Search

Background Patients with single ventricle (SV) congenital heart disease (CHD) undergo several interventions in the first years of life. Advanced diagnostics are required for interstage assessment of anatomy, but are associated with significant diagnostic risk. We sought to evaluate image quality, risk, and accuracy of cardiac computed tomography (CCT) for evaluation of anatomy prior to superior cavopulmonary connection (SCPC) compared to surgical findings across 2 institutions.Methods A retrospective evaluation of image quality, risk, and accuracy of pre-SCPC CCT was performed at 2 institutions between January 1, 2010 and September 30, 2016.Results CCT was performed in 90 SV CHD patients with a median age of 4.03 months (interquartile range [IQR] 3.36, 5.33) prior to SCPC. Image quality was optimal (84%) or good (16%) in all patients, without significant discrepancy compared to surgical findings. 7 patients (8%) required interventional cardiac catheterization subsequent to CCT and before surgical intervention. 49% of scans were performed without sedation, 43% of scans were performed with mild to moderate sedation, and 8% of scans were performed with general anesthesia. The median total procedural dose-length product (DLP) was 18 (IQR 14, 26) mGy*cm, estimating an age adjusted radiation dose of 1.4 millisievert (mSv). One minor (1%) adverse event was reported within 24 h of the CCT. Surgical complications were unrelated to the presurgical findings.Conclusions CCT for pre-SCPC evaluation is safe, with excellent accuracy for anatomy at the time of surgical intervention across 2 institutions. In select patients, noninvasive evaluation with CCT may be indicated.

Do men and women with diabetes fare equally in cardiovascular disease (CVD) prevention and mortality? It appears that they do not. Although mortality from CVD is on the decline, (1) [...]

Nonatherosclerotic abdominal arterial vasculopathies (NAVs), including mesenteric or renal artery dissection, aneurysm, stenosis, and vasculitis, are rare but have great clinical significance. Patients may present emergently with life-threatening complications such as arterial rupture and hemorrhagic shock. Herein, we present our center's experience with NAVs and provide extensive literature review to close the gap in the scarce, related literature.

Introduction:Transesophageal echo (TEE) is routinely used to exclude left atrial appendage (LAA) thrombus prior to direct current cardioversion (DCCV) for atrial fibrillation (AF). However, the COVID-19 pandemic accelerated the use of non-invasive modalities such as cardiac computed tomography (CCT) to avoid aerosolizing viral particles during intubation, such as with introduction of a TEE probe. CCT is not routinely used as a clinical strategy to exclude LAA thrombus prior to DCCV. Therefore, we sought to determine the feasibility of CCT-guided DCCV.Hypothesis: CCT-guided elective cardioversion for atrial arrhythmias is a feasible modality to rule out left atrial appendage thrombus.Methods:We identified patients at Abbott Northwestern Hospital who underwent CCT in lieu of or in addition to TEE within 24 hours of elective DCCV for AF or atrial flutter from March 2020 to February 2022. Thirty-day outcomes were collected including cerebrovascular accident (CVA), myocardial infarction, cardiovascular death, re-hospitalization, arrhythmia recurrence, and overall mortality. Delayed imaging, 90 seconds after arterial phase, was obtained to exclude LAA thrombus.Results:Thirty-two patients were included in our analysis, 10 (31%) were female. Ten (31%) presented with new-onset of AF. CCT did not identify LAA thrombus in any patient. Post-DCCV, the mean time to arrhythmia recurrence was 16.5 days (SD: 9.3). At 30 days, 11 (34%) had been re-hospitalized but mostly for elective procedures. There was no CVA or mortality reported at the 30-day follow-up.Conclusion:CCT-guided elective cardioversion for atrial arrhythmias was evaluated for feasibility in a small pilot. In patients who had no LAA thrombus on CCT and subsequently underwent cardioversion, there were no CCT-related complications, CVA, or deaths at 30 days. Many patients benefit from early DCCV rather than waiting with uninterrupted anticoagulation. CCT guidance is a feasible alternative to TEE but needs further prospective comparison to TEE and uninterrupted anticoagulation in this clinical setting.

This review highlights advances in the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease (CVD) in women in the preceding 12 months.