Search

BACKGROUND/AIM: In childhood an appropriate response to GH treatment is achieved by titration of growth response against dose administered, with careful observation for side-effects. In order to evaluate the potential use of IGF monitoring in children treated with GH, a cross-sectional study has been carried in 215 children and adolescents (134 with GH deficiency (GHD), 54 with Turner syndrome (TS) and 27 with non-GHD growth disorders) treated with GH for 0.2-13.7 years. METHODS: IGF-I and IGF-binding protein-3 (IGFBP-3) were measured in ELISAs, using dried capillary blood collected onto filter papers. Results were expressed as the mean S.D. range (SDS). Values of either analyte < -2 or > +2 SDS were considered abnormal. RESULTS: IGF-I and IGFBP-3 SDS were higher in the TS and non-GHD groups (mean +0.01 and +0.1 respectively) than in those with GHD (mean value -0.6). Nineteen per cent of the IGF-I values (13% low, 6% high) and 12% of IGFBP-3 values were abnormal (10% low, 2% high). Abnormalities, either low or high, were most common in the GHD group. There was a weak but significant relationship between change in height SDS over the Year up to the time of sampling in the whole group and IGF-I SDS. Satisfactory growth performance (+0.5>change in height SDS> -0.5) was found in those with high (7.2%), normal (60%) and low (9.3%) IGF-I levels. Overall, it was estimated that 26% of the tests would indicate that an adjustment to GH dose (up in 18% and down in 8%) could be considered. CONCLUSIONS: From this cross-sectional study of IGF monitoring across a broad range of diagnoses and ages, it can be concluded that the majority of children on GH have normal levels of IGF-I and IGFBP-3, but 26% of tests could suggest that a change of GH dose should be considered. Regular monitoring of IGF-I and IGFBP-3 should be considered in any child on GH treatment.

BACKGROUND/AIM: In childhood an appropriate response to GH treatment is achieved by titration of growth response against dose administered, with careful observation for side-effects. In order to evaluate the potential use of IGF monitoring in children treated with GH, a cross-sectional study has been carried in 215 children and adolescents (134 with GH deficiency (GHD), 54 with Turner syndrome (TS) and 27 with non-GHD growth disorders) treated with GH for 0.2-13.7 years. METHODS: IGF-I and IGF-binding protein-3 (IGFBP-3) were measured in ELISAs, using dried capillary blood collected onto filter papers. Results were expressed as the mean S.D. range (SDS). Values of either analyte < -2 or > +2 SDS were considered abnormal. RESULTS: IGF-I and IGFBP-3 SDS were higher in the TS and non-GHD groups (mean +0.01 and +0.1 respectively) than in those with GHD (mean value -0.6). Nineteen per cent of the IGF-I values (13% low, 6% high) and 12% of IGFBP-3 values were abnormal (10% low, 2% high). Abnormalities, either low or high, were most common in the GHD group. There was a weak but significant relationship between change in height SDS over the Year up to the time of sampling in the whole group and IGF-I SDS. Satisfactory growth performance (+0.5>change in height SDS> -0.5) was found in those with high (7.2%), normal (60%) and low (9.3%) IGF-I levels. Overall, it was estimated that 26% of the tests would indicate that an adjustment to GH dose (up in 18% and down in 8%) could be considered. CONCLUSIONS: From this cross-sectional study of IGF monitoring across a broad range of diagnoses and ages, it can be concluded that the majority of children on GH have normal levels of IGF-I and IGFBP-3, but 26% of tests could suggest that a change of GH dose should be considered. Regular monitoring of IGF-I and IGFBP-3 should be considered in any child on GH treatment.