Search

When irradiating a polymer gel dosimeter to relatively high doses, edge enhancing effects (overshoots) may be noticed near dose gradients, resulting in a loss of spatial dose integrity. These overshoots are believed to be a consequence of monomers diffusing into the high-dose region, where they react with long-living macroradicals. Macroradicals may also be responsible for the temporal chemical instability of post-irradiation polymerization that occurs in the polymer gel dosimeter. In this study, a mathematical model is proposed that simulates the edge enhancing effect. The model is based on the hypothesis that the macroradicals are responsible for both the temporal instability and loss of spatial dose integrity. All input parameters for the model are obtained from independent experiments. The edge enhancing effect is studied both experimentally and theoretically for polymer gel dosimeters with various gelatin concentrations. The change in the edge enhancement is also investigated over post-irradiation time. Comparisons between polymer gel measurements and simulations confirm the hypothesis that there is a strong relation between the spatial and temporal instabilities.

Polymer gel dosimetry was used to assess an intensity-modulated arc therapy (IMAT) treatment for whole abdominopelvic radiotherapy. Prior to the actual dosimetry experiment, a uniformity study on an unirradiated anthropomorphic phantom was carried out. A correction was performed to minimize deviations in the R2 maps due to radiofrequency non-uniformities. In addition, compensation strategies were implemented to limit R2 deviations caused by temperature drift during scanning. Inter- and intra-slice R2 deviations in the phantom were thereby significantly reduced. This was verified in an investigative study where the same phantom was irradiated with two rectangular superimposed beams: structural deviations between gel measurements and computational results remained below 3% outside high dose gradient regions; the spatial shift in those regions was within 2.5 mm. When comparing gel measurements with computational results for the IMAT treatment, dose deviations were noted in the liver and right kidney, but the dose–volume constraints were met. Root-mean-square differences between both dose distributions were within 5% with spatial deviations not more than 2.5 mm. Dose fluctuations due to gantry angle discretization in the dose computation algorithm were particularly noticeable in the low-dose region.