Search

In developmental stages of the clawed toad, Xenopus laevis, we describe the ontogeny of descending supraspinal connections, catecholaminergic projections in particular, by means of retrograde tracing techniques with dextran amines. Already at embryonic stages (stage 40), spinal projections from the reticular formation, raphe nuclei, Mauthner neurons, vestibular nuclei, the locus coeruleus, the interstitial nucleus of the medial longitudinal fasciculus, the posterior tubercle, and the periventricular nucleus of the zona incerta are well developed. At the beginning of the premetamorphic period (stage 46), spinal projections arise from the suprachiasmatic nucleus, the torus semicircularis, the pretectal region, and the ventral telencephalon. After stage 48, tectospinal and cerebellospinal projections develop, with spinal projections from the preoptic area following at stage 51. Rubrospinal projections are present at stage 50. During the prometamorphic period, spinal projections arise in the nucleus of the solitary tract, the lateral line nucleus, and the mesencephalic trigeminal nucleus. With in vitro double‐labeling methods, based on retrograde tracing of dextran amines in combination with tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) immunohistochemistry, we show that at stage 40/41, catecholaminergic (CA) neurons in the posterior tubercle are the first to project to the spinal cord. Subsequently, at stage 43, new projections arise in the periventricular nucleus of the zona incerta and the locus coeruleus. The last CA projection to the spinal cord originates from neurons in the nucleus of the solitary tract at the beginning of prometamorphosis (stage 53). Our data show a temporal, rostrocaudal sequence in the development of the CA cell groups projecting to the spinal cord. Moreover, the early appearance of CA fibers, preterminals and terminal‐like structures in dorsal, intermediate, and ventral zones of the embryonic spinal cord, suggests an important role for catecholamines during development in nociception, autonomic functions, and motor control at the spinal level. J. Comp. Neurol. 446:11–24, 2002. © 2002 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

The present study is the first of a series on descending supraspinal pathways in amphibians in which hodologic and developmental aspects are studied. Representative species of anurans (the green frog, Rana perezi, and the clawed toad, Xenopus laevis), urodeles (the Iberian ribbed newt, Pleurodeles waltl), and gymnophionans (the Mexican caecilian, Dermophis mexicanus) have been used. By means of retrograde tracing with dextran amines, previous data in anurans were largely confirmed and extended, but the studies in P. waltland D. mexicanuspresent the first detailed data on descending pathways to the spinal cord in urodeles and gymnophionans. In all three orders, extensive brainstem‐spinal pathways were present with only minor representation of spinal projections originating in forebrain regions. In the rhombencephalon, spinal projections arise from the reticular formation, several parts of the octavolateral area, the locus coeruleus, the laterodorsal tegmental nucleus, the raphe nucleus, sensory nuclei (trigeminal sensory nuclei and the dorsal column nucleus), and the nucleus of the solitary tract. In all species studied, the cerebellar nucleus and scattered cerebellar cells innervate the spinal cord, predominantly contralaterally. Mesencephalic projections include modest tectospinal projections, torospinal projections, and extensive tegmentospinal projections. The tegmentospinal projections include projections from the nucleus of Edinger‐Westphal, the red nucleus, and from anterodorsal, anteroventral, and posteroventral tegmental nuclei. In the forebrain, diencephalospinal projections originate in the ventral thalamus, posterior tubercle, the pretectal region, and the interstitial nucleus of the fasciculus longitudinalis medialis. The most rostrally located cells of origin of descending spinal pathways were found in the suprachiasmatic nucleus, the preoptic area and a subpallial region in the caudal telencephalic hemisphere, probably belonging to the amygdaloid complex. Our data are discussed in an evolutionary perspective. J. Comp. Neurol. 434:186–208, 2001. © 2001 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

Immunohistochemical studies with antibodies against tyrosine hydroxylase, dopamine, and noradrenaline have revealed that the spinal cord of anuran, urodele, and gymnophionan (apodan) amphibians is abundantly innervated by catecholaminergic (CA) fibers and terminals. Because intraspinal cells occur in all three orders of amphibians CA, it is unclear to what extent the CA innervation of the spinal cord is of supraspinal origin. In a previous study, we showed that many cell groups throughout the forebrain and brainstem project to the spinal cord of two anurans (the green frog, Rana perezi, and the clawed toad, Xenopus laevis), a urodele (the Iberian ribbed newt, Pleurodeles waltl), and a gymnophionan (the Mexican caecilian, Dermophis mexicanus). To determine the exact site of origin of the supraspinal CA innervation of the amphibian spinal cord, retrograde tracing techniques were combined with immunohistochemistry for tyrosine hydroxylase in the same sections. The double‐labeling experiments demonstrated that four brain centers provide CA innervation to the amphibian spinal cord: 1.) the ventrolateral component of the posterior tubercle in the mammillary region, 2.) the periventricular nucleus of the zona incerta in the ventral thalamus, 3.) the locus coeruleus, and 4.) the nucleus of the solitary tract. This pattern holds for all three orders of amphibians, except for the CA projection from the nucleus of the solitary tract in gymnophionans. There are differences in the strength of the projections (based on the number of double‐labeled cells), but in general, spinal functions in amphibians are controlled by CA innervation from brain centers that can easily be compared with their counterparts in amniotes. The organization of the CA input to the spinal cord of amphibians is largely similar to that described for mammals. Nevertheless, by using a segmental approach of the CNS, a remarkable difference was observed with respect to the diencephalic CA projections. J. Comp. Neurol. 434:209–232, 2001. © 2001 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.