Search

The present study evaluates the effects of an artificial freshwater discharge (Canal Andreoni) on the ecology of the ovoviviparous isopod Excirolana armata. Bimonthly, 17 environmental variables plus isopod abundance, biomass, fecundity, growth and mortality were compared between three sites: ?Barra del Chuy' (undisturbed), at 13 km from the canal, ?Coronilla' (moderately disturbed), at 1 km, and ?Andreoni' (grossly disturbed), at the canal mouth. Environmental (salinity, slope, beach width, and swash width) and some biological (isopod abundance, biomass and growth rates) variables significantly decreased towards Canal Andreoni. Salinity was the most important explanatory variable of spatial trends in isopod biomass. However, the reproductive output, fecundity, survival and individual weight were not affected, suggesting that E. armata is regulated by density-dependent and abiotic factors operating together: the former were more intense on undisturbed conditions, whereas the latter prevailed in impacted ones. Internal brooding counteracts the effect of fresh water, which explains the lack of effect of environmental harshness on reproductive traits.

Maintaining and restoring freshwater ecosystem services in the face of local and global change requires adaptive research that effectively engages stakeholders. However, there is a lack of understanding and consensus in the research community regarding where, when, and which stakeholders should be engaged and what kind of researcher should do the engaging (e.g., physical, ecological, or social scientists). This paper explores stakeholder engagement across a developing network of aquatic research sites in North and South America with wide ranging cultural norms, social values, resource management paradigms, and eco-physical conditions. With seven sites in six countries, we found different degrees of engagement were explained by differences in the interests of the stakeholders given the history and perceived urgency of water resource problems as well as differences in the capacities of the site teams to effectively engage given their expertise and resources. We categorized engagement activities and applied Hurlbert and Gupta's split ladder of participation to better understand site differences and distill lessons learned for planning comparative socio-hydrological research and systematic evaluations of the effectiveness of stakeholder engagement approaches. We recommend research networks practice deliberate engagement of stakeholders that adaptively accounts for variations and changes in local socio-hydrologic conditions. This, in turn, requires further efforts to foster the development of well-integrated research teams that attract and retain researchers from multiple social science disciplines and enable training on effective engagement strategies for diverse conditions.