Search

•Zanubrutinib sustained PFS benefit over ibrutinib; sensitivity analyses suggest this was driven by both antileukemic effect and tolerability.•Zanubrutinib maintained a favorable safety/tolerability profile with prevalence of most adverse events remaining stable or decreasing year-over-year.

ABSTRACTIntroductionAcute myeloid leukemia (AML) is typically characterized by a poor prognosis, mainly due to the median age at diagnosis. Until recently, treatment options were limited to intensive chemotherapy (IC) for young patients or hypomethylating agents for those ineligible for IC. Since 2017, nine molecules were registered for newly-diagnosed AML: midostaurin, gilteritinib, quizartinib, enasidenib, ivosidenib, gemtuzumab ozogamicin, CPX-351, glasdegib, and venetoclax.Areas coveredThe review examines the safety profile of these drugs and their interactions with other agents used in supportive care. The PubMed and Google Scholar databases were searched for articles in English concerning new agents in AML from 2017 until 2023. Further relevant publications were obtained by reviewing the prescribing information and Food and Drug Administration (FDA) data.Expert opinionThe therapeutic spectrum in AML has broadened over several years and can also improve outcomes in older patients. However, in addition to their well-known cytotoxic activity, new molecules cause several unique, off-target toxicities. Also, potential drug-drug interactions (DDI) should be taken into consideration when choosing optimal first-line therapy; this remains a challenge in clinical practice.

•Acalabrutinib plus venetoclax and rituximab resulted in high clinical and molecular response rates in patients with TN MCL.•This chemotherapy-free, targeted triple combination was well tolerated, with no unexpected safety concerns reported.

•BTKC481S was most common in both groups; in the acalabrutinib arm, low-VAF T474I (9/47; 8 co-occurring with C481S) but no L528W was seen.•More patients receiving acalabrutinib acquired BTKmutations, though overall, patients with BTKmutation did not fare worse vs those without.

ABSTRACTIntroductionBruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors (BTKi) have been used for the management of human diseases since the approval of the first-in class agent, ibrutinib, by the Food and Drug Administration in 2013 for the treatment of patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). Ibrutinib is a covalent inhibitor along with second-class BTKis: acalabrutinib and zanubrutinib. These well-tolerated agents have transformed the treatment landscape of chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL). A new class of these inhibitors, non-covalent, might become an answer to the emerging resistance by avoiding the sustained contact with the kinase binding domain.Areas coveredThis article examines the chemical composition, mechanism of action, metabolic characteristics, and potential toxicity of inhibitors targeting Bruton tyrosine kinase. A comprehensive search was conducted across English-language articles in PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar.Expert opinionBruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors have greatly enhanced the armamentarium against lymphoid malignancies including CLL/SLL. Their future lies in the choice of appropriate patients who will benefit from the treatment without significant adverse reaction. Combination chemotherapy-free fixed-duration regimens with targeted molecules will allow for MRD-driven approach in patients with CLL/SLL in the near future.

ABSTRACTIntroductionBruton’s tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors have recently been approved for clinical use against several B-cell indolent lymphoid malignancies, both as single agents or in combination. One second-generation BTK inhibitor that is being developed for the treatment of B-cell hematological malignancies, as well as for autoimmune disorders, is orelabrutinib.Areas coveredThis paper reviews recent developments in the use of orelabrutinib against B-cell indolent lymphoid malignancies such as chronic lymphocytic leukemia, mantle cell lymphoma, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, Waldenstrom macroglobulinemia and central nervous system lymphoma. Google Scholar and PubMed were initially searched for articles, and the corpus of articles was broadened by reviewing the references of the identified papers. All were in English. The corpus comprised papers from 2016 to April 2023. In addition, a manual search was performed of conference proceedings from the last five years of The American Society of Hematology, American Society of Clinical Oncology and the European Hematology Association.Expert opinionOrelabrutinib is an active drug in indolent and aggressive B-cell lymphoid malignancies. It demonstrates high selectivity, good efficacy and an excellent safety profile. Nevertheless, further clinical trials are required to optimize its use. In addition, several other highly selective BTK inhibitors are being examined in early-phase studies.

ABSTRACTIntroductionPhosphoinositide 3-kinase delta (PI3Kδ) inhibitors are a class of novel agents that are mainly used to treat B-cell malignancies. They function by inhibiting one or more enzymes which are part of the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway. Idelalisib is a first-in-class PI3Kδ inhibitor effective in patients with B-cell lymphoid malignancies.Areas coveredThis article reviews the chemical structure, mechanism of action, and metabolic and toxicological properties of PI3Kδ inhibitors and discusses their clinical applications in monotherapy and in combination with other agents for the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). A search was conducted of PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar for articles in English.Results/ConclusionPI3Kδ inhibitors hold potential for the treatment of B-cell malignancies, including CLL. However, their use is also associated with severe toxicities, including pneumonia, cytopenias, hepatitis, and rash. Newer drugs are in development to reduce toxicity with novel schedules and/or combinations.Expert opinionThe development of novel PI3Kδ inhibitors might help to reduce toxicity and improve efficacy in patients with CLL and other B-cell lymphoid malignancies.

ABSTRACTIntroductionHairy cell leukemia (HCL) is a rare subtype of indolent lymphoid leukemia originating from a mature B lymphocyte. The standard first-line treatment for classic HCL, and HCL variant (HCLv), consists of purine nucleoside analogs (PNA), with or without rituximab. However, almost half of patients relapse and require subsequent therapy.Areas coveredThis article summarizes recent achievements in the treatment of relapsed and refractory HCL. A literature search was conducted of the PubMed and MEDLINE database for articles in English. Publications from 2010 through January 2023 were scrutinized. The search terms used were hairy cell leukemia in conjunction with BRAF inhibitors, Bruton’s tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors, CD20 monoclonal antibodies, relapsed, refractory and variant.The growing understanding of HCL biology has allowed the design of several new, chemotherapy-free targeted drugs which have demonstrated encouraging efficacy in early clinical trials.Expert opinionNovel drugs will soon be available to assist standard therapy for HCL and HCLv among patients with suboptimal results following PNA treatment. In particular, the BRAF inhibitors vemurafenib and dabrafenib, with or without rituximab, have revolutionized treatment of patients with relapsed or refractory disease

Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors approved for myelofibrosis provide spleen and symptom improvements but do not meaningfully improve anaemia. Momelotinib, a first-in-class inhibitor of activin A receptor type 1 as well as JAK1 and JAK2, has shown symptom, spleen, and anaemia benefits in myelofibrosis. We aimed to confirm the differentiated clinical benefits of momelotinib versus the active comparator danazol in JAK-inhibitor-exposed, symptomatic patients with anaemia and intermediate-risk or high-risk myelofibrosis.

ABSTRACTIntroductionAcute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a heterogeneous disease characterized by many cytogenetic and molecular alterations. Due to better knowledge of the molecular basis of AML, many targeted therapies have been introduced and registered, e.g. FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 inhibitors, isocitrate dehydrogenase 1/2 mutation inhibitors, and Bcl-2 inhibitor. Despite that, the cure for AML remains an unmet clinical need in most patients.Areas coveredThe review aims to present new, not yet registered drugs for AML. We searched the English literature for articles concerning AML, targeted drugs, menin inhibitors, DOT1L, BET, IDH inhibitors, FLT3, hedgehog inhibitors, Polo-like kinase inhibitors, RNA splicing, and immune therapies via PubMed. Publications from January 2000 to August 2022 were scrutinized. Additional relevant publications were obtained by reviewing the references from the chosen articles and Google search. Conference proceedings from the previous 5 years of The American Society of Hematology, the European Hematology Association, and the American Society of Clinical Oncology were searched manually. Additional relevant publications were obtained by reviewing the references.Expert opinionFor several years, the therapeutic approach in AML has become more individualized. Novel groups of drugs give hope for greater curability. High response rates have agents that restore the activity of the p53 protein. In addition, agents that work independently of a particular mutation seem promising for AML without any known mutation.

This is the primary report of the randomized, placebo-controlled phase 3 BRIGHT AML 1019 clinical trial of glasdegib in combination with intensive chemotherapy (cytarabine and daunorubicin) or non-intensive chemotherapy (azacitidine) in patients with untreated acute myeloid leukemia. Overall survival (primary endpoint) was similar between the glasdegib and placebo arms in the intensive (n= 404; hazard ratio [HR] 1.05; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.782–1.408; two-sided p= 0.749) and non-intensive (n= 325; HR 0.99; 95% CI: 0.768–1.289; two-sided p= 0.969) studies. The proportion of patients who experienced treatment-emergent adverse events was similar for glasdegib versus placebo (intensive: 99.0% vs. 98.5%; non-intensive: 99.4% vs. 98.8%). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events were nausea, febrile neutropenia, and anemia in the intensive study and anemia, constipation, and nausea in the non-intensive study. The addition of glasdegib to either cytarabine and daunorubicin or azacitidine did not significantly improve overall survival and the primary efficacy endpoint for the BRIGHT AML 1019 phase 3 trial was not met. Clinical trial registration:ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03416179.

ABSTRACTIn the last few years, BTK inhibitors, PI3K inhibitors, and venetoclax have been approved for clinical use against chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), both as single agents, and in combination. This article summarizes recent achievements in the treatment of patients with CLL, and pays special attention to novel targeted drugs and monoclonal antibodies (Mabs). A literature search was conducted of the PubMed and Google Scholar databases. Rituximab and obinutuzumab have been combined with chemotherapy, and more recently, with BTK inhibitors, PI3K inhibitors, and venetoclax. These agents have demonstrated high activity in treatment naïve (TN) and relapsed or refractory (RR) CLL. Immunochemotherapy regimens are currently considered in TN younger patients with IGHV-mutated disease and should not be given in patients without IGHVmutation. BTK inhibitors are more commonly used as monotherapy in TN and RR patients. PI3K inhibitors can be combined with CD20 Mabs, but their use in CLL is limited due to safety concerns. Venetoclax is typically combined with anti-CD20 Mabs in CLL. Generally, the optimal sequencing of therapies remains to be established, and the selection of upfront therapy needs to be tailored to the individual patient.

The MURANO trial (A Study to Evaluate the Benefit of Venetoclax Plus Rituximab Compared With Bendamustine Plus Rituximab in Participants With Relapsed or Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia [CLL]; ClinicalTrials.gov identifier #NCT02005471) reported superior progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) with venetoclax-rituximab (VenR) vs bendamustine-rituximab (BR) in relapsed/refractory (R/R) CLL. Patients were randomized to 2 years of VenR (n = 194; rituximab for the first 6 months) or 6 months of BR (n = 195). Although undetectable minimal residual disease (uMRD) was achieved more often with VenR, the long-term implications of uMRD with this fixed-duration, chemotherapy-free regimen have not been explored. We report MRD kinetics and updated outcomes with 5 years’ follow-up. Survival benefits with VenR vs BR were sustained (median PFS [95% confidence interval]: 53.6 [48.4, 57.0] vs 17.0 [15.5, 21.7] months, respectively, P < .0001; 5-year OS [95% confidence interval]: 82.1% [76.4, 87.8] vs 62.2% [54.8, 69.6], P < .0001). VenR was superior to BR, regardless of cytogenetic category. VenR-treated patients with uMRD at end of treatment (EOT; n = 83) had superior OS vs those with high-MRD+ (n = 12): 3-year post-EOT survival rates were 95.3% vs 72.9% (P = .039). In those with uMRD at EOT, median time to MRD conversion was 19.4 months. Of 47 patients with documented MRD conversion, 19 developed progressive disease (PD); median time from conversion to PD was 25.2 months. A population-based logistic growth model indicated slower MRD median doubling time post-EOT with VenR (93 days) vs BR (53 days; P = 1.2 × 10−7). No new safety signals were identified. Sustained survival, uMRD benefits, and durable responses support 2-year fixed-duration VenR treatment in R/R CLL.

We report long-term follow-up from the RESONATE-2 phase 3 study of the once-daily Bruton’s tyrosine kinase inhibitor ibrutinib, which is the only targeted therapy with significant progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) benefit in multiple randomized chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) studies. Patients (≥65 years) with previously untreated CLL, without del(17p), were randomly assigned 1:1 to once-daily ibrutinib 420 mg until disease progression/unacceptable toxicity (n = 136) or chlorambucil 0.5-0.8 mg/kg ≤12 cycles (n = 133). With up to 8 years of follow-up (range, 0.1-96.6 months; median, 82.7 months), significant PFS benefit was sustained for ibrutinib vs chlorambucil (hazard ratio [HR], 0.154; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.108-0.220). At 7 years, PFS was 59% for ibrutinib vs 9% for chlorambucil. PFS benefit was also observed for ibrutinib- vs chlorambucil-randomized patients with high-risk genomic features: del(11q) (HR, 0.033; 95% CI, 0.010-0.107) or unmutated immunoglobulin heavy chain variable region (HR, 0.112; 95% CI, 0.065-0.192). OS at 7 years was 78% with ibrutinib. Prevalence of adverse events (AEs) was consistent with previous 5-year follow-up. Ibrutinib dosing was held (≥7 days) for 79 patients and reduced for 31 patients because of AEs; these AEs resolved or improved in 85% (67 of 79) and 90% (28 of 31) of patients, respectively. With up to 8 years of follow-up, 42% of patients remain on ibrutinib. Long-term RESONATE-2 data demonstrate sustained benefit with first-line ibrutinib treatment for CLL, including for patients with high-risk genomic features. These trials were registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01722487 and #NCT01724346.

Elotuzumab plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone has shown improved progression-free and overall survival versus lenalidomide and dexamethasone in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. We aimed to assess these regimens in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma who are ineligible for haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT).

Standard treatment options in classic HCL (cHCL) result in high response rates and near normal life expectancy. However, the disease itself and the recommended standard treatment are associated with profound and prolonged immunosuppression, increasing susceptibility to infections and the risk for a severe course of COVID-19. The Hairy Cell Leukemia Foundation (HCLF) has recently convened experts and discussed different clinical strategies for the management of these patients. The new recommendations adapt the 2017 consensus for the diagnosis and management with cHCL to the current COVID-19 pandemic. They underline the option of active surveillance in patients with low but stable blood counts, consider the use of targeted and non-immunosuppressive agents as first-line treatment for cHCL, and give recommendations on preventive measures against COVID-19.

ABSTRACTIntroductionPeripheral T cell lymphomas (PTCL) are a group of heterogenous hematologic malignancies derived from post-thymic T lymphocytes and mature NK cells. Conventional chemotherapy does not guarantee a good outcome.Areas coveredThe article summarizes recent investigational therapies and their mechanism of action, as well as the pharmacological properties, clinical activity, and toxicity of new agents in the treatment of primary nodal PTCLs. The review scrutinized papers included in the MEDLINE (PubMed) database between 2010 and October 2020. These were supplemented with a manual search of conference proceedings from the previous five years of the American Society of Hematology, European Hematology Association, and American Society of Clinical Oncology. Further relevant publications were obtained by reviewing the references from the chosen articles.Expert opinionPTCLs have proved difficult to treat and investigate because of their rarity. Studies of aggressive lymphoma, including a small proportion of T-cell lymphomas, found that any benefit from intensified traditional chemotherapy in patients with PTCL is accompanied by increased toxicity. However, the management of PTCL is beginning to change dramatically, thanks to the use of more sophisticated agents targeting the mechanisms of disease development.

Der Einsatz neuartiger, zielgerichteter Wirkstoffe ist dabei, die Behandlungsparadigmen der chronischen lymphatischen Leukämie (CLL) von Grund auf zu verändern. Verschiedene Wirkstoffe für das Management der rezidivierenden/refraktären (R/R)-CLL haben große Verbesserungen bei den Überlebensraten der R/R-CLL-Patienten bewirkt, insbesondere Inhibitoren der Bruton-Tyrosinkinase (Ibrutinib und Acalabrutinib), der Phosphatidylinositol-3-Kinase (Idelalisib und Duvelisib) und von B-Zell-Lymphoma-2 (Venetoclax) sowie neuartige monoklonale Antikörper gegen CD20. Patienten mit rezidivierender, aber asymptomatischer CLL bedürfen jedoch keiner sofortigen alternativen Behandlung, sondern sollten bis zu manifesten Anzeichen einer Progression beobachtet werden. Von den bereits zugelassenen Therapien wird Venetoclax plus Rituximab für 24 Monate oder Ibrutinib als Dauertherapie empfohlen. Eine weitere, weniger empfohlene, Option ist Idelalisib in Kombination mit Rituximab. Die Wahl der passenden Behandlungsoption richtet sich danach, welche Therapie vorher angewendet wurde, wie der Patient darauf ansprach und welche Nebenwirkungen aufgetreten sind, welche Komorbiditäten vorliegen und welches Toxizitätsrisiko besteht. Allogene hämatopoetische Stammzelltransplantationen und experimentelle Therapien wie z. B. chimäre Antigenrezeptor-T-Zell-Therapien stellen vielversprechende Optionen für Hochrisikopatienten dar, einschließlich derer mit Krankheitsprogression nach einer oder mehreren zielgerichteten Therapien. In der vorliegenden Übersichtsarbeit werden die aktuellen Behandlungsstrategien für Patienten mit R/R CLL besprochen.

ABSTRACTIntroduction: Patients with hematological malignancies have experienced a more severe clinical course of COVID-19 and higher mortality than those with solid tumors and those without cancer. The ongoing pandemic poses many challenges in assuring the correct and timely diagnosis of hemato-oncology patients as well as the optimal treatment.Areas covered: The present paper reviews current data on the incidence and clinical course of COVID-19 in patients with hematological malignancies. A literature review of the MEDLINE database for articles was conducted via PubMed. Publications from December 2019 through September 2020 were scrutinized. The search terms used were SARS-Cov-2OR COVID-19in conjunction with hematological malignanciesOR leukemiaOR lymphomaOR multiple myelomaOR cancer. Recommendations and expert opinions either published or presented on ASH, ASCO, ESMO, NCCN websites were also reviewed.Expert opinion: The COVID-19 pandemic has brought a pressing need to improve the management of patients with hematological malignancies, including establishing prompt diagnoses and providing effective treatment while also minimalizing the risk of SARS-Cov2 infection. The recommendations developed by many organizations based on expert opinions are helpful in making proper decisions. All cancer patients should be advised to get vaccinated against influenza and pneumococcus.

ABSTRACTIntroductionConventional treatment for mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) patients includes regimens combining rituximab with other cytotoxic drugs, followed or not by consolidation with autologous stem cell transplantation and rituximab maintenance. However, older, unfit, and relapsed/refractory patients are often ineligible for intense treatment. Currently, available new targeted treatment options seem to offer hope in this group of patients.Areas coveredThis article reviews the safety profiles of new therapeutic chemotherapy-free options for MCL patients. Publications in English from 2010 through June 2020 were surveyed on the MEDLINE database for articles. Proceedings of the American Society of Hematology during the last 5 years were also included.Expert opinionMCL is a clinically heterogenous disease predominantly affecting elderly patients. Its variable clinical course requires personalization and individualization of treatment to achieve optimal survival and acceptable safety profiles, especially in poor prognosis patients. Results of clinical trials performed in the past decade indicated that novel drugs used as a single agent or as part of a conventional chemotherapeutic treatment offer promise in minimalizing the relapse rate for MCL and may allow more effective and safer treatment options by reducing the risk of adverse events, especially cytopenias and infections.

Primary immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is a predominantly immunoglobulin G (IgG)-autoantibody-mediated disease characterized by isolated thrombocytopenia. Rozanolixizumab, a subcutaneously infused humanized monoclonal anti-neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn) antibody, reduced serum IgG in healthy volunteers. In this phase 2, multicenter, open-label study, patients with persistent/chronic primary ITP received 1 to 5 once-weekly subcutaneous infusions of rozanolixizumab (cumulative doses, 15-21 mg/kg). Primary objectives were safety and tolerability, and secondary objectives were clinical efficacy (change in platelet count) and pharmacodynamic effect (change in IgG). In all, 51 (77.3%) of 66 patients reported 1 or more adverse events (AEs), all mild-to-moderate, most commonly headaches (26 [39.4%] of 66), of which 15 were treatment related. Four patients had serious AEs, but none were treatment related. No AEs resulted in discontinuation of the study drug. No serious infections occurred. Platelet counts of ≥50 × 109/L were achieved at least once at any time after multiple infusions (5 × 4, 3 × 7, or 2 × 10 mg/kg: 35.7%, 35.7%, and 45.5% of patients, respectively) or single infusions (15 or 20 mg/kg: 66.7% and 54.5% patients, respectively). Minimum mean IgG levels and maximum mean platelet counts both occurred by day 8 in the higher (15 and 20 mg/kg) single-dose cohorts and maximum platelet count occurred by day 11 onward in the multiple-dose cohorts. No clinically meaningful changes occurred in IgA, IgM, IgE, or albumin levels. In patients with persistent/chronic primary ITP, rozanolixizumab demonstrated a favorable safety profile and rapid, substantial platelet increases concordant with substantial IgG reductions, especially with single doses. By day 8, in the 15 and 20 mg/kg single-dose cohorts, >50% patients achieved clinically relevant platelet responses (≥50 × 109/L), coinciding with the lowest mean IgG levels. These data support phase 3 development of rozanolixizumab in persistent/chronic primary ITP. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.govas #NCT02718716.

ABSTRACTIntroduction: During recent years, the introduction of novel drugs, particularly small molecule inhibitors, has led to remarkable progress in both previously untreated and relapsed/refractory (RR) patients in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). However, further research is necessary to find an optimal cure that responds to the individual needs of the patient.Areas covered: This review discusses new agents in phase 1 and 2 clinical trials currently underway in CLL patients. A literature review of the MEDLINE database for articles in English concerning novel drugs, clinical trials, phase 1, phase 2 and CLL was conducted via PubMed. Publications from 2000 through January 2020 were scrutinized. Conference proceedings from the previous five years of the American Society of Hematology, European Hematology Association and American Society of Clinical Oncology were searched manually. Additional relevant publications were obtained by reviewing the references from the chosen articles. The search also included clinical trials registered in clinicaltrials.gov.Expert opinion: The use of BTK and PI3Kδ inhibitors and BCL-2 antagonist have changed the treatment strategy of CLL. Several clinical trials with novel, unapproved agents are currently ongoing. Their findings should define the role of these novel drugs in the treatment of patients with previously untreated and RR CLL.

ABSTRACTIntroductionChronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is a genetically complex disease that affects a heterogeneous patient population. Therapeutic armamentarium of CLL has changed recently following the introduction of novel active agents.Areas coveredThis review presents the current state of knowledge about biologic drugs used in the treatment of patients with CLL. It also discusses the biologics under evaluation in clinical trials and their potential future perspectives. A literature review of the MEDLINE database for articles was conducted via PubMed. Publications from 2000 through October 2019 were scrutinized using the search terms monoclonal antibodies, alloHSCT, vaccinesand CAR-Tin conjunction with CLL. Conference proceedings from the previous five years of the ASH and EHA Annual Scientific Meetings were searched manually. Additional relevant publications were obtained by reviewing the references from the chosen articles.Expert opinionWhen used in combination with chemotherapy and, more recently, with the Bcl-2 inhibitor venetoclax, anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) are among the standard methods used for CLL treatment. Among the new mAbs, anti-ROR1 directed cirmtuzumab seems to have the most promising results. Adoptive immunotherapy with CAR-T is an area of intensive research, giving hope for achieving remission in patients with CLL refractory to all other methods of treatment.

RESONATE-2 is a phase 3 study of first-line ibrutinib versus chlorambucil in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL)/small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL). Patients aged ≥65 years (n= 269) were randomized 1:1 to once-daily ibrutinib 420 mg continuously or chlorambucil 0.5–0.8 mg/kg for ≤12 cycles. With a median (range) follow-up of 60 months (0.1–66), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) benefits for ibrutinib versus chlorambucil were sustained (PFS estimates at 5 years: 70% vs 12%; HR [95% CI]: 0.146 [0.098–0.218]; OS estimates at 5 years: 83% vs 68%; HR [95% CI]: 0.450 [0.266–0.761]). Ibrutinib benefit was also consistent in patients with high prognostic risk (TP53mutation, 11q deletion, and/or unmutated IGHV)(PFS: HR [95% CI]: 0.083 [0.047–0.145]; OS: HR [95% CI]: 0.366 [0.181–0.736]). Investigator-assessed overall response rate was 92% with ibrutinib (complete response, 30%; 11% at primary analysis). Common grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs) included neutropenia (13%), pneumonia (12%), hypertension (8%), anemia (7%), and hyponatremia (6%); occurrence of most events as well as discontinuations due to AEs decreased over time. Fifty-eight percent of patients continue to receive ibrutinib. Single-agent ibrutinib demonstrated sustained PFS and OS benefit versus chlorambucil and increased depth of response over time.

ABSTRACTIntroduction: Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is a disease with an indolent histology, but mostly aggressive clinical course. While treatment can yield more promising results in younger patients, the disease is most diagnosed at a median age of approximately 70 years, and treatment in this group still presents a major challenge for oncohematologists. Unfortunately, due to comorbidities and poorer general status, the implementation of intensive treatment approaches with the cytarabine-based regimens and autologous stem cell transplantation is generally not possible, and the disease remains incurable, especially in elderly patients.Areas covered: In this paper, the authors discuss the therapeutic options available for older patients with MCL in the first line and relapsed/refractory settings, indicating new therapeutic options, which may achieve longer remissions and overall survival.Expert opinion: Although great progress has been made in the treatment of MCL in recent years, there remains a need for new treatment lines which can allow improved patient outcomes. Novel agents targeting altered the signal transduction pathways in MCL cells may offer more promise than traditional chemotherapy or immunochemotherapy and are currently being tested in clinical trials.

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a heterogeneous, highly malignant neoplasm. Apoptosis is a complex process executed by caspases and suppressed by the inhibitor of apoptosis (IAP) family. Neuronal apoptosis inhibitory protein (NAIP), IAP’s member, may play an exceptional role in the mechanisms of tumors’ resistance to chemotherapy. The aims of the study were to assess the expression of NAIP in leukemic blasts of AML patients using flow cytometry and to evaluate its influence on disease outcome. NAIP expression was found in 106 out of 108 patients. A higher complete response rate was associated with a low expression of NAIP, age < 60 yo, and white blood cell count < 20 G/L (p= 0.009, p= 0.033, and p= 0.076, respectively) in univariate analyses and a low NAIP expression and age < 60 yo (p= 0.025 and p= 0.013, respectively) in multivariate analyses. Longer overall survival (OS) in the univariate analysis was influenced by a low NAIP expression, age < 60 yo, and intensive chemotherapy (p= 0.033, p< 0.001, and p< 0.001, respectively). In the intensively treated group, better OS was observed in patients with age < 60 yo, de novoAML, and a low NAIP expression (p= 0.03, p= 0.024, and p= 0.07, respectively). In multivariate analysis, longer OS was associated with age < 60 yo (p= 0.009) and de novoAML (p= 0.007). In conclusion, we suggest that NAIP might play an adverse role in response to chemotherapy.

Leki biopodobne odgrywają coraz większą rolę w terapii wielu chorób wraz z wygaśnięciem ochrony patentowej dla kolejnych leków biologicznych. Celem niniejszego opracowania jest przybliżenie terminologii i zasad wprowadzania na rynek leków biopodobnych, zagadnień dotyczących ich etykietowania, ekstrapolacji, wymienialności i automatycznej substytucji. Opracowanie to przedstawia stanowisko Polskiego Towarzystwa Hematologów i Transfuzjologów dotyczące leków biopodobnych, oparte na wytycznych EMA (European Medicine Agency) i stanowisku ESMO (European Society of Medical Oncology).

Wenetoklaks jest przedstawicielem nowej grupy leków, których mechanizm działania polega na zahamowaniu ekspresji antyapoptotycznych białek rodziny BCL-2. Białka te należą do głównych regulatorów wewnątrzpochodnego szlaku apoptozy i odgrywają kluczową rolę w patogenezie wielu chorób nowotworowych, w tym także nowotworów układu krwiotwórczego. Wyniki badań przedklinicznych i klinicznych wykazały, że wenetoklaks jest lekiem o wysokiej selektywności i akceptowalnym profilu bezpieczeństwa w przewlekłej białaczce limfocytowej (PBL). Jego duża skuteczność w eradykacji minimalnej choroby resztkowej wpływa na znaczne wydłużenie czasu przeżycia chorych. Lek w monoterapii jest przeznaczony do leczenia chorych z grupy wysokiego ryzyka z obecnością delecji 17p/ mutacji TP53z oporną na leczenie i nawrotową PBL po wcześniejszym niepowodzeniu terapii inhibitorami szlaku sygnałowego BCR. Może być również stosowany u chorych bez del17p/ mutacji TP53, u których zarówno immunochemioterapia, jak i leczenie inhibitorem szlaku BCR okazało się nieskuteczne. Ponadto, wenetoklaks w skojarzeniu z rytuksymabem jest wskazany jako leczenie drugiej linii u chorych na PBL. Badania ostatnich lat wskazują, że wenetoklaks jest także skuteczny w leczeniu innych chorób hematologicznych, takich jak ostra białaczka szpikowa, szpiczak plazmocytowy, niektóre chłoniaki nie-Hodgkina oraz w terapii guzów litych.

Ibrutinib, a first-in-class once-daily oral Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor indicated for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), is continued until progressive disease or unacceptable toxicity. We conducted an integrated safety analysis of single-agent ibrutinib from randomized phase 3 studies PCYC-1112 (RESONATE, n = 195) and PCYC-1115/1116 (RESONATE-2, n = 135), and examined longer-term safety separately in the phase 1b/2 PCYC-1102/1103 study (n = 94, 420 mg/d). In the integrated analysis (ibrutinib treatment up to 43 months), the most common adverse events (AEs) were primarily grade 1/2; diarrhea (n = 173, 52% any-grade; n = 15, 5% grade 3) and fatigue (n = 119, 36% any-grade; n = 10, 3% grade 3). The most common grade 3/4 AEs were neutropenia (n = 60, 18%) and pneumonia (n = 38, 12%). Over time, prevalence of AEs of interest (diarrhea, fatigue, grade ≥3 infection, bleeding, and neutropenia) trended down; prevalence of hypertension increased, but incidence decreased after year 1. AEs led to dose reductions in 42 (13%) patients and permanent discontinuations in 37 (11%); dose modifications due to AEs were most common during year 1 and decreased in frequency thereafter. The most common AEs (preferred term) contributing to discontinuation included pneumonia (n = 4), anemia (n = 3), and atrial fibrillation (n = 3). With long-term follow-up on PCYC-1102/1103 (ibrutinib treatment up to 67 months), grade 3/4 AEs were generally similar to those in the integrated analysis. Overall, AEs were primarily grade 1/2 and manageable during prolonged ibrutinib treatment in patients with CLL. These trials were registered at www.clinicaltrials.govas #NCT01578707, #NCT01722487, #NCT01724346, #NCT01105247, and #NCT01109069.

ABSTRACTIntroduction: Cladribine and pentostatin are the drugs of choice in the treatment of hairy cell leukemia (HCL). Recently, immunotoxin moxetumomab pasudotox has been introduced to improve the prognosis in relapsed and refractory HCL.Areas covered: This review discusses the mechanism of action, safety, and efficacy of moxetumomab pasudotox in HCL patients. A literature review of the MEDLINE database for articles in English concerning immunotoxins, moxetumomab pasudotox, and hairy cell leukemia was conducted via PubMed. Publications from 2000 through December 2018 were scrutinized. The search terms used were immunotoxinsand moxetumomab pasudotoxin conjunction with hairy cell leukemia. Conference proceedings from the previous five years of the American Society of Hematology, European Hematology Association and American Society of Clinical Oncology were searched manually. Additional relevant publications were obtained by reviewing the references from the chosen articles.Results/conclusion: Moxetumomab pasudotox, a novel recombinant anti-CD22 immunotoxin, was well tolerated and active in the previous phase 1 and 3 studies in patients with HCL. The drug has been approved in 2018 by the FDA for the treatment of patients with relapsed/refractory HCL who had at least two prior systemic therapies including at least one purine nucleoside analog.Expert opinion: The use of moxetumomab pasudotox is a promising new strategy for the treatment of HCL.

ABSTRACTIntroduction: Venetoclax, an antagonist of BCL-2 protein plays an important role in the pathogenesis of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). It has been approved by the FDA for the treatment of relapsed/refractory CLL with del17p, and by the EMA for patients with del17p/TP53mutation who have failed a BCR inhibitor, or in patients without those aberrations who have failed previous therapy, regardless of their genetic/molecular profile. Venetoclax in combination with rituximab has been also approved for the treatment of CLL after at least 1 prior therapy, regardless of del17p.Areas covered: This article reviews the chemical structure, mechanisms of action, pharmacokinetic, and the clinical applications of venetoclax in monotherapy and in combined treatment of CLL. Publications dated 2010 through March 2019 were obtained from the MEDLINE database. The proceedings of the American Society of Hematology held during the last five years were also included.Expert opinion: Venetoclax shows high efficacy, a favorable toxicity profile, and a high rate of minimal residual disease negativity, which is thought to have an impact on overall survival. It is efficient in patients with del17p/TP53mutations, the incidence of which increases during clonal CLL evolution, and after the failure of BCR pathway inhibitors.

The development of non-chemotherapeutic agents, including monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) and other targeted drugs, makes chemotherapy-free treatment an attractive option for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). The classical mAb, rituximab, has been authorized for use in both first-line and second-line therapy for CLL. New mAbs directed against CD20, ofatumumab, and obinutuzumab (GA-101) have also been approved for the treatment of this disease. Recently, several new mAbs with potential benefits over the approved anti-CD20 antibodies have been developed for use in CLL. Anti-CD37, anti-CD19, and anti-CD40 mAbs are in early clinical trials and show promise in treating CLL. In addition, the combination of mAbs with B-cell receptor signaling pathway inhibitors and immunomodulatory drugs makes the chemotherapy-free option a reality today. Combinations of antibodies with targeted drugs like ibrutinib, idelalisib, or lenalidomide are expected to replace chemotherapy-based combinations for treating CLL in the near future. However, phase III trials should confirm the benefit of these new treatment strategies and establish their exact place in the therapeutic armamentarium for CLL.

•MS provides significant prognostic information in the maintenance setting and complements BM MRD in multiple myeloma.•Without the aid of a baseline serum sample, MS’s prognostic performance is most significant 18 months after transplant.

Kater: Janssen: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Abbvie: Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding. Kipps:Pharmacyclics/ AbbVie, Breast Cancer Research Foundation, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Oncternal Therapeutics, Inc., Specialized Center of Research (SCOR) - The Leukemia and Lymphoma Society (LLS), California Institute for Regenerative Medicine (CIRM): Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Oncternal Therapeutics, Inc.: Other: Cirmtuzumab was developed by Thomas J. Kipps in the Thomas J. Kipps laboratory and licensed by the University of California to Oncternal Therapeutics, Inc., which provided stock options and research funding to the Thomas J. Kipps laboratory, Research Funding; Genentech/Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; VelosBio: Research Funding; Ascerta/AstraZeneca, Celgene, Genentech/F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Gilead, Janssen, Loxo Oncology, Octernal Therapeutics, Pharmacyclics/AbbVie, TG Therapeutics, VelosBio, and Verastem: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Eichhorst:F. Hoffmann-LaRoche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel support, Research Funding; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel support, Research Funding; ArQule: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel support, Research Funding; Oxford Biomedica: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel support, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel support, Research Funding; Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel support, Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel support, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel support, Research Funding; BeiGene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel support, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel support, Research Funding. Hillmen:Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES (paid by any for-profit health care company), Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; AbbVie: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES (paid by any for-profit health care company), Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Astra Zeneca: Honoraria; F. Hoffmann-La Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding. D'Rozario:F. Hoffmann-La Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AbbVie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Owen:AbbVie, F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Janssen, Astrazeneca, Merck, Servier, Novartis, Teva: Honoraria. Assouline:AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; BeiGene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Research Funding. Lamanna:MingSight: Other: Institutional research grants, Research Funding; Astra Zeneca: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Institutional research grants, Research Funding; Oncternal, Verastem, TG Therapeutics: Other: Institutional research grants, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Juno: Other: Institutional research grants, Research Funding; Loxo: Research Funding; Genentech: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Institutional research grants, Research Funding; Gilead: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bei-Gene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Institutional research grants, Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Institutional research grants, Research Funding; Octapharma: Research Funding; Columbia University Medical Center: Current Employment; Janssen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Robak:Abbvie, Pharmacyclics, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, Janssen, Roche, Acerta, AstraZeneca, BioGene, UCB: Research Funding; Abbvie, Pharmacyclics, Novartis, Janssen, Acerta, AstraZeneca, BioGene, UCB, Sandoz: Honoraria; Sandoz, Janssen, AbbVie, Roche, Gilead: Consultancy. de la Serna:F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Abbvie, Pharmacyclics, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, Janssen, Roche, Acerta, AstraZeneca, BioGene, UCB: Research Funding; Abbvie, AstraZeneca: Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses; Abbvie, Janssen: Speakers Bureau; Gilead, AstraZeneca, Abbvie, Janssen, Sandoz, F. Hoffmann-La Roche: Consultancy; Abbvie, Pharmacyclics, Novartis, Janssen, Acerta, AstraZeneca, BioGene, UCB, Sandoz: Honoraria. Jaeger:F. Hoffmann-La Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding. Cartron:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; F. Hoffmann-La Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria; Jansen: Honoraria; Abbvie: Honoraria. Montillo:Gilead: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; AbbVie: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; F. Hoffmann-La Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Astra Zeneca: Honoraria; Verastem: Honoraria. Mellink:Genentech, Inc: Research Funding; Amsterdam University Medical Centre: Current Employment. Chyla:AbbVie: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Wilson:Roche Products Limited: Current Employment. Wu:Genentech, Inc.: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; F. Hoffmann-La Roche: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Jiang:F. Hoffmann-La Roche: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Genentech, Inc.: Current Employment. Lefebure:F. Hoffmann-La Roche: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Boyer:Roche: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES (paid by any for-profit health care company). Seymour:Mei Pharma: Consultancy, Honoraria; Nurix: Honoraria; Morphosys: Consultancy, Honoraria; Gilead: Consultancy; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; F. Hoffmann-La Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; AbbVie: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.

Glasdegib is a Hedgehog pathway inhibitor. This phase II, randomized, open-label, multicenter study (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01546038) evaluated the efficacy of glasdegib plus low-dose cytarabine (LDAC) in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome unsuitable for intensive chemotherapy. Glasdegib 100 mg (oral, QD) was administered continuously in 28-day cycles; LDAC 20 mg (subcutaneous, BID) was administered for 10 per 28 days. Patients (stratified by cytogenetic risk) were randomized (2:1) to receive glasdegib/LDAC or LDAC. The primary endpoint was overall survival. Eighty-eight and 44 patients were randomized to glasdegib/LDAC and LDAC, respectively. Median (80% confidence interval [CI]) overall survival was 8.8 (6.9–9.9) months with glasdegib/LDAC and 4.9 (3.5–6.0) months with LDAC (hazard ratio, 0.51; 80% CI, 0.39–0.67, P= 0.0004). Fifteen (17.0%) and 1 (2.3%) patients in the glasdegib/LDAC and LDAC arms, respectively, achieved complete remission (P< 0.05). Nonhematologic grade 3/4 all-causality adverse events included pneumonia (16.7%) and fatigue (14.3%) with glasdegib/LDAC and pneumonia (14.6%) with LDAC. Clinical efficacy was evident across patients with diverse mutational profiles. Glasdegib plus LDAC has a favorable benefit–risk profile and may be a promising option for AML patients unsuitable for intensive chemotherapy.

Maintenance therapy following autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) can delay disease progression and prolong survival in patients with multiple myeloma. Ixazomib is ideally suited for maintenance therapy given its convenient once-weekly oral dosing and low toxicity profile. In this study, we aimed to determine the safety and efficacy of ixazomib as maintenance therapy following ASCT.

Liczba chorych na szpiczaka plazmocytowego zwiększa się, co jest skutkiem zarówno skuteczniejszej diagnostyki, jak również istotnego przedłużania przeżycia chorych. Zawdzięczamy to dostępności nowych leków w pierwszej i kolejnych liniach leczenia, zmianie koncepcji leczenia i przedłużaniu czasu trwania leczenia, stosując leczenie konsolidujące oraz podtrzymujące do progresji choroby. Poza zmianą koncepcji leczenia, zmienia się obecnie również kryterium czasu rozpoczęcia terapii uwzględniające biomarkery aktywności choroby oraz dużą uwagę przywiązuje się optymalizacji leczenia w oparciu o dowody pochodzące z badań klinicznych. W artykule tym przedstawiono także zalecenia dotyczące rozpoznania i leczenia makroglobulinemii Waldenströma i innych dyskrazji plazmocytowych.

Zakażenia należą do najczęstszych przyczyn chorobowości i śmiertelności chorych na nowotwory hematologiczne, a stosowanie szczepień ochronnych może w istotnym stopniu wpłynąć na zmniejszenie częstości ich występowania. W pracy przedstawiono przegląd danych dotyczących ryzyka zakażeń oraz skuteczności immunizacji czynnej u chorych na nowotwory hematologiczne i u pacjentów z anatomiczną lub czynnościową asplenią. Ponadto zawarto rekomendacje dla populacji polskich pacjentów opracowane przez Sekcję Zakażeń Polskiej Grupy ds. Leczenia Białaczek u Dorosłych (PALG) oraz Polskie Towarzystwo Hematologów i Transfuzjologów. Uwzględniono zarówno zalecenia ogólne dotyczące chorych na nowotwory, jak i szczegółowe odnoszące się do określonych nowotworów hematologicznych. Przedstawiono również propozycje poprawy organizacji szczepień u chorych na nowotwory hematologiczne w Polsce.

ABSTRACTIntroduction: Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) remains a poor prognosis hematological malignancy. The introduction of aggressive chemotherapy with allogeneic stem cell transplantation has resulted in improved clinical outcomes in younger patients. However, the treatment results in unfit elderly AML population remain disappointing. New strategies should be introduced to improve the prognosis in this group of patients.Areas covered: This review presents and discusses the mechanism of action, safety and efficacy of sapacitabine in AML patients.Expert opinion: Sapacitabine, a novel nucleoside analog, seemed to be a promising new agent for AML treatment. Its oral bioavailability and tolerable toxicity profile allow the drug to be used in an outpatient setting, especially in elderly unfit patients. Sapacitabine is known to have antileukemic activity in randomized clinical trials. In AML patients, sapacitabine monotherapy offered no advantage over low-intensity cytarabine treatment, and the combination of sapacitabine with decitabine was not significantly more effective than decitabine alone. However, the oral administration of sapacitabine allows it to be used in AML maintenance therapy.