Search

The use of different growth charts can lead to confusion in discussions between professionals. There are obstetric charts (of fetal growth) and neonatal charts (of measurements at birth and of postnatal growth). These charts can be descriptive (derived from an unselected population) or prescriptive (derived from of a population at low risk and with optimal conditions for growth). (1) To describe available charts for infants at birth and in the neonatal period and compare them, and (2) to recommend one or more charts for use in neonatology in France. Bibliographic research was conducted on MEDLINE and completed by the guidelines of professional societies. Antenatal information about fetal growth restriction or fetuses identified as small-for-gestational-age using Intrauterine charts must be integrated into the identification of newborns at risk, but the use of Intrauterine charts to evaluate birthweight is not recommended to allow consistency with postnatal charts used in neonatal practice. Z-score variations using the updated Fenton postnatal charts are the most appropriate for the assessment of birthweight and postnatal growth for infants born preterm. These charts are sex-specific, include the three measurements (length, weight, and head circumference) and enable longitudinal follow-up of growth up to 50 weeks of corrected age and are linked to the World Health Organization charts at term. The French Audipog charts, although are individualized, accessible online and can be used in maternity units to evaluate birthweight for term infants, but do not allow the follow-up of postnatal growth, while Fenton charts may be used to evaluate birthweight and postnatal growth in the first month for hospitalized term infants. The updated Fenton charts are the neonatal charts that best suit the objectives of pediatricians in France for monitoring the growth of preterm newborns. The use of the Audipog charts at term remains an alternative in maternity wards, while Fenton charts can be used for hospitalized term newborns. The choice of a growth chart is fundamental for identifying newborns at particular neonatal risk.The availability of multiple intrauterine, birthweight, or postnatal growth chart in the literature makes comparisons difficult. The choice of a growth chart is fundamental for identifying newborns at particular neonatal risk. The availability of multiple intrauterine, birthweight, or postnatal growth chart in the literature makes comparisons difficult. The most appropriate birthweight and postnatal charts for monitoring the growth of preterm newborns in the French population are the Fenton charts.The Audipog charts are French birthweight charts that can be used in maternity wards to identify term newborns at risk, while Fenton charts may be used for assessing growth at birth and in the first month among hospitalized term newborns. The most appropriate birthweight and postnatal charts for monitoring the growth of preterm newborns in the French population are the Fenton charts. The Audipog charts are French birthweight charts that can be used in maternity wards to identify term newborns at risk, while Fenton charts may be used for assessing growth at birth and in the first month among hospitalized term newborns.

ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to investigate variations in mortality before neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) discharge of infants born preterm with intraparenchymal haemorrhage (IPH) in Europe with a special interest for withdrawing life-sustaining therapy (WLST).DesignSecondary analysis of the Effective Perinatal Intensive Care in Europe (EPICE) cohort, 2011–2012.SettingNineteen regions in 11 European countries.PatientsAll infants born between 24+0and 31+6weeks’ gestational age (GA) with a diagnosis of IPH.Main outcome measuresMortality rate with multivariable analysis after adjustment for GA, antenatal steroids and gender. WLST policies were described among NICUs and within countries.ResultsAmong 6828 infants born alive between 24+0and 31+6weeks’ GA and without congenital anomalies admitted to NICUs, IPH was diagnosed in 234 infants (3.4%, 95% CI 3.3% to 3.9%) and 138 of them (59%) died. The median age at death was 6 days (3–13). Mortality rates varied significantly between countries (extremes: 30%–81%; p<0.004) and most infants (69%) died after WLST. After adjustment and with reference to the UK, mortality rates were significantly higher for France, Denmark and the Netherlands, with ORs of 8.8 (95% CI 3.3 to 23.6), 5.9 (95% CI 1.6 to 21.4) and 4.8 (95% CI 1.1 to 8.9). There were variations in WLST between European regions and countries.ConclusionIn infants with IPH, rates of death before discharge and death after WLST varied between European countries. These variations in mortality impede studying reliable outcomes in infants with IPH across European countries and encourage reflection of clinical practices of WLST across European units.

ObjectiveTo investigate whether extrauterine growth restriction (EUGR) during the neonatal hospitalisation by sex among extremely preterm (EPT) infants is associated with cerebral palsy (CP) and cognitive and motor abilities at 5 years of age.Study designPopulation-based cohort of births <28 weeks of gestation with data from obstetric and neonatal records and parental questionnaires and clinical assessments at 5 years of age.Setting11 European countries.Patients957 EPT infants born in 2011–2012.Main outcomesEUGR at discharge from the neonatal unit was defined as (1) the difference between Z-scores at birth and discharge with <−2 SD as severe, −2 to −1 SD as moderate using Fenton’s growth charts (Fenton) and (2) average weight-gain velocity using Patel’s formula in grams (g) per kilogram per day (Patel) with <11.2 g (first quartile) as severe, 11.2–12.5 g (median) as moderate. Five-year outcomes were: a CP diagnosis, intelligence quotient (IQ) using the Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scales of Intelligence tests and motor function using the Movement Assessment Battery for Children, second edition.Results40.1% and 33.9% children were classified as having moderate and severe EUGR, respectively, by Fenton and 23.8% and 26.3% by Patel. Among children without CP, those with severe EUGR had lower IQ than children without EUGR (−3.9 points, 95% Confidence Interval (CI)=−7.2 to −0.6 for Fenton and −5.0 points, 95% CI=−8.2 to −1.8 for Patel), with no interaction by sex. No significant associations were observed between motor function and CP.ConclusionsSevere EUGR among EPT infants was associated with decreased IQ at 5 years of age.

The characteristics of pregnancies according to customized definition of fetal growth restriction are described and association between customized standards and adverse pregnancy outcomes are determined. The interest of using customized birth weight standard adjusted for maternal and neonatal characteristics to identify fetuses at risk is highlighted.

High blood pressure during pregnancy, older maternal age, smoking during pregnancy, and extreme thinness or obesity are risk factors for fetal growth restriction. These risk factors were less important causes of other premature births.

Stillbirths are a major public health issue and a sensitive marker of the quality of care around pregnancy and birth. The UN Global Strategy for Women's, Children's and Adolescents’ Health (2016–30) and the Every Newborn Action Plan (led by UNICEF and WHO) call for an end to preventable stillbirths. A first step to prevent stillbirths is obtaining standardised measurement of stillbirth rates across countries. We estimated stillbirth rates and their trends for 195 countries from 2000 to 2019 and assessed progress over time.

(Abstracted from Am J Obstet Gynecol2021;225:676.e1–676.e15)One common cause of perinatal mortality is fetal growth restriction (FGR), which is associated with neurodevelopmental impairment, other neonatal morbidities, as well as a risk of adult vascular disease. Estimated fetal weight of <10th percentile for gestational age is generally used as diagnostic criteria for FGR diagnosis.

ObjectiveExtrauterine growth restriction (EUGR) among very preterm infants is related to poor neurodevelopment, but lack of consensus on EUGR measurement constrains international research. Our aim was to compare EUGR prevalence in a European very preterm cohort using commonly used measures.DesignPopulation-based observational study.Setting19 regions in 11 European countries.Patients6792 very preterm infants born before 32 weeks’ gestational age (GA) surviving to discharge.Main outcome measuresWe investigated two measures based on discharge-weight percentiles with (1) Fenton and (2) Intergrowth (IG) charts and two based on growth velocity (1) birth weight and discharge-weight Z-score differences using Fenton charts and (2) weight-gain velocity using Patel’s model. We estimated country-level relative risks of EUGR adjusting for maternal and neonatal characteristics and associations with population differences in healthy newborn size, measured by mean national birth weight at 40 weeks’ GA.ResultsAbout twofold differences in EUGR prevalence were observed between countries for all indicators and these persisted after case-mix adjustment. Discharge weight <10th percentile using Fenton charts varied from 24% (Sweden) to 60% (Portugal) and using IG from 13% (Sweden) to 43% (Portugal), while low weight-gain velocity ranged from 35% (Germany) to 62% (UK). Mean term birth weight strongly correlated with both percentile-based measures (Spearman’s rho=−0.90 Fenton, −0.84 IG, p<0.01), but not Patel’s weight-gain velocity (rho: −0.38, p=0.25).ConclusionsVery preterm infants have a high prevalence of EUGR, with wide variations between countries in Europe. Variability associated with mean term birth weight when using common postnatal growth charts complicates international benchmarking.

(Abstracted from Lancet 2021;398:772–785)Stillbirths are a public health issue as well as an example of the inequality of care during pregnancy and birth. Groups such as the UN Global Strategy for Women's, Children's, and Adolescents' Health and the Every Newborn Action Plan aim to prevent stillbirths.

ObjectiveTo determine whether the variation in neurodevelopmental disability rates between populations persists after adjustment for demographic, maternal and infant characteristics for an international very preterm (VPT) birth cohort using a standardised approach to neurodevelopmental assessment at 2 years of age.DesignProspective standardised cohort study.Setting15 regions in 10 European countries.PatientsVPT births: 22+0–31+6weeks of gestation.Data collectionStandardised data collection tools relating to pregnancy, birth and neonatal care and developmental outcomes at 2 years corrected age using a validated parent completed questionnaire.Main outcome measuresCrude and standardised prevalence ratios calculated to compare rates of moderate to severe neurodevelopmental impairment between regions grouped by country using fixed effects models.ResultsParent reported rates of moderate or severe neurodevelopmental impairment for the cohort were: 17.3% (ranging 10.2%–26.1% between regions grouped by country) with crude standardised prevalence ratios ranging from 0.60 to 1.53. Adjustment for population, maternal and infant factors resulted in a small reduction in the overall variation (ranging from 0.65 to 1.30).ConclusionThere is wide variation in the rates of moderate to severe neurodevelopmental impairment for VPT cohorts across Europe, much of which persists following adjustment for known population, maternal and infant factors. Further work is needed to investigate whether other factors including quality of care and evidence-based practice have an effect on neurodevelopmental outcomes for these children.

ObjectivesTo develop research priorities on the consequences of very preterm (VPT) birth for the RECAP Preterm platform which brings together data from 23 European VPT birth cohorts.Design and settingThis study used a two-round modified Delphi consensus process. Round 1 was based on 28 research themes related to childhood outcomes (<12 years) derived from consultations with cohort researchers. An external panel of multidisciplinary stakeholders then ranked their top 10 themes and provided comments. In round 2, panel members provided feedback on rankings and on new themes suggested in round 1.ResultsOf 71 individuals contacted, 64 (90%) participated as panel members comprising obstetricians, neonatologists, nurses, general and specialist paediatricians, psychologists, physiotherapists, parents, adults born preterm, policy makers and epidemiologists from 17 countries. All 28 initial themes were ranked in the top 10 by at least six panel members. Highest ranking themes were: education (73% of panel members' top 10 choices); care and outcomes of extremely preterm births, including ethical decisions (63%); growth and nutrition (60%); emotional well-being and social inclusion (55%); parental stress (55%) and impact of social circumstances on outcomes (52%). Highest ranking themes were robust across panel members classified by background. 15 new themes had at least 6 top 10 endorsements in round 2.ConclusionsThis study elicited a broad range of research priorities on the consequences of VPT birth, with good consensus on highest ranks between stakeholder groups. Several highly ranked themes focused on the socioemotional needs of children and parents, which have been less studied.

BackgroundSocioeconomic factors influence language development in the general population, but the association remains poorly documented in children born very preterm (VPT). We assessed the impact of maternal education on language development in children born VPT and effect modification by perinatal risk.MethodsData were from the Effective Perinatal Intensive Care in Europe (EPICE) population-based cohort of children born <32 weeks’ gestational age (GA) in 2011/2012. Regions from six countries (Estonia, France, Germany, Italy, Sweden and UK) used a validated short form MacArthur Developmental Communicative Inventories Checklist to assess language at 2 years corrected age. Perinatal variables were collected from clinical records. We assessed expressive language delay (ELD), defined as (a) not combining words; and (b) expressive vocabulary <10th percentile of norms for age and sex. Perinatal risk (low, moderate and high) was determined using GA, small for GA and neonatal morbidities. We estimated adjusted risk ratios (aRR) of ELD by maternal education with inverse weighting to account for non-response bias.ResultsOf 2741 children, 24.6% were not combining words and 39.7% had a low expressive vocabulary. Low maternal education (lower secondary or less compared with a bachelor’s degree or more) increased risks of ELD: not combining words: aRR=1.52 (95% CI 1.36 to 1.69); low expressive vocabulary: aRR=1.25 (1.04 to 1.51). For children with low perinatal risk, the aRR were 1.88 (1.26 to 2.80) and 1.44 (1.06 to 1.95), respectively, compared with those with high perinatal risks: 1.36 (1.10 to 1.67) and 1.11 (0.97 to 1.27), respectively.ConclusionLow maternal education affects ELD for children born VPT, although the association appears attenuated among those with highest perinatal risk.

ObjectiveThe documented benefits of maternal milk for very preterm infants have raised interest in hospital policies that promote breastfeeding. We investigated the hypothesis that more liberal parental policies are associated with increased breastfeeding at discharge from the neonatal unit.DesignProspective area-based cohort study.SettingNeonatal intensive care units (NICUs) in 19 regions of 11 European countries.PatientsAll very preterm infants discharged alive in participating regions in 2011–2012 after spending >70% of their hospital stay in the same NICU (n=4407).Main outcome measuresWe assessed four feeding outcomes at hospital discharge: any and exclusive maternal milk feeding, independent of feeding method; any and exclusive direct breastfeeding, defined as sucking at the breast. We computed a neonatal unit Parental Presence Score (PPS) based on policies regarding parental visiting in the intensive care area (range 1–10, with higher values indicating more liberal policies), and we used multivariable multilevel modified Poisson regression analysis to assess the relation between unit PPS and outcomes.ResultsPolicies regarding visiting hours, duration of visits and possibility for parents to stay during medical rounds and spend the night in unit differed within and across countries. After adjustment for potential confounders, infants cared for in units with liberal parental policies (PPS≥7) were about twofold significantly more likely to be discharged with exclusive maternal milk feeding and exclusive direct breastfeeding.ConclusionUnit policies promoting parental presence and involvement in care may increase the likelihood of successful breastfeeding at discharge for very preterm infants.

ObjectiveTo investigate the variation in severe neonatal morbidity among very preterm (VPT) infants across European regions and whether morbidity rates are higher in regions with low compared with high mortality rates.DesignArea-based cohort study of all births before 32 weeks of gestational age.Setting16 regions in 11 European countries in 2011/2012.PatientsSurvivors to discharge from neonatal care (n=6422).Main outcome measuresSevere neonatal morbidity was defined as intraventricular haemorrhage grades III and IV, cystic periventricular leukomalacia, surgical necrotizing enterocolitis and retinopathy of prematurity grades ≥3. A secondary outcome included severe bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD), data available in 14 regions. Common definitions for neonatal morbidities were established before data abstraction from medical records. Regional severe neonatal morbidity rates were correlated with regional in-hospital mortality rates for live births after adjustment on maternal and neonatal characteristics.Results10.6% of survivors had a severe neonatal morbidity without severe BPD (regional range 6.4%–23.5%) and 13.8% including severe BPD (regional range 10.0%–23.5%). Adjusted inhospital mortality was 13.7% (regional range 8.4%–18.8%). Differences between regions remained significant after consideration of maternal and neonatal characteristics (P<0.001) and severe neonatal morbidity rates were not correlated with mortality rates (P=0.50).ConclusionSevere neonatal morbidity rates for VPT survivors varied widely across European regions and were independent of mortality rates.

L’hémorragie intra parenchymateuse (HIP) touche près de 4 % des prématurés nés <32 semaines d’aménorrhées (SA) avec un taux de mortalité élevé principalement due à une décision de limitation et arrêt de thérapeutiques actives (LATA). L’objectif de cette étude était d’étudier l’association entre la mortalité des enfants avec une HIP et le pays de naissance.

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.

International comparisons of stillbirth allow assessment of variations in clinical practice to reduce mortality. Currently, such comparisons include only stillbirths from 28 or more completed weeks of gestational age, which underestimates the true burden of stillbirth. With increased registration of early stillbirths in high-income countries, we assessed the reliability of including stillbirths before 28 completed weeks in such comparisons.

IMPORTANCE: Severe morbidity in very preterm infants is associated with profound clinical implications on development and life-course health. However, studies of racial/ethnic disparities in severe neonatal morbidities are scant and suggest that these disparities are modest or null, which may be an underestimation resulting from the analytic approach used. OBJECTIVE: To estimate racial/ethnic differences in severe morbidities among very preterm infants. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This population-based retrospective cohort study was conducted in New York City, New York, using linked birth certificate, mortality data, and hospital discharge data from January 1, 2010, through December 31, 2014. Infants born before 24 weeks’ gestation, with congenital anomalies, and with missing data were excluded. Racial/ethnic disparities in very preterm birth morbidities were estimated through 2 approaches, conventional analysis and fetuses-at-risk analysis. The conventional analysis used log-binomial regression to estimate the relative risk of 4 severe neonatal morbidities for the racial/ethnic groups. For the fetuses-at-risk analysis, Cox proportional hazards regression with death as competing risk was used to estimate subhazard ratios associating race/ethnicity with each outcome. Estimates were adjusted for sociodemographic factors and maternal morbidities. Data were analyzed from September 5, 2017, to May 21, 2018. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Four morbidity outcomes were defined using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, diagnosis and procedure codes: necrotizing enterocolitis, intraventricular hemorrhage, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, and retinopathy of prematurity. RESULTS: In total, 582 297 infants were included in this study. Of these infants, 285 006 were female (48.9%) and 297 291 were male (51.0%). Using the conventional approach in the very preterm birth subcohort, black compared with white infants had an increased risk of only bronchopulmonary dysplasia (adjusted risk ratio [aRR], 1.34; 95% CI, 1.09-1.64) and a borderline increased risk of necrotizing enterocolitis (aRR, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.00-1.93). Hispanic infants had a borderline increased risk of necrotizing enterocolitis (aRR, 1.39; 95% CI, 0.98-1.96), and Asian infants had an increased risk of retinopathy of prematurity (aRR, 1.85; 95% CI, 1.15-2.97). In the fetuses-at-risk analysis, black infants had a 4.40 times higher rate of necrotizing enterocolitis (95% CI, 2.98-6.51), a 2.73 times higher rate of intraventricular hemorrhage (95% CI, 1.63-4.57), a 4.43 times higher rate of bronchopulmonary dysplasia (95% CI, 2.88-6.81), and a 2.98 times higher rate of retinopathy of prematurity (95% CI, 2.01-4.40). Hispanic infants had an approximately 2 times higher rate for all outcomes, and Asian infants had increased risk only for retinopathy of prematurity (adjusted hazard ratio, 2.43; 95% CI, 1.43-4.11). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this study, racial/ethnic disparities in neonatal morbidities among very preterm infants appear to be sizable, but may have been underestimated in previous studies, and may have implications for the future. Understanding these racial/ethnic disparities is important, as they may contribute to inequalities in health and development later in the child’s life.

IMPORTANCE: Substantial quality improvements in neonatal care have occurred over the past decade yet racial and ethnic disparities in morbidity and mortality remain. It is uncertain whether disparate patterns of care by race and ethnicity contribute to disparities in neonatal outcomes. OBJECTIVES: To examine differences in neonatal morbidity and mortality rates among non-Hispanic black (black), Hispanic, and non-Hispanic white (white) very preterm infants and to determine whether these differences are explained by site of delivery. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Population-based retrospective cohort study of 7177 nonanomalous infants born between 24 and 31 completed gestational weeks in 39 New York City hospitals using linked 2010 to 2014 New York City discharge abstract and birth certificate data sets. Mixed-effects logistic regression with a random hospital-specific intercept was used to generate risk-adjusted neonatal morbidity and mortality rates for very preterm infants in each hospital. Hospitals were ranked using this measure, and differences in the distribution of black, Hispanic, and white very preterm births were assessed among these hospitals. The statistical analysis was performed in 2016-2017. EXPOSURE: Race/ethnicity. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Composite of mortality (neonatal or in-hospital up to 1 year) or severe neonatal morbidity (bronchopulmonary dysplasia, severe necrotizing enterocolitis, retinopathy of prematurity stage 3 or greater, or intraventricular hemorrhage grade 3 or greater). RESULTS: Among 7177 very preterm births (VPTBs), morbidity and mortality occurred in 2011 (28%) and was higher among black (893 [32.2%]) and Hispanic (610 [28.1%]) than white (319 [22.5%]) VPTBs (2-tailed P &lt; .001). The risk-standardized morbidity and mortality rate was twice as great for VPTB infants born in hospitals in the highest morbidity and mortality tertile (0.40; 95% CI, 0.38-0.41) as for those born in the lowest morbidity and mortality tertile (0.16; 95% CI, 0.14-0.18). Black (1204 of 2775 [43.4%]) and Hispanic (746 of 2168 [34.4%]) VPTB infants were more likely than white (325 of 1418 [22.9%]) VPTB infants to be born in hospitals in the highest morbidity and mortality tertile (2-tailed P &lt; .001; black-white difference, 20%; 95% CI, 18%-23% and Hispanic-white difference, 11%; 95% CI, 9%-14%). The largest proportion of the explained disparities can be attributed to differences in infant health risks among black, Hispanic, and white VPTB infants. However, 40% (95% CI, 30%-50%) of the black-white disparity and 30% (95% CI, 10%-49%) of the Hispanic-white disparity was explained by birth hospital. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Black and Hispanic VPTB infants are more likely to be born at hospitals with higher risk-adjusted neonatal morbidity and mortality rates, and these differences contribute to excess morbidity and mortality among black and Hispanic infants.

AbstractObjective:To assess the influence of neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) on feeding practices at discharge of Portuguese very preterm infants.Materials and Methods:We analyzed data from 580 very preterm infants (<32 gestational weeks) discharged home from NICUs of two Portuguese regions and enrolled during 2011–2012 in Effective Perinatal Intensive Care in Europepopulation-based cohort. Maternal and infant characteristics were abstracted from medical records, and heads of NICUs provided the units characteristics. Feeding at discharge was classified as exclusive formula, exclusive breast milk or mixed, and differences among NICUs were obtained by comparison with pooled geometric mean odds of all NICUs, using multinomial logistic regression. Median odds ratios (MOR) were calculated to quantify variability among NICUs using multilevel logistic regression.Results:At discharge, 25.2% very preterm infants were exclusively on breast milk, 34.1% exclusively on formula, and 40.7% had mixed feeding, with a wide variation among NICUs. Exclusive breast milk increased in NICUs that had higher numbers of admissions, provided parents eating facilities, and by having designated members to support mothers who were breastfeeding. The individual NICU odds of mixed versus exclusive formula feeding ranged from 0.36 to 2.07 and for exclusive breast milk versus exclusive formula ranged from 0.16 and 5.11. Adjusting for individual and unit characteristics, heterogeneity across NICUs remained evident, being the MOR 1.33 for mixed feeding and 1.35 for exclusive breast milk.Conclusions:NICUs influence feeding practices independently of individual characteristics, highlighting the importance of institution-based interventions to promote breast milk.

(Abstracted from JAMA Pediatr2017;171(7):678–686)Prenatal administration of antenatal corticosteroids (ANSs) reduces neonatal morbidity and mortality in preterm infants and is recommended for women at risk of delivery before 34 weeks' gestation. There is consensus that neonatal benefits are maximized when ANSs are administered 24 hours to 7 days before delivery, but the latest point at which ANSs can be used effectively is unknown.

Growing attention is being paid to obstetric quality of care as patients are pressing the health care system to measure and improve quality. There is also an increasing recognition of persistent racial and ethnic disparities prevalent in obstetric outcomes. Yet few studies have linked obstetric quality of care with racial and ethnic disparities. This article reviews definitions of quality of care, health disparities, and health equity as they relate to obstetric care and outcomes; describes current efforts and challenges in obstetric quality measurement; and proposes 3 steps in an effort to develop, track, and improve quality and reduce disparities in obstetrics.

ObjectiveTo explore international variations in the management and survival of extremely low gestational age and birthweight births.DesignArea-based prospective cohort of birthsSetting12 regions across Belgium, France, Italy, Portugal and the UKParticipants1449 live births and fetal deaths between 22+0and 25+6weeks gestation born in 2011–2012.Main outcome measuresPercentage of births; recorded live born; provided antenatal steroids or respiratory support; surviving to discharge (with/without severe morbidities).ResultsThe percentage of births recorded as live born was consistently low at 22 weeks and consistently high at 25 weeks but varied internationally at 23 weeks for those weighing 500 g and over (range 33%–70%) and at 24 weeks for those under 500 g (range 5%–71%). Antenatal steroids and provision of respiratory support at 22–24 weeks gestation varied between countries, but were consistently high for babies born at 25 weeks. Survival to discharge was universally poor at 22 weeks gestation (0%) and at any gestation with birth weight <500 g, irrespective of treatment provision. In contrast, births at 23 and 24 weeks weighing 500 g and over showed significant international variation in survival (23 weeks: range: 0%–25%; 24 weeks range: 21%–50%), reflecting levels of treatment provision.ConclusionsWide international variation exists in the management and survival of extremely preterm births at 22–24 weeks gestation. Universally poor outcomes for babies at 22 weeks and for those weighing under 500 g suggest little impact of intervention and support the inclusion of birth weight along with gestational age in ethical decision-making guidelines.

Efforts to achieve the new worldwide goals for maternal and child survival will also prevent stillbirth and improve health and developmental outcomes. However, the number of annual stillbirths remains unchanged since 2011 and is unacceptably high: an estimated 2·6 million in 2015. Failure to consistently include global targets or indicators for stillbirth in post-2015 initiatives shows that stillbirths are hidden in the worldwide agenda. This Series paper summarises findings from previous papers in this Series, presents new analyses, and proposes specific criteria for successful integration of stillbirths into post-2015 initiatives for women's and children's health. Five priority areas to change the stillbirth trend include intentional leadership; increased voice, especially of women; implementation of integrated interventions with commensurate investment; indicators to measure effect of interventions and especially to monitor progress; and investigation into crucial knowledge gaps. The post-2015 agenda represents opportunities for all stakeholders to act together to end all preventable deaths, including stillbirths.

Variation in stillbirth rates across high-income countries and large equity gaps within high-income countries persist. If all high-income countries achieved stillbirth rates equal to the best performing countries, 19 439 late gestation (28 weeks or more) stillbirths could have been avoided in 2015. The proportion of unexplained stillbirths is high and can be addressed through improvements in data collection, investigation, and classification, and with a better understanding of causal pathways. Substandard care contributes to 20–30% of all stillbirths and the contribution is even higher for late gestation intrapartum stillbirths. National perinatal mortality audit programmes need to be implemented in all high-income countries. The need to reduce stigma and fatalism related to stillbirth and to improve bereavement care are also clear, persisting priorities for action. In high-income countries, a woman living under adverse socioeconomic circumstances has twice the risk of having a stillborn child when compared to her more advantaged counterparts. Programmes at community and country level need to improve health in disadvantaged families to address these inequities.

An estimated 2·6 million third trimester stillbirths occurred in 2015 (uncertainty range 2·4–3·0 million). The number of stillbirths has reduced more slowly than has maternal mortality or mortality in children younger than 5 years, which were explicitly targeted in the Millennium Development Goals. The Every Newborn Action Plan has the target of 12 or fewer stillbirths per 1000 births in every country by 2030. 94 mainly high-income countries and upper middle-income countries have already met this target, although with noticeable disparities. At least 56 countries, particularly in Africa and in areas affected by conflict, will have to more than double present progress to reach this target. Most (98%) stillbirths are in low-income and middle-income countries. Improved care at birth is essential to prevent 1·3 million (uncertainty range 1·2–1·6 million) intrapartum stillbirths, end preventable maternal and neonatal deaths, and improve child development. Estimates for stillbirth causation are impeded by various classification systems, but for 18 countries with reliable data, congenital abnormalities account for a median of only 7·4% of stillbirths. Many disorders associated with stillbirths are potentially modifiable and often coexist, such as maternal infections (population attributable fraction: malaria 8·0% and syphilis 7·7%), non-communicable diseases, nutrition and lifestyle factors (each about 10%), and maternal age older than 35 years (6·7%). Prolonged pregnancies contribute to 14·0% of stillbirths. Causal pathways for stillbirth frequently involve impaired placental function, either with fetal growth restriction or preterm labour, or both. Two-thirds of newborns have their births registered. However, less than 5% of neonatal deaths and even fewer stillbirths have death registration. Records and registrations of all births, stillbirths, neonatal, and maternal deaths in a health facility would substantially increase data availability. Improved data alone will not save lives but provide a way to target interventions to reach more than 7000 women every day worldwide who experience the reality of stillbirth.

Given slowing secular declines and persistent racial disparities, stillbirth remains a major health burden in the US. We investigate changes in stillbirth rates overall and for Black and White women, and determine how maternal age, delivery year (period), and birth year (cohort) have shaped trends.

(Abstracted from JAMA2016;316(4):410–419)Late-preterm and early-term births occurring spontaneously or through obstetric interventions including labor induction or cesarean delivery are a cause for concern because of consequent risks of adverse neonatal and childhood outcomes. Hence, recommendations in the United States have been to decrease nonmedically indicated or elective deliveries before 39 weeks.

To evaluate the applicability of World Health Organization (WHO) fetal growth charts for abdominal circumference (AC), femur length (FL) and estimated fetal weight (EFW) at the second and third trimester ultrasounds in a French birth cohort.

(Abstracted from J Pediatr2019;215:56–63)Severe maternal morbidity is defined as a life-threatening diagnosis or lifesaving procedure during delivery. It occurs more often in very preterm deliveries, as opposed to term deliveries.

The existence of a male excess among preterm births is interesting because it could shed light on the aetiology of preterm birth. Possible mechanisms are greater body weight, increased susceptibility to complications of pregnancy, sex-linked biochemical processes and earlier conception in the fertile cycle.

AbstractThe study is a critical analysis of the decisions to induce labour or schedule cesareans in the practice of a third level referral centre, with as outcome criterion the reduction of fetal death. 783 women pregnant with twins were included from 1.1.1993 to 31.12.1998, in three groups:originally booked, referred for care during pregnancy, or transferred from another institution. The results show that an important proportion of preterm deliveries result from a medical decision to induce labour or from a scheduled cesarean in the originally booked group with even higher proportions in groups of referred and transferred women. These results are discussed in relation to fetal death rates and causes. Deaths related to fetal growth restriction were not observed in women originally booked for care. The hospital bias has been discussed. The conclusion is that decisions to minimize fetal deaths in twin pregnancies increased preterm deliveries by medical decision.

Obstetric complications persist, with severe maternal and neonatal complications occurring in low-risk term infants. Complication rates among hospitals vary and indicate that the quality of obstetric care can be improved. The Joint Commission recommends 2 perinatal quality measures that address important aspects of obstetric care: elective deliveries performed before 39 weeks’ gestation and cesarean deliveries (CDs) performed in low-risk nulliparous women. How well hospital performance on these quality indicators correlates with maternal or neonatal morbidity is unknown. This population-based observational study was undertaken to determine whether use of these 2 quality measures was associated with severe maternal or neonatal morbidity in New York City hospitals.

IMPORTANCE: Birth before 32 weeks’ gestation (very preterm [VPT]) and birth weight below 1500 g (very low birth weight [VLBW]) have been associated with lower cognitive performance in childhood. However, there are few investigations of the association of neonatal morbidities and maternal educational levels with the adult cognitive performance of individuals born VPT or VLBW (VPT/VLBW). OBJECTIVE: To assess differences in adult IQ between VPT/VLBW and term-born individuals and to examine the association of adult IQ with cohort factors, neonatal morbidities, and maternal educational level among VPT/VLBW participants. DATA SOURCES: Systematic review of published data from PubMed and meta-analysis of individual participant data (IPD) of cohorts from 2 consortia (Research on European Children and Adults Born Preterm [RECAP] and Adults Born Preterm International Collaboration [APIC]). STUDY SELECTION: The meta-analysis included prospective longitudinal cohort studies that assessed the full-scale IQ of adults born VPT or VLBW and respective control groups comprising term-born adults. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: The study followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) reporting guideline for analyses of individual participant data and identified 8 studies that provided data from 2135 adults (1068 VPT/VLBW and 1067 term-born participants) born between 1978 and 1995. Meta-analyses of IPD were performed using a 1-stage approach, treating VPT birth or VLBW and cohort as random effects. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Full-scale IQ scores were converted to z scores within each cohort using the combined SD of VPT/VLBW participants and a control group of term-born participants, with scores centered on the mean of the control group. RESULTS: A total of 426 records were identified and screened. After exclusions, 13 studies were included in the aggregate meta-analysis. The IPD meta-analysis included 8 of the 9 RECAP and APIC cohorts with adult IQ data. The mean (SD) age among the 8 IPD cohorts was 24.6 (4.3) years, and 1163 participants (54.5%) were women. In unadjusted analyses, VPT/VLBW participants had mean adult IQ scores that were 0.78 SD (95% CI, −0.90 to −0.66 SD) lower than term-born participants, equivalent to a difference of 12 IQ points. Among VPT/VLBW participants, lower gestational age (score difference per week of gestation, 0.11; 95% CI, 0.07-0.14), lower birth weight z scores (score difference per 1.0 SD, 0.21; 95% CI, 0.14-0.28), the presence of neonatal bronchopulmonary dysplasia (score difference, −0.16; 95% CI, −0.30 to −0.02) or any grade of intraventricular hemorrhage (score difference, −0.19; 95% CI, −0.33 to −0.05), and lower maternal educational level (score difference, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.17-0.35) were all significantly associated with lower IQ scores in adulthood. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this IPD meta-analysis, lower gestational age, lower weight for gestational age, neonatal morbidities, and lower maternal educational levels were all important risk factors associated with lower IQ among young adults born VPT or VLBW.

(Abstracted from JAMA Pediatr2018;172(11):1061–1069)Racial/ethnic disparity in neonatal mortality associated with the increased risk of very preterm birth among black infants is well documented. However, racial/ethnic disparities in severe neonatal morbidities among very preterm infants are less studied, despite the association of these morbidities with long-term health disparities.

Vitamin D insufficiency is highly prevalent in children and adults including pregnant women. During pregnancy, maternal vitamin D insufficiency could increase risks of several pregnancy complications and adverse birth outcomes. The FEPED study was designed to assess the effects of maternal vitamin D status in the first trimester during pregnancy on risks of preeclampsia, gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), preterm birth and small-for-gestational age (SGA) at birth. This observational prospective cohort included 3129 women with a singleton pregnancy between April 2012 and July 2014 in six maternity units in France and Belgium. The aim of this review is to summarize the results of the FEPED study. At the first trimester the mean 25(OH)D concentration was 21.9 ± 10.4 ng/mL and 25(OH)D concentration was <20 ng/mL in 46.5 % of patients. After matching 83 cases of preeclampsia with 319 controls, a significant decrease in the risk of preeclampsia was associated with maternal vitamin D levels ≥ 30 ng/mL in the third trimesters (OR = 0.34; 95 % CI: 0.13−0.86. P = 0.023). In the first trimester, the risk for preeclampsia was decreased in these patients, but did not achieve statistical significance (OR = 0.57 95 % CI, 0.30−1.01; p = 0.09). For the 250 cases with GDM matched with 941 controls, no linear relationship was found between GDM and 25OHD levels in the first trimester of pregnancy. Finally, 2813 pregnant women were included in analyses of risks of preterm and SGA birth. No association was found between low maternal vitamin D levels in the first trimester and the risks of preterm birth (aOR = 1.53; 95 % CI: 0.97−2.43) or SGA (aOR = 1.07; 95 % CI: 0.75−1.54). Further investigation is needed to understand the mechanisms behind the association between vitamin D and birth outcomes.

Objectives To evaluate the implementation of four high evidence practices for the care of very preterm infants to assess their use and impact in routine clinical practice and whether they constitute a driver for reducing mortality and neonatal morbidity.Design Prospective multinational population based observational study.Setting 19 regions from 11 European countries covering 850 000 annual births participating in the EPICE (Effective Perinatal Intensive Care in Europe for very preterm births) project.Participants 7336 infants born between 24+0 and 31+6 weeks’ gestation in 2011/12 without serious congenital anomalies and surviving to neonatal admission.Main outcome measures Combined use of four evidence based practices for infants born before 28 weeks’ gestation using an “all or none” approach: delivery in a maternity unit with appropriate level of neonatal care; administration of antenatal corticosteroids; prevention of hypothermia (temperature on admission to neonatal unit ≥36°C); surfactant used within two hours of birth or early nasal continuous positive airway pressure. Infant outcomes were in-hospital mortality, severe neonatal morbidity at discharge, and a composite measure of death or severe morbidity, or both. We modelled associations using risk ratios, with propensity score weighting to account for potential confounding bias. Analyses were adjusted for clustering within delivery hospital.Results Only 58.3% (n=4275) of infants received all evidence based practices for which they were eligible. Infants with low gestational age, growth restriction, low Apgar scores, and who were born on the day of maternal admission to hospital were less likely to receive evidence based care. After adjustment, evidence based care was associated with lower in-hospital mortality (risk ratio 0.72, 95% confidence interval 0.60 to 0.87) and in-hospital mortality or severe morbidity, or both (0.82, 0.73 to 0.92), corresponding to an estimated 18% decrease in all deaths without an increase in severe morbidity if these interventions had been provided to all infants.Conclusions More comprehensive use of evidence based practices in perinatal medicine could result in considerable gains for very preterm infants, in terms of increased survival without severe morbidity.