While ionic contrast media (CM) are stronger anticoagulants and antiplatelet agents, both nonionic and ionic CM retard clotting, fibrinopeptide A generation and platelet aggregation (at least by Born-O'Brien aggregometry). Thus, nonionic CM do not cause clots and thrombi. Rather, the driving force for clot or thrombus formation, when it occurs, is blood contact with and activation by the foreign surface of a syringe or catheter itself. A marked enhancement of clotting by glass syringes in comparison to plastic ones supports this view. Blood in any suringe or catheter, therefore, will clot more slowly in the presence of nonionic or ionic CM, the inhibitory effects of the latter being more profound. With respect to models of thrombosis at sites of vascular injury or stenosis, the antithrombotic effecgs of CM may either be transient owing to the dynamic nature of blood flow (local endothelial cell denudation model), or as in the case of ionic CM, actually to enhance local platelet aggregation (stenosis model). In these situations, preservation of the antithrombotic functions of endothelium with nonionic CM may be quite critical., Nonionic contrast agents, used for visualizing blood vessels on X-ray, have been shown to produce fewer side effects than high-osmolarity ionic contrast agents. Since these side effects may include loss of consciousness or cardiac arrest, there is significant reason to use nonionic agents, and by 1989, 70 percent of the procedures visualizing arteries of the heart relied upon nonionic agents. The percentage would likely be 100 percent were it not for the far greater cost of the nonionic agents. There has been some suggestion, however, that nonionic contrast agents may contribute to the formation of blood clots in the syringes and catheters used in the procedures; if this were the case, it would provoke serious concern for the safety of the patient. Laboratory investigation of blood clotting, however, has revealed that nonionic contrast media do not contribute to clotting. Both ionic and nonionic contrast media reduce the likelihood of clotting. The observed clotting is a result of the effect of the synthetic materials of the syringe and catheter. Two ionic contrast media (ioxaglate 320 and diatrizoate) and two nonionic contrast media (iohexol 370 and iopamidol 350) were studied; both reduced the rate of clot formation in catheters and plastic and glass syringes when compared with saline solution. However, the antithrombic activity of the ionic contrast media was found to be greater than that of the nonionic contrast media. (Consumer Summary produced by Reliance Medical Information, Inc.)