Park, Silvia, Bang, Su-Yeon, Kwag, Daehun, Lee, Jong Hyuk, Kim, Tong Yoon, Lee, Joonyeop, Min, Gi June, Park, Sung Soo, Yahng, Seung-Ah, Jeon, Young-Woo, Shin, Seung-Hwan, Yoon, Jae-Ho, Lee, Sung-Eun, Cho, Byung Sik, Eom, Ki-Seong, Kim, Yoo-Jin, Lee, Seok, Min, Chang-Ki, Cho, Seok-Goo, Lee, Jong Wook, and Kim, Hee-Je
In the present study, reduced toxicity (FluBu3) and myeloablative (BuCy) conditioning were compared in patients with AML who received first allogeneic HSCT in MRD-negative CR1. The study included 124 adult patients who underwent HSCT from an HLA-matched (8/8) sibling, unrelated, or 1-locus mismatched (7/8) unrelated donor (MMUD). The median age was 45 years and intermediate cytogenetics comprised majority (71.8%). The 2-year OS, RFS, CIR and NRM for BuCy (n= 78, 62.9%) and FluBu3 (n= 46, 37.1%) groups were 78.3% and 84.5% (p= 0.358), 78.0% and 76.3% (p= 0.806), 7.7% and 21.5% (p= 0.074) and 14.3% and 2.2% (p= 0.032), respectively. At the time of data cut-off, relapse and NRM were the main causes of HSCT failure in each of the FluBu3 and BuCy arms. Among patients, 75% of relapsed FluBu3 patients had high-risk features of either poor cytogenetics or FLT3-ITD mutation compared with 16.7% of BuCy patients. The majority of NRM in the BuCy group was due to GVHD (73%), half of whom received MMUD transplantation. To conclude, the FluBu3 reduced toxicity conditioning showed comparable post-transplant OS and RFS to BuCy and was associated with significantly reduced NRM that was offset by a trend towards higher risk of relapse even in MRD-negative CR1 population.