Search

Purpose: Given prolactin’s (PRL) multifaceted roles in mammary tissue, an association between hyperprolactinemia and breast cancer has been hypothesized. Despite previous studies not identifying this risk, we aimed to investigate whether a connection exists. Methods: This retrospective cohort study compared breast cancer incidence in patients with dopamine agonist (DA)-treated hyperprolactinemia versus matched controls in a 1:5 ratio. The primary outcome was a breast cancer diagnosis following hyperprolactinemia diagnosis. Results: The cohort consisted of 1484 female patients with DA-treated hyperprolactinemia matched to 7418 female controls (mean age at diagnosis 32.70 ± 11.12 years; BMI 25.60 ± 5.84 kg/m2). Breast cancer was diagnosed in 27 patients with hyperprolactinemia (1.82%) and 97 controls (1.31%) (HR 1.40, 95% CI 0.91–2.14, p= 0.12). Patients who developed breast cancer were diagnosed with hyperprolactinemia later in life than those who did not (median age 42.63 vs. 29.79 years; p< 0.0001). Patients with PRL < 5× upper limit of normal (ULN) at diagnosis developed breast cancer at a higher rate than controls (2.25% vs. 1.33%; HR 1.73, 95% CI 1.09–2.75), but the difference was not significant in patients with PRL ≥ 5×ULN. Patients who exhibited longer times to PRL normalization had higher incidence of breast cancer (median 2.60 vs. 1.41 years in those who did not develop breast cancer; p= 0.03). Conclusion: Overall, patients with DA-treated hyperprolactinemia did not show an increased risk for breast cancer compared to controls. However, the risk was significantly higher among those whose PRL levels were < 5×ULN, had advanced age of diagnosis, or prolonged time to PRL normalization.

Purpose: The aims of the current study were to describe clinical and biochemical features of patients with Paget disease of bone (PDB) followed at our medical center, and to examine the long-term effectiveness of zoledronate. Methods: Retrospective cohort study included consecutive patients≥18 years with a diagnosis of PDB, followed in the Rabin Medical Center (RMC) Institute of Endocrinology from 1973 to 2023. The cohort comprised two groups: patients treated/not treated with zoledronic acid (ZOL/NZOL). The primary outcome was the percentage of patients who achieved a biochemical therapeutic response. Results: Overall, 101 patients with PDB were included, 68 in the ZOL group and 33 in the NZOL group. The mean age was 65.2 ± 10.0 years, and 47% were female. Notably, 77% exhibited monostotic involvement, and only 3% had experienced fractures attributed to PDB. Mean ALP level at diagnosis was 160 ± 70.6 U/L. The median follow-up duration was 17 years since PDB diagnosis, comparable between the groups. Primary outcome was more prevalent in the ZOL compared to the NZOL group [42 patients (88%) VS 11 patients (52%) respectively, P= 0.004]. At the end of follow-up, mean ALP levels in the NZOL group were significantly higher than the levels in the ZOL group irrespective of the number of infusions received. Conclusion: The majority of patients with PDB experience a mild disease course, marked by monostotic involvement and a low prevalence of fractures. Zoledronic acid effectively manages PDB, providing sustained biochemical response. The necessity for multiple zoledronic acid injections remains questionable, often implemented due to osteoporosis.

Purpose: Men with mild to moderate hyperprolactinemia rarely present with normal pituitary on MRI with no visible adenoma, a condition entitled also “idiopathic hyperprolactinemia” or “non-tumoral hyperprolactinemia”. We have characterized a cohort of hyperprolactinemic men with normal pituitary imaging. Design: We have identified 13 men with true hyperprolactinemia and normal pituitary MRI. Baseline clinical and hormonal characteristics and response to medical treatment were retrospectively retrieved from medical records. Results: Mean age at diagnosis was 51 ± 16 years (range, 20–77); mean serum prolactin level at presentation was 91 ng/ml (range, 28–264), eight men presented with low baseline testosterone. Initial complaints leading to diagnosis included sexual dysfunction in ten men and gynecomastia in five. All patients were treated with cabergoline, except for one who was given bromocriptine; none required pituitary surgery. All patients normalized prolactin and testosterone with subsequent clinical improvement reported by most men. Currently, after a mean follow-up of 72 months, ten patients continue treatment with caborgoline (median weekly dose, 0.25 mg), whereas three men discontinued treatment. Conclusions: Men with symptomatic hyperprolactinemia may rarely present with normal pituitary imaging. Medical treatment can lead to hormonal improvement with clinical benefit.