Search

This paper proposes an improved memetic algorithm relying on ring neighborhood topology for constrained optimization problems based on our previous work in Cai et al. (Soft Comput (in press), ). The main motivation of using ring neighborhood topology is to provide a good balance between effective exploration and efficient exploitation, which is a very important design issue for memetic algorithms. More specifically, a novel variant of invasive weed optimization (IWO) as the local refinement procedure is proposed in this paper. The proposed IWO variant adopts a neighborhood-based dispersal operator to achieve more fine-grained local search through the estimation of neighborhood fitness information relying on the ring neighborhood topology. Furthermore, a modified version of differential evolution (DE), known as 'DE/current-to-best/1', is integrated into the improved memetic algorithm with the aim of providing a more effective exploration. Performance of the improved memetic algorithm has been comprehensively tested on 13 well-known benchmark test functions and four engineering constrained optimization problems. The experimental results show that the improved memetic algorithm obtains greater competitiveness when compared with the original memetic approach Cai et al. in (Soft Comput (in press), ) and other state-of-the-art algorithms. The effectiveness of the modification of each component in the proposed approach is also discussed in the paper. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This paper proposes a (μ + λ)-differential evolution and an improved adaptive trade-off model for solving constrained optimization problems.The proposed (μ + λ)-differential evolution adopts three mutation strategies (i.e., rand/1 strategy, current-to-best/1 strategy, and rand/2 strategy) and binomial crossover to generate the offspring population. Moreover, the current-to-best/1 strategy has been improved in this paper to further enhance the global exploration ability by exploiting the feasibility proportion of the last population. Additionally, the improved adaptive trade-off model includes three main situations: the infeasible situation, the semi-feasible situation, and the feasible situation. In each situation, a constraint-handlingmechanism is designed based on the characteristics of the current population. By combining the (μ + λ)-differential evolution with the improved adaptive trade-off model, a generic method named (μ + λ)-constrained differential evolution ((μ + λ)-CDE) is developed. The (μ + λ)-CDE is utilized to solve 24 well-known benchmark test functions provided for the special session on constrained real-parameter optimization of the 2006 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC2006). Experimental results suggest that the (μ + λ)-CDE is very promising for constrained optimization, since it can reach the best known solutions for 23 test functions and is able to successfully solve 21 test functions in all runs. Moreover, in this paper, a self-adaptive version of (μ + λ)-CDE is proposed which is the most competitive algorithm so far among the CEC2006 entries. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The performance of evolutionary algorithms can be seriously weakened when constraints limit the feasible region of the search space. In this paper we present a constrained multi-objective optimization algorithm based on adaptive ε-truncation (ε-T-CMOA) to further improve distribution and convergence of the obtained solutions. First of all, as a novel constraint handling technique ε-truncation technique keeps an effective balance between feasible solutions and infeasible solutions by permitting some excellent infeasible solutions with good objective value and low constraint violation to take part in the evolution, so diversity is improved, and convergence is also coordinated. Next, an exponential variation is introduced after differential mutation and crossover to boost the local exploitation ability. At last, the improved crowding density method only selects some Pareto solutions and near solutions to join in calculation, thus it can evaluate the distribution more accurately. The comparative results with other state-of-the-art algorithms show that ε-T-CMOA is more diverse than the other algorithms and it gains better in terms of convergence in some extent. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

During the last three decades, several constraint handling techniques have been developed to be used with evolutionary algorithms (EAs). According to the no free lunch theorem, it is impossible for a single constraint handling technique to outperform all other techniques on every problem. In other words, depending on several factors such as the ratio between feasible search space and the whole search space, multimodality of the problem, the chosen EA, and global exploration/local exploitation stages of the search process, different constraint handling methods can be effective during different stages of the search process. Motivated by these observations, we propose an ensemble of constraint handling techniques (ECHT) to solve constrained real-parameter optimization problems, where each constraint handling method has its own population. A distinguishing feature of the ECHT is the usage of every function call by each population associated with each constraint handling technique. Being a general concept, the ECHT can be realized with any existing EA. In this paper, we present two instantiations of the ECHT using four constraint handling methods with the evolutionary programming and differential evolution as the EAs. Experimental results show that the performance of ECHT is better than each single constraint handling method used to form the ensemble with the respective EA, and competitive to the state-of-the-art algorithms. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Single objective optimization algorithms are the foundation of establishing more complex methods, like constrained optimization, niching and multi-objective algorithms. Therefore, improvements to single objective optimization algorithms are important because they can impact other domains as well. This paper proposes a method using turning-based mutation that is aimed to solve the problem of premature convergence of algorithms based on SHADE (Success-History based Adaptive Differential Evolution) in high dimensional search space. The proposed method is tested on the Single Objective Bound Constrained Numerical Optimization (CEC2020) benchmark sets in 5, 10, 15, and 20 dimensions for all SHADE, L-SHADE, and jSO algorithms. The effectiveness of the method is verified by population diversity measure and population clustering analysis. In addition, the new versions (Tb-SHADE, TbL-SHADE and Tb-jSO) using the proposed turning-based mutation get apparently better optimization results than the original algorithms (SHADE, L-SHADE, and jSO) as well as the advanced DISH and the jDE100 algorithms in 10, 15, and 20 dimensional functions, but only have advantages compared with the advanced j2020 algorithm in 5 dimensional functions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• Optimal foraging algorithm with direction prediction & Gaussian oscillation is built. • New algorithm includes two update methods: prediction model and random model. • Prediction model mends exploitation ability by predicting the evolutionary direction. • Random model mends exploration by exploring the space with Gaussian distribution. • The superiority of algorithm is verified on benchmark set and engineering problems. Optimal foraging algorithm (OFA) is a newly stochastic optimization technique and is famous for its computational accuracy. However, the high computational accuracy leads to slow convergence speed. Experimental results demonstrate that OFA is good at unimodal functions but poor at multimodal functions. To improve these drawbacks, in this paper a novel modified OFA with direction prediction and Gaussian oscillation, named OFA/P&G is introduced. In OFA/P&G, a transition matrix is constructed when a new global optimum is found to generate the candidate individuals. If the current global optimum does not change, the Gaussian oscillation is employed in a low probability and OFA update method is used in a high probability to generate the candidate individuals. The superior performance of OFA/P&G is verified on the 12 CEC2017 benchmark functions, 13 constrained benchmark functions and 5 engineering problems. Experimental results demonstrate that OFA/P&G outperforms other comparative algorithms. Finally, a real-world problem, drilling path optimization, is solved by OFA/P&G. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Self-adaptive variants of evolutionary algorithms (EAs) tune their parameters on the go by learning from the search history. Adaptive differential evolution with optional external archive (JADE) and self-adaptive differential evolution (SaDE) are two well-known self-adaptive versions of differential evolution (DE). They are both unconstrained search and optimization algorithms. However, if some constraint handling techniques (CHTs) are incorporated in their frameworks, then they can be used to solve constrained optimization problems (COPs). In an early work, an ensemble of constraint handling techniques (ECHT) is probabilistically hybridized with the basic version of DE. The ECHT consists of four different CHTs: superiority of feasible solutions, self-adaptive penalty, ε -constraint handling technique and stochastic ranking. This paper employs ECHT in the selection schemes, where offspring competes with their parents for survival to the next generation, of JADE and SaDE. As a result, JADE-ECHT and SaDE-ECHT are developed, which are the constrained variants of JADE and SaDE. Both algorithms are tested on 24 COPs and the experimental results are collected and compared according to algorithms' evaluation criteria of CEC'06. Their comparison, in terms of feasibility rate (FR) and success rate (SR), shows that SaDE-ECHT surpasses JADE-ECHT in terms of FR, while JADE-ECHT outperforms SaDE-ECHT in terms of SR. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Over the last few decades, a number of differential evolution (DE) algorithms have been proposed with excellent performance on mathematical benchmarks. However, like any other optimization algorithm, the success of DE is highly dependent on the search operators and control parameters that are often decided a priori. The selection of the parameter values is itself a combinatorial optimization problem. Although a considerable number of investigations have been conducted with regards to parameter selection, it is known to be a tedious task. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Dynamic economic dispatch with valve-point effects (DED_ vpe) is a high-dimensional constrained optimization problem with non-convex and non-smooth characteristics. Hybrid methods are one of the most advanced methods to solve the problem. However, most of these methods improve the solution accuracy at the expense of algorithm robustness. This paper proposes an adaptive hybrid backtracking search optimization algorithm (AHBSA) for solving the DED_ vpe. The core idea of AHBSA lies in designing a suitable coupling structure based on the current best individual (called optimal partial coupling). The structure hybridizes an improved BSA mutation operator and the DE/best/1 operator with equal probability. The improved BSA mutation operator uses the current best individual and the historical population to update individual position, called BSA/best/old. It is also the first research work of extending BSA to the problem. In addition, an adaptive parameter control mechanism is proposed to select an appropriate 'mixrate' value for achieving better coupling. The performance of AHBSA is validated on six DED test cases of three systems. Experimental results demonstrate that, compared with some representative methods, AHBSA not only reduces the fuel cost but also ensures the robustness of the algorithm. • A hybrid method AHBSA is proposed to solve DED problem with valve-point effects. • An optimal partial coupling structure is designed in AHBSA. • BSA is the first attempt at solving DED problem. • Results on six benchmark DED test cases show AHBSA is competitive. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Many practical problems can be formulated as constrained optimization problems. Due to the simple concept and easy implementation, the penalty function method has been one of the most common techniques to handle constraints. However, the performance of this technique greatly relies on the setting of penalty factors, which are usually determined by manual trial and error, and the suitable penalty factors are often problem-dependent and difficult to set. In this paper, a differential evolution approach based on a co-evolution mechanism, named CDE, is proposed to solve the constrained problems. First, a special penalty function is designed to handle the constraints. Second, a co-evolution model is presented and differential evolution (DE) is employed to perform evolutionary search in spaces of both solutions and penalty factors. Thus, the solutions and penalty factors evolve interactively and self-adaptively, and both the satisfactory solutions and suitable penalty factors can be obtained simultaneously. Simulation results based on several benchmark functions and three well-known constrained design problems as well as comparisons with some existed methods demonstrate the effectiveness, efficiency and robustness of the proposed method. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

The constrained optimization problem is widely used in real-world applications and always hard to handle when the objective function is multimodal or the constraints are too stringent. In this manuscript, an improved differential evolution algorithm is proposed by using a novel individual evaluation scheme as well as a designed constraint handling technique. Firstly, the constrained optimization problem is converted into a biobjective optimization model in which all constraints are taken as an integrated function and further optimized just like the original objective. Then, based on the present individuals, both a reference point and a dynamic line are generated. The distances from any individual to the reference point as well as the dynamic line are adopted to evaluate the individual, and used to categorize individuals for evolving into groups. In addition, in order to improve the feasibility of individuals, a novel constraint handling technique is presented by utilizing the locations of some infeasible points. Finally, the proposed algorithm is executed on some recent benchmark functions as well as the system reliability redundancy allocation problems, and the computation results show the effectiveness of these presented techniques. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Many real-world applications can be modelled as dynamic constrained optimization problems (DCOPs). Due to the fact that objective function and/or constraints change over time, solving DCOPs is a challenging task. Although solving DCOPs by evolutionary algorithms has attracted increasing interest in the community of evolutionary computation, the design of benchmark test functions of DCOPs is still insufficient. Therefore, we propose a test suite for DCOPs. A dynamic unconstrained optimization benchmark with good time-varying characteristics, called moving peaks benchmark, is chosen to be the objective function of our test suite. In addition, we design adjustable dynamic constraints, by which the size, number, and change severity of the feasible regions can be flexibly controlled. Furthermore, the performance of three dynamic constrained optimization evolutionary algorithms is tested on the proposed test suite, one of which is presented in this paper, named dynamic constrained optimization differential evolution (DyCODE). DyCODE includes three main phases: 1) the first phase intends to enter the feasible region from different directions promptly via a multi-population search strategy; 2) in the second phase, some excellent individuals chosen from the first phase form a new population to search for the optimal solution of the current environment; and 3) the third phase combines the memory individuals of the first two phases with some randomly generated individuals to re-initialize the population for the next environment. From the experiments, one can understand the strengths and weaknesses of the three compared algorithms for solving DCOPs in depth. Moreover, we also give some suggestions for researchers to apply these three algorithms on different occasions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To promote research on dynamic constrained multiobjective optimization, we first propose a group of generic test problems with challenging characteristics, including different modes of the true Pareto front (e.g., convexity–concavity and connectedness–disconnectedness) and the changing feasible region. Subsequently, motivated by the challenges presented by dynamism and constraints, we design a dynamic constrained multiobjective optimization algorithm with a nondominated solution selection operator, a mating selection strategy, a population selection operator, a change detection method, and a change response strategy. The designed nondominated solution selection operator can obtain a nondominated population with diversity when the environment changes. The mating selection strategy and population selection operator can adaptively handle infeasible solutions. If a change is detected, the proposed change response strategy reuses some portion of the old solutions in combination with randomly generated solutions to reinitialize the population, and a steady-state update method is designed to improve the retained previous solutions. The experimental results show that the proposed test problems can be used to clearly distinguish the performance of algorithms, and that the proposed algorithm is very competitive for solving dynamic constrained multiobjective optimization problems in comparison with state-of-the-art algorithms. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]