures.

The Woven EndoBridge (WEB) device (MicroVention, Aliso Viejo, California) is an intrasaccular flow disruptor used for the treatment of both unruptured and ruptured intracranial aneurysms. WEB has been shown to have 54% complete and 85% adequate aneurysm occlusion rates at 1-yr follow-up.1 Residual and recurrent ruptured aneurysms have been shown to have a higher risk of re-rupture than completely occluded aneurysms.2 With increased utilization of WEB in the United States, optimizing treatment strategies of residual aneurysms previously treated with the WEB device is essential, including surgical clipping.3,4 Here, we present an operative video demonstrating the surgical clip occlusion of previously ruptured middle cerebral artery and anterior communicating artery aneurysms that had been treated with the WEB device and had sizable recurrence on follow-up angiography. Informed consent was obtained from both patients. Lessons learned include the following: (1) the WEB device is highly compressible, unlike coils; (2) proximal WEB marker may interfere with clip closure; (3) no evidence of WEB extrusion into the subarachnoid space; (4) no more scarring than expected in ruptured cases; and (5) clipping is a feasible option for treating WEB recurrent or residual aneurysms.