Search

Purpose: Growth hormone deficiency (GHD) is a rare condition with a worldwide prevalence of 1 patient in 4000 to 10,000 live births, placing a significant economic burden on healthcare systems. The aim of this study is to generate evidence on the economic burden of children and adolescents with GHD treated with rhGH and their parents in Italy. Methods: A cost of illness analysis, adopting the prevalence approach, has been developed, producing evidence on the total annual cost sustained by the Italian National Health System (NHS) and by the society. The study is based on original data collected from a survey conducted among Italian children and adolescents with GHD and their parents. Results: 143 children/adolescents with GHD and their parents participated to the survey, conducted from May to October 2021. Patients had a mean age of 12.2 years (SD: 3.1) and were mostly males (68.5%). Conclusions: The total annual cost for GHD children is close to € 10,000, and is mainly due to the cost of rhGH treatment. This cost is almost entirely sustained by the NHS, with negligible out-of-pocket expenses.

Purpose: The aim of this study was to produce evidence on quality of life (QoL) among Italian growth hormone deficiency (GHD) children and adolescents treated with growth hormone (GH) and their parents. Methods: A survey was conducted among Italian children and adolescents aged 4–18 with a confirmed diagnosis of GHD and treated with GH therapy and their parents. The European Quality of Life 5 Dimensions 3 Level Version (EQ-5D-3L) and the Quality of Life in Short Stature Youth (QoLISSY) questionnaires were administered between May and October 2021 through the Computer-Assisted Personal Interview (CAPI) method. Results were compared with national and international reference values. Results: The survey included 142 GHD children/adolescents and their parents. The mean EQ-5D-3L score was 0.95 [standard deviation (SD) 0.09], while the mean visual analogue scale (VAS) score was 86.2 (SD 14.2); the scores are similar to those of a reference Italian population aged 18–24 of healthy subjects. As for the QoLISSY child-version, compared to the international reference values for GHD/ idiopathic short stature (ISS) patients, we found a significantly higher score for the physical domain, and lower scores for coping and treatment; compared to the specific reference values for GHD patients, our mean scores were significantly lower for all domains except the physical one. As for the parents, we found a significantly higher score for the physical domain, and a lower score for treatment; compared to reference values GHD-specific, we found lower score in the social, emotional, treatment, parental effects, and total score domains. Conclusions: Our results suggest that the generic health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in treated GHD patients is high, comparable to that of healthy people. The QoL elicited by a disease specific questionnaire is also good, and comparable with that of international reference values of GHD/ISS patients.

Growth hormone (GH) consumption is the object of a particular attention by regulatory bodies, due to its financial impact; nevertheless, GH treatment has been demonstrated to be cost-effective and is, therefore, usually reimbursed by public health service systems. In Italy, significant differences in GH consumption between regions have been recorded. Different appropriateness in real practice is a possible explanation, but the proportion of drug wasted due to different combinations of therapeutic regimes and types of devices used in drug administration is a complementary explanation. Aim of the study is, therefore, to determine how much of the variability in GH consumption is actually due to differences in clinical practice, and how much to waste. A model was settled to estimate the population with indication for GH administration, separately for children, transition subjects and adults, based on both the scientific evidence available and directly collected clinical evaluations. A systematic literature search was conducted using Cochrane Library (HTA and NHSEE) databases, Medline via Ovid, Econlit via Ovid, Embase. The model applied to the Italian population showed that there was apparently unexplainable over-prescription and potential under-prescription in various regions, ranging from 20 to 40 % less than the estimated theoretical consumption to over 200 %. Wastage, at level of single device, could amount to as much as 15 % of the consumption, demonstrating that price per mg is not in general a good proxy of the cost per mg of therapy. Our estimates of the wastage shows a significant potential gap in the model assessment of the HTA bodies, as far as they do not explicitly take into account the issue of wastage and, consequently, the actual variability in local clinical practice.

Multiple sclerosis progressively impairs patients’ ability to independently perform activities of daily living, reduces working capacity, and negatively affects social interactions and relationships, imposing a cost for the society. The aim of this study was to explore the impact on society of treatment of multiple sclerosis with natalizumab in Italian clinical practice. A prospective, observational study was conducted in 24 specialized centers throughout Italy. Direct and indirect costs, as well as the health-related quality of life of patients undergoing treatments, were estimated, while societal impacts were determined using a cost-utility approach. Non-medical direct and indirect costs accounted for 55.7% of the total cost prior to treatment and up to 47.5% after treatment with natalizumab. From the social perspective, greater medical direct costs for second-line drug treatment are nearly offset by savings on non-medical direct costs and by greater productivity, resulting in a +0.5% incremental cost. Assuming a societal perspective, the first year of treatment with natalizumab in real-world clinical practice results in an incremental cost of €2814.8/quality-adjusted life year gained. Multiple sclerosis imposes a considerable burden on patients, their families, and caregivers, stressing the importance of considering the societal perspective in the appraisal process. Treatment with natalizumab shows a noteworthy benefit in social terms.