Search

Abstract: ‘Specking’ on harvested freesia (Freesia hybrida) flowers is a problem worldwide. The disease is caused by the fungal pathogen Botrytis cinerea. This disease symptom detracts from appearance and reduces marketability of the flowers. Unlike other important cut flower crops (e.g. gerbera), the mode of infection and epidemiology of postharvest freesia flower specking caused by B. cinerea has not been reported. Epidemiological studies were carried out under simulated conditions typical of those occurring during postharvest handling of freesia flowers. Infection of freesia flowers by B. cinerea occurred when a conidium germinated, formed a germ tube(s) and penetrated epidermal cells. Fungal hyphae then colonised adjacent cells, resulting in visible lesions. Different host reactions were observed on freesia ‘Cote d’Azur’ petals at 20°C compared to 5°C. The infection process was relatively rapid at 20°C, with visible lesions produced within 7 h of incubation. However, lesion expansion ceased after 24 h of incubation. Infection was slower at 5°C, with visible lesions produced after 48 h of incubation. However, lesion development at 5°C was continuous, with lesions expanding over 4 days. Light microscopy observations revealed increased host defence reactions during infection. These reactions involved production of phenolic compounds, probably lignin and/or callose, around infection sites. Such substances may play a role in restricting petal colonisation and lesion expansion. Disease severity and lesion numbers on freesia flowers incubated at 12°C were higher, but not significantly higher (P > 0.05), than on those incubated at 20°C. Disease severity and progression were differentially mediated by temperature and relative humidity (R.H.). Infection of freesia flowers was severe at 100% R.H. for all three incubation temperatures of 5,12 and 20°C. In contrast, no lesions were produced at 80 to 90% R.H. at either 5 or 20°C.

Controlled environment studies were conducted to determine the effects of inoculum density, temperature, leaf wetness and light regime on the infection of linseed by Alternaria linicola. The % cotyledons and leaves with symptoms, and the disease severity (% leaf area with symptoms) increased linearly when the inoculum density increased from 1×103to 1×105conidia ml−1. The first symptoms appeared on cotyledons and leaves 4 and 6 days after inoculation, respectively. Eight hours of leaf wetness were sufficient to initiate the disease at 25°C but not at 15°C, when 10-h periods of leaf wetness were required. % leaf area with symptoms was lower at 15°C than that at 25°C irrespective of the leaf wetness periods tested. Interruption of a continuous leaf wetness period by a 12-h dry period, occurring at any time between 1 and 18 h after inoculation, decreased the % cotyledons with symptoms and the disease severity, with the greatest reductions (60% and 100%, respectively) being observed when the dry period began 6 h after inoculation. A. linicola conidia were able to exploit successive 12-h periods of leaf wetness cumulatively to infect linseed plants. Disease incidence and severity were positively correlated with the dark period following inoculation, but they were negatively related to the length of the initial light period. Our findings suggest that infection of linseed by A. linicola and further development of symptoms can occur under unfavourable environmental conditions.

Conidia ofAlternaria linicola produced on infected linseed crops were mainly dispersed by wind. The numbers of conidia in the air above linseed crops collected by a Burkard spore sampler were greatest between 12:00 h and 13:00 h, when the relative humidity was lowest. Although numbers of conidia collected decreased with increasing height within and above the crop canopy, air-borneA. linicola conidia were present up to 80 cm above the crop canopy. Conidia ofA. linicola were transported by wind up to at least 40 m downwind from an artificial line inoculum source, but their numbers decreased with increasing distance from the source. In 1991, 1992, and 1993, the dispersal ofA. linicola conidia above linseed crops followed a seasonal periodicity which was influenced by weather conditions and cultural practices. The greatest numbers of conidia were collected during July, August and early September and coincided with periods favourable for sporulation and with an increase in the incidence of the disease in the senescent crop. Air-borneA. linicola conidia produced on point or line inoculum sources (naturally infected linseed stem debris) were responsible for the spread of the disease in linseed crops. In 1992 and 1993, the disease was first detected downwind from the sources, but by the end of the growing seasons, it had spread in all directions and up to 20 m and 60 m from the sources, respectively. Disease gradients were initially steep near the inoculum sources but they became flatter with time due to the secondary spread of the disease.